Single
has 123 methods (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
public class Single<T> {
final OnSubscribe<T> onSubscribe;
/**
File Single.java
has 642 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
/**
* Copyright 2015 Netflix, Inc.
*
* Licensed under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the "License"); you may not use this file except in
* compliance with the License. You may obtain a copy of the License at
Method subscribeOn
has 35 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
public final Single<T> subscribeOn(final Scheduler scheduler) {
if (this instanceof ScalarSynchronousSingle) {
return ((ScalarSynchronousSingle<T>)this).scalarScheduleOn(scheduler);
}
return create(new OnSubscribe<T>() {
Method unsubscribeOn
has 32 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
@Experimental
public final Single<T> unsubscribeOn(final Scheduler scheduler) {
return create(new OnSubscribe<T>() {
@Override
public void call(final SingleSubscriber<? super T> t) {
Method zip
has 10 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
public static <T1, T2, T3, T4, T5, T6, T7, T8, T9, R> Single<R> zip(Single<? extends T1> s1, Single<? extends T2> s2, Single<? extends T3> s3, Single<? extends T4> s4, Single<? extends T5> s5, Single<? extends T6> s6, Single<? extends T7> s7, Single<? extends T8> s8,
Single<? extends T9> s9, final Func9<? super T1, ? super T2, ? super T3, ? super T4, ? super T5, ? super T6, ? super T7, ? super T8, ? super T9, ? extends R> zipFunction) {
Method merge
has 9 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
public static <T> Observable<T> merge(Single<? extends T> t1, Single<? extends T> t2, Single<? extends T> t3, Single<? extends T> t4, Single<? extends T> t5, Single<? extends T> t6, Single<? extends T> t7, Single<? extends T> t8, Single<? extends T> t9) {
Method concat
has 9 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
public static <T> Observable<T> concat(Single<? extends T> t1, Single<? extends T> t2, Single<? extends T> t3, Single<? extends T> t4, Single<? extends T> t5, Single<? extends T> t6, Single<? extends T> t7, Single<? extends T> t8, Single<? extends T> t9) {
Method zip
has 9 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
public static <T1, T2, T3, T4, T5, T6, T7, T8, R> Single<R> zip(Single<? extends T1> s1, Single<? extends T2> s2, Single<? extends T3> s3, Single<? extends T4> s4, Single<? extends T5> s5, Single<? extends T6> s6, Single<? extends T7> s7, Single<? extends T8> s8,
final Func8<? super T1, ? super T2, ? super T3, ? super T4, ? super T5, ? super T6, ? super T7, ? super T8, ? extends R> zipFunction) {
Method iterableToArray
has a Cognitive Complexity of 10 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
@SuppressWarnings("unchecked")
static <T> Single<? extends T>[] iterableToArray(final Iterable<? extends Single<? extends T>> singlesIterable) {
Single<? extends T>[] singlesArray;
int count;
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method iterableToArray
has 26 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
@SuppressWarnings("unchecked")
static <T> Single<? extends T>[] iterableToArray(final Iterable<? extends Single<? extends T>> singlesIterable) {
Single<? extends T>[] singlesArray;
int count;
Method merge
has 8 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
public static <T> Observable<T> merge(Single<? extends T> t1, Single<? extends T> t2, Single<? extends T> t3, Single<? extends T> t4, Single<? extends T> t5, Single<? extends T> t6, Single<? extends T> t7, Single<? extends T> t8) {
Method zip
has 8 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
public static <T1, T2, T3, T4, T5, T6, T7, R> Single<R> zip(Single<? extends T1> s1, Single<? extends T2> s2, Single<? extends T3> s3, Single<? extends T4> s4, Single<? extends T5> s5, Single<? extends T6> s6, Single<? extends T7> s7,
final Func7<? super T1, ? super T2, ? super T3, ? super T4, ? super T5, ? super T6, ? super T7, ? extends R> zipFunction) {
Method concat
has 8 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
public static <T> Observable<T> concat(Single<? extends T> t1, Single<? extends T> t2, Single<? extends T> t3, Single<? extends T> t4, Single<? extends T> t5, Single<? extends T> t6, Single<? extends T> t7, Single<? extends T> t8) {
Method zip
has 7 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
public static <T1, T2, T3, T4, T5, T6, R> Single<R> zip(Single<? extends T1> s1, Single<? extends T2> s2, Single<? extends T3> s3, Single<? extends T4> s4, Single<? extends T5> s5, Single<? extends T6> s6,
final Func6<? super T1, ? super T2, ? super T3, ? super T4, ? super T5, ? super T6, ? extends R> zipFunction) {
Method merge
has 7 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
public static <T> Observable<T> merge(Single<? extends T> t1, Single<? extends T> t2, Single<? extends T> t3, Single<? extends T> t4, Single<? extends T> t5, Single<? extends T> t6, Single<? extends T> t7) {
Method concat
has 7 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
public static <T> Observable<T> concat(Single<? extends T> t1, Single<? extends T> t2, Single<? extends T> t3, Single<? extends T> t4, Single<? extends T> t5, Single<? extends T> t6, Single<? extends T> t7) {
Method concat
has 6 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
public static <T> Observable<T> concat(Single<? extends T> t1, Single<? extends T> t2, Single<? extends T> t3, Single<? extends T> t4, Single<? extends T> t5, Single<? extends T> t6) {
Method zip
has 6 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
public static <T1, T2, T3, T4, T5, R> Single<R> zip(Single<? extends T1> s1, Single<? extends T2> s2, Single<? extends T3> s3, Single<? extends T4> s4, Single<? extends T5> s5, final Func5<? super T1, ? super T2, ? super T3, ? super T4, ? super T5, ? extends R> zipFunction) {
Method merge
has 6 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
public static <T> Observable<T> merge(Single<? extends T> t1, Single<? extends T> t2, Single<? extends T> t3, Single<? extends T> t4, Single<? extends T> t5, Single<? extends T> t6) {
Method merge
has 5 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
public static <T> Observable<T> merge(Single<? extends T> t1, Single<? extends T> t2, Single<? extends T> t3, Single<? extends T> t4, Single<? extends T> t5) {
Method zip
has 5 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
public static <T1, T2, T3, T4, R> Single<R> zip(Single<? extends T1> s1, Single<? extends T2> s2, Single<? extends T3> s3, Single<? extends T4> s4, final Func4<? super T1, ? super T2, ? super T3, ? super T4, ? extends R> zipFunction) {
Method concat
has 5 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
public static <T> Observable<T> concat(Single<? extends T> t1, Single<? extends T> t2, Single<? extends T> t3, Single<? extends T> t4, Single<? extends T> t5) {
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
} catch (Throwable ex) {
Exceptions.throwIfFatal(ex);
// if an unhandled error occurs executing the onSubscribe we will propagate it
try {
te.onError(RxJavaHooks.onSingleError(ex));
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 80.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
} catch (Throwable e) {
// special handling for certain Throwable/Error/Exception types
Exceptions.throwIfFatal(e);
// if an unhandled error occurs executing the onSubscribe we will propagate it
try {
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 80.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
return zipFunction.call((T1) args[0], (T2) args[1], (T3) args[2], (T4) args[3], (T5) args[4], (T6) args[5], (T7) args[6], (T8) args[7], (T9) args[8]);
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 78.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
return zipFunction.call((T1) args[0], (T2) args[1], (T3) args[2], (T4) args[3], (T5) args[4], (T6) args[5], (T7) args[6], (T8) args[7]);
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 70.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
return zipFunction.call((T1) args[0], (T2) args[1], (T3) args[2], (T4) args[3], (T5) args[4], (T6) args[5], (T7) args[6]);
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 62.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
if (count == tempArray.length) {
Single<? extends T>[] sb = new Single[count + (count >> 2)];
System.arraycopy(tempArray, 0, sb, 0, count);
tempArray = sb;
}
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 58.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
public static <T> Observable<T> merge(Single<? extends T> t1, Single<? extends T> t2, Single<? extends T> t3, Single<? extends T> t4, Single<? extends T> t5, Single<? extends T> t6, Single<? extends T> t7, Single<? extends T> t8, Single<? extends T> t9) {
return Observable.merge(asObservable(t1), asObservable(t2), asObservable(t3), asObservable(t4), asObservable(t5), asObservable(t6), asObservable(t7), asObservable(t8), asObservable(t9));
}
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 54.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
@Override
public void call(SingleSubscriber<? super T> singleSubscriber) {
Single<? extends T> single;
try {
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 54.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
t.add(Subscriptions.create(new Action0() {
@Override
public void call() {
final Scheduler.Worker w = scheduler.createWorker();
w.schedule(new Action0() {
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 54.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
return zipFunction.call((T1) args[0], (T2) args[1], (T3) args[2], (T4) args[3], (T5) args[4], (T6) args[5]);
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 54.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
public static <T> Observable<T> concat(Single<? extends T> t1, Single<? extends T> t2, Single<? extends T> t3, Single<? extends T> t4, Single<? extends T> t5, Single<? extends T> t6, Single<? extends T> t7, Single<? extends T> t8, Single<? extends T> t9) {
return Observable.concat(asObservable(t1), asObservable(t2), asObservable(t3), asObservable(t4), asObservable(t5), asObservable(t6), asObservable(t7), asObservable(t8), asObservable(t9));
}
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 54.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
public static <T> Observable<T> merge(Single<? extends T> t1, Single<? extends T> t2, Single<? extends T> t3, Single<? extends T> t4, Single<? extends T> t5, Single<? extends T> t6, Single<? extends T> t7, Single<? extends T> t8) {
return Observable.merge(asObservable(t1), asObservable(t2), asObservable(t3), asObservable(t4), asObservable(t5), asObservable(t6), asObservable(t7), asObservable(t8));
}
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 49.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
@Override
public void call(final SingleSubscriber<? super T> child) {
SingleSubscriber<Single<? extends T>> parent = new SingleSubscriber<Single<? extends T>>() {
@Override
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 49.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
public static <T> Observable<T> concat(Single<? extends T> t1, Single<? extends T> t2, Single<? extends T> t3, Single<? extends T> t4, Single<? extends T> t5, Single<? extends T> t6, Single<? extends T> t7, Single<? extends T> t8) {
return Observable.concat(asObservable(t1), asObservable(t2), asObservable(t3), asObservable(t4), asObservable(t5), asObservable(t6), asObservable(t7), asObservable(t8));
}
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 49.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
return zipFunction.call((T1) args[0], (T2) args[1], (T3) args[2], (T4) args[3], (T5) args[4]);
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 46.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
public static <T> Observable<T> concat(Single<? extends T> t1, Single<? extends T> t2, Single<? extends T> t3, Single<? extends T> t4, Single<? extends T> t5, Single<? extends T> t6, Single<? extends T> t7) {
return Observable.concat(asObservable(t1), asObservable(t2), asObservable(t3), asObservable(t4), asObservable(t5), asObservable(t6), asObservable(t7));
}
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 44.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
public static <T> Observable<T> merge(Single<? extends T> t1, Single<? extends T> t2, Single<? extends T> t3, Single<? extends T> t4, Single<? extends T> t5, Single<? extends T> t6, Single<? extends T> t7) {
return Observable.merge(asObservable(t1), asObservable(t2), asObservable(t3), asObservable(t4), asObservable(t5), asObservable(t6), asObservable(t7));
}
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 44.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76