Function jsep
has 332 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
jsep = function(expr) {
// `index` stores the character number we are currently at while `length` is a constant
// All of the gobbles below will modify `index` as we move along
var index = 0,
charAtFunc = expr.charAt,
- Create a ticketCreate a ticket
File jsep.js
has 469 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
// JavaScript Expression Parser (JSEP) 0.3.1
// JSEP may be freely distributed under the MIT License
// http://jsep.from.so/
/*global module: true, exports: true, console: true */
- Create a ticketCreate a ticket
Function gobbleVariable
has 43 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
gobbleVariable = function() {
var ch_i, node;
ch_i = exprICode(index);
if(ch_i === OPAREN_CODE) {
- Create a ticketCreate a ticket
Function gobbleBinaryExpression
has 38 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
gobbleBinaryExpression = function() {
var ch_i, node, biop, prec, stack, biop_info, left, right, i;
// First, try to get the leftmost thing
// Then, check to see if there's a binary operator operating on that leftmost thing
- Create a ticketCreate a ticket
Function gobbleNumericLiteral
has 36 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
gobbleNumericLiteral = function() {
var number = '', ch, chCode;
while(isDecimalDigit(exprICode(index))) {
number += exprI(index++);
}
- Create a ticketCreate a ticket
Function gobbleStringLiteral
has 29 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
gobbleStringLiteral = function() {
var str = '', quote = exprI(index++), closed = false, ch;
while(index < length) {
ch = exprI(index++);
- Create a ticketCreate a ticket
Function gobbleIdentifier
has 29 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
gobbleIdentifier = function() {
var ch = exprICode(index), start = index, identifier;
if(isIdentifierStart(ch)) {
index++;
- Create a ticketCreate a ticket
Function gobbleToken
has 28 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
gobbleToken = function() {
var ch, to_check, tc_len;
gobbleSpaces();
ch = exprICode(index);
- Create a ticketCreate a ticket
Function gobbleExpression
has 28 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
gobbleExpression = function() {
var test = gobbleBinaryExpression(),
consequent, alternate;
gobbleSpaces();
if(exprICode(index) === QUMARK_CODE) {
- Create a ticketCreate a ticket
Avoid too many return
statements within this function. Open
return {
type: UNARY_EXP,
operator: to_check,
argument: gobbleToken(),
prefix: true
- Create a ticketCreate a ticket
Avoid too many return
statements within this function. Open
return false;
- Create a ticketCreate a ticket
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
jsep.removeUnaryOp = function(op_name) {
delete unary_ops[op_name];
if(op_name.length === max_unop_len) {
max_unop_len = getMaxKeyLen(unary_ops);
}
- Read upRead up
- Create a ticketCreate a ticket
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 59.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
jsep.removeBinaryOp = function(op_name) {
delete binary_ops[op_name];
if(op_name.length === max_binop_len) {
max_binop_len = getMaxKeyLen(binary_ops);
}
- Read upRead up
- Create a ticketCreate a ticket
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 59.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
return (ch === 36) || (ch === 95) || // `$` and `_`
(ch >= 65 && ch <= 90) || // A...Z
(ch >= 97 && ch <= 122) || // a...z
(ch >= 128 && !binary_ops[String.fromCharCode(ch)]); // any non-ASCII that is not an operator
- Read upRead up
- Create a ticketCreate a ticket
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 50.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
return (ch === 36) || (ch === 95) || // `$` and `_`
(ch >= 65 && ch <= 90) || // A...Z
(ch >= 97 && ch <= 122) || // a...z
(ch >= 48 && ch <= 57) || // 0...9
- Read upRead up
- Create a ticketCreate a ticket
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 50.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76