Showing 12 of 14 total issues
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
<?php
declare(strict_types=1);
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 200.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
<?php
declare(strict_types=1);
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 200.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
$hierarchical_labels = array(
/* translators: %s: Taxonomy singular name */
'parent_item_colon' => wp_sprintf( _x( 'Parent %s:', 'Label used to prefix parents of hierarchical items. Not used on non-hierarchical taxonomys. Default is ‘Parent {taxonomy plural name}:’.', 'pinkcrab' ), \esc_attr( $taxonomy->singular ?? '' ) ),
/* translators: %s: Taxonomy singular name */
'parent_item' => wp_sprintf( _x( 'Parent %s', 'Label for the parent term', 'pinkcrab' ), \esc_attr( $taxonomy->singular ?? '' ) ),
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 131.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
$tag_labels = array(
/* translators: %s: Taxonomy plural name */
'separate_items_with_commas' => wp_sprintf( _x( 'Separate %s with commas', 'This label is only used for non-hierarchical taxonomies. Default \'Separate {taxonomy plural name} with commas\', used in the meta box.’.', 'pinkcrab' ), \esc_attr( $taxonomy->plural ?? '' ) ),
/* translators: %s: Taxonomy plural name */
'add_or_remove_items' => wp_sprintf( _x( 'Add or remove %s', 'This label is only used for non-hierarchical taxonomies. Default \'Add or remove {taxonomy plural name}\', used in the meta box when JavaScript is disabled.', 'pinkcrab' ), \esc_attr( $taxonomy->plural ?? '' ) ),
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 131.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Meta_Data
has 22 functions (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
class Meta_Data {
/**
* Object type meta applies to
*
* @var string
Method register
has 48 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
public function register( Registerable $registerable ): void {
if ( ! is_a( $registerable, Additional_Meta_Data_Controller::class ) ) {
throw new Exception( 'Registerable must be an instance of Additional_Meta_Data_Controller' );
}
Method register
has 38 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
public function register( Meta_Box $meta_box ): void {
if ( ! $this->validator->verify_meta_box( $meta_box ) ) {
throw new Exception(
sprintf(
Function register
has a Cognitive Complexity of 11 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
public function register( Registerable $registerable ): void {
if ( ! is_a( $registerable, Additional_Meta_Data_Controller::class ) ) {
throw new Exception( 'Registerable must be an instance of Additional_Meta_Data_Controller' );
}
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method process_post_type
has 26 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
protected function process_post_type( Post_Type $post_type_registerable ) {
// Register registerable.
$this->loader->action(
'init',
static function() use ( $post_type_registerable ) {
Function process
has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
public function process( object $class ): object {
if ( ! is_a( $class, Registerable::class ) ) {
return $class;
}
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function create_rest_update_method
has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
protected function create_rest_update_method( Meta_Data $meta ): \Closure {
/**
* @param mixed $value
* @param \WP_Post|\WP_Term|\WP_User|\WP_Comment $object
*/
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function create_rest_get_method
has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
protected function create_rest_get_method( Meta_Data $meta ): callable {
return function( $model ) use ( $meta ) {
switch ( $meta->get_meta_type() ) {
case 'post':
$value = get_post_meta( $model['id'], $meta->get_meta_key(), true );
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"