File multiple.rb
has 558 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
require 'monitor'
require 'rx/concurrency/async_lock'
require 'rx/subscriptions/subscription'
require 'rx/subscriptions/composite_subscription'
require 'rx/subscriptions/ref_count_subscription'
Method combine_latest
has a Cognitive Complexity of 36 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def combine_latest(other, &result_selector)
AnonymousObservable.new do |observer|
has_left = false
has_right = false
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method rescue_error
has a Cognitive Complexity of 32 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def rescue_error(*args)
AnonymousObservable.new do |observer|
gate = AsyncLock.new
disposed = false
e = args.length == 1 && args[0].is_a?(Enumerator) ? args[0] : args.to_enum
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method concat
has a Cognitive Complexity of 26 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def concat(*args)
AnonymousObservable.new do |observer|
disposed = false
e = args.length == 1 && args[0].is_a?(Enumerator) ? args[0] : args.to_enum
subscription = SerialSubscription.new
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method on_error_resume_next
has a Cognitive Complexity of 26 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def on_error_resume_next(*args)
AnonymousObservable.new do |observer|
gate = AsyncLock.new
disposed = false
e = args.length == 1 && args[0].is_a?(Enumerator) ? args[0] : args.to_enum
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method merge_concurrent
has a Cognitive Complexity of 25 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def merge_concurrent(max_concurrent = 1)
AnonymousObservable.new do |observer|
gate = Monitor.new
q = []
stopped = false
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method latest
has a Cognitive Complexity of 20 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def latest
AnonymousObservable.new do |observer|
gate = Monitor.new
inner_subscription = SerialSubscription.new
stopped = false
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method combine_latest
has 58 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def combine_latest(other, &result_selector)
AnonymousObservable.new do |observer|
has_left = false
has_right = false
Method rescue_error
has 49 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def rescue_error(*args)
AnonymousObservable.new do |observer|
gate = AsyncLock.new
disposed = false
e = args.length == 1 && args[0].is_a?(Enumerator) ? args[0] : args.to_enum
Method combine_latest
has a Cognitive Complexity of 15 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def combine_latest(*args, &result_selector)
AnonymousObservable.new do |observer|
result_selector ||= lambda {|*inner_args| inner_args }
n = args.length
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method merge_concurrent
has 47 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def merge_concurrent(max_concurrent = 1)
AnonymousObservable.new do |observer|
gate = Monitor.new
q = []
stopped = false
Method combine_latest
has 43 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def combine_latest(*args, &result_selector)
AnonymousObservable.new do |observer|
result_selector ||= lambda {|*inner_args| inner_args }
n = args.length
Method concat
has 41 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def concat(*args)
AnonymousObservable.new do |observer|
disposed = false
e = args.length == 1 && args[0].is_a?(Enumerator) ? args[0] : args.to_enum
subscription = SerialSubscription.new
Method on_error_resume_next
has 41 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def on_error_resume_next(*args)
AnonymousObservable.new do |observer|
gate = AsyncLock.new
disposed = false
e = args.length == 1 && args[0].is_a?(Enumerator) ? args[0] : args.to_enum
Method amb
has 39 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def amb(second)
AnonymousObservable.new do |observer|
left_subscription = SingleAssignmentSubscription.new
right_subscription = SingleAssignmentSubscription.new
choice = :neither
Method latest
has 36 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def latest
AnonymousObservable.new do |observer|
gate = Monitor.new
inner_subscription = SerialSubscription.new
stopped = false
Method amb
has a Cognitive Complexity of 12 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def amb(second)
AnonymousObservable.new do |observer|
left_subscription = SingleAssignmentSubscription.new
right_subscription = SingleAssignmentSubscription.new
choice = :neither
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method zip
has 34 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def zip(*args, &result_selector)
AnonymousObservable.new do |observer|
result_selector ||= lambda {|*inner_args| inner_args }
n = args.length
Method merge_all
has a Cognitive Complexity of 11 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def merge_all
AnonymousObservable.new do |observer|
gate = Monitor.new
stopped = false
m = SingleAssignmentSubscription.new
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method skip_until
has a Cognitive Complexity of 10 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def skip_until(other)
raise ArgumentError.new 'Other cannot be nil' unless other
AnonymousObservable.new do |observer|
source_subscription = SingleAssignmentSubscription.new
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method merge_all
has 27 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def merge_all
AnonymousObservable.new do |observer|
gate = Monitor.new
stopped = false
m = SingleAssignmentSubscription.new
Method rescue_error
has a Cognitive Complexity of 9 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def rescue_error(other = nil, &action)
return Observable.rescue_error(other) if other && !block_given?
raise ArgumentError.new 'Invalid arguments' if other.nil? && !block_given?
AnonymousObservable.new do |observer|
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method zip
has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def zip(*args, &result_selector)
AnonymousObservable.new do |observer|
result_selector ||= lambda {|*inner_args| inner_args }
n = args.length
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
right_obs = Observer.configure do |o|
o.on_next do |r|
has_right = true
right = r
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 57.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
left_obs = Observer.configure do |o|
o.on_next do |l|
has_left = true
left = l
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 57.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
left_obs = Observer.configure do |o|
o.on_next {|x| handle_left.call { observer.on_next x } }
o.on_error {|err| handle_left.call { observer.on_error err } }
o.on_completed { handle_left.call { observer.on_completed } }
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 34.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
right_obs = Observer.configure do |o|
o.on_next {|x| handle_right.call { observer.on_next x } }
o.on_error {|err| handle_right.call { observer.on_error err } }
o.on_completed { handle_right.call { observer.on_completed } }
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 34.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76