File Connection.ts
has 683 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
import type {
ILDAPConnectionOptions,
LDAPEncryptionType,
LDAPSearchScope,
ILDAPEntry,
LDAPConnection
has 32 functions (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
export class LDAPConnection {
public ldapjs: any;
public connected: boolean;
Function doPagedSearch
has 77 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
private async doPagedSearch<T = ldapjs.SearchEntry>(
baseDN: string,
searchOptions: ldapjs.SearchOptions,
pageSize: number,
callback: ILDAPPageCallback,
Function initializeConnection
has 46 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
private initializeConnection(callback: ILDAPCallback): void {
connLogger.info('Init Setup');
this._receivedResponse = false;
this._connectionTimedOut = false;
this._connectionCallback = callback;
Function searchAllUsers
has 40 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
public async searchAllUsers<T = ldapjs.SearchEntry>({
dataCallback,
endCallback,
entryCallback,
}: ILDAPSearchAllCallbacks<T>): Promise<void> {
Function constructor
has 38 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
constructor() {
this.ldapjs = ldapjs;
this.connected = false;
this._receivedResponse = false;
Function doCustomSearch
has 36 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
public async doCustomSearch<T>(baseDN: string, searchOptions: ldapjs.SearchOptions, entryCallback: ILDAPEntryCallback<T>): Promise<T[]> {
await this.runBeforeSearch(searchOptions);
if (!searchOptions.scope) {
searchOptions.scope = this.options.userSearchScope || 'sub';
Function getClientOptions
has 34 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
private getClientOptions(): {
clientOptions: ldapjs.ClientOptions;
tlsOptions: Record<string, any>;
} {
const clientOptions: ldapjs.ClientOptions = {
Function searchMembersOfGroupFilter
has 30 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
public async searchMembersOfGroupFilter(): Promise<string[]> {
if (!this.options.groupFilterEnabled) {
return [];
}
Function searchById
has 30 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
public async searchById(id: string, attribute?: string): Promise<ILDAPEntry[]> {
const searchOptions: ldapjs.SearchOptions = {
scope: this.options.userSearchScope || 'sub',
attributes: this.options.attributesToQuery,
};
Function isUserAcceptedByGroupFilter
has 27 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
public async isUserAcceptedByGroupFilter(username: string, userdn: string): Promise<boolean> {
if (!this.options.groupFilterEnabled) {
return true;
}
Function doAsyncSearch
has 27 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
private async doAsyncSearch<T = ldapjs.SearchEntry>(
baseDN: string,
searchOptions: ldapjs.SearchOptions,
callback: ILDAPCallback,
entryCallback?: ILDAPEntryCallback<T>,
Function searchById
has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
public async searchById(id: string, attribute?: string): Promise<ILDAPEntry[]> {
const searchOptions: ldapjs.SearchOptions = {
scope: this.options.userSearchScope || 'sub',
attributes: this.options.attributesToQuery,
};
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Avoid too many return
statements within this function. Open
return ensureArray<string>(members);
Function constructor
has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
constructor() {
this.ldapjs = ldapjs;
this.connected = false;
this._receivedResponse = false;
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function handleConnectionResponse
has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
private handleConnectionResponse(error: any, response?: any): void {
if (!this._receivedResponse) {
this._receivedResponse = true;
this._connectionCallback(error, response);
return;
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function searchMembersOfGroupFilter
has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
public async searchMembersOfGroupFilter(): Promise<string[]> {
if (!this.options.groupFilterEnabled) {
return [];
}
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Similar blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
if (this.options.groupFilterGroupMemberAttribute) {
filter.push(`(${this.options.groupFilterGroupMemberAttribute}=${this.options.groupFilterGroupMemberFormat})`);
}
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 55.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
if (this.options.groupFilterGroupIdAttribute) {
filter.push(`(${this.options.groupFilterGroupIdAttribute}=${this.options.groupFilterGroupName})`);
}
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 55.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
if (this.options.groupFilterGroupIdAttribute) {
filter.push(`(${this.options.groupFilterGroupIdAttribute}=${this.options.groupFilterGroupName})`);
}
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 55.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
if (entries.length >= internalPageSize) {
this.processSearchPage<T>(
{
entries,
title: 'Internal Page',
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 46.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
if (entries.length) {
this.processSearchPage<T>(
{
entries,
title: 'Final Page',
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 46.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76