time/1/9/7/3/McCampbell_Ufology/06/index.html
<!--#include virtual="/header-start.html" -->
<title>Physiological Effects (Ufology, by James M. McCampbell)</title>
<meta content="https://www.nicap.org/ufology/ufochap6.htm" name="url"/>
<!--#include virtual="/header-end.html" -->
<p class="exergue">The history of science has shown that it is the things that don't fit, the apparent exceptions to the
rule, that signal potential breakthroughs in our concept of the world about us <span
class="source">- J. Allen Hyneck</span></p>
<p>Effects of UFOs upon the principal sensory organs have been explored elsewhere. It was found, in brief, that the
visual experience involved images of metallic vehicles, including various structural details, which were sometimes
surrounded by vivid displays in brilliant colors or dazzling halos. A study of their noises disclosed several distinct
types and suggested the artificial stimulation of auditory sensations within the head. Finally, several unique odors
noticed in the vicinity of UFOs were traced to specific chemical compounds that are formed in the atmosphere under the
stimulus of radiant energy that is emitted by UFOs. Reception of signals by the eyes, ears, and nose have been
accounted for, yet there remains a variety of ways in which the body responds to UFOs at short range.</p>
<h2>Primary Symptoms</h2>
<p>A sensation of body heating during a close encounter is a common complaint. A huge craft, 70 meters long, flew within
30 meters of two sheriffs in Texas causing a heat wave. (1) Six teenagers in Ohio experienced the same reaction as a
disc-shaped machine hovered overhead. (2) The intensity of this effect is, of course, variable and it may reach
frightful proportions. Near the Capitan Curbelo Naval Air Station in Uruguay an experienced pilot flew his light plane
to within 700 meters of a brilliant object shaped like a "musical top" that had come to a dead stop directly ahead on
his flight path. "I saw that (the UFO) rocked twice in a balancing motion. Then it took off in the direction of the
sea at a fantastic speed. It left a little trail in the form of water vapor....The temperature was greatly increased,
so much that I had to open the windows and door of the plane, and take off my field jacket. I almost fainted." (3) A
stronger heat wave in the cockpit of an F94 jet during a UFO chase became so unbearable that the pilot and his crewman
had to bail out. The plane crashed in Walesville, New York, tragically killing four people and injuring others. (4)
Actual burns of first and second degree, usually on the face and hands, have been the reward of unwary people who
approached UFOs too closely or of others innocently minding their own business when one flew past at very close range.
(5)</p>
<p>Sometimes the witnesses are temporarily paralyzed while the UFO is nearby, usually within 50 to 150 meters. (6) A
farmer in San Pietro, Italy, became paralyzed when he approached to within 10 meters of a UFO that had landed in the
village square. (7) Three figures moving around a landed UFO at Stratford-on-Avon held the attention of a man who
could not move until they boarded the craft and flew away. (8) In at least seven other instances, witnesses were
immobilized during the encounter, but their involuntary body functions, such as breathing, heart beat, and vision,
were unimpaired. (9) Return to normalcy was usually immediate when the UFO left, but it took about 20 minutes for one
victim to regain his muscular coordination. (10) Approximately the same amount of time was required by a French farmer
to recover, although his paralysis was probably induced by some kind of a weapon. (11)</p>
<p>Loss of consciousness is also relatively frequent, being reported as either an isolated symptom or in association
with other symptoms. (12) Quite significantly, about half of the people who were either paralyzed or who had lost
consciousness also described feeling a prickling sensation or an electrical shock. As a man in Massachusetts
explained, "My mind was not at all affected. I just could not move, felt like shock and numbness." (13)</p>
<p>Because of the prominent association between the other physiological effects and the feeling of electrical shock, one
is inclined to ascribe the cause of the symptoms to some electrical phenomenon. That temptation becomes overwhelming
when a tabulation of the cases reveals that, in nearly every instance of bodily heating, paralysis, loss of
consciousness, or electrical shock, automobile engines were also stopped or began to misfire. In two instances,
headlamps also went out (14) This definite correlation between the effects upon the human body and upon electrical
circuits clearly points to electromagnetic energy as the causative agent, a relationship that has long been suspected.
(15) "Loud humming" and "beeping," whose origin was probably electromagnetic, were also heard just prior to paralysis
and unconsciousness. (16) Obviously the sounds must precede or follow the loss of consciousness, since by definition,
an unconscious person is oblivious to external stimuli. At any rate, the instant- by-instant sequence of events in
these sightings should be examined with care. Painful prickling like an electrical shock were felt by a motorist in
France as his child, also riding in the car, began to cry. The pain increased, then the engine failed and the lights
went out. (17) In other words, the electrical shock gradually increased up to the point that the responsible agent
disrupted the electrical circuits of the car. Had the increase continued further, one suspects that the witness may
have become paralyzed. While this instance stands alone, it does suggest that the prickling sensation is an early
manifestation of the radiant energy, followed by electrical interference and, finally, paralysis or unconsciousness.
Probably the most sensitive response to the radiation is auditory, for, it may be recalled, the Hills first heard a
beeping sound and then felt the prickling sensation. (18) Both the physiological and physical responses seem to be
related to a flight maneuver of the UFOs. In two cases, conditions were normal until the UFOs began to rise at which
time the lights of one car went out. (19) and the engine of the other failed. (20) In still another case, prickling
and paralysis occurred at the same time that the engine slowed down when a nearby UFO rose off the ground. (21) The
strength of the causative agent, known to be ineffective at great distance, seems to depend upon the proximity of the
UFO and appears to be strongest when the UFOs apply a burst of power at take-off.</p>
<p>A considerable variety of other physiological effects have also been noted in isolated instances. These include
amnesia, headache, eye pain, loss of vision, nausea, and vomiting. Specific instances of these ailments will be taken
up after some insights are developed concerning the primary symptoms.</p>
<p>Several factors point directly toward microwave energy as being responsible for the physiological effects. Such
energy is known to be radiated from UFOs. It is the primary candidate for disrupting electrical circuits, and the
failure of headlights and engines correlates well with heating of the body, electrical shock, paralysis, and loss of
consciousness, all of which are induced by UFOs from some distance. The search for an understanding of these
physiological effects should begin with an examination of related physical and biological data. Further searching
should not be required if the technology of microwaves and the life processes together reveal specific mechanisms that
can duplicate the observations.</p>
<h2>Heating</h2>
<p>Diathermy is a medical process for applying heat to tissues deep within the human body. It is usually accomplished by
placing the part to be treated between suitably contoured electrodes that are padded with towels. An alternating
potential applied to the plates causes them to act as a condenser in which the human tissues are the dielectric.
Alternating electrical fields between the plates, completely penetrating the treated part, agitate molecules in the
tissue and generate the desired heat. An antenna, substituted for the plates at microwave frequencies, beams
electromagnetic radiation into the patient with the same penetrative result. A commercial machine for microwave
diathermy operates with an output power of 100 watts at 2,450 MHz. (22) The penetration is excellent at that
frequency, although it diminishes at higher frequencies, tending to concentrate the absorbed energy into a shallow
layer near the skin. (23) Some potential danger attends the use of microwaves on people because the human body has
heat receptors only on the skin. Overheating, therefore, might occur in the deeper tissues without the forewarning of
pain, especially in portions not cooled by freely flowing blood, as in bone marrow and the eyes. In the previous
discussion of UFO plasmas, the gases were estimated to have temperatures in the range of roughly 2000 to 4000F. Such
hot gases will radiate energy over a wide spectrum that includes the infrared, visible, and ultraviolet. Heating of
the skin and even serious burns could be produced by the infrared rays, depending upon their intensity and the
duration of exposure. Typical sunburns could be produced by the ultraviolet rays. As both types of radiation are
blocked by clothing, they would cause localized effects upon the bare skin of the face and hands. The more generalized
experience of "heat waves" that force people to remove clothing and to jump out of airplanes must have a different
origin. Absorption of high-frequency radiation with the generation of heat as in microwave diathermy, is a likely
candidate.</p>
<h2>Paralysis</h2>
<p>Control of the human body is the task of the central nervous system. It receives information on the circumstances
outside the body from the senses and status reports on internal conditions such as the muscular needs for oxygen. This
data is incorporated into the general experience and conscious desires of the individual. Two major sets of signals
are then sent out along nerves to the muscles and glands to implement a response that is appropriate to the conditions
prevailing at that instant. This process is continuous. Of primary concern at present are the functional properties of
nerve fibers. In some ways these fibers resemble insulated electrical wires. A central core of protoplasmic material,
a moderately good conductor of electricity, is surrounded by a sheath of membrane of a fatty substance that is a
moderately good insulator. Orders to outlying muscles, sent by the central nervous system, travel along these fibers
as a wave of electrical potential. The similarity to electrical wires cannot be carried very far, however, fibers have
certain unique properties. The traveling pulse, known as an action potential, always has the same intensity in a
particular fiber. At any point along the fiber, it is either present or it is not; it never shows up only partially or
at a potential above the norm. Energy for transmission of this signal derives from the fiber itself, not from some
driving force at the input end. The sheath is interrupted at intervals of about 1 millimeter, called Ranvier nodes,
and the transmission energy is supplied by the passage of certain ions through the membranes in these short segments.
The width of the pulse is about 1 millisecond and it travels at various speeds, depending upon the size of the fiber,
typically on the order of 10 meters per second. Measurements of electrical potentials inside the sheath show that a
fiber at rest is about 0.07 volts negative compared to the external solution. An action potential traveling down the
fiber has a positive amplitude of about 0.10 to 0.12 volts. Therefore, at the moment the action potential occupies a
position in the fiber, its interior experiences a momentary swing that is about 0.04 volts positive compared to the
outside. Experimental electrodes implanted in the fiber at any location can trigger the standard pulse by impressing a
potential difference across the membrane of about 0.02 volts or greater. Pulses then travel outward in both directions
along the fiber, although they would normally travel in only one direction. After the pulse has been passed through
one segment of the fiber, a finite time is required for that segment to return to normal. During the recovery period,
it is completely incapable of transmitting another pulse. For about one millisecond the fiber cannot be stimulated at
all; for roughly another millisecond it can, but only by a stimulus stronger than usual. (24) If a stimulus below the
threshold of 0.02 volts is followed by another within about 2 milliseconds, then the second one may evoke a response
even though it too is weaker than the threshold. The first stimulus opens the gate, so to speak, for the next ones.
(25)</p>
<p>If microwave radiation were capable of providing the requisite stimulus, then an action potential would be induced.
It has been found, in fact, that microwave radiation can create the necessary electrical tension across the membrane.
By inserting miniature electrodes into nerve fibers, the potential difference between the inside and the outside can
be measured. Irradiation by microwaves induces potentials that are typically in the millivolt range, but are sometimes
as high as 0.10 volt, five times stronger than the threshold value of 0.02 volt. (26) As action potentials triggered
by this mechanism would be identical in every respect to those that are sent out by the central nervous system, there
would be no way in which the receptors could detect them to be frauds. Muscular response would be absolutely dictated
by such artificially produced stimuli.</p>
<p>Traveling along a nerve at 10 meters per second, the pulse would progress a distance of 1 cm in 1 millisecond. As it
takes about that long for the sheath to recover, the traveling pulse carries with it a zone of desensitized fiber
about 1 cm in length, like the wake of a motorboat. The zone would actually be about twice that long since as the
fibers gradually return to normal within about 1 millisecond after the first millisecond period when they are
absolutely refractive. Bear in mind that this dead zone does not remain stationary, but moves along the nerve
immediately behind the action potential with the same speed.</p>
<p>Now consider the chain of events that would occur if a burst of microwave radiation should stimulate the nerve fiber
at several locations. Action potentials would propagate away from the sites of origin in both directions. From
neighboring sites, therefore, two pulses traveling toward one another must collide. Up to the instant of contact, the
two pulses are being followed by their respective wakes of desensitized fiber. They cannot interpenetrate or continue
traveling in their original directions because the dead zone of the other is not capable of furnishing the
propagation. For the same reason, they cannot be reflected back along their course. Upon colliding, they must both be
annihilated. The last indication of their existence would be the electrical change in the small segment where they
met. Centered upon the site of their disappearance would be a section of the nerve about 2 cm long that would remain
dormant for about 1 millisecond. Several such events happening at the same time would take a sizeable fraction of the
nerve out of service momentarily. Should a second burst of microwave energy inundate the nerve while several sections
are still dormant, more action potentials will be stimulated in those normal portions between the dormant zones that
have recovered from the passage of the last pulse. Then the process leading to annihilation of contra-traveling pulses
simply starts again. It is most interesting to explore the conditions that might be established in the nerve by
microwave energy that is itself being pulsed about 500 times per second. First of all, the effective threshold for
stimulation would be lowered by the "gate effect" and action potentials could be induced more readily. The individual
bursts of microwave energy would arrive at intervals of 2 milliseconds, which is approximately the time that the dead
zones persist at the points of annihilation. Action potentials would be stimulated only in the responsive sections,
which immediately thereafter would become insensitive. Meanwhile, previously exhausted sections would recover and
become active again, just in time to be stimulated by the next burst of microwaves. One can envision a state of
quasi-equilibrium in which a chain of sections, alternately insensitive and responsive, are switching their roles
approximately 500 times per second. At all times, about half the nerve would be completely incapable of transmitting
any signal.</p>
<p>Next consider the fate of legitimate impulses issued by the brain. They would obviously get wiped out upon meeting
artificially induced pulses that were traveling the wrong way. They would disappear in the annihilation process- a
most efficient means of disposing of signals that were intended for control of the muscles. As shown before, a series
of pulses cannot be closer together in the nerve than the length of the dead zone. This restriction establishes an
absolute upper limit to the message handling capacity of the nerve. For a nerve having a propagation speed of 10
meters per second, as was assumed for the previous discussion, the dead zone is about 1 cm long. Therefore, the
absolute upper limit of signal density occurs when they are 1 cm apart. At their common velocity, they would pass a
given point at the rate of one every millisecond, or 1,000 of them in 1 sec. But because the nerve membrane requires
an additional amount of time to recover, the spacing will be about 2 cm and that figure would be cut in half. The
maximum rate of propagation in this nerve is estimated to be roughly 500 pulses per second. The behavior of this fiber
under a steady, prolonged stimulus should reveal the correct value. Consider an electrical potential greater than the
threshold to be applied and maintained across the sheath. It would respond by initiating an action potential and would
then enter its refractory period. As soon as it recovers, it again experiences the stimulus and responds, and so on.
The rate at which the action potentials are triggered in this experiment is the maximum propagation rate for that
nerve. It has been found in the laboratory that such a sustained stimulus causes the emission of a train of pulses,
usually 4 or 5 with gradually increased spacing, in about 100 milliseconds. (27) Apparently the capacity of the sheath
to continue at its maximum transmission rate is severely limited, a point which cannot be pursued further without
access to the original laboratory reports. These findings are significant to the annihilation of the action potentials
originating in the brain. Such pulses may have to travel as far as 1 meter to contract a leg muscle, a journey that
would take about 0.1 sec. A microwave field pulsed very slowly would leave large gaps of time during which muscular
coordination would be normal, although sporadic disruption would occur. Higher pulse rates would increase the
difficulty of control. At frequencies equal to, or greater than the maximum rate that the signals can be sent through
the nerve, pulses from the brain would have no chance of getting through.</p>
<p>At the muscle end of the motor nerve, impulses are delivered to the receptors at the maximum rate. A single impulse
causes a muscle fiber to contract for a finite period, say, 0.01 sec. If another pulse arrives during that period, the
muscle is again stimulated to contract before having an opportunity to relax. Hence, a rapid series of such pulses
will hold the muscle in a state of sustained contraction. A difficulty arises here, however. All skeletal muscles
occur in pair-sets. Any kind of bodily motion, which is governed by one set of muscles can be compensated by another
motion governed by the opposite set. A volitional action is accomplished by contracting the appropriate set of muscles
while inhibiting their counterparts, an enormously complex obligation of the central nervous system. As microwaves
cannot make such distinctions, all the motor nerves are stimulated indiscriminately. The net result is obvious: sets
of muscles contract in opposition to each other and the body freezes into rigid immobility.</p>
<p>A mechanism to explain the typical UFO paralysis thus emerges. A pulsed microwave field emitted by the UFO weakens
the threshold and stimulates action potentials in the motor nerves. Half of these travel the wrong way and nullify the
signals issued by the brain. The witness suddenly becomes paralyzed, in whatever position he held at the time, by a
stream of fraudulent pulses causing the skeletal muscles to work against each other. When the field intensity falls
too low, everything usually returns to normal. As an Australian youth said after two minutes in that condition, he was
"merely cognizant of things as they were without being able to react." (28) The microwaves apparently stimulate only
the nerves to the voluntary muscles without producing a comparable effect upon the nerves to the involuntary body
functions, including muscles and glands. Sensory channels also seem to be immune from influence, except perhaps the
auditory nerve. How the excitation process can be so selective is not at all clear. It is known that nerve fibers of
small diameter have higher thresholds than larger ones. (29) Perhaps the answer is very simple-the larger nerves
controlling voluntary actions are easier to stimulate. Because of health hazards, humans have not been exposed to
high-intensity microwave fields, and there is no laboratory indication of a paralyzing effect.</p>
<h2>Electrical Shock</h2>
<p>As the power output of many large radars has increased enormously in the last two decades, some special precautions
have been taken. Several costly installations were constructed to detect missiles over the horizon that might be
launched toward the United States. This system provides about 15 minutes warning time for retaliatory action.
Potential exposure of 20 times the allowable flux of microwave energy at these sites prohibits the performance of
routine maintenance while the radars are in operation. As it is unthinkable to shut down periodically for any purpose,
special protective clothing for the technicians had to be developed. These suits cover the entire body, head, face,
hands and feet. They are made from a metallized nylon to reflect electromagnetic energy away from the wearer. A
special design assures electrical continuity across the seams. As electrical fields of thousand of volts per meter
were also predicated, the suits have an exterior insulating layer of neoprene-coated nylon. (30) This layer prevents
surges of current through the conducting layer that would otherwise be produced if a workman touched two metal pipes
having different electrical potentials. In an environment of this nature, but of lesser intensity, an unprotected
worker or a UFO witness might well experience an electrical shock.</p>
<p>Because microwave fields induce currents in electrical conductors, the military forces must take further precautions.
They must make sure that ordnance is not accidentally detonated by stray radiation. This problem is most severe where
ordnance must be handled close to powerful radar sets. On Navy ships, for example, the operational use of radar might
have to be restricted. Primary research on this problem is conducted by the Electromagnetic Hazards Division of the
Naval Weapons Laboratory in Dahlgren, Virginia. (31) In view of the importance of radiation-induced currents in the
military experience, one would certainly anticipate an electrical effect upon the human body while exposed to
microwaves. As moist skin is a good conductor and well furnished with sensory receptors, a prickling sensation would
be quite expectable.</p>
<h2>Loss of Consciousness</h2>
<p>One component of the central nervous system regulates such body functions as sleep, temperature, blood pressure,
other autonomic functions, and the emotional states. The nature of this control mechanism is fundamentally chemical;
that is, the organ controls the production of small amounts of powerful agents such as adrenaline and serotonin.
Experiments in 1952 showed that electrical stimulation of the thalamus increased the production of serotonin. (32) A
similar electrical stimulation induced by microwaves could have the same result, that is, production of sleep-inducing
chemicals.</p>
<h2>Secondary Symptoms</h2>
<p>Among the less frequent but notable ailments following close exposure to UFOs is the common headache. Two UFOs that
landed in Brazil discharged three small beings from one and two from the other. These beings stood around talking for
about 5 minutes before conducting a thorough inspection of both craft. All the while, they were being watched by a
15-year-old boy, whose companions were up ahead of him en route to a movie. After the UFO took off, the boy suddenly
suffered violent headaches. As standard medication gave no relief for 5 days, he was taken to a doctor by his father.
(33) In another situation, a bright disc-shaped craft, producing a high-pitched sound, came down near Rio de Janeiro
and hovered, while three of its occupants walked nearby. One of the witnesses later suffered severe headaches. (34)
Not only are the headaches clearly associated with the sightings, but in these two cases, the headaches began after
the UFOs had left, a most puzzling detail. Whether the radiation received during the observation had anything to do
with this symptom is doubtful, but it should be noted for the record that headaches are sometimes produced by
microwaves. A study was conducted in 1943 involving 45 men with histories of exposure to low levels of microwave
radiation spanning periods of 2 months to 9 years. "Several of these men reported frontal headaches and a flushed
heating sensation when standing within 3 ft of a generating antenna." (35) The abbreviated source material
unfortunately does not indicate the strength of the beam or whether the subjects were exposed directly to it. Also,
these histories of exposure to microwaves are not typical of UFO witnesses. But the important aspect is that headaches
were experienced and, apparently, only while the subjects were being irradiated. Because of the gross disparity in the
time factors here, the cause for headaches associated with UFOs is lacking an explanation.</p>
<p>On rare occasions, the witnesses describe a loss of vision, either total or partial, resulting in cloudy or hazy
images. A typical example involved a 37-year-old man in Pennsylvania who saw a large disc fly in front of the moon.
Twenty minutes later both eyes became pained and his vision hazy. He gradually lost vision in both eyes; within
several days, it returned to normal. His entire body was "sunburned." A doctor who examined him attributed the effects
to ultraviolet exposure. (36) That diagnosis may well be correct, since unique blue light on or about the UFO was
reportedly very intense for about 3 seconds at the end of the sighting. Consider, however, the oddity that the skin
irritation was not confined to exposed portions of the body. As the witness had just put his car in the garage,
according to the report, it may be presumed that he was normally attired. His clothing should have protected most of
the body, since ultraviolet rays are easily stopped by a cotton shirt. Whatever troubled his eyes also penetrated his
clothing. Recall that the propulsion system of UFOs involves the emission of microwave energy that, on occasion,
excites the xenon molecules in the atmosphere to emit their characteristic bright blue. Microwaves pass through
clothing without significant loss, but at frequencies used in diathermy they also penetrate deeply into the human
body. At somewhat higher frequencies, above 3,000 MHz, tissue penetration is greatly abated and nearly half of the
impinging energy is absorbed on the skin. Absorption of microwave energy in the skin produces conditions that are
indistinguishable from ordinary sunburn arising from an excess of ultraviolet rays. In all probability, this witness
suffered a flash burn on the retina and "sunburn" over his entire body by a 3-second exposure to microwaves at a
frequency greater than 3,000 MHz.</p>
<p>The eyes are especially sensitive to microwaves, whose energy is readily absorbed by the internal fluid, the aqueous
humor. In addition, when wavelengths of the radiation are approximately the same dimension as the eyeball the
conditions for a tuned cavity prevail in which absorption is further enhanced. Absorbed energy raises the eye
temperature, a very dangerous condition even for small increases that cannot be felt. As the lens is very intolerant
of stress, the abnormal temperature can generate cataracts. Furthermore, microwaves produce a direct effect upon the
lens involving chemical changes resulting in the formation of cataracts. (37) For these reasons, the allowable
exposure to the eyes is severely limited and eye protection is a must. Cataracts produced by microwaves do not
normally progress to total blindness, and they gradually disappear. That such lenticular opacity, or cloudiness of the
aqueous humor, has been induced by UFOs seems fairly clear. A doctor examining one witness with hazy vision "could not
see the retina," presumably because of opacity of the lens or eye fluid. (38)</p>
<p>After stopping the car of an Australian businessman, a mushroom shaped UFO aimed a strong beam of light toward him.
He later found himself driving down the road, unable to remember starting the car.(39) He had suffered amnesia
covering a brief span of time, and the reported beam of light indicates a purposeful act by the UFO occupants. In a
previous chapter, review of two other instances of memory lapse showed deliberate action also. Amnesia, however,
appears to be rare and not merely a consequence of being too close to a UFO.</p>
<p>Sighting a UFO is sometimes quite a shock to the witness. Anything so completely out of the ordinary could overwhelm
a person's effort to adjust to his surroundings. The most sturdy personality might have some difficulty, and the
experience could prove to be too stunning for an individual whose struggle with life has left little reserve strength.
In order to escape from the anxiety of the situation, some witnesses may subconsciously respond hysterically, they may
experience unusual sensations of vision, hearing, taste, or smell, their body might suddenly go rigid for a moment,
waves of nausea could trouble them for days; or their subsequent behavior patterns may be completely out of character.
These reactions to stress, being of purely psychological origin, can obviously mimic some of the physiological
responses that have been described above. It would be moderately easy to confuse some of the emotional and
physiological effects. The error in either direction would be serious, namely, falsely ascribing a physiological cause
to a purely emotional reaction, or inadvertently overlooking a valid physiological explanation. Some protection
against the latter pitfall is afforded by automobile engines and radios that are not inclined to be neurotic. Their
malfunctions require a specific, physical agency. When that agency is identified and it produces a physiological
response in the witness, a psychological explanation is not required and, indeed, is superfluous.</p>
<h2>Scientific Uncertainty</h2>
<p>In the face of substantial evidence to the contrary, most American researchers cling to the notion that absorption of
microwaves in the human body produces nothing but heat. Varied biological changes, they contend, are traceable to a
rise in temperature. The concept of a direct biochemical effect is rejected with several arguments. The radiation
dosage, for example, cannot be reliably reported because there are no generally accepted standards of instrumentation.
Or, perhaps, the possibility of a purely thermal response in the tissues has not been disproven. A recent review
article points out that "There are many areas in which presently available data are questionable, contradictory, or
inapplicable." (40) Microwave research in the United States certainly suffers more confusion than becomes a scientific
discipline. On the international scene, the situation is no better. A summary of Soviet views indicates, among other
things contradicting the American position, that "At the present time, the opinion of most Soviet investigators is
that microwaves: ....affect the structure and chemical reactivity of neutral cells." (41) Russian research purports to
demonstrate sub-threshold effects, that is, irreversible chemical changes that are produced at levels below the onset
of any thermal responses. Furthermore, these changes are believed to be cumulative. Without ever being exposed to
levels of radiation causing damage by heat, according to these views, a worker exposed repeatedly to low-level
microwaves at his job might suffer serious injury over a period of time. These beliefs are reflected in the safety
standards that have been adopted; permissible limits of exposure in Russia are 1,000 times more conservative than in
the United States. (42) This disparity persists because the methods, rationale, and data of the Soviet scientists
appear to be obscure and nebulous to the Americans. At any rate, most of the symptoms produced by UFOs, being
inadmissible to American science, are thoroughly compatible with the Russian findings.</p>
<p>One Russian conclusion that is especially vague to Americans is the alleged "asthenia" syndrome, a combination of
mental and personality changes. "The symptoms include weakness, fatigability, depression, antisocial tendencies, sense
of fear, impairment of memory and general mental function and an inability to make decisions." (43) During the '60s
the U.S. Embassy in Moscow was reportedly found to be permeated by abnormal levels of microwave radiation, presumably
beamed there to confuse the diplomats and make them more tractable in negotiations. Subsequent experiments on monkeys
in the U.S. by the Advanced Research Projects Agency yielded no definite conclusions on the matter. The Russians may
have had this type of plan in mind during the international chess tournament, when the American, Bobby Fischer, was
accused of using "electronic devices and chemical substances" to gain an unfair advantage. Concerning the Russian
Spassky, his assistant commented that ". . . it is the first time that I observe such unusual slackening of
concentration and display of impulsiveness in his playing . . ." A thorough search disclosed no incriminating
evidence.</p>
<h2>Observers Reactions</h2>
<p>Witnesses, who have been exposed to microwave radiation from UFOs should be good candidates for displaying symptoms
of the asthenia syndrome propounded by the Russians. An artificial sense of fear, for example, might be experienced
when that emotion was inappropriate, or in intensities not warranted by the circumstances. For the most part, distant
observations of UFOs are accompanied by entirely normal behavior. Relatives and neighbors are called out of their
houses to verify the experience. Police officers and pilots contact others on their radio networks for the same
purpose. A motorist may stop to watch the show or drive to another location for an unobstructed view. These patterns
would be expected in events that are sometimes so distracting that witnesses forget to use their cameras. Responses at
closer range vary greatly, but a few patterns can be discerned. Upon spotting a disc-shaped machine descend and come
to rest on its landing gear, a witness might rush toward it for a closer examination, especially when he later affirms
that the incident was entirely beyond anything else in his experience. Such behavior, however, is rare. A few people
have moved in for a closer look, (44) even to the point of standing immediately adjacent to the UFOs and touching
them. (45) More typical, however, is a negative reaction in which the witness takes refuge in hiding, runs away from
the scene, or if in a car, drives away in reckless disregard for traffic laws. People seem to be genuinely afraid of
UFOs, but they may only be unnerved by rainbow colors cascading off their edges or by some other oddity. The imminent
landing of a large wheel with flaming openings in front sent two Brazilian workers into hiding. (46) Two youngsters
ran for cover from an object circling overhead that resembled an up-side-down plate. (47) Two British airmen remained
unperturbed while watching a dome-shaped object land behind a hangar, but took to their heels when an opening appeared
in the UFO. (48) Two young New Zealanders also held their ground in the presence of a UFO until a similar opening made
them think that it was about to land. (49) Three hunters, a breed not easily frightened, ran away from a very large,
egg-shaped object that they discovered hovering in a Venezuelan forest. (50) Of course, stronger emotional impact has
occurred. A large sphere of orange light so frightened a 16-year-old boy in Indiana that he lost control of his
bicycle. (51) A low-flying object terrified two witnesses in Georgia, who abandoned their bicycles and ran home nearly
hysterical. (52) An Italian was paralyzed with fear by a metallic object, 10 meters in diameter, hovering close to the
ground. (53) As seen in previous sections, however, this last witness may have been paralyzed for physiological,
rather than emotional, reasons.</p>
<p>It is necessary here to anticipate the subject matter of two later chapters by summarizing the reactions of witnesses
upon confronting strange occupants of UFOs. Unadulterated, bone-rattling fear seems to be found exclusively in this
context. Four Canadian children were panic stricken by an extremely tall UFO pilot who held out his hand to them
saying something that was unintelligible. (54) A dark figure the size of a man, with wings like a bat, thoroughly
spooked some British teenagers.(55) A creature emerging from a UFO in Gabon terrified a fisherman who was watching
from nearby. (56) Some small creatures attacking three Argentine students enroute to school threw them into a state of
terror. (57) Several adults and children in Peru panicked at the sight of a very small creature walking the street
leaving a luminous trail. (58) And so on. (59) It is perfectly normal for people to flee in terror from strange
beings, particularly when the people are young, as is most often the case, and when the creatures act in a threatening
manner, or actually attack.</p>
<p>While these data carry a modest load of ambiguity, they do not generally sustain the Russian concepts. The level of
fear displayed during the encounters with UFOs and their occupants seems to be within normal bounds, although rather
high at times. It must be mentioned that the Russian research pertains to repeated exposures to low-level radiation
whereas these examples do not.</p>
<p>Unfortunately, this issue cannot be put to rest so neatly, for other sources of information tend to support the
opposite conclusion, namely, that abnormal feelings of fear are induced in the witnesses by UFOs at close range. In a
series of sightings in New Hampshire, nearly all the witnesses were very frightened. The investigator of these
incidents observed that ". . . some people were in actual shock or hysteria as a result of extremely low-level
encounters with the objects." (60) Descriptive terms used by the witnesses emphatically showed their reactions to be
very intense and, under the circumstances, probably inappropriate. Despite the absence of any recognized threat to
life or limb, witnesses were variously reported to be badly shaken or scared to death. (61) Emotional experiences,
described on two occasions as "shivery feeling" and "funniest feeling through me," may have been artificial or merely
the natural accessory to fear. An interesting suggestion of a direct influence by a UFO occurred when a witness
panicked while within close range, drove away to report the sighting to the police, and upon regaining composure,
returned to the scene for a second look. While these reports are inconclusive on this point, they require that the
question of UFO-induced emotional states remain open. It is hoped that further insight may be achieved from
independent studies in the future and from the analysis of animal behavior in the following section.</p>
<h2>Animals Too</h2>
<p>As the higher animals are physiologically very similar to man, a close parallel is expected between their reactions
to UFOs and those of people. Any marked differences would be a clue that beckons for further research into the causes.
Source materials for this section are some 200 animal incidents compiled by a British quarterly. (62)</p>
<p>Millions of delicate UFO detectors are already distributed in a world-wide network. Each one is carefully maintained
in top condition and monitored round the clock for any response signifying the presence of a UFO. Man's best friend is
also his best UFO detector. Very commonly, indeed, the first indication that a UFO is present or approaching is the
excited barking of a dog or a whole neighborhood full. Suppose that some random noise sets a dog to barking; others
within earshot may take up the call, and presently the whole neighborhood echoes with their racket. This kind of
domino effect could be the basis for the area-wide disturbances of dogs near UFOs, although it doesn't seem likely. It
is not an ordinary bark that is evoked by UFOs. In the language of the reports, one pooch was howling enough to awaken
the dead, (63) one barked furiously, frothing at the mouth, (64) one carried on something terrible, (65) and one made
a dreadful noise. (66) These animals were disturbed in some unique way; they were not just relaying the neighborhood
gossip. Because dogs can sense the approach of UFOs before humans, one wonders if the detection is based upon keener
hearing, as with the early announcement of an approaching police siren, or if another mechanism is responsible. Dogs
dislike UFOS. In fact, they are terrified by them and seek to escape from them. Under circumstances clearly indicating
a landed UFO was nearby, a Canadian woman heard knocks at her door. Her dog rushed forward, then suddenly retreated,
trembling as if terrified, and retired into a comer. (67) When a man opened a door to investigate the cause of his
dog's howling outside, the animal crawled in on its belly in abject terror. The man found a UFO and its pilots
outside. (68) One of several dogs owned by a witness was so terrified that it ran into a barbed wire fence; the others
whined while cowering on the ground. (69) A dog became disturbed in a car when a UFO was first sighted. By the time
the driver was flagged down on the highway by the UFO people, the dog was lying in a tight ball under the seat,
trembling violently.</p>
<p>He was still cowering there two hours later. (70) These animals exhibited symptoms of extreme fright. In some of
these cases the animals could not see the UFOs. They had never read any science fiction nor been instructed how to act
in the presence of a UFO. In other words, their behavior must have been induced by the UFOs. One must face the
probability that their response was stimulated by microwaves, namely, a symptom of the asthenia syndrome as reported
by Russian scientists. It should be most interesting to discover in the future why this response is seen more clearly
in dogs than in people. If microwave radiation were inducing this sense of fear in the dogs, one would expect that a
higher intensity might even paralyze them. A Frenchman out hunting with his dog saw two people climbing out of a small
UFO on the ground, 40 meters away. He fled, but his dog, running toward the UFO, soon retreated, walking as though he
were partially paralyzed. (71) Perhaps the dog didn't get close enough to become completely paralyzed. An incident
which occurred during the evening of October 21, 1963, in Trancas, Argentina is especially significant:</p>
<blockquote>
<p> Three very fierce dogs inside the house, and two dozen fowls outside, were for forty minutes cowed and paralyzed
by a vivid hot beam of light, varying in color from red to violet, directed at the house from one of a number of
UFOs nearby. As the revolving beam returned and caught the dogs through the windows, they became apathetic and
silent, recovering slightly in the intervals. (72)</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Both a man and his dog were temporarily paralyzed, at the same time, when an object dived down toward them and then
climbed back into the sky. (73) It was luminous and white, a condition seen previously to coincide with the strongest
emission of microwaves. In this case, the man and the dog were about equally susceptible to the induced paralysis.
While there is no laboratory evidence of microwave paralysis in humans, experiments on small animals have produced
motor paralysis that disappeared when the exposure was terminated. (74)</p>
<p>Physiological effects among animals are by no means limited to dogs. Among the 200 cases under study, influences were
also noted upon wild birds, pigeons, ducks, geese, chickens, turkeys, sheep, cows, horses, and cats. All these
creatures are severely agitated by UFOs and they seem to fear them. A cat, hissing and spitting, leaped into the air
and then hid under a bed, (75) sheep stampeded, (76) cows in the field panicked and ran away, (77) horses reared up
and cattle did everything but turn somersaults, (78) and so on. Some of them may have been paralyzed. With a whistling
sound, a UFO landed in a meadow in Denmark. The witness became paralyzed when he approached within 50 meters and
observed that nearby cows seemed unable to move. He further noted that birds had stopped singing. (79) Any naturalist
knows that a disturbance in the woods causes birds to stop singing, and other wild creatures depend upon that change
as an alarm signal. But the notion that the birds stopped singing because they had been paralyzed was also a prominent
aspect of a sighting by three men in Brazil who were hunting crocodiles one night. A UFO on the opposite bank of a
river caused an "awful, uncanny silence" to descend upon the forest. Not even a cicada was to be heard. (80) Not only
were the usually noisy, tropical birds put out of action, but, perhaps, so were the insects.</p>
<p>A UFO was spotted one night standing on three legs on some railroad tracks 300 meters from a man's home. It rose
silently while a dome on top started to spin and the legs retracted. It was gone in 20 seconds. The next day, the
witness inspected the site with his dog. There were no marks or traces, but one sniff sent the dog dashing away,
howling. (81) Things should return to normal immediately after a UFO has flown away, but unfortunately, they don't.
Presumably the dog had no prior knowledge that he was visiting the site of a UFO landing, yet something disturbed him.
Direct radiation from the UFO must be ruled out and another cause for his delayed reaction found. The language of the
report itself provides the best clue that an odor was responsible. In a previous section concerning that subject,
various noxious gases were found to be produced by UFOs. Some of these gases, being relatively heavy, could settle to
the ground and linger for many hours.</p>
<p>A thick, gray disc coming straight down over a farm in Australia threw all the animals into a panic. For several days
the cows could not be herded into the paddock over which the UFO had hovered. (82) similar aversion was demonstrated
by some cattle in Iowa. In the middle of the night, a cigar-shaped object remained on the ground for 20 minutes amidst
a vivid, red illumination, crackling noises, and the odor of ozone. In the morning the cattle were found to have
bolted to the end of the pasture, from where they refused to budge toward the landing site for feeding. (83) Fine
strands resembling spider webs, known as angel hair, are sometimes discharged from UFOs for no apparent reason. This
substance evaporates when touched and it has not been chemically analyzed. (84) Such material, falling into a field in
Tennessee, caused the witnesses to become nauseated and to feel itching sensations. The same effects were experienced
by everyone who entered the area during the next few days. During that period, the family dog would not leave the
house nor would the cows be coaxed back to the site. Everything eventually returned to normal when rainfall apparently
washed away the offensive substance. (85) Another possible source of offense to the animals is an odd, oily substance
that is sometimes found at landing sites. (86) If some of this material could be retrieved from a future landing, and
if its chemical composition should prove to be unique, animal reactions to it could produce some interesting case
studies. A sample of such substance, having a purple color and the odor of 3-in-1 oil, was turned over to the
authorities in 1965. Its composition was never published. (87)</p>
<p>In summary, dogs, being sensitive to the approach of UFOs, constitute a universal detection network. They display
symptoms of extreme fear when the UFO is moderately close, even though they may be indoors or inside an automobile
where they cannot see it. An artificial state of fear that is induced by radiation is the suspected cause of this
reaction. Many domestic animals and perhaps some wild ones panic at the approach of a UFO. The radiation that at
greater intensity apparently causes a biochemical psychosis, also paralyzes dogs, cows, probably birds, and possibly
insects.</p>
<p>Footnotes: </p>
<p>1. The primary source for this chapter is Vallee, Jacques, Passport to Magonia, Regnery, 1969,<br> referred to merely
by case number, in this instance, Case 694.<br> 2. Case 903.<br> 3. Lore, Gordon, Strange Effect From UFOs, p.16,
National Investigations Committee on<br> Aerial Phenomena, 1969.<br> 4. Keyhoe, Donald E., The Flying Saucer
Conspiracy, Holt, 1955.<br> 5. Hall, Richard E., The UFO Evidence, National Investigations Committee on Aerial<br>
Phenomena, p.97, 1964.<br> 6. Cases 199, 274, and 358.<br> 7. Case 558.<br> 8. Case 480.<br> 9. Cases 477, 613, 142,
182, 823, 905, and 912.<br> 10. Case 823.<br> 11. Case65O.<br> 12. Cases 482, 524, 720, 906, 912.<br> 13. Lore,
Gordon, Strange Effects From UFOs, p.8, National Investigations Committee<br> on Aerial Phenomena, 1969.<br> 14. Cases
274 and 314.<br> 15. Hall, Richard E., The UFO Evidence, p. 97, National Investigations Committee on<br> Aerial
Phenomena, 1964,<br> 16. Cases 682 and 524.<br> 17. Case 300.<br> 18. Case 525.<br> 19. Case 323.<br> 20. Case
413.<br> 21. Case 337.<br> 22. Bukstein, Edward J., Medical Electronics, p.131, Ungar, 1959.<br> 23. Copson, David A.,
"Microwave Heating-In Freeze-Drying, Electronic Ovens, and Other<br> Applications," Chapter 19, Radiation Biology of
Microwaves, AVI Publishing Co., 1962.<br> 24. Encyclopedia Britannica, Vol.16, p.38, 1965.<br> 25. Fitzhugh, Richard,
"Mathematical Models of Excitation and Propagation In Nerve,"<br> Chapter 1, Schwan, Herman P., Editor, Biological
Engineer ing, McGraw-Hill, 1969.<br> 26. Copson, David A., "Microwave Heating-In Freeze Drying Electronic Ovens, and
Other<br> Applications," Chapter 19, Radiation Biology of Microwaves, AVI Publishing Co., 1962.<br> 27. Fitzhugh,
Richard, "Mathematical Models of Excitation and Propagation in Nerve,"<br> Chapter I. Schwan, Herman P., Editor,
Biological Engineering, McGraw-Hill, 1969.<br> 28. Case 402.<br> 29. LeaveIl, Lutie, C., et al., Anatomy and
Physiology, 15th Edition, p.239, MacMillan, 1966.<br> 30. Reynolds, Martin R., "Development of a Garrnent for
Protection of Personnel in<br> High-Power RF Environments," Peyton, Mary Fouse, Editor, Biological Effects of<br>
Microwave Radiation, Proceedings of the Fourth Annual Tn-Service Conference,<br> p.71, Vol.1, 16-18 August 1960, New
York University, Plenum Press, 1961.<br> 31. Payne, James N., "Similarities and Differences Between Technical Aspects
of the Navy<br> HERO Program for Ordnance and the Personnel Hazard Program," Peyton, Mary Fouse,<br> Editor,
Biological Effects of Microwave Radiation, Proceedings of the Fourth<br> Annual Tn-Service Conference, p. 319, Vol. 1,
16-18 August 1960, New York<br> University, Plenum Press, 1961.<br> 32. Finch, Bernard E., "Phosphenes and the UFO
Phenomenon," Flying Saucer Review,<br> Vol.16, No.5, p.9, September/October, 1970.<br> 33. Case 662, original
source.<br> 34. Case 900.<br> 35. Milroy, William C., and Michaelson, Sol M., "Biological Effects of Microwave
Radiation,"<br> Health Physics, Vol.20, p.570, Pergamon Press, June 1971.<br> 36. Case 677.<br> 37. Neville, Roy 0.,
et al., "Microwaves," Kirk-Othmer Encyclopedia of Chemical<br> Technology, p.58S, Wiley, 1971.<br> 38. Case 000.<br>
39. Case 893.<br> 40. Milroy, William C., and Michaelson, Sol M., "Biological Effects of Microwave Radiation,"<br>
Health Physics, Vol, 20, p.573, Pergamon Press, June 1971.<br> 41. Michaelson, "Sol M., and Dodge, Christopher H.,
Soviet Views on the Biological Effects<br> of Microwaves-An Analysis," Health Physics, Vol. 21, p.108, Pergamon Press,
July 1971.<br> 42. Gordon, Z. V., Biological Effects of Microwaves in Occupational Hygiene, Translated<br> From
Russian, National Aeronautics and Space Ad ministration, Israel Program for Scientific<br> Translations, 1970,
available from Clearinghouse for Federal and Technical Information,<br> Springfield, Va. 22151.<br> 43. Wade,
Nicholas, "Fischer-Spassky Charges: What Did The Russians Have In Mind?"<br> Science, Vol.177, p.778, 1 September
1972.<br> 44. Cases 484, 485, 540, 835, and 908.<br> 45. Cases 748 and 895.<br> 46. Case 697.<br> 47. Case 755.<br>
48. Case 590.<br> 49. Case 629.<br> 50. Case 787.<br> 51. Case 525<br> 52. Case 616.<br> 53. Case 529.<br> 54. Case
581.<br> 55. Case 588.<br> 56. Case 592.<br> 57. Case 706.<br> 58. Case 778.<br> 59. Cases 551, 678, 754, 855, 871,
873, 877, 910, and 913.<br> 60. Fuller, John G., incident At Exeter, p.143, Putnam, 1966.<br> 61. This impression is
inescapable in view of quotations from Fuller, John G., Incident At<br> Exeter, pages63,65,71,72,73,81,
133,143,175,176,177, and 181, Putnam, 1966.<br> 62. A "New FSR Catalogue, The Effects of UFOs Upon Animals, Birds, and
Smaller<br> Creatures," Flying Saucer Review, beginning in Vol.16, No.1, January/February 1970.<br> Subsequent
references in this section are identified as FSR Case NK,<br> 63. FSR Case 34.<br> 64. FSR Case 62.<br> 65. FSR Case
118.<br> 66. FSR Case 120.<br> 67. FSR Case 30.<br> 68. FSR Case 34.<br> 69. FSR Case7l.<br> 70. FSR Case 72.<br> 71.
FSR Case44.<br> 72. FSR Case 78.<br> 73. FSR Case 37.<br> 74. Milroy, William C., and Michaelson, Sol M., "Biological
Effects of Microwave Radiation,<br> "Health Physics, pp.567-575, Vol.20, June 1971.<br> 75. FSR Case 28.<br> 76. FSR
Case 31.<br> 77. FSR Case 42.<br> 78. FSR Case 75.<br> 79. FSR Case 23.<br> 80. FSR Case 67.<br> 81. FSR Case 69,
original source.<br> 82. FSR Case 75.<br> 83. FSR Case 109.<br> 84. For a compilation of 43 cases involving angel hair
see Hall, Richard H., Editor, The<br> UFO Evidence, p.100, National Investigations Committee on Aerial Phenomena,
1964.<br> Regrettably the author can offer no suggestions as to the purpose, composition, or<br> significance of angel
hair.<br> 85. FSR Case 116.<br> 86. Vallee, Jacques, Passport To Magonia, Cases 187, 222, 639, and 850, Regnery, 1969.<br>
87. Fuller, John G., Incident at Exeter, p.35, Putnam, 1966.</p>
<!--#include virtual="/footer.html" -->