Method convertArrays2ParamXmlDoc
has a Cognitive Complexity of 86 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
public static PmmXmlDoc convertArrays2ParamXmlDoc(LinkedHashMap<String, String> varMap, Array name,
Array value, Array timeUnit, Array categories, Array units, Array error, Array min, Array max, Array desc, Array paramType, Array P, Array t, Integer modelId, Integer emid) {
PmmXmlDoc paramDoc = new PmmXmlDoc();
if (name != null) {
try {
- Read upRead up
- Create a ticketCreate a ticket
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method convertStringLists2TSXmlDoc
has a Cognitive Complexity of 74 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
public static PmmXmlDoc convertStringLists2TSXmlDoc(Array t, Array tu, Array l, Array lu, Array lot, Array stddevs, Array wdhs, String modelUnit, String timeUnit) {
PmmXmlDoc tsDoc = new PmmXmlDoc();
if (t != null) {
try {
Object[] toksT = (Object[])t.getArray();
- Read upRead up
- Create a ticketCreate a ticket
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method convertArrays2IndepXmlDoc
has a Cognitive Complexity of 57 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
public static PmmXmlDoc convertArrays2IndepXmlDoc(LinkedHashMap<String, String> varMap, Array name, Array min, Array max, Array categories, Array units, Array desc, boolean isPrimary) {
PmmXmlDoc indepDoc = new PmmXmlDoc();
if (name != null) {
try {
Object[] na = (Object[])name.getArray();
- Read upRead up
- Create a ticketCreate a ticket
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method convertArrays2MiscXmlDoc
has a Cognitive Complexity of 41 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
public static PmmXmlDoc convertArrays2MiscXmlDoc(Array id, Array param, Array desc, Array value, Array unit, String dbuuid) {
PmmXmlDoc miscDoc = new PmmXmlDoc();
if (id != null) {
try {
Object[] sid = (Object[])id.getArray();
- Read upRead up
- Create a ticketCreate a ticket
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method checkUnits
has a Cognitive Complexity of 24 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
private static void checkUnits(Object[] toksT, Object[] toksLu) {
try {
if (toksLu != null && toksLu.length > 0) {
String unit = toksLu[0].toString();
int i=1;
- Read upRead up
- Create a ticketCreate a ticket
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
File DbIo.java
has 268 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
/*******************************************************************************
* Copyright (c) 2015 Federal Institute for Risk Assessment (BfR), Germany
*
* This program is free software: you can redistribute it and/or modify
* it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by
- Create a ticketCreate a ticket
Method convertArrays2ParamXmlDoc
has 15 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
public static PmmXmlDoc convertArrays2ParamXmlDoc(LinkedHashMap<String, String> varMap, Array name,
Array value, Array timeUnit, Array categories, Array units, Array error, Array min, Array max, Array desc, Array paramType, Array P, Array t, Integer modelId, Integer emid) {
- Create a ticketCreate a ticket
Method convertStringLists2TSXmlDoc
has 44 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
public static PmmXmlDoc convertStringLists2TSXmlDoc(Array t, Array tu, Array l, Array lu, Array lot, Array stddevs, Array wdhs, String modelUnit, String timeUnit) {
PmmXmlDoc tsDoc = new PmmXmlDoc();
if (t != null) {
try {
Object[] toksT = (Object[])t.getArray();
- Create a ticketCreate a ticket
Method convertArrays2ParamXmlDoc
has 42 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
public static PmmXmlDoc convertArrays2ParamXmlDoc(LinkedHashMap<String, String> varMap, Array name,
Array value, Array timeUnit, Array categories, Array units, Array error, Array min, Array max, Array desc, Array paramType, Array P, Array t, Integer modelId, Integer emid) {
PmmXmlDoc paramDoc = new PmmXmlDoc();
if (name != null) {
try {
- Create a ticketCreate a ticket
Consider simplifying this complex logical expression. Open
if ((current == 0x9) ||
(current == 0xA) ||
(current == 0xD) ||
((current >= 0x20) && (current <= 0xD7FF)) ||
((current >= 0xE000) && (current <= 0xFFFD)) ||
- Create a ticketCreate a ticket
Consider simplifying this complex logical expression. Open
if (toksT.length > 0) {
Category modelUnitCat = modelUnit == null ? null : Categories.getCategoryByUnit(modelUnit);
Category timeUnitCat = timeUnit == null ? null : Categories.getCategoryByUnit(timeUnit);
int i=0;
for (Object time : toksT) {
- Create a ticketCreate a ticket
Method convertArrays2IndepXmlDoc
has 32 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
public static PmmXmlDoc convertArrays2IndepXmlDoc(LinkedHashMap<String, String> varMap, Array name, Array min, Array max, Array categories, Array units, Array desc, boolean isPrimary) {
PmmXmlDoc indepDoc = new PmmXmlDoc();
if (name != null) {
try {
Object[] na = (Object[])name.getArray();
- Create a ticketCreate a ticket
Method convertStringLists2TSXmlDoc
has 9 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
public static PmmXmlDoc convertStringLists2TSXmlDoc(Array t, Array tu, Array l, Array lu, Array lot, Array stddevs, Array wdhs, String modelUnit, String timeUnit) {
- Create a ticketCreate a ticket
Method convertArrays2IndepXmlDoc
has 8 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
public static PmmXmlDoc convertArrays2IndepXmlDoc(LinkedHashMap<String, String> varMap, Array name, Array min, Array max, Array categories, Array units, Array desc, boolean isPrimary) {
- Create a ticketCreate a ticket
Method convertArray2String
has a Cognitive Complexity of 9 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
public static String convertArray2String(Array array) {
String result = null;
if (array != null) {
try {
Object[] o = (Object[])array.getArray();
- Read upRead up
- Create a ticketCreate a ticket
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method addCorrs
has a Cognitive Complexity of 9 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
private static ParamXml addCorrs(ParamXml px, int modelId, int emid) throws SQLException {
Integer paramId = DBKernel.getID("ModellkatalogParameter", new String[]{"Modell", "Parametername", "Parametertyp"}, new String[]{modelId+"", px.origName, "2"}); // Bfrdb.PARAMTYPE_PARAM
if (paramId == null) System.err.println("paramId = null... " + px.origName);
Integer estParamId = DBKernel.getID("GeschaetzteParameter", new String[]{"GeschaetztesModell", "Parameter"}, new String[]{emid+"", paramId+""});
ResultSet rs = DBKernel.getResultSet("SELECT \"param2\",\"Wert\" FROM \"GeschaetzteParameterCovCor\" WHERE \"param1\" = " + estParamId + " AND \"GeschaetztesModell\" = " + emid, false);
- Read upRead up
- Create a ticketCreate a ticket
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method stripNonValidXMLCharacters
has a Cognitive Complexity of 9 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
public static String stripNonValidXMLCharacters(String in) {
StringBuffer out = new StringBuffer(); // Used to hold the output.
char current; // Used to reference the current character.
if (in == null || ("".equals(in))) return ""; // vacancy test.
- Read upRead up
- Create a ticketCreate a ticket
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method convertArrays2MiscXmlDoc
has 6 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
public static PmmXmlDoc convertArrays2MiscXmlDoc(Array id, Array param, Array desc, Array value, Array unit, String dbuuid) {
- Create a ticketCreate a ticket
Consider simplifying this complex logical expression. Open
if (sid != null && sid.length > 0) {
for (int i=0;i<sid.length;i++) {
Integer sidi = (sid[i] == null ? null : Integer.parseInt(sid[i].toString()));
String spas = (spa == null || spa[i] == null ? null : spa[i].toString());
String sdes = (sde == null || sde[i] == null ? null : sde[i].toString());
- Create a ticketCreate a ticket
Method getVarParMap
has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
public static LinkedHashMap<String, String> getVarParMap(String varparStr) {
LinkedHashMap<String, String> ret = new LinkedHashMap<>();
if (varparStr != null) {
String[] t1 = varparStr.split(",");
- Read upRead up
- Create a ticketCreate a ticket
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Refactor this method to reduce its Cognitive Complexity from 74 to the 15 allowed. Open
public static PmmXmlDoc convertStringLists2TSXmlDoc(Array t, Array tu, Array l, Array lu, Array lot, Array stddevs, Array wdhs, String modelUnit, String timeUnit) {
- Read upRead up
- Create a ticketCreate a ticket
- Exclude checks
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how hard the control flow of a method is to understand. Methods with high Cognitive Complexity will be difficult to maintain.
See
Refactor this method to reduce its Cognitive Complexity from 57 to the 15 allowed. Open
public static PmmXmlDoc convertArrays2IndepXmlDoc(LinkedHashMap<String, String> varMap, Array name, Array min, Array max, Array categories, Array units, Array desc, boolean isPrimary) {
- Read upRead up
- Create a ticketCreate a ticket
- Exclude checks
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how hard the control flow of a method is to understand. Methods with high Cognitive Complexity will be difficult to maintain.
See
Refactor this method to reduce its Cognitive Complexity from 24 to the 15 allowed. Open
private static void checkUnits(Object[] toksT, Object[] toksLu) {
- Read upRead up
- Create a ticketCreate a ticket
- Exclude checks
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how hard the control flow of a method is to understand. Methods with high Cognitive Complexity will be difficult to maintain.
See
Refactor this method to reduce its Cognitive Complexity from 86 to the 15 allowed. Open
public static PmmXmlDoc convertArrays2ParamXmlDoc(LinkedHashMap<String, String> varMap, Array name,
- Read upRead up
- Create a ticketCreate a ticket
- Exclude checks
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how hard the control flow of a method is to understand. Methods with high Cognitive Complexity will be difficult to maintain.
See
Refactor this method to reduce its Cognitive Complexity from 41 to the 15 allowed. Open
public static PmmXmlDoc convertArrays2MiscXmlDoc(Array id, Array param, Array desc, Array value, Array unit, String dbuuid) {
- Read upRead up
- Create a ticketCreate a ticket
- Exclude checks
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how hard the control flow of a method is to understand. Methods with high Cognitive Complexity will be difficult to maintain.
See
Identical blocks of code found in 5 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
Double mad = (ma == null || ma[i] == null) ? Double.NaN : Double.parseDouble(ma[i].toString());
- Read upRead up
- Create a ticketCreate a ticket
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 44.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Identical blocks of code found in 5 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
Double svd = (sv == null || sv[i] == null) ? Double.NaN : Double.parseDouble(sv[i].toString());
- Read upRead up
- Create a ticketCreate a ticket
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 44.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Identical blocks of code found in 5 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
Double erd = (er == null || er[i] == null) ? Double.NaN : Double.parseDouble(er[i].toString());
- Read upRead up
- Create a ticketCreate a ticket
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 44.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Identical blocks of code found in 5 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
Double vad = (va == null || va[i] == null) ? Double.NaN : Double.parseDouble(va[i].toString());
- Read upRead up
- Create a ticketCreate a ticket
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 44.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Identical blocks of code found in 5 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
Double mid = (mi == null || mi[i] == null) ? Double.NaN : Double.parseDouble(mi[i].toString());
- Read upRead up
- Create a ticketCreate a ticket
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 44.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
toksL == null || toksL[i] == null ? null : convert(Double.parseDouble(toksL[i].toString()), toksLui, modelUnit, modelUnitCat),
- Read upRead up
- Create a ticketCreate a ticket
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 42.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
toksSd == null || toksSd[i] == null ? null : convert(Double.parseDouble(toksSd[i].toString()), toksLui, modelUnit, modelUnitCat),
- Read upRead up
- Create a ticketCreate a ticket
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 42.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Identical blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
Integer estParamId = DBKernel.getID("GeschaetzteParameter", new String[]{"GeschaetztesModell", "Parameter"}, new String[]{emid+"", paramId+""});
- Read upRead up
- Create a ticketCreate a ticket
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 40.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
if (ct != null && ct[i] != null) px.t = Double.parseDouble(ct[i].toString());
- Read upRead up
- Create a ticketCreate a ticket
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 40.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
if (cp != null && cp[i] != null) px.P = Double.parseDouble(cp[i].toString());
- Read upRead up
- Create a ticketCreate a ticket
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 40.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76