Showing 14,752 of 14,752 total issues
Add a nested comment explaining why this method is empty, throw an UnsupportedOperationException or complete the implementation. Open
protected void loadInternals(final File internDir, final ExecutionMonitor exec)
- Read upRead up
- Create a ticketCreate a ticket
- Exclude checks
There are several reasons for a method not to have a method body:
- It is an unintentional omission, and should be fixed to prevent an unexpected behavior in production.
- It is not yet, or never will be, supported. In this case an
UnsupportedOperationException
should be thrown. - The method is an intentionally-blank override. In this case a nested comment should explain the reason for the blank override.
Noncompliant Code Example
public void doSomething() { } public void doSomethingElse() { }
Compliant Solution
@Override public void doSomething() { // Do nothing because of X and Y. } @Override public void doSomethingElse() { throw new UnsupportedOperationException(); }
Exceptions
Default (no-argument) constructors are ignored when there are other constructors in the class, as are empty methods in abstract classes.
public abstract class Animal { void speak() { // default implementation ignored } }
Define a constant instead of duplicating this literal "dbuuid" 9 times. Open
final MatrixXml matrix2 = new MatrixXml(Type.MD, 0, "name", "detail", "dbuuid");
- Read upRead up
- Create a ticketCreate a ticket
- Exclude checks
Duplicated string literals make the process of refactoring error-prone, since you must be sure to update all occurrences.
On the other hand, constants can be referenced from many places, but only need to be updated in a single place.
Noncompliant Code Example
With the default threshold of 3:
public void run() { prepare("action1"); // Noncompliant - "action1" is duplicated 3 times execute("action1"); release("action1"); } @SuppressWarning("all") // Compliant - annotations are excluded private void method1() { /* ... */ } @SuppressWarning("all") private void method2() { /* ... */ } public String method3(String a) { System.out.println("'" + a + "'"); // Compliant - literal "'" has less than 5 characters and is excluded return ""; // Compliant - literal "" has less than 5 characters and is excluded }
Compliant Solution
private static final String ACTION_1 = "action1"; // Compliant public void run() { prepare(ACTION_1); // Compliant execute(ACTION_1); release(ACTION_1); }
Exceptions
To prevent generating some false-positives, literals having less than 5 characters are excluded.
Define a constant instead of duplicating this literal "drink" 4 times. Open
element.setAttribute("drink", "");
- Read upRead up
- Create a ticketCreate a ticket
- Exclude checks
Duplicated string literals make the process of refactoring error-prone, since you must be sure to update all occurrences.
On the other hand, constants can be referenced from many places, but only need to be updated in a single place.
Noncompliant Code Example
With the default threshold of 3:
public void run() { prepare("action1"); // Noncompliant - "action1" is duplicated 3 times execute("action1"); release("action1"); } @SuppressWarning("all") // Compliant - annotations are excluded private void method1() { /* ... */ } @SuppressWarning("all") private void method2() { /* ... */ } public String method3(String a) { System.out.println("'" + a + "'"); // Compliant - literal "'" has less than 5 characters and is excluded return ""; // Compliant - literal "" has less than 5 characters and is excluded }
Compliant Solution
private static final String ACTION_1 = "action1"; // Compliant public void run() { prepare(ACTION_1); // Compliant execute(ACTION_1); release(ACTION_1); }
Exceptions
To prevent generating some false-positives, literals having less than 5 characters are excluded.
Define a constant instead of duplicating this literal "description" 6 times. Open
model.setIndepDescription("aloha", "description");
- Read upRead up
- Create a ticketCreate a ticket
- Exclude checks
Duplicated string literals make the process of refactoring error-prone, since you must be sure to update all occurrences.
On the other hand, constants can be referenced from many places, but only need to be updated in a single place.
Noncompliant Code Example
With the default threshold of 3:
public void run() { prepare("action1"); // Noncompliant - "action1" is duplicated 3 times execute("action1"); release("action1"); } @SuppressWarning("all") // Compliant - annotations are excluded private void method1() { /* ... */ } @SuppressWarning("all") private void method2() { /* ... */ } public String method3(String a) { System.out.println("'" + a + "'"); // Compliant - literal "'" has less than 5 characters and is excluded return ""; // Compliant - literal "" has less than 5 characters and is excluded }
Compliant Solution
private static final String ACTION_1 = "action1"; // Compliant public void run() { prepare(ACTION_1); // Compliant execute(ACTION_1); release(ACTION_1); }
Exceptions
To prevent generating some false-positives, literals having less than 5 characters are excluded.
Define a constant instead of duplicating this literal "dbuuid" 8 times. Open
final EstModelXml model2 = new EstModelXml(0, "name", .0, .0, .0, .0, .0, 1, true, 1, "dbuuid");
- Read upRead up
- Create a ticketCreate a ticket
- Exclude checks
Duplicated string literals make the process of refactoring error-prone, since you must be sure to update all occurrences.
On the other hand, constants can be referenced from many places, but only need to be updated in a single place.
Noncompliant Code Example
With the default threshold of 3:
public void run() { prepare("action1"); // Noncompliant - "action1" is duplicated 3 times execute("action1"); release("action1"); } @SuppressWarning("all") // Compliant - annotations are excluded private void method1() { /* ... */ } @SuppressWarning("all") private void method2() { /* ... */ } public String method3(String a) { System.out.println("'" + a + "'"); // Compliant - literal "'" has less than 5 characters and is excluded return ""; // Compliant - literal "" has less than 5 characters and is excluded }
Compliant Solution
private static final String ACTION_1 = "action1"; // Compliant public void run() { prepare(ACTION_1); // Compliant execute(ACTION_1); release(ACTION_1); }
Exceptions
To prevent generating some false-positives, literals having less than 5 characters are excluded.
Add a nested comment explaining why this method is empty, throw an UnsupportedOperationException or complete the implementation. Open
public void saveSettings(final NodeSettingsWO settings) {
- Read upRead up
- Create a ticketCreate a ticket
- Exclude checks
There are several reasons for a method not to have a method body:
- It is an unintentional omission, and should be fixed to prevent an unexpected behavior in production.
- It is not yet, or never will be, supported. In this case an
UnsupportedOperationException
should be thrown. - The method is an intentionally-blank override. In this case a nested comment should explain the reason for the blank override.
Noncompliant Code Example
public void doSomething() { } public void doSomethingElse() { }
Compliant Solution
@Override public void doSomething() { // Do nothing because of X and Y. } @Override public void doSomethingElse() { throw new UnsupportedOperationException(); }
Exceptions
Default (no-argument) constructors are ignored when there are other constructors in the class, as are empty methods in abstract classes.
public abstract class Animal { void speak() { // default implementation ignored } }
Refactor this method to reduce its Cognitive Complexity from 18 to the 15 allowed. Open
private void createPcData(PCMLDocument pcmlDoc, final PortObject[] inObjects) {
- Read upRead up
- Create a ticketCreate a ticket
- Exclude checks
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how hard the control flow of a method is to understand. Methods with high Cognitive Complexity will be difficult to maintain.
See
Add a default case to this switch. Open
switch (flowVar.getType()) {
- Read upRead up
- Create a ticketCreate a ticket
- Exclude checks
The requirement for a final default
clause is defensive programming. The clause should either take appropriate action, or contain a
suitable comment as to why no action is taken.
Noncompliant Code Example
switch (param) { //missing default clause case 0: doSomething(); break; case 1: doSomethingElse(); break; } switch (param) { default: // default clause should be the last one error(); break; case 0: doSomething(); break; case 1: doSomethingElse(); break; }
Compliant Solution
switch (param) { case 0: doSomething(); break; case 1: doSomethingElse(); break; default: error(); break; }
Exceptions
If the switch
parameter is an Enum
and if all the constants of this enum are used in the case
statements,
then no default
clause is expected.
Example:
public enum Day { SUNDAY, MONDAY } ... switch(day) { case SUNDAY: doSomething(); break; case MONDAY: doSomethingElse(); break; }
See
- MITRE, CWE-478 - Missing Default Case in Switch Statement
- CERT, MSC01-C. - Strive for logical completeness
Refactor this method to reduce its Cognitive Complexity from 101 to the 15 allowed. Open
public BufferedDataTable importBufferedDataTable(String varName, boolean nonNumbersAsMissing,
- Read upRead up
- Create a ticketCreate a ticket
- Exclude checks
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how hard the control flow of a method is to understand. Methods with high Cognitive Complexity will be difficult to maintain.
See
Refactor this method to reduce its Cognitive Complexity from 102 to the 15 allowed. Open
public void monitoredAssign(final String name, final BufferedDataTable table,
- Read upRead up
- Create a ticketCreate a ticket
- Exclude checks
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how hard the control flow of a method is to understand. Methods with high Cognitive Complexity will be difficult to maintain.
See
Define a constant instead of duplicating this literal "mdAgent" 3 times. Open
final Element element = new Element("mdAgent");
- Read upRead up
- Create a ticketCreate a ticket
- Exclude checks
Duplicated string literals make the process of refactoring error-prone, since you must be sure to update all occurrences.
On the other hand, constants can be referenced from many places, but only need to be updated in a single place.
Noncompliant Code Example
With the default threshold of 3:
public void run() { prepare("action1"); // Noncompliant - "action1" is duplicated 3 times execute("action1"); release("action1"); } @SuppressWarning("all") // Compliant - annotations are excluded private void method1() { /* ... */ } @SuppressWarning("all") private void method2() { /* ... */ } public String method3(String a) { System.out.println("'" + a + "'"); // Compliant - literal "'" has less than 5 characters and is excluded return ""; // Compliant - literal "" has less than 5 characters and is excluded }
Compliant Solution
private static final String ACTION_1 = "action1"; // Compliant public void run() { prepare(ACTION_1); // Compliant execute(ACTION_1); release(ACTION_1); }
Exceptions
To prevent generating some false-positives, literals having less than 5 characters are excluded.
Define a constant instead of duplicating this literal "EstimatedModelLiterature" 3 times. Open
new LiteratureItem(new Element("EstimatedModelLiterature"));
- Read upRead up
- Create a ticketCreate a ticket
- Exclude checks
Duplicated string literals make the process of refactoring error-prone, since you must be sure to update all occurrences.
On the other hand, constants can be referenced from many places, but only need to be updated in a single place.
Noncompliant Code Example
With the default threshold of 3:
public void run() { prepare("action1"); // Noncompliant - "action1" is duplicated 3 times execute("action1"); release("action1"); } @SuppressWarning("all") // Compliant - annotations are excluded private void method1() { /* ... */ } @SuppressWarning("all") private void method2() { /* ... */ } public String method3(String a) { System.out.println("'" + a + "'"); // Compliant - literal "'" has less than 5 characters and is excluded return ""; // Compliant - literal "" has less than 5 characters and is excluded }
Compliant Solution
private static final String ACTION_1 = "action1"; // Compliant public void run() { prepare(ACTION_1); // Compliant execute(ACTION_1); release(ACTION_1); }
Exceptions
To prevent generating some false-positives, literals having less than 5 characters are excluded.
Define a constant instead of duplicating this literal "comment" 12 times. Open
"issue", 0, 0, "website", 0, "comment", 0, "dbuuid");
- Read upRead up
- Create a ticketCreate a ticket
- Exclude checks
Duplicated string literals make the process of refactoring error-prone, since you must be sure to update all occurrences.
On the other hand, constants can be referenced from many places, but only need to be updated in a single place.
Noncompliant Code Example
With the default threshold of 3:
public void run() { prepare("action1"); // Noncompliant - "action1" is duplicated 3 times execute("action1"); release("action1"); } @SuppressWarning("all") // Compliant - annotations are excluded private void method1() { /* ... */ } @SuppressWarning("all") private void method2() { /* ... */ } public String method3(String a) { System.out.println("'" + a + "'"); // Compliant - literal "'" has less than 5 characters and is excluded return ""; // Compliant - literal "" has less than 5 characters and is excluded }
Compliant Solution
private static final String ACTION_1 = "action1"; // Compliant public void run() { prepare(ACTION_1); // Compliant execute(ACTION_1); release(ACTION_1); }
Exceptions
To prevent generating some false-positives, literals having less than 5 characters are excluded.
Define a constant instead of duplicating this literal "Cadena" 11 times. Open
schema.addStringAttribute("Cadena");
- Read upRead up
- Create a ticketCreate a ticket
- Exclude checks
Duplicated string literals make the process of refactoring error-prone, since you must be sure to update all occurrences.
On the other hand, constants can be referenced from many places, but only need to be updated in a single place.
Noncompliant Code Example
With the default threshold of 3:
public void run() { prepare("action1"); // Noncompliant - "action1" is duplicated 3 times execute("action1"); release("action1"); } @SuppressWarning("all") // Compliant - annotations are excluded private void method1() { /* ... */ } @SuppressWarning("all") private void method2() { /* ... */ } public String method3(String a) { System.out.println("'" + a + "'"); // Compliant - literal "'" has less than 5 characters and is excluded return ""; // Compliant - literal "" has less than 5 characters and is excluded }
Compliant Solution
private static final String ACTION_1 = "action1"; // Compliant public void run() { prepare(ACTION_1); // Compliant execute(ACTION_1); release(ACTION_1); }
Exceptions
To prevent generating some false-positives, literals having less than 5 characters are excluded.
Define a constant instead of duplicating this literal "dbuuid" 11 times. Open
final MiscXml misc1 = new MiscXml(0, "name", "description", .0, Arrays.asList("category"), "unit", "dbuuid");
- Read upRead up
- Create a ticketCreate a ticket
- Exclude checks
Duplicated string literals make the process of refactoring error-prone, since you must be sure to update all occurrences.
On the other hand, constants can be referenced from many places, but only need to be updated in a single place.
Noncompliant Code Example
With the default threshold of 3:
public void run() { prepare("action1"); // Noncompliant - "action1" is duplicated 3 times execute("action1"); release("action1"); } @SuppressWarning("all") // Compliant - annotations are excluded private void method1() { /* ... */ } @SuppressWarning("all") private void method2() { /* ... */ } public String method3(String a) { System.out.println("'" + a + "'"); // Compliant - literal "'" has less than 5 characters and is excluded return ""; // Compliant - literal "" has less than 5 characters and is excluded }
Compliant Solution
private static final String ACTION_1 = "action1"; // Compliant public void run() { prepare(ACTION_1); // Compliant execute(ACTION_1); release(ACTION_1); }
Exceptions
To prevent generating some false-positives, literals having less than 5 characters are excluded.
Define a constant instead of duplicating this literal "concentrationUnit" 11 times. Open
final TimeSeriesXml series0 = new TimeSeriesXml("name", 0.0, "timeUnit", 1.0, "concentrationUnit", 0.0, 1);
- Read upRead up
- Create a ticketCreate a ticket
- Exclude checks
Duplicated string literals make the process of refactoring error-prone, since you must be sure to update all occurrences.
On the other hand, constants can be referenced from many places, but only need to be updated in a single place.
Noncompliant Code Example
With the default threshold of 3:
public void run() { prepare("action1"); // Noncompliant - "action1" is duplicated 3 times execute("action1"); release("action1"); } @SuppressWarning("all") // Compliant - annotations are excluded private void method1() { /* ... */ } @SuppressWarning("all") private void method2() { /* ... */ } public String method3(String a) { System.out.println("'" + a + "'"); // Compliant - literal "'" has less than 5 characters and is excluded return ""; // Compliant - literal "" has less than 5 characters and is excluded }
Compliant Solution
private static final String ACTION_1 = "action1"; // Compliant public void run() { prepare(ACTION_1); // Compliant execute(ACTION_1); release(ACTION_1); }
Exceptions
To prevent generating some false-positives, literals having less than 5 characters are excluded.
Define a constant instead of duplicating this literal "concentrationUnitObjectType" 8 times. Open
"concentrationUnitObjectType", "origConcentrationUnit", 0.0, 1);
- Read upRead up
- Create a ticketCreate a ticket
- Exclude checks
Duplicated string literals make the process of refactoring error-prone, since you must be sure to update all occurrences.
On the other hand, constants can be referenced from many places, but only need to be updated in a single place.
Noncompliant Code Example
With the default threshold of 3:
public void run() { prepare("action1"); // Noncompliant - "action1" is duplicated 3 times execute("action1"); release("action1"); } @SuppressWarning("all") // Compliant - annotations are excluded private void method1() { /* ... */ } @SuppressWarning("all") private void method2() { /* ... */ } public String method3(String a) { System.out.println("'" + a + "'"); // Compliant - literal "'" has less than 5 characters and is excluded return ""; // Compliant - literal "" has less than 5 characters and is excluded }
Compliant Solution
private static final String ACTION_1 = "action1"; // Compliant public void run() { prepare(ACTION_1); // Compliant execute(ACTION_1); release(ACTION_1); }
Exceptions
To prevent generating some false-positives, literals having less than 5 characters are excluded.
Define a constant instead of duplicating this literal "detail" 11 times. Open
final MatrixXml matrix1 = new MatrixXml(0, "name", "detail");
- Read upRead up
- Create a ticketCreate a ticket
- Exclude checks
Duplicated string literals make the process of refactoring error-prone, since you must be sure to update all occurrences.
On the other hand, constants can be referenced from many places, but only need to be updated in a single place.
Noncompliant Code Example
With the default threshold of 3:
public void run() { prepare("action1"); // Noncompliant - "action1" is duplicated 3 times execute("action1"); release("action1"); } @SuppressWarning("all") // Compliant - annotations are excluded private void method1() { /* ... */ } @SuppressWarning("all") private void method2() { /* ... */ } public String method3(String a) { System.out.println("'" + a + "'"); // Compliant - literal "'" has less than 5 characters and is excluded return ""; // Compliant - literal "" has less than 5 characters and is excluded }
Compliant Solution
private static final String ACTION_1 = "action1"; // Compliant public void run() { prepare(ACTION_1); // Compliant execute(ACTION_1); release(ACTION_1); }
Exceptions
To prevent generating some false-positives, literals having less than 5 characters are excluded.
Add a nested comment explaining why this method is empty, throw an UnsupportedOperationException or complete the implementation. Open
public void saveSettings(final NodeSettingsWO settings) {
- Read upRead up
- Create a ticketCreate a ticket
- Exclude checks
There are several reasons for a method not to have a method body:
- It is an unintentional omission, and should be fixed to prevent an unexpected behavior in production.
- It is not yet, or never will be, supported. In this case an
UnsupportedOperationException
should be thrown. - The method is an intentionally-blank override. In this case a nested comment should explain the reason for the blank override.
Noncompliant Code Example
public void doSomething() { } public void doSomethingElse() { }
Compliant Solution
@Override public void doSomething() { // Do nothing because of X and Y. } @Override public void doSomethingElse() { throw new UnsupportedOperationException(); }
Exceptions
Default (no-argument) constructors are ignored when there are other constructors in the class, as are empty methods in abstract classes.
public abstract class Animal { void speak() { // default implementation ignored } }
Disable access to external entities in XML parsing. Open
SAXParserFactory saxFac = SAXParserFactory.newInstance();
- Read upRead up
- Create a ticketCreate a ticket
- Exclude checks
XML specification allows the use of entities that can be internal or external (file system / network access ...) which could lead to vulnerabilities such as confidential file disclosures or SSRFs.
Example in this XML document, an external entity read the /etc/passwd file:
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?> <!DOCTYPE test [ <!ENTITY xxe SYSTEM "file:///etc/passwd"> ]> <note xmlns="http://www.w3schools.com" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"> <to>&xxe;</to> <from>Jani</from> <heading>Reminder</heading> <body>Don't forget me this weekend!</body> </note>
In this XSL document, network access is allowed which can lead to SSRF vulnerabilities:
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?> <xsl:stylesheet version="1.0" xmlns:xsl="http://www.attacker.com/evil.xsl"> <xsl:import href="http://www.attacker.com/evil.xsl"/> <xsl:include href="http://www.attacker.com/evil.xsl"/> <xsl:template match="/"> &content; </xsl:template> </xsl:stylesheet>
It is recommended to disable access to external entities and network access in general.
To protect Java XML Parsers from XXE attacks these properties have been defined since JAXP 1.5:
- ACCESS_EXTERNAL_DTD: should be set to "" when processing XML/XSD/XLS files (it looks for external DOCTYPEs)
- ACCESS_EXTERNAL_SCHEMA: should be set to "" when processing XML/XSD/XLS files (it looks for external schemalocation ect)
- ACCESS_EXTERNAL_STYLESHEET should be set to "" when processing XLS file (it looks for external imports, includes ect);
Note that Apache Xerces is still based on JAXP 1.4, therefore one solution is to set to
false
the external-general-entities feature.
Avoid FEATURE_SECURE_PROCESSING feature to protect from XXE attacks because depending on the implementation:
- it has no effect to protect the parser from XXE attacks but helps guard against excessive memory consumption from XML processing.
- or it's just an obscur shortcut (it could set ACCESS_EXTERNAL_DTD and ACCESS_EXTERNAL_SCHEMA to "" but without guarantee).
When setting an entity
resolver to null
(eg: setEntityResolver(null)
) the parser will use its own resolution, which is unsafe.
Noncompliant Code Examples
DocumentBuilderFactory library:
String xml = "xxe.xml"; DocumentBuilderFactory df = DocumentBuilderFactory.newInstance(); DocumentBuilder builder = df.newDocumentBuilder(); // Noncompliant Document document = builder.parse(new InputSource(xml)); DOMSource domSource = new DOMSource(document);
SAXParserFactory library:
String xml = "xxe.xml"; SaxHandler handler = new SaxHandler(); SAXParserFactory factory = SAXParserFactory.newInstance(); SAXParser parser = factory.newSAXParser(); // Noncompliant parser.parse(xml, handler);
XMLInputFactory library:
XMLInputFactory factory = XMLInputFactory.newInstance(); // Noncompliant XMLEventReader eventReader = factory.createXMLEventReader(new FileReader("xxe.xml"));
TransformerFactory library:
String xslt = "xxe.xsl"; String xml = "xxe.xml"; TransformerFactory transformerFactory = javax.xml.transform.TransformerFactory.newInstance(); // Noncompliant Transformer transformer = transformerFactory.newTransformer(new StreamSource(xslt)); StringWriter writer = new StringWriter(); transformer.transform(new StreamSource(xml), new StreamResult(writer)); String result = writer.toString();
SchemaFactory library:
String xsd = "xxe.xsd"; StreamSource xsdStreamSource = new StreamSource(xsd); SchemaFactory schemaFactory = SchemaFactory.newInstance(XMLConstants.W3C_XML_SCHEMA_NS_URI); // Noncompliant Schema schema = schemaFactory.newSchema(xsdStreamSource);
Validator library:
String xsd = "xxe.xsd"; String xml = "xxe.xml"; StreamSource xsdStreamSource = new StreamSource(xsd); StreamSource xmlStreamSource = new StreamSource(xml); SchemaFactory schemaFactory = SchemaFactory.newInstance(XMLConstants.W3C_XML_SCHEMA_NS_URI); Schema schema = schemaFactory.newSchema(xsdStreamSource); Validator validator = schema.newValidator(); // Noncompliant StringWriter writer = new StringWriter(); validator.validate(xmlStreamSource, new StreamResult(writer));
Dom4j library:
SAXReader xmlReader = new SAXReader(); // Noncompliant by default Document xmlResponse = xmlReader.read(xml);
Jdom2 library:
SAXBuilder builder = new SAXBuilder(); // Noncompliant by default Document document = builder.build(new File(xml));
Compliant Solution
DocumentBuilderFactory library:
String xml = "xxe.xml"; DocumentBuilderFactory df = DocumentBuilderFactory.newInstance(); df.setAttribute(XMLConstants.ACCESS_EXTERNAL_DTD, ""); // Compliant df.setAttribute(XMLConstants.ACCESS_EXTERNAL_SCHEMA, ""); // compliant DocumentBuilder builder = df.newDocumentBuilder(); Document document = builder.parse(new InputSource(xml)); DOMSource domSource = new DOMSource(document);
SAXParserFactory library:
String xml = "xxe.xml"; SaxHandler handler = new SaxHandler(); SAXParserFactory factory = SAXParserFactory.newInstance(); SAXParser parser = factory.newSAXParser(); parser.setProperty(XMLConstants.ACCESS_EXTERNAL_DTD, ""); // Compliant parser.setProperty(XMLConstants.ACCESS_EXTERNAL_SCHEMA, ""); // compliant parser.parse(xml, handler);
XMLInputFactory library:
XMLInputFactory factory = XMLInputFactory.newInstance(); factory.setProperty(XMLConstants.ACCESS_EXTERNAL_DTD, ""); // Compliant factory.setProperty(XMLConstants.ACCESS_EXTERNAL_SCHEMA, ""); // compliant XMLEventReader eventReader = factory.createXMLEventReader(new FileReader("xxe.xml"));
TransformerFactory library:
String xslt = "xxe.xsl"; String xml = "xxe.xml"; TransformerFactory transformerFactory = javax.xml.transform.TransformerFactory.newInstance(); transformerFactory.setAttribute(XMLConstants.ACCESS_EXTERNAL_DTD, ""); // Compliant transformerFactory.setAttribute(XMLConstants.ACCESS_EXTERNAL_STYLESHEET, ""); // Compliant // ACCESS_EXTERNAL_SCHEMA not supported in several TransformerFactory implementations Transformer transformer = transformerFactory.newTransformer(new StreamSource(xslt)); StringWriter writer = new StringWriter(); transformer.transform(new StreamSource(xml), new StreamResult(writer)); String result = writer.toString();
SchemaFactory library:
String xsd = "xxe.xsd"; StreamSource xsdStreamSource = new StreamSource(xsd); SchemaFactory schemaFactory = SchemaFactory.newInstance(XMLConstants.W3C_XML_SCHEMA_NS_URI); schemaFactory.setProperty(XMLConstants.ACCESS_EXTERNAL_SCHEMA, ""); // Compliant schemaFactory.setProperty(XMLConstants.ACCESS_EXTERNAL_DTD, ""); // Compliant Schema schema = schemaFactory.newSchema(xsdStreamSource);
Validator library:
String xsd = "xxe.xsd"; String xml = "xxe.xml"; StreamSource xsdStreamSource = new StreamSource(xsd); StreamSource xmlStreamSource = new StreamSource(xml); SchemaFactory schemaFactory = SchemaFactory.newInstance(XMLConstants.W3C_XML_SCHEMA_NS_URI); Schema schema = schemaFactory.newSchema(xsdStreamSource); schemaFactory.setProperty(XMLConstants.ACCESS_EXTERNAL_DTD, ""); schemaFactory.setProperty(XMLConstants.ACCESS_EXTERNAL_SCHEMA, ""); // validators will also inherit of these properties Validator validator = schema.newValidator(); validator.setProperty(XMLConstants.ACCESS_EXTERNAL_DTD, ""); // Compliant validator.setProperty(XMLConstants.ACCESS_EXTERNAL_SCHEMA, ""); // Compliant StringWriter writer = new StringWriter(); validator.validate(xmlStreamSource, new StreamResult(writer));
For dom4j library, ACCESS_EXTERNAL_DTD and ACCESS_EXTERNAL_SCHEMA are not supported, thus a very strict fix is to disable doctype declarations:
SAXReader xmlReader = new SAXReader(); xmlReader.setFeature("http://apache.org/xml/features/disallow-doctype-decl", true); // Compliant Document xmlResponse = xmlReader.read(xml);
Jdom2 library:
SAXBuilder builder = new SAXBuilder(); // Compliant builder.setProperty(XMLConstants.ACCESS_EXTERNAL_DTD, ""); // Compliant builder.setProperty(XMLConstants.ACCESS_EXTERNAL_SCHEMA, ""); // Compliant Document document = builder.build(new File(xml));
See
- OWASP Top 10 2017 Category A4 - XML External Entities (XXE)
- OWASP XXE Prevention Cheat Sheet
- MITRE, CWE-611 - Information Exposure Through XML External Entity Reference
- MITRE, CWE-827 - Improper Control of Document Type Definition