SiLeBAT/FSK-Lab

View on GitHub
de.bund.bfr.knime.fsklab.nodes/src/de/bund/bfr/knime/fsklab/v2_0/fskdbview/FSKDBViewNodeModel.java

Summary

Maintainability
D
1 day
Test Coverage

File FSKDBViewNodeModel.java has 308 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

/*
 ***************************************************************************************************
 * Copyright (c) 2020 Federal Institute for Risk Assessment (BfR), Germany
 *
 * This program is free software: you can redistribute it and/or modify it under the terms of the

FSKDBViewNodeModel has 28 methods (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

public class FSKDBViewNodeModel
    extends AbstractWizardNodeModel<FSKDBViewRepresentation, FSKDBViewValue> {
  // Input and output port types
  private static final PortType[] IN_TYPES = {BufferedDataTable.TYPE_OPTIONAL};
  private static final PortType[] OUT_TYPES = {BufferedDataTable.TYPE};

Method performExecute has 42 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

  @Override
  protected PortObject[] performExecute(PortObject[] inObjects, ExecutionContext exec)
      throws Exception {
    PortObject inPort = inObjects[0];
    PortObject outputPort = null;

Method saveSettingsTo has a Cognitive Complexity of 12 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

  @Override
  protected void saveSettingsTo(final NodeSettingsWO settings) {
    m_repositoryLocationSettings.saveSettingsTo(settings);
    m_SandwichListSettings.saveSettingsTo(settings);
    m_TitleSettings.saveSettingsTo(settings);

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Method validateSettings has 31 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

  @Override
  protected void validateSettings(final NodeSettingsRO settings) throws InvalidSettingsException {
    m_repositoryLocationSettings.validateSettings(settings);
    m_maxSelectionNumberSettings.validateSettings(settings);
    if (settings.containsKey(KEY_SHOW_DOWNLOAD_BUTTON)) {

Method validateSettings has a Cognitive Complexity of 9 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

  @Override
  protected void validateSettings(final NodeSettingsRO settings) throws InvalidSettingsException {
    m_repositoryLocationSettings.validateSettings(settings);
    m_maxSelectionNumberSettings.validateSettings(settings);
    if (settings.containsKey(KEY_SHOW_DOWNLOAD_BUTTON)) {

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Method convertJSONTableToBufferedDataTable has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

  private BufferedDataTable convertJSONTableToBufferedDataTable(final ExecutionContext exec) {

    String[] colNames = new String[] {"JSON", "Selected (Table View)"};
    DataType[] colTypes = new DataType[] {StringCell.TYPE, BooleanCell.TYPE};
    DataTableSpec spec = new DataTableSpec(colNames, colTypes);

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Method performExecute has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

  @Override
  protected PortObject[] performExecute(PortObject[] inObjects, ExecutionContext exec)
      throws Exception {
    PortObject inPort = inObjects[0];
    PortObject outputPort = null;

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Add a nested comment explaining why this method is empty, throw an UnsupportedOperationException or complete the implementation.
Open

  public void setHideInWizard(boolean hide) {}

There are several reasons for a method not to have a method body:

  • It is an unintentional omission, and should be fixed to prevent an unexpected behavior in production.
  • It is not yet, or never will be, supported. In this case an UnsupportedOperationException should be thrown.
  • The method is an intentionally-blank override. In this case a nested comment should explain the reason for the blank override.

Noncompliant Code Example

public void doSomething() {
}

public void doSomethingElse() {
}

Compliant Solution

@Override
public void doSomething() {
  // Do nothing because of X and Y.
}

@Override
public void doSomethingElse() {
  throw new UnsupportedOperationException();
}

Exceptions

Default (no-argument) constructors are ignored when there are other constructors in the class, as are empty methods in abstract classes.

public abstract class Animal {
  void speak() {  // default implementation ignored
  }
}

Add a nested comment explaining why this method is empty, throw an UnsupportedOperationException or complete the implementation.
Open

  public void saveCurrentValue(NodeSettingsWO content) {}

There are several reasons for a method not to have a method body:

  • It is an unintentional omission, and should be fixed to prevent an unexpected behavior in production.
  • It is not yet, or never will be, supported. In this case an UnsupportedOperationException should be thrown.
  • The method is an intentionally-blank override. In this case a nested comment should explain the reason for the blank override.

Noncompliant Code Example

public void doSomething() {
}

public void doSomethingElse() {
}

Compliant Solution

@Override
public void doSomething() {
  // Do nothing because of X and Y.
}

@Override
public void doSomethingElse() {
  throw new UnsupportedOperationException();
}

Exceptions

Default (no-argument) constructors are ignored when there are other constructors in the class, as are empty methods in abstract classes.

public abstract class Animal {
  void speak() {  // default implementation ignored
  }
}

Define a constant instead of duplicating this literal "false" 8 times.
Open

    return new SettingsModelString(KEY_SHOW_DOWNLOAD_BUTTON, "false");

Duplicated string literals make the process of refactoring error-prone, since you must be sure to update all occurrences.

On the other hand, constants can be referenced from many places, but only need to be updated in a single place.

Noncompliant Code Example

With the default threshold of 3:

public void run() {
  prepare("action1");                              // Noncompliant - "action1" is duplicated 3 times
  execute("action1");
  release("action1");
}

@SuppressWarning("all")                            // Compliant - annotations are excluded
private void method1() { /* ... */ }
@SuppressWarning("all")
private void method2() { /* ... */ }

public String method3(String a) {
  System.out.println("'" + a + "'");               // Compliant - literal "'" has less than 5 characters and is excluded
  return "";                                       // Compliant - literal "" has less than 5 characters and is excluded
}

Compliant Solution

private static final String ACTION_1 = "action1";  // Compliant

public void run() {
  prepare(ACTION_1);                               // Compliant
  execute(ACTION_1);
  release(ACTION_1);
}

Exceptions

To prevent generating some false-positives, literals having less than 5 characters are excluded.

Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

    if (settings.containsKey(KEY_SHOW_DOWNLOAD_BUTTON)) {
      m_showDownloadSettings.loadSettingsFrom(settings);
      m_showDetailsSettings.loadSettingsFrom(settings);
      m_showExecuteSettings.loadSettingsFrom(settings);
      m_showHeaderSettings.loadSettingsFrom(settings);
de.bund.bfr.knime.fsklab.deprecatednodes/src-prerakip/de/bund/bfr/knime/pmm/fskx/creator/FskxCreatorNodeDialog.java on lines 141..148

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 50.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

      if (fskdbViewValue != null && fskdbViewValue.getSelection() != null
          && fskdbViewValue.getSelection().length > 0) {
        selectionSettings.setStringArrayValue(fskdbViewValue.getSelection());
      }
de.bund.bfr.knime.fsklab.nodes/src/de/bund/bfr/knime/fsklab/v2_0/fskdbview/FSKDBViewNodeModel.java on lines 216..220

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 42.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

    if (viewValue != null && viewValue.getSelection() != null
        && viewValue.getSelection().length > 0) {
      selectionSettings.setStringArrayValue(viewValue.getSelection());

    }
de.bund.bfr.knime.fsklab.nodes/src/de/bund/bfr/knime/fsklab/v2_0/fskdbview/FSKDBViewNodeModel.java on lines 385..388

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 42.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

There are no issues that match your filters.

Category
Status