SiLeBAT/FSK-Lab

View on GitHub

Showing 14,752 of 14,752 total issues

Method equals has a Cognitive Complexity of 27 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

  @Override
  public boolean equals(Object obj) {
    if (this == obj)
      return true;
    if (obj == null)

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Method createChart has a Cognitive Complexity of 27 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

    private void createChart() {
        String selectedID = null;

        if (configPanel.isDisplayFocusedRow()) {
            selectedID = selectionPanel.getFocusedID();

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Method createDataTuple has a Cognitive Complexity of 27 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

    private KnimeTuple createDataTuple(TableReader reader, String id) {
        KnimeTuple dataTuple;
        KnimeTuple tuple = reader.getTupleMap().get(id);
        Plotable plotable = reader.getPlotables().get(id);
        Map<String, List<Double>> conditions = plotable.getFunctionArguments();

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Method loadSettings has a Cognitive Complexity of 27 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

    public void loadSettings(NodeSettingsRO settings) {
        try {
            selectedID = settings.getString(CFG_SELECTEDID);
        } catch (InvalidSettingsException e) {
        }

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Method actionPerformed has a Cognitive Complexity of 27 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

  public void actionPerformed(ActionEvent e) {
      String lastOutDir = DBKernel.prefs.get("LAST_OUTPUT_DIR", "");
      JFileChooser fc = new JFileChooser(lastOutDir);
//      if (!DBKernel.isKrise) fc.addChoosableFileFilter(new LieferkettenImporterNew());      
      fc.addChoosableFileFilter(new MyProzessXMLImporter());
Severity: Minor
Found in org.hsh.bfr.db/src/org/hsh/bfr/db/gui/actions/ImportAction.java - About 3 hrs to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Method run has a Cognitive Complexity of 27 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

            public void run() {
                System.err.println("Importing " + filename);
                logMessages += "Importing " + filename + "\n";
                try {
                    if (progress != null) {

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Method createSbmlDocument has a Cognitive Complexity of 27 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

  private static SBMLDocument createSbmlDocument(final FskMetaData template) {

    // Creates SBMLDocument for the primary model
    final SBMLDocument sbmlDocument = new SBMLDocument(TableReader.LEVEL, TableReader.VERSION);

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Method updateDialog has a Cognitive Complexity of 27 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

  private void updateDialog(ModelType modelType, String readmeFile,
      EnvironmentManager environment) {
    modelTypeComboBoxModel.setSelectedItem(modelType);
    m_readmePanel.setSelectedFile(readmeFile);
    clearEnvironmentPanel();

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Method performExecute has a Cognitive Complexity of 27 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

  @Override
  protected PortObject[] performExecute(PortObject[] inObjects, ExecutionContext exec)
      throws Exception {
    convertMetadataToGenericVersion(inObjects);
    PortObject svgImageFromView = null;

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Method fetchConditions has a Cognitive Complexity of 27 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

    private List<ConditionsData> fetchConditions(BufferedDataTable table) {

        /**
         * Two types of conditions tables:
         * <ol>

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Identical blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

        for (Reference ref : rule.getReferences()) {
            String author = ref.getAuthor();
            Integer year = ref.getYear();
            String title = ref.getTitle();
            String abstractText = ref.getAbstractText();
de.bund.bfr.knime.pmm.nodes/src/de/bund/bfr/knime/pmm/common/reader/Model2Tuple.java on lines 120..142
de.bund.bfr.knime.pmm.nodes/src/de/bund/bfr/knime/pmm/common/reader/Model2Tuple.java on lines 146..168

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 244.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Identical blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

        for (Reference ref : rule.getReferences()) {
            final String author = ref.getAuthor();
            final Integer year = ref.getYear();
            final String title = ref.getTitle();
            final String abstractText = ref.getAbstractText();
de.bund.bfr.knime.pmm.nodes/src/de/bund/bfr/knime/pmm/common/reader/Model1Tuple.java on lines 165..187
de.bund.bfr.knime.pmm.nodes/src/de/bund/bfr/knime/pmm/common/reader/Model2Tuple.java on lines 146..168

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 244.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Identical blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

        for (Reference ref : m2Annot.getReferences()) {
            final String author = ref.getAuthor();
            final Integer year = ref.getYear();
            final String title = ref.getTitle();
            final String abstractText = ref.getAbstractText();
de.bund.bfr.knime.pmm.nodes/src/de/bund/bfr/knime/pmm/common/reader/Model1Tuple.java on lines 165..187
de.bund.bfr.knime.pmm.nodes/src/de/bund/bfr/knime/pmm/common/reader/Model2Tuple.java on lines 120..142

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 244.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

            } else if (o.defaultViewDate) {
                var year = o.defaultViewDate.year || new Date().getFullYear();
                var month = o.defaultViewDate.month || 0;
                var day = o.defaultViewDate.day || 1;
                o.defaultViewDate = UTCDate(year, month, day);
Severity: Major
Found in de.bund.bfr.knime.js/src/js/lib/bootstrap-datepicker.js and 1 other location - About 3 hrs to fix
de.bund.bfr.knime.fsklab.deprecatednodes/js-src/bootstrap-datepicker/1_6_4/debug/js/bootstrap-datepicker.js on lines 312..319

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 113.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

            if (o.defaultViewDate) {
                var year = o.defaultViewDate.year || new Date().getFullYear();
                var month = o.defaultViewDate.month || 0;
                var day = o.defaultViewDate.day || 1;
                o.defaultViewDate = UTCDate(year, month, day);
de.bund.bfr.knime.js/src/js/lib/bootstrap-datepicker.js on lines 306..313

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 113.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

        indent: function(state, textAfter) {
            var trueText = textAfter.replace(/^\s+|\s+$/g, '') ;
            if (trueText.match(closing) || trueText.match(doubleClosing) || trueText.match(middle)) return conf.indentUnit*(state.currentIndent-1);
            if(state.currentIndent < 0) return 0;
            return state.currentIndent * conf.indentUnit;
de.bund.bfr.knime.js/js-lib/codemirror-5.49.2/mode/vb/vb.js on lines 261..266

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 113.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

        indent: function(state, textAfter) {
            var trueText = textAfter.replace(/^\s+|\s+$/g, '') ;
            if (trueText.match(closing) || trueText.match(doubleClosing) || trueText.match(middle)) return conf.indentUnit*(state.currentIndent-1);
            if(state.currentIndent < 0) return 0;
            return state.currentIndent * conf.indentUnit;
Severity: Major
Found in de.bund.bfr.knime.js/js-lib/codemirror-5.49.2/mode/vb/vb.js and 1 other location - About 3 hrs to fix
de.bund.bfr.knime.js/js-lib/codemirror-5.49.2/mode/vbscript/vbscript.js on lines 337..342

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 113.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

  cloneableTags[dateTag] = cloneableTags[float32Tag] =
  cloneableTags[float64Tag] = cloneableTags[int8Tag] =
  cloneableTags[int16Tag] = cloneableTags[int32Tag] =
  cloneableTags[numberTag] = cloneableTags[objectTag] =
  cloneableTags[regexpTag] = cloneableTags[stringTag] =
de.bund.bfr.knime.fsklab.deprecatednodes/js-src/de/bund/bfr/knime/fsklab/nodes/joiner/jointjs/lodash.min.js on lines 161..167

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 113.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

  typedArrayTags[argsTag] = typedArrayTags[arrayTag] =
  typedArrayTags[arrayBufferTag] = typedArrayTags[boolTag] =
  typedArrayTags[dateTag] = typedArrayTags[errorTag] =
  typedArrayTags[funcTag] = typedArrayTags[mapTag] =
  typedArrayTags[numberTag] = typedArrayTags[objectTag] =
de.bund.bfr.knime.fsklab.deprecatednodes/js-src/de/bund/bfr/knime/fsklab/nodes/joiner/jointjs/lodash.min.js on lines 173..179

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 113.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

        _check_template: function(tmp){
            try {
                // If empty
                if (tmp === undefined || tmp === "") {
                    return false;
Severity: Major
Found in de.bund.bfr.knime.js/src/js/lib/bootstrap-datepicker.js and 1 other location - About 3 hrs to fix
de.bund.bfr.knime.fsklab.deprecatednodes/js-src/bootstrap-datepicker/1_6_4/debug/js/bootstrap-datepicker.js on lines 178..195

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 113.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Severity
Category
Status
Source
Language