Sign upLogin

SiLeBAT/FSK-Lab

View on GitHub
Star
de.bund.bfr.knime.fsklab.metadata.model.tests/src/metadata/EmfMetadataModuleTest.java

Summary

Maintainability
F
4 days
Test Coverage

File EmfMetadataModuleTest.java has 717 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

package metadata;

import static org.junit.Assert.*;

import java.io.IOException;
Severity: Major
Found in de.bund.bfr.knime.fsklab.metadata.model.tests/src/metadata/EmfMetadataModuleTest.java - About 1 day to fix

Method setUp has 156 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

    @BeforeClass
    public static void setUp() {
        MAPPER = EMFModule.setupDefaultMapper().registerModule(new ThreeTenModule())
                .registerModule(new EmfMetadataModule());
Severity: Major
Found in de.bund.bfr.knime.fsklab.metadata.model.tests/src/metadata/EmfMetadataModuleTest.java - About 6 hrs to fix

EmfMetadataModuleTest has 35 methods (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

@SuppressWarnings("static-method")
public class EmfMetadataModuleTest {

    private static ObjectMapper MAPPER;
Severity: Minor
Found in de.bund.bfr.knime.fsklab.metadata.model.tests/src/metadata/EmfMetadataModuleTest.java - About 4 hrs to fix

Method testGeneralInformation has 48 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

    @Test
    public void testGeneralInformation() throws IOException {

        Copier copier = new Copier();
Severity: Minor
Found in de.bund.bfr.knime.fsklab.metadata.model.tests/src/metadata/EmfMetadataModuleTest.java - About 1 hr to fix

Define a constant instead of duplicating this literal "identifier" 4 times.
Open

        OLD_STUDY.setStudyIdentifier("identifier");
Severity: Critical
Found in de.bund.bfr.knime.fsklab.metadata.model.tests/src/metadata/EmfMetadataModuleTest.java by sonar-java

Duplicated string literals make the process of refactoring error-prone, since you must be sure to update all occurrences.

On the other hand, constants can be referenced from many places, but only need to be updated in a single place.

Noncompliant Code Example

With the default threshold of 3:

public void run() {
  prepare("action1");                              // Noncompliant - "action1" is duplicated 3 times
  execute("action1");
  release("action1");
}

@SuppressWarning("all")                            // Compliant - annotations are excluded
private void method1() { /* ... */ }
@SuppressWarning("all")
private void method2() { /* ... */ }

public String method3(String a) {
  System.out.println("'" + a + "'");               // Compliant - literal "'" has less than 5 characters and is excluded
  return "";                                       // Compliant - literal "" has less than 5 characters and is excluded
}

Compliant Solution

private static final String ACTION_1 = "action1";  // Compliant

public void run() {
  prepare(ACTION_1);                               // Compliant
  execute(ACTION_1);
  release(ACTION_1);
}

Exceptions

To prevent generating some false-positives, literals having less than 5 characters are excluded.

Define a constant instead of duplicating this literal "description" 16 times.
Open

        OLD_PRODUCT.setProductDescription("description");
Severity: Critical
Found in de.bund.bfr.knime.fsklab.metadata.model.tests/src/metadata/EmfMetadataModuleTest.java by sonar-java

Duplicated string literals make the process of refactoring error-prone, since you must be sure to update all occurrences.

On the other hand, constants can be referenced from many places, but only need to be updated in a single place.

Noncompliant Code Example

With the default threshold of 3:

public void run() {
  prepare("action1");                              // Noncompliant - "action1" is duplicated 3 times
  execute("action1");
  release("action1");
}

@SuppressWarning("all")                            // Compliant - annotations are excluded
private void method1() { /* ... */ }
@SuppressWarning("all")
private void method2() { /* ... */ }

public String method3(String a) {
  System.out.println("'" + a + "'");               // Compliant - literal "'" has less than 5 characters and is excluded
  return "";                                       // Compliant - literal "" has less than 5 characters and is excluded
}

Compliant Solution

private static final String ACTION_1 = "action1";  // Compliant

public void run() {
  prepare(ACTION_1);                               // Compliant
  execute(ACTION_1);
  release(ACTION_1);
}

Exceptions

To prevent generating some false-positives, literals having less than 5 characters are excluded.

Define a constant instead of duplicating this literal "treatment" 4 times.
Open

        OLD_PRODUCT.setProductTreatment("treatment");
Severity: Critical
Found in de.bund.bfr.knime.fsklab.metadata.model.tests/src/metadata/EmfMetadataModuleTest.java by sonar-java

Duplicated string literals make the process of refactoring error-prone, since you must be sure to update all occurrences.

On the other hand, constants can be referenced from many places, but only need to be updated in a single place.

Noncompliant Code Example

With the default threshold of 3:

public void run() {
  prepare("action1");                              // Noncompliant - "action1" is duplicated 3 times
  execute("action1");
  release("action1");
}

@SuppressWarning("all")                            // Compliant - annotations are excluded
private void method1() { /* ... */ }
@SuppressWarning("all")
private void method2() { /* ... */ }

public String method3(String a) {
  System.out.println("'" + a + "'");               // Compliant - literal "'" has less than 5 characters and is excluded
  return "";                                       // Compliant - literal "" has less than 5 characters and is excluded
}

Compliant Solution

private static final String ACTION_1 = "action1";  // Compliant

public void run() {
  prepare(ACTION_1);                               // Compliant
  execute(ACTION_1);
  release(ACTION_1);
}

Exceptions

To prevent generating some false-positives, literals having less than 5 characters are excluded.

Define a constant instead of duplicating this literal "level" 6 times.
Open

        OLD_HAZARD.setNoObservedAdverseAffectLevel("level");
Severity: Critical
Found in de.bund.bfr.knime.fsklab.metadata.model.tests/src/metadata/EmfMetadataModuleTest.java by sonar-java

Duplicated string literals make the process of refactoring error-prone, since you must be sure to update all occurrences.

On the other hand, constants can be referenced from many places, but only need to be updated in a single place.

Noncompliant Code Example

With the default threshold of 3:

public void run() {
  prepare("action1");                              // Noncompliant - "action1" is duplicated 3 times
  execute("action1");
  release("action1");
}

@SuppressWarning("all")                            // Compliant - annotations are excluded
private void method1() { /* ... */ }
@SuppressWarning("all")
private void method2() { /* ... */ }

public String method3(String a) {
  System.out.println("'" + a + "'");               // Compliant - literal "'" has less than 5 characters and is excluded
  return "";                                       // Compliant - literal "" has less than 5 characters and is excluded
}

Compliant Solution

private static final String ACTION_1 = "action1";  // Compliant

public void run() {
  prepare(ACTION_1);                               // Compliant
  execute(ACTION_1);
  release(ACTION_1);
}

Exceptions

To prevent generating some false-positives, literals having less than 5 characters are excluded.

Define a constant instead of duplicating this literal "method" 4 times.
Open

        OLD_PRODUCT.setProductionMethod("method");
Severity: Critical
Found in de.bund.bfr.knime.fsklab.metadata.model.tests/src/metadata/EmfMetadataModuleTest.java by sonar-java

Duplicated string literals make the process of refactoring error-prone, since you must be sure to update all occurrences.

On the other hand, constants can be referenced from many places, but only need to be updated in a single place.

Noncompliant Code Example

With the default threshold of 3:

public void run() {
  prepare("action1");                              // Noncompliant - "action1" is duplicated 3 times
  execute("action1");
  release("action1");
}

@SuppressWarning("all")                            // Compliant - annotations are excluded
private void method1() { /* ... */ }
@SuppressWarning("all")
private void method2() { /* ... */ }

public String method3(String a) {
  System.out.println("'" + a + "'");               // Compliant - literal "'" has less than 5 characters and is excluded
  return "";                                       // Compliant - literal "" has less than 5 characters and is excluded
}

Compliant Solution

private static final String ACTION_1 = "action1";  // Compliant

public void run() {
  prepare(ACTION_1);                               // Compliant
  execute(ACTION_1);
  release(ACTION_1);
}

Exceptions

To prevent generating some false-positives, literals having less than 5 characters are excluded.

Define a constant instead of duplicating this literal "subject" 4 times.
Open

        OLD_PARAMETER.setParameterSubject("subject");
Severity: Critical
Found in de.bund.bfr.knime.fsklab.metadata.model.tests/src/metadata/EmfMetadataModuleTest.java by sonar-java

Duplicated string literals make the process of refactoring error-prone, since you must be sure to update all occurrences.

On the other hand, constants can be referenced from many places, but only need to be updated in a single place.

Noncompliant Code Example

With the default threshold of 3:

public void run() {
  prepare("action1");                              // Noncompliant - "action1" is duplicated 3 times
  execute("action1");
  release("action1");
}

@SuppressWarning("all")                            // Compliant - annotations are excluded
private void method1() { /* ... */ }
@SuppressWarning("all")
private void method2() { /* ... */ }

public String method3(String a) {
  System.out.println("'" + a + "'");               // Compliant - literal "'" has less than 5 characters and is excluded
  return "";                                       // Compliant - literal "" has less than 5 characters and is excluded
}

Compliant Solution

private static final String ACTION_1 = "action1";  // Compliant

public void run() {
  prepare(ACTION_1);                               // Compliant
  execute(ACTION_1);
  release(ACTION_1);
}

Exceptions

To prevent generating some false-positives, literals having less than 5 characters are excluded.

Define a constant instead of duplicating this literal "region" 4 times.
Open

        OLD_CONTACT.setRegion("region");
Severity: Critical
Found in de.bund.bfr.knime.fsklab.metadata.model.tests/src/metadata/EmfMetadataModuleTest.java by sonar-java

Duplicated string literals make the process of refactoring error-prone, since you must be sure to update all occurrences.

On the other hand, constants can be referenced from many places, but only need to be updated in a single place.

Noncompliant Code Example

With the default threshold of 3:

public void run() {
  prepare("action1");                              // Noncompliant - "action1" is duplicated 3 times
  execute("action1");
  release("action1");
}

@SuppressWarning("all")                            // Compliant - annotations are excluded
private void method1() { /* ... */ }
@SuppressWarning("all")
private void method2() { /* ... */ }

public String method3(String a) {
  System.out.println("'" + a + "'");               // Compliant - literal "'" has less than 5 characters and is excluded
  return "";                                       // Compliant - literal "" has less than 5 characters and is excluded
}

Compliant Solution

private static final String ACTION_1 = "action1";  // Compliant

public void run() {
  prepare(ACTION_1);                               // Compliant
  execute(ACTION_1);
  release(ACTION_1);
}

Exceptions

To prevent generating some false-positives, literals having less than 5 characters are excluded.

Define a constant instead of duplicating this literal "value" 4 times.
Open

        OLD_ASSAY.setUncertaintyValue("value");
Severity: Critical
Found in de.bund.bfr.knime.fsklab.metadata.model.tests/src/metadata/EmfMetadataModuleTest.java by sonar-java

Duplicated string literals make the process of refactoring error-prone, since you must be sure to update all occurrences.

On the other hand, constants can be referenced from many places, but only need to be updated in a single place.

Noncompliant Code Example

With the default threshold of 3:

public void run() {
  prepare("action1");                              // Noncompliant - "action1" is duplicated 3 times
  execute("action1");
  release("action1");
}

@SuppressWarning("all")                            // Compliant - annotations are excluded
private void method1() { /* ... */ }
@SuppressWarning("all")
private void method2() { /* ... */ }

public String method3(String a) {
  System.out.println("'" + a + "'");               // Compliant - literal "'" has less than 5 characters and is excluded
  return "";                                       // Compliant - literal "" has less than 5 characters and is excluded
}

Compliant Solution

private static final String ACTION_1 = "action1";  // Compliant

public void run() {
  prepare(ACTION_1);                               // Compliant
  execute(ACTION_1);
  release(ACTION_1);
}

Exceptions

To prevent generating some false-positives, literals having less than 5 characters are excluded.

Define a constant instead of duplicating this literal "title" 4 times.
Open

        OLD_CONTACT.setTitle("title");
Severity: Critical
Found in de.bund.bfr.knime.fsklab.metadata.model.tests/src/metadata/EmfMetadataModuleTest.java by sonar-java

Duplicated string literals make the process of refactoring error-prone, since you must be sure to update all occurrences.

On the other hand, constants can be referenced from many places, but only need to be updated in a single place.

Noncompliant Code Example

With the default threshold of 3:

public void run() {
  prepare("action1");                              // Noncompliant - "action1" is duplicated 3 times
  execute("action1");
  release("action1");
}

@SuppressWarning("all")                            // Compliant - annotations are excluded
private void method1() { /* ... */ }
@SuppressWarning("all")
private void method2() { /* ... */ }

public String method3(String a) {
  System.out.println("'" + a + "'");               // Compliant - literal "'" has less than 5 characters and is excluded
  return "";                                       // Compliant - literal "" has less than 5 characters and is excluded
}

Compliant Solution

private static final String ACTION_1 = "action1";  // Compliant

public void run() {
  prepare(ACTION_1);                               // Compliant
  execute(ACTION_1);
  release(ACTION_1);
}

Exceptions

To prevent generating some false-positives, literals having less than 5 characters are excluded.

Define a constant instead of duplicating this literal "country" 6 times.
Open

        OLD_CONTACT.setCountry("country");
Severity: Critical
Found in de.bund.bfr.knime.fsklab.metadata.model.tests/src/metadata/EmfMetadataModuleTest.java by sonar-java

Duplicated string literals make the process of refactoring error-prone, since you must be sure to update all occurrences.

On the other hand, constants can be referenced from many places, but only need to be updated in a single place.

Noncompliant Code Example

With the default threshold of 3:

public void run() {
  prepare("action1");                              // Noncompliant - "action1" is duplicated 3 times
  execute("action1");
  release("action1");
}

@SuppressWarning("all")                            // Compliant - annotations are excluded
private void method1() { /* ... */ }
@SuppressWarning("all")
private void method2() { /* ... */ }

public String method3(String a) {
  System.out.println("'" + a + "'");               // Compliant - literal "'" has less than 5 characters and is excluded
  return "";                                       // Compliant - literal "" has less than 5 characters and is excluded
}

Compliant Solution

private static final String ACTION_1 = "action1";  // Compliant

public void run() {
  prepare(ACTION_1);                               // Compliant
  execute(ACTION_1);
  release(ACTION_1);
}

Exceptions

To prevent generating some false-positives, literals having less than 5 characters are excluded.

Define a constant instead of duplicating this literal "gender" 4 times.
Open

        OLD_CONTACT.setGender("gender");
Severity: Critical
Found in de.bund.bfr.knime.fsklab.metadata.model.tests/src/metadata/EmfMetadataModuleTest.java by sonar-java

Duplicated string literals make the process of refactoring error-prone, since you must be sure to update all occurrences.

On the other hand, constants can be referenced from many places, but only need to be updated in a single place.

Noncompliant Code Example

With the default threshold of 3:

public void run() {
  prepare("action1");                              // Noncompliant - "action1" is duplicated 3 times
  execute("action1");
  release("action1");
}

@SuppressWarning("all")                            // Compliant - annotations are excluded
private void method1() { /* ... */ }
@SuppressWarning("all")
private void method2() { /* ... */ }

public String method3(String a) {
  System.out.println("'" + a + "'");               // Compliant - literal "'" has less than 5 characters and is excluded
  return "";                                       // Compliant - literal "" has less than 5 characters and is excluded
}

Compliant Solution

private static final String ACTION_1 = "action1";  // Compliant

public void run() {
  prepare(ACTION_1);                               // Compliant
  execute(ACTION_1);
  release(ACTION_1);
}

Exceptions

To prevent generating some false-positives, literals having less than 5 characters are excluded.

Define a constant instead of duplicating this literal "source" 4 times.
Open

        OLD_PARAMETER.setParameterSource("source");
Severity: Critical
Found in de.bund.bfr.knime.fsklab.metadata.model.tests/src/metadata/EmfMetadataModuleTest.java by sonar-java

Duplicated string literals make the process of refactoring error-prone, since you must be sure to update all occurrences.

On the other hand, constants can be referenced from many places, but only need to be updated in a single place.

Noncompliant Code Example

With the default threshold of 3:

public void run() {
  prepare("action1");                              // Noncompliant - "action1" is duplicated 3 times
  execute("action1");
  release("action1");
}

@SuppressWarning("all")                            // Compliant - annotations are excluded
private void method1() { /* ... */ }
@SuppressWarning("all")
private void method2() { /* ... */ }

public String method3(String a) {
  System.out.println("'" + a + "'");               // Compliant - literal "'" has less than 5 characters and is excluded
  return "";                                       // Compliant - literal "" has less than 5 characters and is excluded
}

Compliant Solution

private static final String ACTION_1 = "action1";  // Compliant

public void run() {
  prepare(ACTION_1);                               // Compliant
  execute(ACTION_1);
  release(ACTION_1);
}

Exceptions

To prevent generating some false-positives, literals having less than 5 characters are excluded.

Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

    @Test
    public void testEmptyStudy() {
        
        metadata.Study emptyOldStudy = metadata.MetadataFactory.eINSTANCE.createStudy();
        Study study = EmfMetadataModule.convertStudy(MAPPER.valueToTree(emptyOldStudy));
Severity: Major
Found in de.bund.bfr.knime.fsklab.metadata.model.tests/src/metadata/EmfMetadataModuleTest.java and 1 other location - About 2 hrs to fix
de.bund.bfr.knime.fsklab.metadata.model.tests/src/metadata/EmfMetadataModuleTest.java on lines 749..771

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 161.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

    @Test
    public void testEmptyParameter() {
        
        metadata.Parameter emptyOldParameter = metadata.MetadataFactory.eINSTANCE.createParameter();
        Parameter parameter = EmfMetadataModule.convertParameter(MAPPER.valueToTree(emptyOldParameter));
Severity: Major
Found in de.bund.bfr.knime.fsklab.metadata.model.tests/src/metadata/EmfMetadataModuleTest.java and 1 other location - About 2 hrs to fix
de.bund.bfr.knime.fsklab.metadata.model.tests/src/metadata/EmfMetadataModuleTest.java on lines 682..704

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 161.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

    @Test
    public void testEmptyPopulationGroup() {
        
        metadata.PopulationGroup emptyOldGroup = metadata.MetadataFactory.eINSTANCE.createPopulationGroup();
        PopulationGroup group = EmfMetadataModule.convertPopulationGroup(MAPPER.valueToTree(emptyOldGroup));
Severity: Major
Found in de.bund.bfr.knime.fsklab.metadata.model.tests/src/metadata/EmfMetadataModuleTest.java and 1 other location - About 2 hrs to fix
de.bund.bfr.knime.fsklab.metadata.model.tests/src/metadata/EmfMetadataModuleTest.java on lines 252..271

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 137.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

    @Test
    public void testEmptyContact() {
        
        metadata.Contact emptyOldContact = metadata.MetadataFactory.eINSTANCE.createContact();
        Contact contact = EmfMetadataModule.convertContact(MAPPER.valueToTree(emptyOldContact));
Severity: Major
Found in de.bund.bfr.knime.fsklab.metadata.model.tests/src/metadata/EmfMetadataModuleTest.java and 1 other location - About 2 hrs to fix
de.bund.bfr.knime.fsklab.metadata.model.tests/src/metadata/EmfMetadataModuleTest.java on lines 521..540

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 137.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

    @Test
    public void testEmptyExposure() {
        
        metadata.Exposure emptyOldExposure = metadata.MetadataFactory.eINSTANCE.createExposure();
        Exposure exposure = EmfMetadataModule.convertExposure(MAPPER.valueToTree(emptyOldExposure));
Severity: Major
Found in de.bund.bfr.knime.fsklab.metadata.model.tests/src/metadata/EmfMetadataModuleTest.java and 1 other location - About 1 hr to fix
de.bund.bfr.knime.fsklab.metadata.model.tests/src/metadata/EmfMetadataModuleTest.java on lines 785..796

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 73.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

    @Test
    public void testEmptyModelEquation() {
        
        metadata.ModelEquation emptyOldEquation = metadata.MetadataFactory.eINSTANCE.createModelEquation();
        ModelEquation equation = EmfMetadataModule.convertModelEquation(MAPPER.valueToTree(emptyOldEquation));
Severity: Major
Found in de.bund.bfr.knime.fsklab.metadata.model.tests/src/metadata/EmfMetadataModuleTest.java and 1 other location - About 1 hr to fix
de.bund.bfr.knime.fsklab.metadata.model.tests/src/metadata/EmfMetadataModuleTest.java on lines 810..821

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 73.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

There are no issues that match your filters.

Category
Status