Showing 27 of 28 total issues
File dynamodb_table_manager.rb
has 324 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
module DynamoDbFramework
class TableManager
attr_reader :dynamodb
Method create
has a Cognitive Complexity of 19 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def create(store: DynamoDbFramework.default_store, read_capacity: 25, write_capacity: 25, indexes: [])
#make method idempotent
if exists?(store: store)
wait_until_active(store: store)
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method create_table
has 51 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def create_table(options = {})
if options[:name] == nil
raise 'A valid table name must be specified.'
end
Method query
has 46 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def query(partition_key_name, partition_key_value, range_key_name = nil, range_key_value = nil, expression = nil, expression_params = nil, index_name = nil, limit = nil, count = false)
params = {
table_name: table_name
}
Method query
has a Cognitive Complexity of 14 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def query(partition_key_name, partition_key_value, range_key_name = nil, range_key_value = nil, expression = nil, expression_params = nil, index_name = nil, limit = nil, count = false)
params = {
table_name: table_name
}
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method create
has a Cognitive Complexity of 14 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def create(store: DynamoDbFramework.default_store, read_capacity: 25, write_capacity: 25, submit: true, billing_mode: 'PROVISIONED')
unless self.instance_variable_defined?(:@table)
raise DynamoDbFramework::Index::InvalidConfigException.new('Table must be specified.')
end
table = self.instance_variable_get(:@table)
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method create_table
has a Cognitive Complexity of 13 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def create_table(options = {})
if options[:name] == nil
raise 'A valid table name must be specified.'
end
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method scan
has 36 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def scan(expression, expression_params, limit = nil, count = false)
params = {
:table_name => table_name
}
Method build
has 34 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def build
@expression_string = ''
@expression_params = {}
counter = 0
Method create
has 34 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def create(store: DynamoDbFramework.default_store, read_capacity: 25, write_capacity: 25, submit: true, billing_mode: 'PROVISIONED')
unless self.instance_variable_defined?(:@table)
raise DynamoDbFramework::Index::InvalidConfigException.new('Table must be specified.')
end
table = self.instance_variable_get(:@table)
Method create
has 34 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def create(store: DynamoDbFramework.default_store, read_capacity: 25, write_capacity: 25, indexes: [])
#make method idempotent
if exists?(store: store)
wait_until_active(store: store)
Method create
has 33 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def create(table_name, attributes, partition_key, range_key = nil, read_capacity = 20, write_capacity = 10, global_indexes = nil, billing_mode = 'PROVISIONED')
if exists?(table_name)
return
end
Method scan
has a Cognitive Complexity of 11 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def scan(expression, expression_params, limit = nil, count = false)
params = {
:table_name => table_name
}
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method clean_hash
has a Cognitive Complexity of 11 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def clean_hash(hash)
hash.each do |key, value|
if value == ''
hash[key] = nil
elsif value.is_a?(Array)
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method query
has 9 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def query(partition_key_name, partition_key_value, range_key_name = nil, range_key_value = nil, expression = nil, expression_params = nil, index_name = nil, limit = nil, count = false)
Method create
has 8 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def create(table_name, attributes, partition_key, range_key = nil, read_capacity = 20, write_capacity = 10, global_indexes = nil, billing_mode = 'PROVISIONED')
Method add_from_args
has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def add_from_args(name, type, key = nil)
type_symbol = :S
if type == 'number' || type == :N || type == :number
type_symbol = :N
elsif type == 'binary' || type == :B || type == :binary
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method create_global_index
has 6 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def create_global_index(name, partition_key, range_key = nil, read_capacity = 20, write_capacity = 10, billing_mode = 'PROVISIONED')
Method add_from_hash
has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def add_from_hash(options)
type_symbol = :S
if options[:type] == 'number' || options[:type] == :N || options[:type] == :number
type_symbol = :N
elsif options[:type] == 'binary' || options[:type] == :B || options[:type] == :binary
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
def drop(table_name)
if !exists?(table_name)
return
end
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 35.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76