SiLeBAT/FSK-Lab

View on GitHub

Showing 14,752 of 14,752 total issues

Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

  function def(mimes, mode) {
    if (typeof mimes == "string") mimes = [mimes];
    var words = [];
    function add(obj) {
      if (obj) for (var prop in obj) if (obj.hasOwnProperty(prop))
de.bund.bfr.knime.js/js-lib/codemirror-5.49.2/mode/ttcn/ttcn.js on lines 222..242

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 210.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

File ExposureModelSheetImporter.java has 530 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

package metadata.swagger;

import java.math.BigDecimal;
import java.util.Arrays;
import java.util.HashMap;

Similar blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

    "assay": [{
        "id": "name",
        "label": "Assay name",
        "type": "text",
        "description": "A name given to the assay",
Severity: Major
Found in de.bund.bfr.knime.js/js-lib/bfr/fskapp/editor_data_1.0.0.js and 2 other locations - About 1 day to fix
de.bund.bfr.knime.fsklab.deprecatednodes/js-src/de/bund/bfr/knime/fsklab/1.7.2/editor/editor_data.js on lines 677..723
de.bund.bfr.knime.js/js-lib/bfr/fskmetadata_1.0.0.js on lines 677..723

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 209.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Similar blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

    "assay": [{
        "id": "name",
        "label": "Name",
        "type": "text",
        "description": "A name given to the assay",
de.bund.bfr.knime.js/js-lib/bfr/fskapp/editor_data_1.0.0.js on lines 686..732
de.bund.bfr.knime.js/js-lib/bfr/fskmetadata_1.0.0.js on lines 677..723

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 209.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Similar blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

    "assay": [{
        "id": "name",
        "label": "Name",
        "type": "text",
        "description": "A name given to the assay",
Severity: Major
Found in de.bund.bfr.knime.js/js-lib/bfr/fskmetadata_1.0.0.js and 2 other locations - About 1 day to fix
de.bund.bfr.knime.fsklab.deprecatednodes/js-src/de/bund/bfr/knime/fsklab/1.7.2/editor/editor_data.js on lines 677..723
de.bund.bfr.knime.js/js-lib/bfr/fskapp/editor_data_1.0.0.js on lines 686..732

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 209.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

File WriterNodeModel.java has 529 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

/*
 ***************************************************************************************************
 * Copyright (c) 2017 Federal Institute for Risk Assessment (BfR), Germany
 *
 * This program is free software: you can redistribute it and/or modify it under the terms of the

Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

            if (arguments.length){
                $.each(arguments, $.proxy(function(i, date){
                    if (date instanceof Date)
                        date = this._local_to_utc(date);
                    dates.push(date);
de.bund.bfr.knime.js/src/js/lib/bootstrap-datepicker.js on lines 754..770

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 208.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

            if (arguments.length){
                $.each(arguments, $.proxy(function(i, date){
                    if (date instanceof Date)
                        date = this._local_to_utc(date);
                    dates.push(date);
Severity: Major
Found in de.bund.bfr.knime.js/src/js/lib/bootstrap-datepicker.js and 1 other location - About 1 day to fix
de.bund.bfr.knime.fsklab.deprecatednodes/js-src/bootstrap-datepicker/1_6_4/debug/js/bootstrap-datepicker.js on lines 750..767

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 208.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

File QraModelSheetImporter.java has 527 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

package metadata.swagger;

import java.math.BigDecimal;
import java.util.HashMap;

File slim.js has 525 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

// CodeMirror, copyright (c) by Marijn Haverbeke and others
// Distributed under an MIT license: https://codemirror.net/LICENSE

// Slim Highlighting for CodeMirror copyright (c) HicknHack Software Gmbh

Severity: Major
Found in de.bund.bfr.knime.js/js-lib/codemirror-5.49.2/mode/slim/slim.js - About 1 day to fix

Function 10 has 215 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

},{}],10:[function(require,module,exports){
'use strict';


module.exports = {

Method deserialize has a Cognitive Complexity of 55 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

        @Override
        public GenericModelGeneralInformation deserialize(JsonParser parser, DeserializationContext context)
                throws IOException, JsonProcessingException {

            JsonNode node = parser.readValueAsTree();

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Method actionPerformed has a Cognitive Complexity of 55 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

    @Override
    public void actionPerformed(ActionEvent event) {
        if (event.getSource() == xlsButton) {
            loadFromXLS();
        } else if (event.getSource() == clearButton) {

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Method execute has a Cognitive Complexity of 55 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

    @Override
    protected BufferedDataTable[] execute(final BufferedDataTable[] inData, final ExecutionContext exec) throws Exception {

        Bfrdb db = null;
        try {

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Method doImport has a Cognitive Complexity of 55 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

    public String doImport(final String filename, final JProgressBar progress, final boolean showResults) {
        Runnable runnable = new Runnable() {
            public void run() {
                System.err.println("Importing " + filename);
                logMessages += "Importing " + filename + "\n";

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Method yylex has a Cognitive Complexity of 55 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

    private org.fife.ui.rsyntaxtextarea.Token yylex() {
        int zzInput;
        int zzAction;

        // cached fields:

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Method yylex has a Cognitive Complexity of 55 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

    private org.fife.ui.rsyntaxtextarea.Token yylex() {
        int zzInput;
        int zzAction;

        // cached fields:

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Method yylex has a Cognitive Complexity of 55 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

    private org.fife.ui.rsyntaxtextarea.Token yylex() {
        int zzInput;
        int zzAction;

        // cached fields:

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

File RiskModelSheetImporter.java has 523 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

package metadata.swagger;

import java.math.BigDecimal;
import java.util.HashMap;

File ChildParentDocumentImpl.java has 523 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

/*
 * An XML document type.
 * Localname: ChildParent
 * Namespace: http://www.bfr.bund.de/PCML-1_0
 * Java type: de.bund.bfr.pcml10.ChildParentDocument
Severity
Category
Status
Source
Language