File Content.php
has 1078 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
<?php
/**
* This file is part of PHPPresentation - A pure PHP library for reading and writing
* presentations documents.
*
Function writeContent
has a Cognitive Complexity of 74 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
protected function writeContent(): string
{
// Create XML writer
$objWriter = new XMLWriter(XMLWriter::STORAGE_MEMORY);
$objWriter->startDocument('1.0', 'UTF-8');
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function writeShapeTxt
has a Cognitive Complexity of 65 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
protected function writeShapeTxt(XMLWriter $objWriter, RichText $shape): void
{
// draw:frame
$objWriter->startElement('draw:frame');
$objWriter->writeAttribute('draw:style-name', 'gr' . $this->shapeId);
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method writeContent
has 246 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
protected function writeContent(): string
{
// Create XML writer
$objWriter = new XMLWriter(XMLWriter::STORAGE_MEMORY);
$objWriter->startDocument('1.0', 'UTF-8');
Function writeStyleSlide
has a Cognitive Complexity of 58 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
protected function writeStyleSlide(XMLWriter $objWriter, Slide $slide, int $incPage): void
{
// style:style
$objWriter->startElement('style:style');
$objWriter->writeAttribute('style:family', 'drawing-page');
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function writeShapeTable
has a Cognitive Complexity of 55 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
protected function writeShapeTable(XMLWriter $objWriter, Table $shape): void
{
// draw:frame
$objWriter->startElement('draw:frame');
$objWriter->writeAttribute('svg:x', Text::numberFormat(CommonDrawing::pixelsToCentimeters((int) $shape->getOffsetX()), 3) . 'cm');
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method writeStyleSlide
has 179 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
protected function writeStyleSlide(XMLWriter $objWriter, Slide $slide, int $incPage): void
{
// style:style
$objWriter->startElement('style:style');
$objWriter->writeAttribute('style:family', 'drawing-page');
Function writeTableStyle
has a Cognitive Complexity of 42 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
protected function writeTableStyle(XMLWriter $objWriter, Table $shape): void
{
foreach ($shape->getRows() as $keyRow => $shapeRow) {
// style:style
$objWriter->startElement('style:style');
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method writeShapeTxt
has 108 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
protected function writeShapeTxt(XMLWriter $objWriter, RichText $shape): void
{
// draw:frame
$objWriter->startElement('draw:frame');
$objWriter->writeAttribute('draw:style-name', 'gr' . $this->shapeId);
Function writeTxtStyle
has a Cognitive Complexity of 28 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
protected function writeTxtStyle(XMLWriter $objWriter, RichText $shape): void
{
// style:style
$objWriter->startElement('style:style');
$objWriter->writeAttribute('style:name', 'gr' . $this->shapeId);
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method writeTxtStyle
has 86 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
protected function writeTxtStyle(XMLWriter $objWriter, RichText $shape): void
{
// style:style
$objWriter->startElement('style:style');
$objWriter->writeAttribute('style:name', 'gr' . $this->shapeId);
Method writeTableStyle
has 85 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
protected function writeTableStyle(XMLWriter $objWriter, Table $shape): void
{
foreach ($shape->getRows() as $keyRow => $shapeRow) {
// style:style
$objWriter->startElement('style:style');
Method writeShapeTable
has 64 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
protected function writeShapeTable(XMLWriter $objWriter, Table $shape): void
{
// draw:frame
$objWriter->startElement('draw:frame');
$objWriter->writeAttribute('svg:x', Text::numberFormat(CommonDrawing::pixelsToCentimeters((int) $shape->getOffsetX()), 3) . 'cm');
Method writeStylePartShadow
has 32 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
protected function writeStylePartShadow(XMLWriter $objWriter, Shadow $oShadow): void
{
if (!$oShadow->isVisible()) {
return;
}
Method writeShapeMedia
has 31 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
protected function writeShapeMedia(XMLWriter $objWriter, Media $shape): void
{
// draw:frame
$objWriter->startElement('draw:frame');
$objWriter->writeAttribute('draw:name', $shape->getName());
Method writeShapeDrawing
has 30 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
protected function writeShapeDrawing(XMLWriter $objWriter, AbstractDrawingAdapter $shape): void
{
// draw:frame
$objWriter->startElement('draw:frame');
$objWriter->writeAttribute('draw:name', $shape->getName());
Function writeStylePartShadow
has a Cognitive Complexity of 10 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
protected function writeStylePartShadow(XMLWriter $objWriter, Shadow $oShadow): void
{
if (!$oShadow->isVisible()) {
return;
}
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function writeGroupStyle
has a Cognitive Complexity of 9 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
protected function writeGroupStyle(XMLWriter $objWriter, Group $group): void
{
$shapes = $group->getShapeCollection();
foreach ($shapes as $shape) {
// Increment $this->shapeId
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function writeShapeGroup
has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
protected function writeShapeGroup(XMLWriter $objWriter, Group $group): void
{
// draw:g
$objWriter->startElement('draw:g');
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function writeSlideNote
has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
protected function writeSlideNote(XMLWriter $objWriter, Note $note): void
{
$shapesNote = $note->getShapeCollection();
if (count($shapesNote) > 0) {
$objWriter->startElement('presentation:notes');
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
foreach ($richtexts as $richtext) {
++$richtextId;
if ($richtext instanceof TextElement) {
// text:span
$objWriter->startElement('text:span');
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 205.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
foreach ($richtexts as $richtext) {
++$richtextId;
if ($richtext instanceof TextElement) {
// text:span
$objWriter->startElement('text:span');
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 205.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
case Font::FORMAT_EAST_ASIAN:
$objWriter->writeAttribute('style:font-family-asian', $item->getFont()->getName());
$objWriter->writeAttribute('style:font-size-asian', $item->getFont()->getSize() . 'pt');
$objWriter->writeAttributeIf($item->getFont()->isBold(), 'style:font-weight-asian', 'bold');
$objWriter->writeAttribute('style:language-asian', ($item->getLanguage() ? $item->getLanguage() : 'en'));
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 105.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
case Font::FORMAT_COMPLEX_SCRIPT:
$objWriter->writeAttribute('style:font-family-complex', $item->getFont()->getName());
$objWriter->writeAttribute('style:font-size-complex', $item->getFont()->getSize() . 'pt');
$objWriter->writeAttributeIf($item->getFont()->isBold(), 'style:font-weight-complex', 'bold');
$objWriter->writeAttribute('style:language-complex', ($item->getLanguage() ? $item->getLanguage() : 'en'));
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 105.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
case Font::FORMAT_LATIN:
$objWriter->writeAttribute('fo:font-family', $item->getFont()->getName());
$objWriter->writeAttribute('fo:font-size', $item->getFont()->getSize() . 'pt');
$objWriter->writeAttributeIf($item->getFont()->isBold(), 'fo:font-weight', 'bold');
$objWriter->writeAttribute('fo:language', ($item->getLanguage() ? $item->getLanguage() : 'en'));
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 105.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76