SiLeBAT/FSK-Lab

View on GitHub
de.bund.bfr.knime.fsklab.deprecatednodes/src-1_9_0/de/bund/bfr/knime/fsklab/v1_9/reader/ReaderNodeModel.java

Summary

Maintainability
F
1 wk
Test Coverage

Method readFskPortObject has a Cognitive Complexity of 72 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

  private FskPortObject readFskPortObject(CombineArchive archive, List<String> ListOfPaths,
      int readLevel) throws Exception {
    Map<String, URI> URIS = FSKML.getURIS(1, 0, 12);

    Model model = new Model();

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Method readFskPortObject has 182 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

  private FskPortObject readFskPortObject(CombineArchive archive, List<String> ListOfPaths,
      int readLevel) throws Exception {
    Map<String, URI> URIS = FSKML.getURIS(1, 0, 12);

    Model model = new Model();

File ReaderNodeModel.java has 448 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

/*
 ***************************************************************************************************
 * Copyright (c) 2017 Federal Institute for Risk Assessment (BfR), Germany
 *
 * This program is free software: you can redistribute it and/or modify it under the terms of the

Method readMetadata has 32 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

  private Model readMetadata(ArchiveEntry metadataEntry)
      throws JsonProcessingException, IOException {

    // Create temporary file with metadata
    File temp = File.createTempFile("metadata", ".json");

Consider simplifying this complex logical expression.
Open

    if (ListOfPaths != null && ListOfPaths.size() > 1) {
      String firstelement = ListOfPaths.get(ListOfPaths.size() % 2);
      // classify the pathes into two groups, each belongs to sub model
      List<String> firstGroup = ListOfPaths.stream().filter(line -> line.startsWith(firstelement))
          .collect(Collectors.toList());

Avoid deeply nested control flow statements.
Open

                if (commandNode != null
                    && commandNode.hasAttr(NodeUtils.METADATA_COMMAND_VALUE)) {
                  command = commandNode.getAttrValue(NodeUtils.METADATA_COMMAND_VALUE);
                }

Refactor this method to reduce its Cognitive Complexity from 73 to the 15 allowed.
Open

  private FskPortObject readFskPortObject(CombineArchive archive, List<String> ListOfPaths,

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how hard the control flow of a method is to understand. Methods with high Cognitive Complexity will be difficult to maintain.

See

Define a constant instead of duplicating this literal "workspace" 3 times.
Open

            workspace = FileUtil.createTempFile("workspace", ".RData");

Duplicated string literals make the process of refactoring error-prone, since you must be sure to update all occurrences.

On the other hand, constants can be referenced from many places, but only need to be updated in a single place.

Noncompliant Code Example

With the default threshold of 3:

public void run() {
  prepare("action1");                              // Noncompliant - "action1" is duplicated 3 times
  execute("action1");
  release("action1");
}

@SuppressWarning("all")                            // Compliant - annotations are excluded
private void method1() { /* ... */ }
@SuppressWarning("all")
private void method2() { /* ... */ }

public String method3(String a) {
  System.out.println("'" + a + "'");               // Compliant - literal "'" has less than 5 characters and is excluded
  return "";                                       // Compliant - literal "" has less than 5 characters and is excluded
}

Compliant Solution

private static final String ACTION_1 = "action1";  // Compliant

public void run() {
  prepare(ACTION_1);                               // Compliant
  execute(ACTION_1);
  release(ACTION_1);
}

Exceptions

To prevent generating some false-positives, literals having less than 5 characters are excluded.

Define a constant instead of duplicating this literal ".RData" 3 times.
Open

            workspace = FileUtil.createTempFile("workspace", ".RData");

Duplicated string literals make the process of refactoring error-prone, since you must be sure to update all occurrences.

On the other hand, constants can be referenced from many places, but only need to be updated in a single place.

Noncompliant Code Example

With the default threshold of 3:

public void run() {
  prepare("action1");                              // Noncompliant - "action1" is duplicated 3 times
  execute("action1");
  release("action1");
}

@SuppressWarning("all")                            // Compliant - annotations are excluded
private void method1() { /* ... */ }
@SuppressWarning("all")
private void method2() { /* ... */ }

public String method3(String a) {
  System.out.println("'" + a + "'");               // Compliant - literal "'" has less than 5 characters and is excluded
  return "";                                       // Compliant - literal "" has less than 5 characters and is excluded
}

Compliant Solution

private static final String ACTION_1 = "action1";  // Compliant

public void run() {
  prepare(ACTION_1);                               // Compliant
  execute(ACTION_1);
  release(ACTION_1);
}

Exceptions

To prevent generating some false-positives, literals having less than 5 characters are excluded.

Use try-with-resources or close this "!Unknown!" in a "finally" clause.
Open

      Files.walk(workflowContext.getCurrentLocation().toPath())

Connections, streams, files, and other classes that implement the Closeable interface or its super-interface, AutoCloseable, needs to be closed after use. Further, that close call must be made in a finally block otherwise an exception could keep the call from being made. Preferably, when class implements AutoCloseable, resource should be created using "try-with-resources" pattern and will be closed automatically.

Failure to properly close resources will result in a resource leak which could bring first the application and then perhaps the box the application is on to their knees.

Noncompliant Code Example

private void readTheFile() throws IOException {
  Path path = Paths.get(this.fileName);
  BufferedReader reader = Files.newBufferedReader(path, this.charset);
  // ...
  reader.close();  // Noncompliant
  // ...
  Files.lines("input.txt").forEach(System.out::println); // Noncompliant: The stream needs to be closed
}

private void doSomething() {
  OutputStream stream = null;
  try {
    for (String property : propertyList) {
      stream = new FileOutputStream("myfile.txt");  // Noncompliant
      // ...
    }
  } catch (Exception e) {
    // ...
  } finally {
    stream.close();  // Multiple streams were opened. Only the last is closed.
  }
}

Compliant Solution

private void readTheFile(String fileName) throws IOException {
    Path path = Paths.get(fileName);
    try (BufferedReader reader = Files.newBufferedReader(path, StandardCharsets.UTF_8)) {
      reader.readLine();
      // ...
    }
    // ..
    try (Stream<String> input = Files.lines("input.txt"))  {
      input.forEach(System.out::println);
    }
}

private void doSomething() {
  OutputStream stream = null;
  try {
    stream = new FileOutputStream("myfile.txt");
    for (String property : propertyList) {
      // ...
    }
  } catch (Exception e) {
    // ...
  } finally {
    stream.close();
  }
}

Exceptions

Instances of the following classes are ignored by this rule because close has no effect:

  • java.io.ByteArrayOutputStream
  • java.io.ByteArrayInputStream
  • java.io.CharArrayReader
  • java.io.CharArrayWriter
  • java.io.StringReader
  • java.io.StringWriter

Java 7 introduced the try-with-resources statement, which implicitly closes Closeables. All resources opened in a try-with-resources statement are ignored by this rule.

try (BufferedReader br = new BufferedReader(new FileReader(fileName))) {
  //...
}
catch ( ... ) {
  //...
}

See

Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

    if (ListOfPaths != null && ListOfPaths.size() > 1) {
      String firstelement = ListOfPaths.get(ListOfPaths.size() % 2);
      // classify the pathes into two groups, each belongs to sub model
      List<String> firstGroup = ListOfPaths.stream().filter(line -> line.startsWith(firstelement))
          .collect(Collectors.toList());
de.bund.bfr.knime.fsklab.nodes/src/de/bund/bfr/knime/fsklab/v2_0/reader/ReaderNodeUtil.java on lines 331..509

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 986.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

    if (jsonNode.has("modelType")) {
      String modelType = jsonNode.get("modelType").asText();
      Class<? extends Model> modelClass = FskPortObject.Serializer.modelClasses.get(modelType);
      model = mapper.treeToValue(jsonNode, modelClass);
    } else if (jsonNode.has("version")) {
de.bund.bfr.knime.fsklab.nodes/src/de/bund/bfr/knime/fsklab/v2_0/reader/ReaderNodeUtil.java on lines 773..801

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 256.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

    try (final CombineArchive archive = new CombineArchive(in)) {

      // 1. Get SBML URI
      URI sbmlURI = FSKML.getURIS(1, 0, 12).get("sbml");

de.bund.bfr.knime.fsklab.nodes/src/de/bund/bfr/knime/fsklab/v2_0/reader/ReaderNodeUtil.java on lines 670..704

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 166.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

      for (ArchiveEntry entry : entries) {
        // workaround to make python models from version 1.7.2 compatible with 1.8.x
        // those models had scripts that ended in ".r" instead of ".py"
        if (( entry.getFormat().equals(scriptUri) || entry.getFormat().equals(URIS.get("r")) )
            && !entry.getDescriptions().isEmpty()) {
de.bund.bfr.knime.fsklab.nodes/src/de/bund/bfr/knime/fsklab/v2_0/reader/ReaderNodeUtil.java on lines 553..571

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 152.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

  @Override
  protected void reset() {
    NodeContext nodeContext = NodeContext.getContext();
    WorkflowManager wfm = nodeContext.getWorkflowManager();
    WorkflowContext workflowContext = wfm.getContext();
de.bund.bfr.knime.fsklab.deprecatednodes/src-1_7_2/de/bund/bfr/knime/fsklab/nodes/v1_7_2/reader/ReaderNodeModel.java on lines 144..170

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 137.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

    for (org.jlibsedml.Model model : sedml.getModels()) {

      Map<String, String> params = model.getListOfChanges().stream()
          .filter(change -> change.getChangeKind().equals(SEDMLTags.CHANGE_ATTRIBUTE_KIND))
          .map(change -> (ChangeAttribute) change).collect(Collectors
de.bund.bfr.knime.fsklab.deprecatednodes/src-1_7_2/de/bund/bfr/knime/fsklab/nodes/v1_7_2/reader/ReaderNodeModel.java on lines 670..681

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 100.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Identical blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

  private static String loadTextEntry(final ArchiveEntry entry) throws IOException {

    // Create temporary file with script
    File temp = File.createTempFile("temp", null);
    String contents;
de.bund.bfr.knime.fsklab.deprecatednodes/src-1_7_2/de/bund/bfr/knime/fsklab/nodes/v1_7_2/reader/ReaderNodeModel.java on lines 620..640
de.bund.bfr.knime.fsklab.nodes/src/de/bund/bfr/knime/fsklab/v2_0/reader/ReaderNodeUtil.java on lines 735..755

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 70.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Identical blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

    if (annotations != null && annotations.size() > 0) {
      org.jlibsedml.Annotation indexAnnotation = annotations.get(0);
      Text indexAnnotationText = (Text) indexAnnotation.getAnnotationElement().getContent().get(0);
      selectedSimulationIndex = Integer.parseInt(indexAnnotationText.getText());
    }
de.bund.bfr.knime.fsklab.deprecatednodes/src-1_7_2/de/bund/bfr/knime/fsklab/nodes/v1_7_2/reader/ReaderNodeModel.java on lines 571..576
de.bund.bfr.knime.fsklab.nodes/src/de/bund/bfr/knime/fsklab/v2_0/reader/ReaderNodeUtil.java on lines 855..859

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 64.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

      if (workspaceEntry.isPresent()) {
        FskMetaDataObject fmdo =
            new FskMetaDataObject(workspaceEntry.get().getDescriptions().get(0));
        if (fmdo.getResourceType() == ResourceType.workspace) {
          workspace = FileUtil.createTempFile("workspace", ".RData");
de.bund.bfr.knime.fsklab.nodes/src/de/bund/bfr/knime/fsklab/v2_0/reader/ReaderNodeUtil.java on lines 583..590

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 64.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

  private Optional<ArchiveEntry> getArchiveEntry(List<ArchiveEntry> entries, URI uri ){

    Optional<ArchiveEntry> archive_entry =
        entries.stream().filter(entry -> entry.getFormat().equals(uri))
        .filter(entry -> !entry.getDescriptions().isEmpty()).findAny();
de.bund.bfr.knime.fsklab.nodes/src/de/bund/bfr/knime/fsklab/v2_0/reader/ReaderNodeUtil.java on lines 725..732

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 49.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

  @Override
  protected PortObjectSpec[] configure(PortObjectSpec[] inSpecs) throws InvalidSettingsException {
    String warning = CheckUtils.checkSourceFile(filePath.getStringValue());
    if (warning != null) {
        setWarningMessage(warning);
de.bund.bfr.knime.fsklab.nodes/src/de/bund/bfr/knime/fsklab/v2_0/reader/ReaderNodeModel.java on lines 111..118

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 46.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

      Optional<ArchiveEntry> metadataEntry =
          entries.stream().filter(entry -> entry.getFormat().equals(jsonUri))
          .filter(entry -> entry.getEntityPath().endsWith("metaData.json")).findAny();
de.bund.bfr.knime.fsklab.nodes/src/de/bund/bfr/knime/fsklab/v2_0/reader/ReaderNodeUtil.java on lines 539..541

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 40.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

There are no issues that match your filters.

Category
Status