File mat5_reader.rb
has 353 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
require_relative './mat_reader.rb'
module NMatrix::IO::Matlab
# Reader (and eventual writer) for a version 5 .mat file.
Method read_packed
has a Cognitive Complexity of 19 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def read_packed(packedio, options)
flags_class, self.nonzero_max = packedio.read([Element, options]).data
self.matlab_class = MatReader::MCLASSES[flags_class % 16]
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method read_packed
has a Cognitive Complexity of 16 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def read_packed(packedio, options)
raise(ArgumentError, 'Missing mandatory option :endian.') \
unless options.has_key?(:endian)
tag = packedio.read([Tag, {:endian => options[:endian]}])
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method read_packed
has 37 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def read_packed(packedio, options)
flags_class, self.nonzero_max = packedio.read([Element, options]).data
self.matlab_class = MatReader::MCLASSES[flags_class % 16]
Method repacked_data
has a Cognitive Complexity of 11 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def repacked_data(to_dtype = nil)
real_mdtype = self.real_part.tag.data_type
# Figure out what dtype to use based on the MATLAB data-types
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method read_packed
has 29 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def read_packed(packedio, options)
raise(ArgumentError, 'Missing mandatory option :endian.') \
unless options.has_key?(:endian)
tag = packedio.read([Tag, {:endian => options[:endian]}])
Method to_nm
has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def to_nm(dtype = nil)
# Hardest part is figuring out from_dtype, from_index_dtype, and dtype.
dtype ||= guess_dtype_from_mdtype
from_dtype = MatReader::MDTYPE_TO_DTYPE[self.real_part.tag.data_type]
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"