Sign upLogin

OpenMarshal/npm-WebDAV-Server

View on GitHub
Star

Showing 90 of 107 total issues

Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

    creationDate(ctx : RequestContext, path : Path | string, callback : ReturnCallback<number>) : void
    {
        const pPath = new Path(path);
        callback = FileSystem.neutralizeEmptyDateCallback(callback);
Severity: Major
Found in src/manager/v2/fileSystem/FileSystem.ts and 1 other location - About 6 hrs to fix
src/manager/v2/fileSystem/FileSystem.ts on lines 1796..1813

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 174.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

    lastModifiedDate(ctx : RequestContext, path : Path | string, callback : ReturnCallback<number>) : void
    {
        const pPath = new Path(path);
        callback = FileSystem.neutralizeEmptyDateCallback(callback);
Severity: Major
Found in src/manager/v2/fileSystem/FileSystem.ts and 1 other location - About 6 hrs to fix
src/manager/v2/fileSystem/FileSystem.ts on lines 1752..1769

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 174.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Function standardCopy has a Cognitive Complexity of 45 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

    public static standardCopy(ctx : RequestContext, subPathFrom : Path, fsFrom : FileSystem, subPathTo : Path, fsTo : FileSystem, _overwrite : boolean | number | ReturnCallback<boolean>, _depth ?: number | ReturnCallback<boolean>, _callback ?: ReturnCallback<boolean>) : void
    {
        const overwrite = _overwrite.constructor === Boolean ? _overwrite as boolean : false;
        const depth = _callback ? _depth as number : (!_depth ? -1 : (_overwrite.constructor === Number ? _overwrite as number : -1));
        const callback = _callback ? _callback : (_depth ? _depth as ReturnCallback<boolean> : _overwrite as ReturnCallback<boolean>);
Severity: Minor
Found in src/manager/v2/fileSystem/StandardMethods.ts - About 6 hrs to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

                    setLock(lock : Lock, callback : SimpleCallback) : void
                    {
                        fs.emit('before-lock-set', ctx, pPath, { lock });
                        issuePrivilegeCheck(fs, ctx, pPath, 'canWriteLocks', callback, () => {
                            buffIsLocked.isLocked((e, isLocked) => {
Severity: Major
Found in src/manager/v2/fileSystem/FileSystem.ts and 1 other location - About 5 hrs to fix
src/manager/v2/fileSystem/FileSystem.ts on lines 1554..1569

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 135.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

                    removeProperty(name : string, callback : SimpleCallback) : void
                    {
                        fs.emit('before-property-remove', ctx, pPath, { name });
                        issuePrivilegeCheck(fs, ctx, pPath, 'canWriteProperties', callback, () => {
                            buffIsLocked.isLocked((e, isLocked) => {
Severity: Major
Found in src/manager/v2/fileSystem/FileSystem.ts and 1 other location - About 5 hrs to fix
src/manager/v2/fileSystem/FileSystem.ts on lines 1425..1440

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 135.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Function addXMLInfo has a Cognitive Complexity of 32 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

    addXMLInfo(ctx : HTTPRequestContext, data : Buffer, resource : Resource, multistatus : XMLElementBuilder, _callback : (e ?: Error) => void) : void
    {
        const reqBody = parseRequestBody(ctx, data);

        const response = new XMLElementBuilder('D:response');
Severity: Minor
Found in src/server/v2/commands/Propfind.ts - About 4 hrs to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Function parseHTTPAuthHeader has a Cognitive Complexity of 30 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

export function parseHTTPAuthHeader(authHeader : string, prefix : string) : any
{
    const stepOverSeparator = (currentString, index, separator) => {
        while(currentString.length > index && /\s/.test(currentString[index].toString()))
            ++index;
Severity: Minor
Found in src/user/CommonFunctions.ts - About 4 hrs to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Function openWriteStream has a Cognitive Complexity of 16 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

    openWriteStream(ctx : RequestContext, _path : Path | string, _mode : OpenWriteStreamMode | boolean | number | Return2Callback<Writable, boolean>, _targetSource ?: boolean | number | Return2Callback<Writable, boolean>, _estimatedSize ?: number | Return2Callback<Writable, boolean>, _callback ?: Return2Callback<Writable, boolean>) : void
    {
        let targetSource = false;
        for(const obj of [ _mode, _targetSource ])
            if(obj && obj.constructor === Boolean)
Severity: Minor
Found in src/manager/v2/fileSystem/FileSystem.ts - About 2 hrs to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

        const callback : ReturnCallback<boolean> = (e, overrided) => {
            if(!e)
                this.emit('move', ctx, pathFrom, { pathFrom, pathTo, overwrite, overrided })
            callbackFinal(e, overrided);
        }
Severity: Major
Found in src/manager/v2/fileSystem/FileSystem.ts and 1 other location - About 1 hr to fix
src/manager/v2/fileSystem/FileSystem.ts on lines 1038..1042

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 73.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

        const callback : ReturnCallback<boolean> = (e, overrided) => {
            if(!e)
                this.emit('copy', ctx, pathFrom, { pathTo, overwrite, overrided, depth })
            callbackFinal(e, overrided);
        }
Severity: Major
Found in src/manager/v2/fileSystem/FileSystem.ts and 1 other location - About 1 hr to fix
src/manager/v2/fileSystem/FileSystem.ts on lines 904..908

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 73.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Function _done has a Cognitive Complexity of 14 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

    protected _done(subject : any, e ?: any, data ?: any)
    {
        if(this.counter <= 0)
            return;
Severity: Minor
Found in src/helper/Workflow.ts - About 1 hr to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Function getFileSystemSync has a Cognitive Complexity of 13 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

    getFileSystemSync(path : Path) : { fs : FileSystem, rootPath : Path, subPath : Path }
    {
        let best : any = {
            index: 0,
            rootPath : new Path('/')
Severity: Minor
Found in src/server/v2/webDAVServer/WebDAVServer.ts - About 1 hr to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Function create has a Cognitive Complexity of 12 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

    static create(server : WebDAVServer, _options ?: RequestContextExternalOptions | ((error : Error, ctx : ExternalRequestContext) => void), _callback ?: (error : Error, ctx : ExternalRequestContext) => void) : ExternalRequestContext
    {
        const defaultValues = new DefaultRequestContextExternalOptions();

        const options = _options && _options.constructor !== Function ? _options as RequestContextExternalOptions : defaultValues;
Severity: Minor
Found in src/server/v2/RequestContext.ts - About 1 hr to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Function copy has a Cognitive Complexity of 12 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

    copy(ctx : RequestContext, _pathFrom : Path | string, _pathTo : Path | string, _overwrite : boolean | number | ReturnCallback<boolean>, _depth ?: number | ReturnCallback<boolean>, _callback ?: ReturnCallback<boolean>) : void
    {
        const overwrite = ensureValue(_overwrite.constructor === Boolean ? _overwrite as boolean : undefined, false);
        const depth = ensureValue(_callback ? _depth as number : !_depth ? -1 : _overwrite.constructor === Number ? _overwrite as number : undefined, -1);
        const callbackFinal = _callback ? _callback : _depth ? _depth as ReturnCallback<boolean> : _overwrite as ReturnCallback<boolean>;
Severity: Minor
Found in src/manager/v2/fileSystem/FileSystem.ts - About 1 hr to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Similar blocks of code found in 5 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

    typeAsync(ctx : RequestContext, path : Path | string) : Promise<ResourceType>
    {
        return promisifyCall((cb) => this.type(ctx, path, cb));
    }
Severity: Major
Found in src/manager/v2/fileSystem/FileSystem.ts and 4 other locations - About 1 hr to fix
src/server/v2/webDAVServer/WebDAVServer.ts on lines 123..126
src/manager/v2/fileSystem/FileSystem.ts on lines 1385..1388
src/manager/v2/fileSystem/FileSystem.ts on lines 1505..1508
src/manager/v2/fileSystem/FileSystem.ts on lines 2310..2313

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 62.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Similar blocks of code found in 5 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

    lockManagerAsync(ctx : RequestContext, path : Path | string) : Promise<ILockManagerAsync>
    {
        return promisifyCall((cb) => this.lockManager(ctx, path, cb))
    }
Severity: Major
Found in src/manager/v2/fileSystem/FileSystem.ts and 4 other locations - About 1 hr to fix
src/server/v2/webDAVServer/WebDAVServer.ts on lines 123..126
src/manager/v2/fileSystem/FileSystem.ts on lines 1505..1508
src/manager/v2/fileSystem/FileSystem.ts on lines 1893..1896
src/manager/v2/fileSystem/FileSystem.ts on lines 2310..2313

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 62.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Similar blocks of code found in 5 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

    getResourceAsync(ctx : RequestContext, path : Path | string) : Promise<Resource>
    {
        return promisifyCall((cb) => this.getResource(ctx, path, cb));
    }
Severity: Major
Found in src/server/v2/webDAVServer/WebDAVServer.ts and 4 other locations - About 1 hr to fix
src/manager/v2/fileSystem/FileSystem.ts on lines 1385..1388
src/manager/v2/fileSystem/FileSystem.ts on lines 1505..1508
src/manager/v2/fileSystem/FileSystem.ts on lines 1893..1896
src/manager/v2/fileSystem/FileSystem.ts on lines 2310..2313

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 62.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Similar blocks of code found in 5 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

    propertyManagerAsync(ctx : RequestContext, path : Path | string) : Promise<IPropertyManager>
    {
        return promisifyCall((cb) => this.propertyManager(ctx, path, cb))
    }
Severity: Major
Found in src/manager/v2/fileSystem/FileSystem.ts and 4 other locations - About 1 hr to fix
src/server/v2/webDAVServer/WebDAVServer.ts on lines 123..126
src/manager/v2/fileSystem/FileSystem.ts on lines 1385..1388
src/manager/v2/fileSystem/FileSystem.ts on lines 1893..1896
src/manager/v2/fileSystem/FileSystem.ts on lines 2310..2313

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 62.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Similar blocks of code found in 5 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

    privilegeManagerAsync(ctx : RequestContext, path : Path | string) : Promise<PrivilegeManager>
    {
        return promisifyCall((cb) => this.privilegeManager(ctx, path, cb));
    }
Severity: Major
Found in src/manager/v2/fileSystem/FileSystem.ts and 4 other locations - About 1 hr to fix
src/server/v2/webDAVServer/WebDAVServer.ts on lines 123..126
src/manager/v2/fileSystem/FileSystem.ts on lines 1385..1388
src/manager/v2/fileSystem/FileSystem.ts on lines 1505..1508
src/manager/v2/fileSystem/FileSystem.ts on lines 1893..1896

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 62.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

                    if(e)
                    {
                        if(e === Errors.ResourceAlreadyExists)
                            ctx.setCode(HTTPCodes.PreconditionFailed);
                        else if(!ctx.setCodeFromError(e))
Severity: Major
Found in src/server/v2/commands/Move.ts and 1 other location - About 1 hr to fix
src/server/v2/commands/Mkcol.ts on lines 29..37

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 61.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Severity
Category
Status
Source
Language