Showing 73 of 94 total issues
Update packaged libxml2 (2.9.12 → 2.9.13) and libxslt (1.1.34 → 1.1.35) Open
nokogiri (1.12.5)
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Advisory: CVE-2021-30560
Criticality: High
URL: https://github.com/sparklemotion/nokogiri/security/advisories/GHSA-fq42-c5rg-92c2
Solution: upgrade to >= 1.13.2
Out-of-bounds Write in zlib affects Nokogiri Open
nokogiri (1.12.5)
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Advisory: CVE-2018-25032
Criticality: High
URL: https://github.com/sparklemotion/nokogiri/security/advisories/GHSA-v6gp-9mmm-c6p5
Solution: upgrade to >= 1.13.4
Denial of Service (DoS) in Nokogiri on JRuby Open
nokogiri (1.12.5)
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Advisory: CVE-2022-24839
Criticality: High
URL: https://github.com/sparklemotion/nekohtml/security/advisories/GHSA-9849-p7jc-9rmv
Solution: upgrade to >= 1.13.4
Improper Handling of Unexpected Data Type in Nokogiri Open
nokogiri (1.12.5)
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Advisory: CVE-2022-29181
Criticality: High
URL: https://github.com/sparklemotion/nokogiri/security/advisories/GHSA-xh29-r2w5-wx8m
Solution: upgrade to >= 1.13.6
Integer Overflow or Wraparound in libxml2 affects Nokogiri Open
nokogiri (1.12.5)
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Advisory:
Criticality: High
URL: https://github.com/sparklemotion/nokogiri/security/advisories/GHSA-cgx6-hpwq-fhv5
Solution: upgrade to >= 1.13.5
Update bundled libxml2 to v2.10.3 to resolve multiple CVEs Open
nokogiri (1.12.5)
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Advisory:
URL: https://github.com/sparklemotion/nokogiri/security/advisories/GHSA-2qc6-mcvw-92cw
Solution: upgrade to >= 1.13.9
Inefficient Regular Expression Complexity in Nokogiri Open
nokogiri (1.12.5)
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Advisory: CVE-2022-24836
Criticality: High
URL: https://github.com/sparklemotion/nokogiri/security/advisories/GHSA-crjr-9rc5-ghw8
Solution: upgrade to >= 1.13.4
XML Injection in Xerces Java affects Nokogiri Open
nokogiri (1.12.5)
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Advisory: CVE-2022-23437
Criticality: Medium
URL: https://github.com/sparklemotion/nokogiri/security/advisories/GHSA-xxx9-3xcr-gjj3
Solution: upgrade to >= 1.13.4
File engine.rb
has 312 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
require 'json'
require 'net/http'
ANNOUNCE_URL = 'https://scc.suse.com/connect/subscriptions/systems'.freeze
ACTIVATE_PRODUCT_URL = 'https://scc.suse.com/connect/systems/products'.freeze
Method scc_check_subscription_expiration
has a Cognitive Complexity of 24 (exceeds 10 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def scc_check_subscription_expiration(headers, login, system_token, logger)
auth = headers['HTTP_AUTHORIZATION'] if headers.include?('HTTP_AUTHORIZATION')
uri = URI.parse(SYSTEMS_ACTIVATIONS_URL)
http = Net::HTTP.new(uri.host, uri.port)
http.use_ssl = true
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method try_copying_from_cache
has a Cognitive Complexity of 24 (exceeds 10 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def try_copying_from_cache(files, ignore_errors: false)
# We need to verify if the cached copy is still relevant
# Create a HTTP/HTTPS HEAD request if possible, return nil if not
cache_requests = files.map { |file| [file, cache_head_request(file)] }.to_h
available_in_cache = cache_requests.compact.values
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
File products_controller_spec.rb
has 271 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
require 'rails_helper'
# rubocop:disable RSpec/NestedGroups
describe Api::Connect::V3::Systems::ProductsController, type: :request do
Method in_alpha_or_beta?
has a Cognitive Complexity of 22 (exceeds 10 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def in_alpha_or_beta?
products = []
unless errored_repos_id.empty?
products = Product.joins(:repositories).where(
'repositories.id' => errored_repos_id
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method handle_exceptions
has 50 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def handle_exceptions
yield
rescue RMT::Deduplicator::HardlinkException => e
raise RMT::CLI::Error.new(
_('Could not create deduplication hardlink: %{error}.') % { error: e.message },
Method scc_check_subscription_expiration
has 47 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def scc_check_subscription_expiration(headers, login, system_token, logger)
auth = headers['HTTP_AUTHORIZATION'] if headers.include?('HTTP_AUTHORIZATION')
uri = URI.parse(SYSTEMS_ACTIVATIONS_URL)
http = Net::HTTP.new(uri.host, uri.port)
http.use_ssl = true
Method authenticate_system
has a Cognitive Complexity of 19 (exceeds 10 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def authenticate_system(skip_on_duplicated: false)
authenticate_or_request_with_http_basic('RMT API') do |login, password|
@systems = System.get_by_credentials(login, password)
if @systems.present?
# Return now if we just detected duplicates and we were told to skip on
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method clean
has 41 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def clean
base_directory = RMT::DEFAULT_MIRROR_DIR
repos_to_delete = Repository.where(mirroring_enabled: false).map do |repo|
repository_dir = File.join(base_directory, repo.local_path)
Method try_copying_from_cache
has 33 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def try_copying_from_cache(files, ignore_errors: false)
# We need to verify if the cached copy is still relevant
# Create a HTTP/HTTPS HEAD request if possible, return nil if not
cache_requests = files.map { |file| [file, cache_head_request(file)] }.to_h
available_in_cache = cache_requests.compact.values
Method get_system
has a Cognitive Complexity of 16 (exceeds 10 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def get_system(systems)
return nil if systems.blank?
byos_systems_with_token = systems.select { |system| system.proxy_byos && system.system_token }
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
context 'when SCC request fails' do
before do
stub_request(:get, scc_systems_activations_url).to_return(status: 401, body: [body_expired].to_json, headers: {})
expect(URI).to receive(:encode_www_form).with({ byos: true })
allow(File).to receive(:directory?)
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 55.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76