Method revisions_in_chunks
has a Cognitive Complexity of 53 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def revisions_in_chunks(path, identifier_from, identifier_to, options = {}, &block)
revision_regexp = %r{
(?<h>[0-9a-f]{40});\s
(?<ai>.*);\s
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method entries
has a Cognitive Complexity of 48 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def entries(path, identifier = nil, options = {})
path ||= ''
p = scm_iconv(path_encoding, 'UTF-8', path)
entries = Entries.new
cmd_args = %w{ls-tree -l}
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
File undev_git_adapter.rb
has 417 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
require_dependency 'redmine/scm/adapters/git_adapter'
require_dependency 'redmine/scm/adapters/undev_git_revision'
module Redmine::Scm::Adapters
class UndevGitAdapter < AbstractAdapter
Class UndevGitAdapter
has 29 methods (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
class UndevGitAdapter < AbstractAdapter
include RedmineUndevGit::Includes::GitShell
# Git executable name
Method revisions_in_chunks
has 71 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def revisions_in_chunks(path, identifier_from, identifier_to, options = {}, &block)
revision_regexp = %r{
(?<h>[0-9a-f]{40});\s
(?<ai>.*);\s
Method revisions
has a Cognitive Complexity of 14 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def revisions(path, identifier_from, identifier_to, options = {}, &block)
if block_given?
raise 'Can' 't read chunks with reverse option' if options[:reverse]
revisions_in_chunks(path, identifier_from, identifier_to, options, &block)
else
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method chunked_git_log
has a Cognitive Complexity of 13 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def chunked_git_log(path, options, &block)
skip = 0
revisions = revisions_for_git_cmd(options)
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method revisions_for_git_cmd
has a Cognitive Complexity of 13 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def revisions_for_git_cmd(options = {})
revisions = []
identifier_from, identifier_to = options[:identifier_from], options[:identifier_to]
if identifier_from || identifier_to
revisions << ''
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method entries
has 33 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def entries(path, identifier = nil, options = {})
path ||= ''
p = scm_iconv(path_encoding, 'UTF-8', path)
entries = Entries.new
cmd_args = %w{ls-tree -l}
Method chunked_git_log
has 32 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def chunked_git_log(path, options, &block)
skip = 0
revisions = revisions_for_git_cmd(options)
Method lastrev
has a Cognitive Complexity of 10 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def lastrev(path, rev)
return nil if path.nil?
cmd_args = %w{log --no-color --encoding=UTF-8 --date=iso --pretty=fuller --no-merges -n 1}
cmd_args << rev if rev
cmd_args << '--' << path unless path.empty?
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method annotate
has a Cognitive Complexity of 10 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def annotate(path, identifier = nil)
identifier = 'HEAD' if identifier.blank?
cmd_args = %w{blame --encoding=UTF-8}
cmd_args << '-p' << identifier << '--' << scm_iconv(path_encoding, 'UTF-8', path)
blame = Annotate.new
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method annotate
has 27 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def annotate(path, identifier = nil)
identifier = 'HEAD' if identifier.blank?
cmd_args = %w{blame --encoding=UTF-8}
cmd_args << '-p' << identifier << '--' << scm_iconv(path_encoding, 'UTF-8', path)
blame = Annotate.new
Method diff
has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def diff(path, identifier_from, identifier_to = nil)
path ||= ''
cmd_args = []
if identifier_to
cmd_args << 'diff' << '--no-color' << identifier_to << identifier_from
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method initialize
has 5 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def initialize(url, root_url, login=nil, password=nil, path_encoding=nil)
Method revisions
has 5 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def revisions(path, identifier_from, identifier_to, options = {}, &block)
Method revisions_in_chunks
has 5 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def revisions_in_chunks(path, identifier_from, identifier_to, options = {}, &block)
Method cloned?
has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def cloned?
return false unless Dir.exist?(root_url)
args = ['--git-dir', root_url, 'rev-parse']
args = args.map { |arg| shell_quote(arg.to_s) }.join(' ')
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method entry
has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def entry(path = nil, identifier = nil)
parts = path.to_s.split(%r{[\/\\]}).select { |n| !n.blank? }
search_path = parts[0..-2].join('/')
search_name = parts[-1]
if search_path.blank? && search_name.blank?
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"