SiLeBAT/FSK-Lab

View on GitHub
de.bund.bfr.knime.fsklab.metadata.model/gen/metadata/impl/MetadataFactoryImpl.java

Summary

Maintainability
C
1 day
Test Coverage

MetadataFactoryImpl has 36 methods (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

public class MetadataFactoryImpl extends EFactoryImpl implements MetadataFactory {
    /**
     * Creates the default factory implementation.
     * <!-- begin-user-doc -->
     * <!-- end-user-doc -->

Method create has 26 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

    @Override
    public EObject create(EClass eClass) {
        switch (eClass.getClassifierID()) {
            case MetadataPackage.GENERAL_INFORMATION: return createGeneralInformation();
            case MetadataPackage.MODEL_CATEGORY: return createModelCategory();

Define a constant instead of duplicating this literal "' is not a valid classifier" 3 times.
Open

                throw new IllegalArgumentException("The class '" + eClass.getName() + "' is not a valid classifier");

Duplicated string literals make the process of refactoring error-prone, since you must be sure to update all occurrences.

On the other hand, constants can be referenced from many places, but only need to be updated in a single place.

Noncompliant Code Example

With the default threshold of 3:

public void run() {
  prepare("action1");                              // Noncompliant - "action1" is duplicated 3 times
  execute("action1");
  release("action1");
}

@SuppressWarning("all")                            // Compliant - annotations are excluded
private void method1() { /* ... */ }
@SuppressWarning("all")
private void method2() { /* ... */ }

public String method3(String a) {
  System.out.println("'" + a + "'");               // Compliant - literal "'" has less than 5 characters and is excluded
  return "";                                       // Compliant - literal "" has less than 5 characters and is excluded
}

Compliant Solution

private static final String ACTION_1 = "action1";  // Compliant

public void run() {
  prepare(ACTION_1);                               // Compliant
  execute(ACTION_1);
  release(ACTION_1);
}

Exceptions

To prevent generating some false-positives, literals having less than 5 characters are excluded.

Define a constant instead of duplicating this literal "The value '" 3 times.
Open

        if (result == null) throw new IllegalArgumentException("The value '" + initialValue + "' is not a valid enumerator of '" + eDataType.getName() + "'");

Duplicated string literals make the process of refactoring error-prone, since you must be sure to update all occurrences.

On the other hand, constants can be referenced from many places, but only need to be updated in a single place.

Noncompliant Code Example

With the default threshold of 3:

public void run() {
  prepare("action1");                              // Noncompliant - "action1" is duplicated 3 times
  execute("action1");
  release("action1");
}

@SuppressWarning("all")                            // Compliant - annotations are excluded
private void method1() { /* ... */ }
@SuppressWarning("all")
private void method2() { /* ... */ }

public String method3(String a) {
  System.out.println("'" + a + "'");               // Compliant - literal "'" has less than 5 characters and is excluded
  return "";                                       // Compliant - literal "" has less than 5 characters and is excluded
}

Compliant Solution

private static final String ACTION_1 = "action1";  // Compliant

public void run() {
  prepare(ACTION_1);                               // Compliant
  execute(ACTION_1);
  release(ACTION_1);
}

Exceptions

To prevent generating some false-positives, literals having less than 5 characters are excluded.

Define a constant instead of duplicating this literal "' is not a valid enumerator of '" 3 times.
Open

        if (result == null) throw new IllegalArgumentException("The value '" + initialValue + "' is not a valid enumerator of '" + eDataType.getName() + "'");

Duplicated string literals make the process of refactoring error-prone, since you must be sure to update all occurrences.

On the other hand, constants can be referenced from many places, but only need to be updated in a single place.

Noncompliant Code Example

With the default threshold of 3:

public void run() {
  prepare("action1");                              // Noncompliant - "action1" is duplicated 3 times
  execute("action1");
  release("action1");
}

@SuppressWarning("all")                            // Compliant - annotations are excluded
private void method1() { /* ... */ }
@SuppressWarning("all")
private void method2() { /* ... */ }

public String method3(String a) {
  System.out.println("'" + a + "'");               // Compliant - literal "'" has less than 5 characters and is excluded
  return "";                                       // Compliant - literal "" has less than 5 characters and is excluded
}

Compliant Solution

private static final String ACTION_1 = "action1";  // Compliant

public void run() {
  prepare(ACTION_1);                               // Compliant
  execute(ACTION_1);
  release(ACTION_1);
}

Exceptions

To prevent generating some false-positives, literals having less than 5 characters are excluded.

Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

    @Override
    public String convertToString(EDataType eDataType, Object instanceValue) {
        switch (eDataType.getClassifierID()) {
            case MetadataPackage.PUBLICATION_TYPE:
                return convertPublicationTypeToString(eDataType, instanceValue);
de.bund.bfr.knime.fsklab.metadata.model/gen/metadata/impl/MetadataFactoryImpl.java on lines 94..108

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 85.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

    @Override
    public Object createFromString(EDataType eDataType, String initialValue) {
        switch (eDataType.getClassifierID()) {
            case MetadataPackage.PUBLICATION_TYPE:
                return createPublicationTypeFromString(eDataType, initialValue);
de.bund.bfr.knime.fsklab.metadata.model/gen/metadata/impl/MetadataFactoryImpl.java on lines 115..129

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 85.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Similar blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

    public PublicationType createPublicationTypeFromString(EDataType eDataType, String initialValue) {
        PublicationType result = PublicationType.get(initialValue);
        if (result == null) throw new IllegalArgumentException("The value '" + initialValue + "' is not a valid enumerator of '" + eDataType.getName() + "'");
        return result;
    }
de.bund.bfr.knime.fsklab.metadata.model/gen/metadata/impl/MetadataFactoryImpl.java on lines 376..380
de.bund.bfr.knime.fsklab.metadata.model/gen/metadata/impl/MetadataFactoryImpl.java on lines 396..400

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 53.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Similar blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

    public ParameterType createParameterTypeFromString(EDataType eDataType, String initialValue) {
        ParameterType result = ParameterType.get(initialValue);
        if (result == null) throw new IllegalArgumentException("The value '" + initialValue + "' is not a valid enumerator of '" + eDataType.getName() + "'");
        return result;
    }
de.bund.bfr.knime.fsklab.metadata.model/gen/metadata/impl/MetadataFactoryImpl.java on lines 356..360
de.bund.bfr.knime.fsklab.metadata.model/gen/metadata/impl/MetadataFactoryImpl.java on lines 376..380

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 53.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Similar blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

    public ParameterClassification createParameterClassificationFromString(EDataType eDataType, String initialValue) {
        ParameterClassification result = ParameterClassification.get(initialValue);
        if (result == null) throw new IllegalArgumentException("The value '" + initialValue + "' is not a valid enumerator of '" + eDataType.getName() + "'");
        return result;
    }
de.bund.bfr.knime.fsklab.metadata.model/gen/metadata/impl/MetadataFactoryImpl.java on lines 356..360
de.bund.bfr.knime.fsklab.metadata.model/gen/metadata/impl/MetadataFactoryImpl.java on lines 396..400

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 53.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

There are no issues that match your filters.

Category
Status