Function processQueryOptionsOnResult
has a Cognitive Complexity of 25 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
const processQueryOptionsOnResult = <T extends { _id?: string } & Record<string, any>, F extends keyof T>(
result: T[],
options: {
fields?: {
[key in F]?: 1 | 0;
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function processQueryOptionsOnResult
has 79 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
const processQueryOptionsOnResult = <T extends { _id?: string } & Record<string, any>, F extends keyof T>(
result: T[],
options: {
fields?: {
[key in F]?: 1 | 0;
File commands.ts
has 275 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
import { Messages } from '@rocket.chat/models';
import { Random } from '@rocket.chat/random';
import { Meteor } from 'meteor/meteor';
import objectPath from 'object-path';
Function post
has a Cognitive Complexity of 16 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
async post() {
const body = this.bodyParams;
if (typeof body.command !== 'string') {
return API.v1.failure('You must provide a command to run the preview item on.');
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function post
has 51 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
async post() {
const body = this.bodyParams;
if (typeof body.command !== 'string') {
return API.v1.failure('You must provide a command to run the preview item on.');
Function post
has a Cognitive Complexity of 13 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
async post() {
const body = this.bodyParams;
if (typeof body.command !== 'string') {
return API.v1.failure('You must provide a command to run.');
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function post
has 36 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
async post() {
const body = this.bodyParams;
if (typeof body.command !== 'string') {
return API.v1.failure('You must provide a command to run.');
Avoid deeply nested control flow statements. Open
if (valueA > valueB) {
r = direction;
break;
}
Avoid deeply nested control flow statements. Open
if (field.indexOf('.') > -1) {
valueA = objectPath.get(a, field);
valueB = objectPath.get(b, field);
} else {
valueA = a[field];
Avoid deeply nested control flow statements. Open
if (valueA < valueB) {
r = -direction;
break;
}
Avoid too many return
statements within this function. Open
return API.v1.failure('The preview item being executed is in the wrong format.');
Avoid too many return
statements within this function. Open
return API.v1.unauthorized();
Avoid too many return
statements within this function. Open
return API.v1.failure('Invalid thread.');
Avoid too many return
statements within this function. Open
return API.v1.failure('The tmid parameter when provided must be a string.');
Avoid too many return
statements within this function. Open
return API.v1.success();
Avoid too many return
statements within this function. Open
return API.v1.success({ preview });
Avoid too many return
statements within this function. Open
return API.v1.failure('The triggerId parameter when provided must be a string.');
Avoid too many return
statements within this function. Open
return API.v1.failure('The command provided does not exist (or is disabled).');
Avoid too many return
statements within this function. Open
return API.v1.unauthorized();
Avoid too many return
statements within this function. Open
return API.v1.success({ result });
Avoid too many return
statements within this function. Open
return API.v1.failure('The command provided does not exist (or is disabled).');
Avoid too many return
statements within this function. Open
return API.v1.unauthorized();
Avoid too many return
statements within this function. Open
return API.v1.failure('Invalid thread.');
Function get
has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
async get() {
const query = this.queryParams;
const user = await getLoggedInUser(this.request);
if (typeof query.command !== 'string') {
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
if (typeof body.tmid === 'string') {
const thread = await Messages.findOneById(body.tmid);
if (!thread || thread.rid !== body.roomId) {
return API.v1.failure('Invalid thread.');
}
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 65.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
if (body.tmid) {
const thread = await Messages.findOneById(body.tmid);
if (!thread || thread.rid !== body.roomId) {
return API.v1.failure('Invalid thread.');
}
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 65.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76