File ANCFormUtils.java
has 645 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
package org.smartregister.anc.library.util;
import android.annotation.SuppressLint;
Method processRequiredStepsField
has a Cognitive Complexity of 43 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
public static void processRequiredStepsField(Facts facts, JSONObject object) throws Exception {
if (object != null) {
Iterator<String> keys = object.keys();
while (keys.hasNext()) {
String key = keys.next();
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
ANCFormUtils
has 43 methods (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
public class ANCFormUtils extends FormUtils {
public static String obtainValue(String key, JSONArray value) throws JSONException {
String result = "";
for (int j = 0; j < value.length(); j++) {
Method processCheckBoxSpecialWidget
has a Cognitive Complexity of 29 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
private static void processCheckBoxSpecialWidget(JSONObject widget, List<String> keyList, List<String> valueList)
throws Exception {
//Clear previous selected values from the widget first
if (widget.has(JsonFormConstants.VALUE)) {
widget.remove(JsonFormConstants.VALUE);
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method getFilteredItemsWithoutFilteredSource
has a Cognitive Complexity of 27 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
private static boolean getFilteredItemsWithoutFilteredSource(JSONObject mainJsonObject, JSONObject checkBoxField, ArrayList<JSONObject> newOptionsList, Map<String, JSONObject> optionsMap) throws JSONException {
if (checkBoxField.has(ConstantsUtils.FILTER_OPTIONS)) {
JSONArray filterOptions = checkBoxField.getJSONArray(ConstantsUtils.FILTER_OPTIONS);
if (filterOptions.length() > 0) {
for (int count = 0; count < filterOptions.length(); count++) {
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method cleanValue
has a Cognitive Complexity of 23 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
@SuppressLint("NewApi")
static String cleanValue(String value) {
String returnValue = "";
try {
if (value.trim().length() > 0 && value.trim().charAt(0) == '[') {
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method compareItemAndValueGlobal
has a Cognitive Complexity of 16 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
private static boolean compareItemAndValueGlobal(String itemValue, String globalValue) {
if (!TextUtils.isEmpty(itemValue) && !TextUtils.isEmpty(globalValue)) {
List<String> globalValuesList = new ArrayList<>();
if (globalValue.startsWith("[")) {
String[] globalValuesArray = globalValue.substring(1, globalValue.length() - 1).split(", ");
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method processRadioButtonsSpecialWidget
has a Cognitive Complexity of 14 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
private static void processRadioButtonsSpecialWidget(JSONObject widget, List<String> valueList) throws Exception {
//Value already good for radio buttons so no keylist
JSONArray jsonArray = widget.getJSONArray(JsonFormConstants.OPTIONS_FIELD_NAME);
for (int i = 0; i < jsonArray.length(); i++) {
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method createSecondaryFormObject
has a Cognitive Complexity of 13 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
public static JSONObject createSecondaryFormObject(JSONObject parentObject, JSONObject jsonSubForm, String encounterType)
throws JSONException {
Map<String, String> vMap = new HashMap<>();
JSONObject resultJsonObject = new JSONObject();
JSONObject stepJsonObject = new JSONObject();
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method processRequiredStepsField
has 38 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
public static void processRequiredStepsField(Facts facts, JSONObject object) throws Exception {
if (object != null) {
Iterator<String> keys = object.keys();
while (keys.hasNext()) {
String key = keys.next();
Method processCheckBoxSpecialWidget
has 36 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
private static void processCheckBoxSpecialWidget(JSONObject widget, List<String> keyList, List<String> valueList)
throws Exception {
//Clear previous selected values from the widget first
if (widget.has(JsonFormConstants.VALUE)) {
widget.remove(JsonFormConstants.VALUE);
Method getListValuesAsString
has a Cognitive Complexity of 12 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
@SuppressLint("NewApi")
public static String getListValuesAsString(List<String> list) {
List<String> returnList = new ArrayList<>();
if (list.size() != 0) {
for (int i = 0; i < list.size(); i++) {
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method keyToValueConverter
has a Cognitive Complexity of 11 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
public static String keyToValueConverter(String keys) {
if (keys != null) {
String cleanKey = "";
String value = cleanValue(keys);
if (!value.contains(JsonFormConstants.TEXT) || !value.contains(".") && StringUtils.isNotBlank(value)) {
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method processCheckboxFilteredItems
has a Cognitive Complexity of 11 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
public static void processCheckboxFilteredItems(JSONObject mainJsonObject) throws JSONException {
if (!mainJsonObject.has(ConstantsUtils.FILTERED_ITEMS) || mainJsonObject.getJSONArray(ConstantsUtils.FILTERED_ITEMS).length() < 1) {
return;
}
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method processRequiredStepsExpansionPanelValues
has a Cognitive Complexity of 10 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
private static void processRequiredStepsExpansionPanelValues(Facts facts, JSONObject fieldObject) throws Exception {
if (fieldObject.has(JsonFormConstants.TYPE) &&
JsonFormConstants.EXPANSION_PANEL.equals(fieldObject.getString(JsonFormConstants.TYPE)) &&
fieldObject.has(JsonFormConstants.VALUE)) {
JSONArray expansionPanelValue = fieldObject.getJSONArray(JsonFormConstants.VALUE);
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method getSecondaryValueKeyPair
has a Cognitive Complexity of 10 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
private static void getSecondaryValueKeyPair(JSONArray values, int valueLength, List<String> keyList, List<String> valueList) throws JSONException {
for (int k = 0; k < valueLength; k++) {
String valuesString = values.getString(k);
String keyString = "";
if (TextUtils.isEmpty(keyString) && valuesString.contains(":")) {
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method getFilteredItemsWithoutFilteredSource
has 27 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
private static boolean getFilteredItemsWithoutFilteredSource(JSONObject mainJsonObject, JSONObject checkBoxField, ArrayList<JSONObject> newOptionsList, Map<String, JSONObject> optionsMap) throws JSONException {
if (checkBoxField.has(ConstantsUtils.FILTER_OPTIONS)) {
JSONArray filterOptions = checkBoxField.getJSONArray(ConstantsUtils.FILTER_OPTIONS);
if (filterOptions.length() > 0) {
for (int count = 0; count < filterOptions.length(); count++) {
Method cleanValue
has 26 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
@SuppressLint("NewApi")
static String cleanValue(String value) {
String returnValue = "";
try {
if (value.trim().length() > 0 && value.trim().charAt(0) == '[') {
Avoid deeply nested control flow statements. Open
if (fieldKey != null && fieldObject.has(JsonFormConstants.VALUE) && fieldObject.has(JsonFormConstants.TYPE)
&& !JsonFormConstants.EXPANSION_PANEL.equals(fieldObject.getString(JsonFormConstants.TYPE))) {
if (JsonFormConstants.CHECK_BOX.equals(fieldObject.optString(JsonFormConstants.TYPE, ""))) {
String value = Utils.getProperties(context).getProperty(ConstantsUtils.Properties.WIDGET_VALUE_TRANSLATED, "false");
if (StringUtils.isNotBlank(value) && Boolean.parseBoolean(value)) {
Avoid deeply nested control flow statements. Open
if (optionsToFilter == null) {
String itemKey = removeKeyPrefix(keyGlobal, ConstantsUtils.PREVIOUS);
newOptionsList.add(optionsMap.get(itemKey));
} else {
for (int itemIndex = 0; itemIndex < optionsToFilter.length(); itemIndex++) {
Avoid deeply nested control flow statements. Open
if (fieldObject.has(JsonFormConstants.CONTENT_FORM)) {
processRequiredStepsExpansionPanelValues(facts, fieldObject);
}
Method setSecondaryValues
has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
private static void setSecondaryValues(JSONObject itemField, JSONArray secondaryValues) throws JSONException {
for (int j = 0; j < secondaryValues.length(); j++) {
JSONObject secValue = secondaryValues.getJSONObject(j);
if (secValue.length() > 0) {
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method processAbnormalValues
has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
private static void processAbnormalValues(Facts facts, JSONObject jsonObject) throws Exception {
//Expansion panel widgets have "values" attribute with no "value" do not process them
//We will handle the processing somewhere else.
if (jsonObject.has(JsonFormConstants.VALUES) && !jsonObject.has(JsonFormConstants.VALUE)) {
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method sortSecondaryValues
has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
public static JSONArray sortSecondaryValues(JSONObject fieldObject) throws JSONException {
JSONObject otherValue = null;
JSONArray newJsonArray = new JSONArray();
JSONArray secondaryValues = fieldObject.getJSONArray(ConstantsUtils.KeyUtils.SECONDARY_VALUES);
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
if (fieldObject.has(JsonFormConstants.VALUE) && !TextUtils.isEmpty(fieldObject.getString(JsonFormConstants.VALUE)) &&
fieldObject.getString(ConstantsUtils.KeyUtils.KEY).endsWith(ConstantsUtils.SuffixUtils.OTHER) && facts.get(
fieldObject.getString(ConstantsUtils.KeyUtils.KEY).replace(ConstantsUtils.SuffixUtils.OTHER, ConstantsUtils.SuffixUtils.VALUE)) != null) {
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 78.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
String fieldKeySecondary = fieldKey.contains(ConstantsUtils.SuffixUtils.OTHER) ?
fieldKey.substring(0, fieldKey.indexOf(ConstantsUtils.SuffixUtils.OTHER)) + ConstantsUtils.SuffixUtils.VALUE : "";
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 44.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
if (valueItem.has(JsonFormConstants.TYPE) && valueItem.has(JsonFormConstants.VALUES)) {
String type = valueItem.optString(JsonFormConstants.TYPE);
JSONArray values = valueItem.optJSONArray(JsonFormConstants.VALUES);
result = extractItemValue(type, values);
}
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 42.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
for (int j = 0; j < secondaryValues.length(); j++) {
JSONObject jsonObject = secondaryValues.getJSONObject(j);
processAbnormalValues(facts, jsonObject);
}
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 42.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
if (fieldKey.endsWith(ConstantsUtils.SuffixUtils.OTHER) && !fieldKeySecondary.isEmpty() &&
facts.get(fieldKeySecondary) != null && facts.get(fieldKeyOtherValue) != null) {
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 42.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76