File hps.rb
has 411 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
require 'nokogiri'
module ActiveMerchant #:nodoc:
module Billing #:nodoc:
class HpsGateway < Gateway
Class HpsGateway
has 37 methods (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
class HpsGateway < Gateway
self.live_url = 'https://posgateway.secureexchange.net/Hps.Exchange.PosGateway/PosGatewayService.asmx?wsdl'
self.test_url = 'https://posgateway.cert.secureexchange.net/Hps.Exchange.PosGateway/PosGatewayService.asmx?wsdl'
self.supported_countries = ['US']
Method add_card_or_token_customer_data
has a Cognitive Complexity of 27 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def add_card_or_token_customer_data(xml, credit_card, options)
xml.hps :CardHolderData do
if credit_card.respond_to?(:number)
xml.hps :CardHolderFirstName, credit_card.first_name if credit_card.first_name
xml.hps :CardHolderLastName, credit_card.last_name if credit_card.last_name
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method build_request
has a Cognitive Complexity of 26 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def build_request(action)
xml = Builder::XmlMarkup.new(encoding: 'UTF-8')
xml.instruct!(:xml, encoding: 'UTF-8')
xml.SOAP :Envelope, {
'xmlns:SOAP' => 'http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/envelope/',
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method add_card_or_token_payment
has a Cognitive Complexity of 25 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def add_card_or_token_payment(xml, card_or_token, options)
xml.hps :CardData do
if card_or_token.respond_to?(:number)
if card_or_token.track_data
xml.tag!('hps:TrackData', 'method' => 'swipe') do
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method add_card_or_token_payment
has 32 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def add_card_or_token_payment(xml, card_or_token, options)
xml.hps :CardData do
if card_or_token.respond_to?(:number)
if card_or_token.track_data
xml.tag!('hps:TrackData', 'method' => 'swipe') do
Method build_request
has 31 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def build_request(action)
xml = Builder::XmlMarkup.new(encoding: 'UTF-8')
xml.instruct!(:xml, encoding: 'UTF-8')
xml.SOAP :Envelope, {
'xmlns:SOAP' => 'http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/envelope/',
Method add_stored_credentials
has a Cognitive Complexity of 9 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def add_stored_credentials(xml, options)
return unless options[:stored_credential]
xml.hps :CardOnFileData do
if options[:stored_credential][:initiator] == 'customer'
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method build_three_d_secure
has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def build_three_d_secure(xml, three_d_secure)
# PaymentDataSource is required when supplying the SecureECommerce data group,
# and the gateway currently only allows the values within the mapping
return unless PAYMENT_DATA_SOURCE_MAPPING[three_d_secure[:source].to_sym]
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method parse
has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def parse(raw)
response = {}
doc = Nokogiri::XML(raw)
doc.remove_namespaces!
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method message_from
has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def message_from(response)
if response['Fault']
response['Fault']
elsif response['GatewayRspCode'] == '0'
if SUCCESSFUL_RESPONSE_CODES.include? response['RspCode']
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method add_details
has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def add_details(xml, options)
xml.hps :AdditionalTxnFields do
xml.hps :Description, options[:description] if options[:description]
xml.hps :InvoiceNbr, options[:order_id][0..59] if options[:order_id]
xml.hps :CustomerID, options[:customer_id] if options[:customer_id]
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
commit('CreditAuth') do |xml|
add_amount(xml, money)
add_allow_dup(xml)
add_card_or_token_customer_data(xml, card_or_token, options)
add_details(xml, options)
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 31.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
commit('CreditSale') do |xml|
add_amount(xml, money)
add_allow_dup(xml)
add_card_or_token_customer_data(xml, card_or_token, options)
add_details(xml, options)
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 31.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76