Showing 10 of 12 total issues
Method handleMessage
has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
@Transactional(rollbackFor = {Exception.class})
public void handleMessage(ID id, STATE newState, Object info) throws Exception {
Lock lockObject = lockProvider.getLockObject(id);
boolean locked = false;
try {
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Remove this unused private "setInfo" method. Open
private void setInfo(Object info) {
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
private
methods that are never executed are dead code: unnecessary, inoperative code that should be removed. Cleaning out dead code
decreases the size of the maintained codebase, making it easier to understand the program and preventing bugs from being introduced.
Note that this rule does not take reflection into account, which means that issues will be raised on private
methods that are only
accessed using the reflection API.
Noncompliant Code Example
public class Foo implements Serializable { private Foo(){} //Compliant, private empty constructor intentionally used to prevent any direct instantiation of a class. public static void doSomething(){ Foo foo = new Foo(); ... } private void unusedPrivateMethod(){...} private void writeObject(ObjectOutputStream s){...} //Compliant, relates to the java serialization mechanism private void readObject(ObjectInputStream in){...} //Compliant, relates to the java serialization mechanism }
Compliant Solution
public class Foo implements Serializable { private Foo(){} //Compliant, private empty constructor intentionally used to prevent any direct instantiation of a class. public static void doSomething(){ Foo foo = new Foo(); ... } private void writeObject(ObjectOutputStream s){...} //Compliant, relates to the java serialization mechanism private void readObject(ObjectInputStream in){...} //Compliant, relates to the java serialization mechanism }
Exceptions
This rule doesn't raise any issue on annotated methods.
Define and throw a dedicated exception instead of using a generic one. Open
public void handleMessage(ID id, STATE newState, Object info) throws Exception {
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Using such generic exceptions as Error
, RuntimeException
, Throwable
, and Exception
prevents
calling methods from handling true, system-generated exceptions differently than application-generated errors.
Noncompliant Code Example
public void foo(String bar) throws Throwable { // Noncompliant throw new RuntimeException("My Message"); // Noncompliant }
Compliant Solution
public void foo(String bar) { throw new MyOwnRuntimeException("My Message"); }
Exceptions
Generic exceptions in the signatures of overriding methods are ignored, because overriding method has to follow signature of the throw declaration in the superclass. The issue will be raised on superclass declaration of the method (or won't be raised at all if superclass is not part of the analysis).
@Override public void myMethod() throws Exception {...}
Generic exceptions are also ignored in the signatures of methods that make calls to methods that throw generic exceptions.
public void myOtherMethod throws Exception { doTheThing(); // this method throws Exception }
See
- MITRE, CWE-397 - Declaration of Throws for Generic Exception
- CERT, ERR07-J. - Do not throw RuntimeException, Exception, or Throwable
Make "newState" transient or serializable. Open
private E newState;
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Fields in a Serializable
class must themselves be either Serializable
or transient
even if the class is
never explicitly serialized or deserialized. For instance, under load, most J2EE application frameworks flush objects to disk, and an allegedly
Serializable
object with non-transient, non-serializable data members could cause program crashes, and open the door to attackers. In
general a Serializable
class is expected to fulfil its contract and not have an unexpected behaviour when an instance is serialized.
This rule raises an issue on non-Serializable
fields, and on collection fields when they are not private
(because they
could be assigned non-Serializable
values externally), and when they are assigned non-Serializable
types within the
class.
Noncompliant Code Example
public class Address { //... } public class Person implements Serializable { private static final long serialVersionUID = 1905122041950251207L; private String name; private Address address; // Noncompliant; Address isn't serializable }
Compliant Solution
public class Address implements Serializable { private static final long serialVersionUID = 2405172041950251807L; } public class Person implements Serializable { private static final long serialVersionUID = 1905122041950251207L; private String name; private Address address; }
Exceptions
The alternative to making all members serializable
or transient
is to implement special methods which take on the
responsibility of properly serializing and de-serializing the object. This rule ignores classes which implement the following methods:
private void writeObject(java.io.ObjectOutputStream out) throws IOException private void readObject(java.io.ObjectInputStream in) throws IOException, ClassNotFoundException;
See
- MITRE, CWE-594 - Saving Unserializable Objects to Disk
- Oracle Java 6, Serializable
- Oracle Java 7, Serializable
Extract the assignment out of this expression. Open
if (locked = lockObject.tryLock(lockTimeout, TimeUnit.MILLISECONDS)) {
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Assignments within sub-expressions are hard to spot and therefore make the code less readable. Ideally, sub-expressions should not have side-effects.
Noncompliant Code Example
if ((str = cont.substring(pos1, pos2)).isEmpty()) { // Noncompliant //...
Compliant Solution
str = cont.substring(pos1, pos2); if (str.isEmpty()) { //...
Exceptions
Assignments in while
statement conditions, and assignments enclosed in relational expressions are ignored.
BufferedReader br = new BufferedReader(/* ... */); String line; while ((line = br.readLine()) != null) {...}
Chained assignments, including compound assignments, are ignored.
int i = j = 0; int k = (j += 1); result = (bresult = new byte[len]);
See
- MITRE, CWE-481 - Assigning instead of Comparing
- CERT, EXP45-C. - Do not perform assignments in selection statements
- CERT, EXP51-J. - Do not perform assignments in conditional expressions
Either re-interrupt this method or rethrow the "InterruptedException" that can be caught here. Open
} catch (InterruptedException e) {
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
InterruptedExceptions
should never be ignored in the code, and simply logging the exception counts in this case as "ignoring". The
throwing of the InterruptedException
clears the interrupted state of the Thread, so if the exception is not handled properly the fact
that the thread was interrupted will be lost. Instead, InterruptedExceptions
should either be rethrown - immediately or after cleaning up
the method's state - or the thread should be re-interrupted by calling Thread.interrupt()
even if this is supposed to be a
single-threaded application. Any other course of action risks delaying thread shutdown and loses the information that the thread was interrupted -
probably without finishing its task.
Similarly, the ThreadDeath
exception should also be propagated. According to its JavaDoc:
If
ThreadDeath
is caught by a method, it is important that it be rethrown so that the thread actually dies.
Noncompliant Code Example
public void run () { try { while (true) { // do stuff } }catch (InterruptedException e) { // Noncompliant; logging is not enough LOGGER.log(Level.WARN, "Interrupted!", e); } }
Compliant Solution
public void run () { try { while (true) { // do stuff } }catch (InterruptedException e) { LOGGER.log(Level.WARN, "Interrupted!", e); // Restore interrupted state... Thread.currentThread().interrupt(); } }
See
- MITRE, CWE-391 - Unchecked Error Condition
- Dealing with InterruptedException
Define and throw a dedicated exception instead of using a generic one. Open
throw new RuntimeException("something went completely wrong and we can't obtain lock on a key: " + key);
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Using such generic exceptions as Error
, RuntimeException
, Throwable
, and Exception
prevents
calling methods from handling true, system-generated exceptions differently than application-generated errors.
Noncompliant Code Example
public void foo(String bar) throws Throwable { // Noncompliant throw new RuntimeException("My Message"); // Noncompliant }
Compliant Solution
public void foo(String bar) { throw new MyOwnRuntimeException("My Message"); }
Exceptions
Generic exceptions in the signatures of overriding methods are ignored, because overriding method has to follow signature of the throw declaration in the superclass. The issue will be raised on superclass declaration of the method (or won't be raised at all if superclass is not part of the analysis).
@Override public void myMethod() throws Exception {...}
Generic exceptions are also ignored in the signatures of methods that make calls to methods that throw generic exceptions.
public void myOtherMethod throws Exception { doTheThing(); // this method throws Exception }
See
- MITRE, CWE-397 - Declaration of Throws for Generic Exception
- CERT, ERR07-J. - Do not throw RuntimeException, Exception, or Throwable
Make "info" transient or serializable. Open
private Object info;
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Fields in a Serializable
class must themselves be either Serializable
or transient
even if the class is
never explicitly serialized or deserialized. For instance, under load, most J2EE application frameworks flush objects to disk, and an allegedly
Serializable
object with non-transient, non-serializable data members could cause program crashes, and open the door to attackers. In
general a Serializable
class is expected to fulfil its contract and not have an unexpected behaviour when an instance is serialized.
This rule raises an issue on non-Serializable
fields, and on collection fields when they are not private
(because they
could be assigned non-Serializable
values externally), and when they are assigned non-Serializable
types within the
class.
Noncompliant Code Example
public class Address { //... } public class Person implements Serializable { private static final long serialVersionUID = 1905122041950251207L; private String name; private Address address; // Noncompliant; Address isn't serializable }
Compliant Solution
public class Address implements Serializable { private static final long serialVersionUID = 2405172041950251807L; } public class Person implements Serializable { private static final long serialVersionUID = 1905122041950251207L; private String name; private Address address; }
Exceptions
The alternative to making all members serializable
or transient
is to implement special methods which take on the
responsibility of properly serializing and de-serializing the object. This rule ignores classes which implement the following methods:
private void writeObject(java.io.ObjectOutputStream out) throws IOException private void readObject(java.io.ObjectInputStream in) throws IOException, ClassNotFoundException;
See
- MITRE, CWE-594 - Saving Unserializable Objects to Disk
- Oracle Java 6, Serializable
- Oracle Java 7, Serializable
Make "ids" transient or serializable. Open
private Collection<ID> ids;
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Fields in a Serializable
class must themselves be either Serializable
or transient
even if the class is
never explicitly serialized or deserialized. For instance, under load, most J2EE application frameworks flush objects to disk, and an allegedly
Serializable
object with non-transient, non-serializable data members could cause program crashes, and open the door to attackers. In
general a Serializable
class is expected to fulfil its contract and not have an unexpected behaviour when an instance is serialized.
This rule raises an issue on non-Serializable
fields, and on collection fields when they are not private
(because they
could be assigned non-Serializable
values externally), and when they are assigned non-Serializable
types within the
class.
Noncompliant Code Example
public class Address { //... } public class Person implements Serializable { private static final long serialVersionUID = 1905122041950251207L; private String name; private Address address; // Noncompliant; Address isn't serializable }
Compliant Solution
public class Address implements Serializable { private static final long serialVersionUID = 2405172041950251807L; } public class Person implements Serializable { private static final long serialVersionUID = 1905122041950251207L; private String name; private Address address; }
Exceptions
The alternative to making all members serializable
or transient
is to implement special methods which take on the
responsibility of properly serializing and de-serializing the object. This rule ignores classes which implement the following methods:
private void writeObject(java.io.ObjectOutputStream out) throws IOException private void readObject(java.io.ObjectInputStream in) throws IOException, ClassNotFoundException;
See
- MITRE, CWE-594 - Saving Unserializable Objects to Disk
- Oracle Java 6, Serializable
- Oracle Java 7, Serializable
Rename field "stateMachine" Open
private StateMachine<ENTITY, STATE, ID> stateMachine = this;
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
It's confusing to have a class member with the same name (case differences aside) as its enclosing class. This is particularly so when you consider the common practice of naming a class instance for the class itself.
Best practice dictates that any field or member with the same name as the enclosing class be renamed to be more descriptive of the particular aspect of the class it represents or holds.
Noncompliant Code Example
public class Foo { private String foo; public String getFoo() { } } Foo foo = new Foo(); foo.getFoo() // what does this return?
Compliant Solution
public class Foo { private String name; public String getName() { } } //... Foo foo = new Foo(); foo.getName()
Exceptions
When the type of the field is the containing class and that field is static, no issue is raised to allow singletons named like the type.
public class Foo { ... private static Foo foo; public Foo getInstance() { if(foo==null) { foo = new Foo(); } return foo; } ... }