SiLeBAT/FSK-Lab

View on GitHub
de.bund.bfr.knime.pmm.nodes/src/de/bund/bfr/knime/pmm/pdfkeeper/PdfKeeperNodeDialog.java

Summary

Maintainability
B
6 hrs
Test Coverage

Method openPDF has a Cognitive Complexity of 22 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

    private void openPDF() {
        try {
            if (fileBytes != null && fileName != null) {
                Runnable runnable = new Runnable() {
                    @Override

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Method run has a Cognitive Complexity of 13 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

                    @Override
                    public void run() {
                        try {
                            String tmpFolder = System.getProperty("java.io.tmpdir");
                            String pathname = "";

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Method openPDF has 37 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

    private void openPDF() {
        try {
            if (fileBytes != null && fileName != null) {
                Runnable runnable = new Runnable() {
                    @Override

Refactor this method to reduce its Cognitive Complexity from 22 to the 15 allowed.
Open

    private void openPDF() {

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how hard the control flow of a method is to understand. Methods with high Cognitive Complexity will be difficult to maintain.

See

Change this "try" to a try-with-resources.
Open

                                try {

Java 7 introduced the try-with-resources statement, which guarantees that the resource in question will be closed. Since the new syntax is closer to bullet-proof, it should be preferred over the older try/catch/finally version.

This rule checks that close-able resources are opened in a try-with-resources statement.

Note that this rule is automatically disabled when the project's sonar.java.source is lower than 7.

Noncompliant Code Example

FileReader fr = null;
BufferedReader br = null;
try {
  fr = new FileReader(fileName);
  br = new BufferedReader(fr);
  return br.readLine();
} catch (...) {
} finally {
  if (br != null) {
    try {
      br.close();
    } catch(IOException e){...}
  }
  if (fr != null ) {
    try {
      br.close();
    } catch(IOException e){...}
  }
}

Compliant Solution

try (
    FileReader fr = new FileReader(fileName);
    BufferedReader br = new BufferedReader(fr)
  ) {
  return br.readLine();
}
catch (...) {}

or

try (BufferedReader br =
        new BufferedReader(new FileReader(fileName))) { // no need to name intermediate resources if you don't want to
  return br.readLine();
}
catch (...) {}

See

  • CERT, ERR54-J. - Use a try-with-resources statement to safely handle closeable resources

There are no issues that match your filters.

Category
Status