Showing 44 of 44 total issues
File metadata.rb
has 402 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
module Ridley::Chef
class Cookbook
# Borrowed and modified from: {https://raw.github.com/opscode/chef/11.4.0/lib/chef/cookbook/metadata.rb}
#
# Copyright:: Copyright 2008-2010 Opscode, Inc.
Class Metadata
has 40 methods (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
class Metadata
class << self
def from_hash(hash)
new.from_hash(hash)
end
Method from_hash
has a Cognitive Complexity of 23 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def from_hash(o)
@name = o[NAME] if o.has_key?(NAME)
@description = o[DESCRIPTION] if o.has_key?(DESCRIPTION)
@long_description = o[LONG_DESCRIPTION] if o.has_key?(LONG_DESCRIPTION)
@maintainer = o[MAINTAINER] if o.has_key?(MAINTAINER)
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Class Cookbook
has 22 methods (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
class Cookbook
require_relative 'cookbook/metadata'
require_relative 'cookbook/syntax_check'
class << self
Method validate
has a Cognitive Complexity of 15 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def validate(opts, map)
#--
# validate works by taking the keys in the validation map, assuming it's a hash, and
# looking for _pv_:symbol as methods. Assuming it find them, it calls the right
# one.
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method build_query
has a Cognitive Complexity of 12 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def build_query(query_string, options = {})
{}.tap do |query_opts|
query_opts[:q] = query_string unless query_string.nil?
query_opts[:sort] = options[:sort] unless options[:sort].nil?
query_opts[:rows] = options[:rows] unless options[:rows].nil?
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method stream
has 33 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def stream(target, destination)
FileUtils.mkdir_p(File.dirname(destination))
target = Addressable::URI.parse(target)
headers = Middleware::ChefAuth.authentication_headers(
Method initialize
has 32 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def initialize(cookbook = nil, maintainer = 'YOUR_COMPANY_NAME', maintainer_email = 'YOUR_EMAIL', license = 'none')
@cookbook = cookbook
@name = cookbook ? cookbook.name : ""
@long_description = ""
self.maintainer(maintainer)
Method upload
has 32 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def upload(sandbox, chk_id, file)
checksum = sandbox.checksum(chk_id)
unless checksum[:needs_upload]
return nil
Method _pv_regex
has a Cognitive Complexity of 11 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def _pv_regex(opts, key, regex)
value = _pv_opts_lookup(opts, key)
if value != nil
passes = false
[ regex ].flatten.each do |r|
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method initialize
has 31 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def initialize(server_url, client_name, client_key, options = {})
options = options.reverse_merge(retries: 5, retry_interval: 0.5)
@client_name = client_name
@client_key = client_key
@retries = options.delete(:retries)
Method upload
has 29 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def upload(path, options = {})
options = options.reverse_merge(validate: true, force: false, freeze: false)
cookbook = Ridley::Chef::Cookbook.from_path(path)
unless (existing = find(cookbook.cookbook_name, cookbook.version)).nil?
Method validate_choice_default_rule
has a Cognitive Complexity of 10 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def validate_choice_default_rule(options)
return if !options[:choice].is_a?(Array) || options[:choice].empty?
if options[:default].is_a?(String) && options[:default] != ""
raise ArgumentError, "Default must be one of your choice values!" if options[:choice].index(options[:default]) == nil
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method initialize
has a Cognitive Complexity of 10 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def initialize(options = {})
@options = options.reverse_merge(
pool_size: 4
).deep_symbolize_keys
self.class.validate_options(@options)
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method stream
has a Cognitive Complexity of 10 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def stream(target, destination)
FileUtils.mkdir_p(File.dirname(destination))
target = Addressable::URI.parse(target)
headers = Middleware::ChefAuth.authentication_headers(
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
def find(data_bag, object)
chef_id = object.respond_to?(:chef_id) ? object.chef_id : object
new(data_bag).from_hash(request(:get, "#{DataBagResource.resource_path}/#{data_bag.name}/#{chef_id}"))
rescue AbortError => ex
return nil if ex.cause.is_a?(Errors::HTTPNotFound)
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 44.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
def delete(data_bag, object)
chef_id = object.respond_to?(:chef_id) ? object.chef_id : object
new(data_bag).from_hash(request(:delete, "#{DataBagResource.resource_path}/#{data_bag.name}/#{chef_id}"))
rescue AbortError => ex
return nil if ex.cause.is_a?(Errors::HTTPNotFound)
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 44.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Method upload
has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def upload(sandbox, chk_id, file)
checksum = sandbox.checksum(chk_id)
unless checksum[:needs_upload]
return nil
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method load_root
has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def load_root
[].tap do |files|
Dir.glob(path.join('*'), File::FNM_DOTMATCH).each do |file|
next if File.directory?(file)
next if ignored?(file)
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method _pv_equal_to
has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def _pv_equal_to(opts, key, to_be)
value = _pv_opts_lookup(opts, key)
unless value.nil?
passes = false
Array(to_be).each do |tb|
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"