SiLeBAT/FSK-Lab

View on GitHub
de.bund.bfr.knime.internal.nodes/src/de/bund/bfr/knime/node/editableTable/JSONDataTableSpec.java

Summary

Maintainability
F
3 days
Test Coverage

Method equals has a Cognitive Complexity of 37 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

    @Override
    public boolean equals(final Object obj) {
        if (this == obj) {
            return true;
        }

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

JSONDataTableSpec has 31 methods (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

@JsonAutoDetect
@JsonTypeInfo(use = JsonTypeInfo.Id.CLASS, include = JsonTypeInfo.As.PROPERTY, property = "@class")
public class JSONDataTableSpec {

    /**

File JSONDataTableSpec.java has 303 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

/*
 * ------------------------------------------------------------------------
 *  Copyright by KNIME GmbH, Konstanz, Germany
 *  Website: http://www.knime.org; Email: contact@knime.org
 *

Method equals has 64 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

    @Override
    public boolean equals(final Object obj) {
        if (this == obj) {
            return true;
        }

Method createDataTableSpec has 30 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

    public DataTableSpec createDataTableSpec() {
        DataColumnSpec[] columns = new DataColumnSpec[m_numColumns];
        for (int i = 0; i < m_numColumns; i++) {
            JSTypes type = JSTypes.valueOf(m_colTypes.get(i));
            DataType dataType = null;

Method getJSONType has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

    static JSTypes getJSONType(final DataType colType) {
        JSTypes type;
        if (colType.isCompatible(SvgValue.class)) {
            type = JSTypes.SVG;
        } else if (colType.isCompatible(PNGImageValue.class)) {

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Avoid too many return statements within this method.
Open

                return false;

Avoid too many return statements within this method.
Open

            return false;

Avoid too many return statements within this method.
Open

            return false;

Avoid too many return statements within this method.
Open

                return false;

Avoid too many return statements within this method.
Open

            return false;

Avoid too many return statements within this method.
Open

            return false;

Avoid too many return statements within this method.
Open

                return false;

Avoid too many return statements within this method.
Open

                return false;

Avoid too many return statements within this method.
Open

            return false;

Avoid too many return statements within this method.
Open

                return false;

Avoid too many return statements within this method.
Open

            return false;

Avoid too many return statements within this method.
Open

            return false;

Avoid too many return statements within this method.
Open

            return false;

Avoid too many return statements within this method.
Open

            return false;

Avoid too many return statements within this method.
Open

            return false;

Avoid too many return statements within this method.
Open

        return true;

Refactor this method to reduce its Cognitive Complexity from 29 to the 15 allowed.
Open

    public boolean equals(final Object obj) {

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how hard the control flow of a method is to understand. Methods with high Cognitive Complexity will be difficult to maintain.

See

Identical blocks of code found in 7 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

        if (m_possibleValues == null) {
            if (other.m_possibleValues != null) {
                return false;
            }
        } else if (!m_possibleValues.equals(other.m_possibleValues)) {
de.bund.bfr.knime.internal.nodes/src/de/bund/bfr/knime/node/editableTable/JSONDataTable.java on lines 501..507
de.bund.bfr.knime.internal.nodes/src/de/bund/bfr/knime/node/editableTable/JSONDataTable.java on lines 589..595
de.bund.bfr.knime.internal.nodes/src/de/bund/bfr/knime/node/editableTable/JSONDataTableSpec.java on lines 467..473
de.bund.bfr.knime.internal.nodes/src/de/bund/bfr/knime/node/editableTable/JSONDataTableSpec.java on lines 474..480
de.bund.bfr.knime.internal.nodes/src/de/bund/bfr/knime/node/editableTable/JSONDataTableSpec.java on lines 481..487
de.bund.bfr.knime.internal.nodes/src/de/bund/bfr/knime/node/editableTable/JSONDataTableSpec.java on lines 488..494

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 44.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Identical blocks of code found in 7 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

        if (m_colTypes == null) {
            if (other.m_colTypes != null) {
                return false;
            }
        } else if (!m_colTypes.equals(other.m_colTypes)) {
de.bund.bfr.knime.internal.nodes/src/de/bund/bfr/knime/node/editableTable/JSONDataTable.java on lines 501..507
de.bund.bfr.knime.internal.nodes/src/de/bund/bfr/knime/node/editableTable/JSONDataTable.java on lines 589..595
de.bund.bfr.knime.internal.nodes/src/de/bund/bfr/knime/node/editableTable/JSONDataTableSpec.java on lines 467..473
de.bund.bfr.knime.internal.nodes/src/de/bund/bfr/knime/node/editableTable/JSONDataTableSpec.java on lines 481..487
de.bund.bfr.knime.internal.nodes/src/de/bund/bfr/knime/node/editableTable/JSONDataTableSpec.java on lines 488..494
de.bund.bfr.knime.internal.nodes/src/de/bund/bfr/knime/node/editableTable/JSONDataTableSpec.java on lines 510..516

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 44.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Identical blocks of code found in 7 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

        if (m_extensionTypes == null) {
            if (other.m_extensionTypes != null) {
                return false;
            }
        } else if (!m_extensionTypes.equals(other.m_extensionTypes)) {
de.bund.bfr.knime.internal.nodes/src/de/bund/bfr/knime/node/editableTable/JSONDataTable.java on lines 501..507
de.bund.bfr.knime.internal.nodes/src/de/bund/bfr/knime/node/editableTable/JSONDataTable.java on lines 589..595
de.bund.bfr.knime.internal.nodes/src/de/bund/bfr/knime/node/editableTable/JSONDataTableSpec.java on lines 467..473
de.bund.bfr.knime.internal.nodes/src/de/bund/bfr/knime/node/editableTable/JSONDataTableSpec.java on lines 474..480
de.bund.bfr.knime.internal.nodes/src/de/bund/bfr/knime/node/editableTable/JSONDataTableSpec.java on lines 481..487
de.bund.bfr.knime.internal.nodes/src/de/bund/bfr/knime/node/editableTable/JSONDataTableSpec.java on lines 510..516

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 44.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Identical blocks of code found in 7 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

        if (m_colNames == null) {
            if (other.m_colNames != null) {
                return false;
            }
        } else if (!m_colNames.equals(other.m_colNames)) {
de.bund.bfr.knime.internal.nodes/src/de/bund/bfr/knime/node/editableTable/JSONDataTable.java on lines 501..507
de.bund.bfr.knime.internal.nodes/src/de/bund/bfr/knime/node/editableTable/JSONDataTable.java on lines 589..595
de.bund.bfr.knime.internal.nodes/src/de/bund/bfr/knime/node/editableTable/JSONDataTableSpec.java on lines 474..480
de.bund.bfr.knime.internal.nodes/src/de/bund/bfr/knime/node/editableTable/JSONDataTableSpec.java on lines 481..487
de.bund.bfr.knime.internal.nodes/src/de/bund/bfr/knime/node/editableTable/JSONDataTableSpec.java on lines 488..494
de.bund.bfr.knime.internal.nodes/src/de/bund/bfr/knime/node/editableTable/JSONDataTableSpec.java on lines 510..516

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 44.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Identical blocks of code found in 7 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

        if (m_extensionNames == null) {
            if (other.m_extensionNames != null) {
                return false;
            }
        } else if (!m_extensionNames.equals(other.m_extensionNames)) {
de.bund.bfr.knime.internal.nodes/src/de/bund/bfr/knime/node/editableTable/JSONDataTable.java on lines 501..507
de.bund.bfr.knime.internal.nodes/src/de/bund/bfr/knime/node/editableTable/JSONDataTable.java on lines 589..595
de.bund.bfr.knime.internal.nodes/src/de/bund/bfr/knime/node/editableTable/JSONDataTableSpec.java on lines 467..473
de.bund.bfr.knime.internal.nodes/src/de/bund/bfr/knime/node/editableTable/JSONDataTableSpec.java on lines 474..480
de.bund.bfr.knime.internal.nodes/src/de/bund/bfr/knime/node/editableTable/JSONDataTableSpec.java on lines 488..494
de.bund.bfr.knime.internal.nodes/src/de/bund/bfr/knime/node/editableTable/JSONDataTableSpec.java on lines 510..516

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 44.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

There are no issues that match your filters.

Category
Status