Showing 436 of 436 total issues
Method getButtonAlertStatus
has a Cognitive Complexity of 10 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
public static ButtonAlertStatus getButtonAlertStatus
(Map<String, String> details, Context context, boolean isProfile) {
String contactStatus = details.get(DBConstantsUtils.KeyUtils.CONTACT_STATUS);
String nextContactDate = details.get(DBConstantsUtils.KeyUtils.NEXT_CONTACT_DATE);
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method processRequiredStepsExpansionPanelValues
has a Cognitive Complexity of 10 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
private static void processRequiredStepsExpansionPanelValues(Facts facts, JSONObject fieldObject) throws Exception {
if (fieldObject.has(JsonFormConstants.TYPE) &&
JsonFormConstants.EXPANSION_PANEL.equals(fieldObject.getString(JsonFormConstants.TYPE)) &&
fieldObject.has(JsonFormConstants.VALUE)) {
JSONArray expansionPanelValue = fieldObject.getJSONArray(JsonFormConstants.VALUE);
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method getSecondaryValueKeyPair
has a Cognitive Complexity of 10 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
private static void getSecondaryValueKeyPair(JSONArray values, int valueLength, List<String> keyList, List<String> valueList) throws JSONException {
for (int k = 0; k < valueLength; k++) {
String valuesString = values.getString(k);
String keyString = "";
if (TextUtils.isEmpty(keyString) && valuesString.contains(":")) {
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method onCreate
has a Cognitive Complexity of 10 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
@Override
protected void onCreate(Bundle savedInstanceState) {
super.onCreate(savedInstanceState);
setContentView(getViewLayoutId());
actionBar = getSupportActionBar();
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method savePartialContact
has a Cognitive Complexity of 10 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
public void savePartialContact(PartialContact partialContact) {
if (partialContact == null) return;
else if (partialContact.getUpdatedAt() == null) {
partialContact.setUpdatedAt(Calendar.getInstance().getTimeInMillis());
}
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method processTasks
has a Cognitive Complexity of 10 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
private void processTasks(JSONObject formObject) {
try {
String encounterType = formObject.getString(ConstantsUtils.JsonFormKeyUtils.ENCOUNTER_TYPE);
if (formObject.has(ConstantsUtils.JsonFormKeyUtils.ENCOUNTER_TYPE) && StringUtils.isNotBlank(encounterType) && ConstantsUtils.JsonFormUtils.ANC_TEST_ENCOUNTER_TYPE.equals(encounterType)) {
JSONObject dueStep = formObject.optJSONObject(JsonFormConstants.STEP1);
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method updateEventAndRequiredStepsField
has a Cognitive Complexity of 10 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
private void updateEventAndRequiredStepsField(String baseEntityId, PartialContactRepository partialContactRepository,
List<PartialContact> partialContactList, Facts facts, List<String> formSubmissionIDs) throws Exception {
if (partialContactList != null) {
Collections.sort(partialContactList, (firstPartialContact, secondPartialContact) -> firstPartialContact.getSortOrder().compareTo(secondPartialContact.getSortOrder()));
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method buildRepeatingGroupValues
has 27 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
public static HashMap<String, HashMap<String, String>> buildRepeatingGroupValues(@NonNull JSONArray fields, @NonNull String fieldName) throws JSONException {
ArrayList<String> keysArrayList = new ArrayList<>();
JSONObject jsonObject = JsonFormUtils.getFieldJSONObject(fields, fieldName);
HashMap<String, HashMap<String, String>> repeatingGroupMap = new LinkedHashMap<>();
if (jsonObject != null) {
Method processRegistrationForm
has 27 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
public static Pair<Client, Event> processRegistrationForm(AllSharedPreferences allSharedPreferences, String jsonString) {
try {
Triple<Boolean, JSONObject, JSONArray> registrationFormParams = validateParameters(jsonString);
if (!registrationFormParams.getLeft()) {
Method getFilteredItemsWithoutFilteredSource
has 27 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
private static boolean getFilteredItemsWithoutFilteredSource(JSONObject mainJsonObject, JSONObject checkBoxField, ArrayList<JSONObject> newOptionsList, Map<String, JSONObject> optionsMap) throws JSONException {
if (checkBoxField.has(ConstantsUtils.FILTER_OPTIONS)) {
JSONArray filterOptions = checkBoxField.getJSONArray(ConstantsUtils.FILTER_OPTIONS);
if (filterOptions.length() > 0) {
for (int count = 0; count < filterOptions.length(); count++) {
Method getAutoPopulatedJsonEditRegisterFormString
has 27 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
public static String getAutoPopulatedJsonEditRegisterFormString(Context context, Map<String, String> womanClient) {
try {
JSONObject form = FormUtils.getInstance(context).getFormJson(ConstantsUtils.JsonFormUtils.ANC_REGISTER);
LocationPickerView lpv = createLocationPickerView(context);
if (lpv != null) {
Method getDisplayTemplate
has 27 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
private static String getDisplayTemplate(Context context, String alertStatus,
boolean isProfile) {
String displayTemplate;
if (StringUtils.isNotBlank(alertStatus) && !isProfile) {
switch (alertStatus) {
Method defaultRegisterConfiguration
has 27 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
public static RegisterConfiguration defaultRegisterConfiguration(Context context) {
if (context == null) {
return null;
}
Method onBindViewHolder
has 27 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
@Override
public void onBindViewHolder(@NonNull ViewHolder viewHolder, int position) {
if (lastContactDetailsList.size() > 0) {
LastContactDetailsWrapper lastContactDetails = lastContactDetailsList.get(position);
Facts facts = lastContactDetails.getFacts();
Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
else if (!isPermissionGranted() && Build.VERSION.SDK_INT >= Build.VERSION_CODES.R)
{
Intent intent = new Intent();
intent.setAction(Settings.ACTION_MANAGE_APP_ALL_FILES_ACCESS_PERMISSION);
Uri uri = Uri.fromParts("package", this.getPackageName(), null);
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 74.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
else if(!isPermissionGranted() && Build.VERSION.SDK_INT >= Build.VERSION_CODES.R)
{
Intent intent = new Intent();
intent.setAction(Settings.ACTION_MANAGE_APP_ALL_FILES_ACCESS_PERMISSION);
Uri uri = Uri.fromParts("package", this.getPackageName(), null);
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 74.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
case BOTH:
CreateRemoteLocalCursorUtils createRemoteLocalCursorUtils = new CreateRemoteLocalCursorUtils(matrixCursor, true);
remoteLocalCursor.addRow(new Object[]{createRemoteLocalCursorUtils.getId(),
createRemoteLocalCursorUtils.getRelationalId(), createRemoteLocalCursorUtils.getFirstName(),
createRemoteLocalCursorUtils.getLastName(), createRemoteLocalCursorUtils.getDob(),
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 74.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
case RIGHT:
CreateRemoteLocalCursorUtils localCreateRemoteLocalCursorUtils = new CreateRemoteLocalCursorUtils(cursor, false);
remoteLocalCursor.addRow(new Object[]{localCreateRemoteLocalCursorUtils.getId(),
localCreateRemoteLocalCursorUtils.getRelationalId(), localCreateRemoteLocalCursorUtils.getFirstName(),
localCreateRemoteLocalCursorUtils.getLastName(), localCreateRemoteLocalCursorUtils.getDob(),
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 74.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
private void showDialog() {
((ContactSummaryFinishActivity) context).showProgressDialog(R.string.please_wait_message);
((ContactSummaryFinishActivity) context).getProgressDialog().setMessage(String.format(context.getString(R.string.summarizing_contact_number), intent.getExtras().getInt(ConstantsUtils.IntentKeyUtils.CONTACT_NO)) + " data");
((ContactSummaryFinishActivity) context).getProgressDialog().show();
}
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 73.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
@NotNull
private Task getTask(JSONObject field, String key, String baseEntityId) {
Task task = new Task();
task.setBaseEntityId(baseEntityId);
task.setKey(key);
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 73.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76