Method q
has a Cognitive Complexity of 30 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def q(a, x, with_error = false)
fail(ArgumentError, 'Range Error: a and x must be non-negative') if a < 0.0 || x < 0.0
if x == 0.0
return with_error ? [1.0, 0.0] : 1.0
elsif a == 0.0
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
File incomplete_gamma.rb
has 340 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
module Distribution
module MathExtension
module IncompleteGamma
NMAX = 5000
SMALL = Float::EPSILON**3
Method q_series
has 84 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def q_series(a, x, with_error = false)
term1 = nil
sum = nil
term2 = nil
begin
Method d
has a Cognitive Complexity of 23 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def d(a, x, with_error = false)
error = nil
if a < 10.0
ln_a = Math.lgamma(a + 1.0).first
lnr = a * Math.log(x) - x - ln_a
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method unnormalized
has a Cognitive Complexity of 20 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def unnormalized(a, x, with_error = false)
fail(ArgumentError, 'x cannot be negative') if x < 0.0
if x == 0.0
result = Math.gamma(a.to_f)
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method p
has a Cognitive Complexity of 16 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def p(a, x, with_error = false)
fail(ArgumentError, 'Range Error: a must be positive, x must be non-negative') if a <= 0.0 || x < 0.0
if x == 0.0
return with_error ? [0.0, 0.0] : 0.0
elsif x < 20.0 || x < 0.5 * a
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method q_large_x
has a Cognitive Complexity of 13 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def q_large_x(a, x, with_error = false)
d = d(a, x, with_error)
d, d_err = d if with_error
sum = 1.0
term = 1.0
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method f_continued_fraction
has a Cognitive Complexity of 13 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def f_continued_fraction(a, x, with_error = false)
hn = 1.0 # convergent
cn = 1.0 / SMALL
dn = 1.0
n = 2
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method unnormalized
has 28 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def unnormalized(a, x, with_error = false)
fail(ArgumentError, 'x cannot be negative') if x < 0.0
if x == 0.0
result = Math.gamma(a.to_f)
Method d
has 26 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def d(a, x, with_error = false)
error = nil
if a < 10.0
ln_a = Math.lgamma(a + 1.0).first
lnr = a * Math.log(x) - x - ln_a
Method q
has 26 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def q(a, x, with_error = false)
fail(ArgumentError, 'Range Error: a and x must be non-negative') if a < 0.0 || x < 0.0
if x == 0.0
return with_error ? [1.0, 0.0] : 1.0
elsif a == 0.0
Method p_series
has a Cognitive Complexity of 9 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def p_series(a, x, with_error = false)
d = d(a, x, with_error)
d, d_err = d if with_error
sum = 1.0
term = 1.0
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method q_asymptotic_uniform
has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def q_asymptotic_uniform(a, x, with_error = false)
rta = Math.sqrt(a)
eps = (x - a).quo(a)
ln_term = Log.log_1plusx_minusx(eps, with_error)
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Avoid deeply nested control flow statements. Open
if x > a - Math.sqrt(a)
return q_continued_fraction(a, x, with_error)
else
p = p_series(a, x, with_error)
p, p_err = p if with_error
Method q_series
has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def q_series(a, x, with_error = false)
term1 = nil
sum = nil
term2 = nil
begin
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Avoid deeply nested control flow statements. Open
return x <= 1.0e+06 ? q_continued_fraction(a, x, with_error) : q_large_x(a, x, with_error)
Avoid too many return
statements within this method. Open
return with_error ? [result, p_err + 2.0 * Float::EPSILON * result.abs] : result
Avoid too many return
statements within this method. Open
return q_continued_fraction(a, x, with_error)
Avoid too many return
statements within this method. Open
return q_series(a, x, with_error)
Avoid too many return
statements within this method. Open
return with_error ? [result, 2.0 * (1.0 + a.abs) * Float::EPSILON * gax.abs] : result
Avoid too many return
statements within this method. Open
return q_asymptotic_uniform_complement a, x, with_error
Avoid too many return
statements within this method. Open
return x <= 1.0e+06 ? q_continued_fraction(a, x, with_error) : q_large_x(a, x, with_error)
Avoid too many return
statements within this method. Open
return series(a.to_f, x.to_f, with_error)
Avoid too many return
statements within this method. Open
return q_large_x_complement(a, x, with_error)
Avoid too many return
statements within this method. Open
return p_series(a, x, with_error)
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
c9 = -2.75573192239859e-6 *
(-2.8243487670469080 + lnx) *
(-2.3798494322701120 + lnx) *
(-1.9143674728689960 + lnx) *
(-1.3814529102920370 + lnx) *
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 37.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
c10 = -2.75573192239859e-7 *
(-2.9540329644556910 + lnx) *
(-2.5491366926991850 + lnx) *
(-2.1348279229279880 + lnx) *
(-1.6741881076349450 + lnx) *
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 37.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
p = p_series(a, x, with_error)
p, p_err = p if with_error
result = 1.0 - p
return with_error ? [result, p_err + 2.0 * Float::EPSILON * result.abs] : result
end
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 33.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
p = p_series(a, x, with_error)
p, p_err = p if with_error
result = 1.0 - p
return with_error ? [result, p_err + 2.0 * Float::EPSILON * result.abs] : result
elsif a >= 1.0e+06 && (x - a) * (x - a) < a # difficult asymptotic regime, only way to do this region
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 33.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
def q_large_x_complement(a, x, with_error = false)
q = q_large_x(a, x, with_error)
with_error ? [1.0 - q.first, q.last + 2.0 * Float::EPSILON * (1.0 - q.first).abs] : 1.0 - q
end
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 32.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
def q_continued_fraction_complement(a, x, with_error = false)
q = q_continued_fraction(a, x, with_error)
with_error ? [1.0 - q.first, q.last + 2.0 * Float::EPSILON * (1.0 - q.first).abs] : 1.0 - q
end
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 32.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
term1 = a * (c1 + a * (c2 + a * (c3 + a * (c4 + a * (c5 + a * (c6 + a * (c7 + a * (c8 + a * (c9 + a * c10)))))))))
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 27.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76