File cyber_source.rb
has 977 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
module ActiveMerchant #:nodoc:
module Billing #:nodoc:
# Initial setup instructions can be found in
# http://apps.cybersource.com/library/documentation/dev_guides/SOAP_Toolkits/SOAP_toolkits.pdf
#
Class CyberSourceGateway
has 102 methods (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
class CyberSourceGateway < Gateway
self.test_url = 'https://ics2wstesta.ic3.com/commerce/1.x/transactionProcessor'
self.live_url = 'https://ics2wsa.ic3.com/commerce/1.x/transactionProcessor'
# Schema files can be found here: https://ics2ws.ic3.com/commerce/1.x/transactionProcessor/
Method add_address
has a Cognitive Complexity of 37 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def add_address(xml, payment_method, address, options, shipTo = false)
first_name, last_name = address_names(address[:name], payment_method)
bill_to_merchant_tax_id = options[:merchant_tax_id] unless shipTo
xml.tag! shipTo ? 'shipTo' : 'billTo' do
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method add_auth_network_tokenization
has a Cognitive Complexity of 32 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def add_auth_network_tokenization(xml, payment_method, options)
return unless network_tokenization?(payment_method)
commerce_indicator = 'internet' if subsequent_nt_apple_pay_auth(payment_method.source, options)
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method add_auth_service
has a Cognitive Complexity of 27 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def add_auth_service(xml, payment_method, options)
if network_tokenization?(payment_method)
add_auth_network_tokenization(xml, payment_method, options)
else
xml.tag! 'ccAuthService', { 'run' => 'true' } do
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method add_subscription
has a Cognitive Complexity of 22 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def add_subscription(xml, options, reference = nil)
options[:subscription] ||= {}
xml.tag! 'recurringSubscriptionInfo' do
if reference
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method add_normalized_threeds_2_data
has a Cognitive Complexity of 15 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def add_normalized_threeds_2_data(xml, payment_method, options)
threeds_2_options = options[:three_d_secure]
cc_brand = card_brand(payment_method).to_sym
return if threeds_2_options[:cavv].blank? && infer_commerce_indicator?(options, cc_brand)
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method add_installments
has a Cognitive Complexity of 14 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def add_installments(xml, options)
return unless %i[installment_total_count installment_total_amount installment_plan_type first_installment_date installment_annual_interest_rate installment_grace_period_duration].any? { |gsf| options.include?(gsf) }
xml.tag! 'installment' do
xml.tag!('totalCount', options[:installment_total_count]) if options[:installment_total_count]
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method add_merchant_descriptor
has a Cognitive Complexity of 13 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def add_merchant_descriptor(xml, options)
return unless options[:merchant_descriptor] || options[:user_po] || options[:taxable] || options[:reference_data_code] || options[:invoice_number]
xml.tag! 'invoiceHeader' do
xml.tag! 'merchantDescriptor', options[:merchant_descriptor] if options[:merchant_descriptor]
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method add_merchant_description
has a Cognitive Complexity of 12 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def add_merchant_description(xml, options)
return unless options[:merchant_descriptor_name] || options[:merchant_descriptor_address1] || options[:merchant_descriptor_locality]
xml.tag! 'merchantInformation' do
xml.tag! 'merchantDescriptor' do
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method parse_element
has a Cognitive Complexity of 12 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def parse_element(reply, node)
if node.has_elements?
node.elements.each { |e| parse_element(reply, e) }
else
if /item/.match?(node.parent.name)
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method add_stored_credential_options
has a Cognitive Complexity of 12 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def add_stored_credential_options(xml, options = {})
return unless options[:stored_credential] || options[:stored_credential_overrides]
stored_credential_subsequent_auth_first = 'true' if options.dig(:stored_credential, :initial_transaction)
stored_credential_transaction_id = options.dig(:stored_credential, :network_transaction_id) if options.dig(:stored_credential, :initiator) == 'merchant'
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method build_purchase_request
has 33 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def build_purchase_request(money, payment_method_or_reference, options)
xml = Builder::XmlMarkup.new indent: 2
add_customer_id(xml, options)
add_payment_method_or_subscription(xml, money, payment_method_or_reference, options)
add_threeds_2_ucaf_data(xml, payment_method_or_reference, options)
Method add_purchase_data
has a Cognitive Complexity of 11 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def add_purchase_data(xml, money = 0, include_grand_total = false, options = {})
xml.tag! 'purchaseTotals' do
xml.tag! 'currency', options[:currency] || currency(money)
xml.tag!('discountManagementIndicator', options[:discount_management_indicator]) if options[:discount_management_indicator]
xml.tag!('taxAmount', options[:purchase_tax_amount]) if options[:purchase_tax_amount]
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method build_create_subscription_request
has 29 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def build_create_subscription_request(payment_method, options)
default_subscription_params = { frequency: 'on-demand', amount: 0, automatic_renew: false }
options[:subscription] = default_subscription_params.update(
options[:subscription] || {}
)
Method build_create_subscription_request
has a Cognitive Complexity of 10 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def build_create_subscription_request(payment_method, options)
default_subscription_params = { frequency: 'on-demand', amount: 0, automatic_renew: false }
options[:subscription] = default_subscription_params.update(
options[:subscription] || {}
)
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method add_other_tax
has a Cognitive Complexity of 10 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def add_other_tax(xml, options)
return unless %i[vat_tax_rate local_tax_amount national_tax_amount national_tax_indicator].any? { |gsf| options.include?(gsf) }
xml.tag! 'otherTax' do
xml.tag! 'vatTaxRate', options[:vat_tax_rate] if options[:vat_tax_rate]
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method add_auth_network_tokenization
has 27 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def add_auth_network_tokenization(xml, payment_method, options)
return unless network_tokenization?(payment_method)
commerce_indicator = 'internet' if subsequent_nt_apple_pay_auth(payment_method.source, options)
Method add_line_item_data
has a Cognitive Complexity of 9 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def add_line_item_data(xml, options)
return unless options[:line_items]
options[:line_items].each_with_index do |value, index|
xml.tag! 'item', { 'id' => index } do
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method add_credit_service
has a Cognitive Complexity of 9 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def add_credit_service(xml, options = {})
service = options[:use_check_service] ? 'ecCreditService' : 'ccCreditService'
request_tag = options[:use_check_service] ? 'debitRequestID' : 'captureRequestID'
options.delete :request_token if options[:use_check_service]
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method build_purchase_request
has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def build_purchase_request(money, payment_method_or_reference, options)
xml = Builder::XmlMarkup.new indent: 2
add_customer_id(xml, options)
add_payment_method_or_subscription(xml, money, payment_method_or_reference, options)
add_threeds_2_ucaf_data(xml, payment_method_or_reference, options)
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method add_address
has 5 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def add_address(xml, payment_method, address, options, shipTo = false)
Method commit
has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def commit(request, action, amount, options)
begin
raw_response = ssl_post(test? ? self.test_url : self.live_url, build_request(request, options))
rescue ResponseError => e
raw_response = e.response.body
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method add_mastercard_network_tokenization_ucaf_data
has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def add_mastercard_network_tokenization_ucaf_data(xml, payment_method, options)
return unless network_tokenization?(payment_method) && card_brand(payment_method).to_sym == :master
commerce_indicator = 'internet' if subsequent_nt_apple_pay_auth(payment_method.source, options)
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method build_update_subscription_request
has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def build_update_subscription_request(reference, creditcard, options)
xml = Builder::XmlMarkup.new indent: 2
add_address(xml, creditcard, options[:billing_address], options) unless options[:billing_address].blank?
add_purchase_data(xml, options[:setup_fee], true, options) unless options[:setup_fee].blank?
add_creditcard(xml, creditcard) if creditcard
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method add_decision_manager_fields
has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def add_decision_manager_fields(xml, options)
return unless options[:decision_manager_enabled]
xml.tag! 'decisionManager' do
xml.tag! 'enabled', options[:decision_manager_enabled] if options[:decision_manager_enabled]
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method add_stored_credential_subsequent_auth
has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def add_stored_credential_subsequent_auth(xml, options = {})
return unless options[:stored_credential] || options[:stored_credential_overrides]
stored_credential_subsequent_auth = 'true' if options.dig(:stored_credential, :initiator) == 'merchant'
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method add_mdd_fields
has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def add_mdd_fields(xml, options)
return unless options.keys.any? { |key| key.to_s.start_with?('mdd_field') && options[key] }
xml.tag! 'merchantDefinedData' do
(1..100).each do |each|
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method add_tax_service
has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def add_tax_service(xml)
xml.tag! 'taxService', { 'run' => 'true' } do
xml.tag!('nexus', @options[:nexus]) unless @options[:nexus].blank?
xml.tag!('sellerRegistration', @options[:vat_reg_number]) unless @options[:vat_reg_number].blank?
end
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
if /item/.match?(node.parent.name)
parent = node.parent.name
parent += '_' + node.parent.attributes['id'] if node.parent.attributes['id']
parent += '_'
end
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 31.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
xml.tag! 'decisionManager' do
xml.tag! 'enabled', options[:decision_manager_enabled] if options[:decision_manager_enabled]
xml.tag! 'profile', options[:decision_manager_profile] if options[:decision_manager_profile]
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 25.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
MultiResponse.run(:use_first_response) do |r|
r.process { authorize(amount, payment, options) }
r.process(:ignore_result) { void(r.authorization, options) } unless amount == 0
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 25.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76