SiLeBAT/FSK-Lab

View on GitHub

Showing 14,752 of 14,752 total issues

Function addRow has 94 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

    addRow( rowIndex, rowData, tableData, isMainTable, isEdit) {
        
        let O = this;
        tableData = O._tableData
        // row
Severity: Major
Found in de.bund.bfr.knime.js/src/js/app/app.table.js - About 3 hrs to fix

Function fill has 94 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

        fill: function() {
            var d = new Date(this.viewDate),
                year = d.getUTCFullYear(),
                month = d.getUTCMonth(),
                startYear = this.o.startDate !== -Infinity ? this.o.startDate.getUTCFullYear() : -Infinity,

File FskService.java has 323 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

package de.bund.bfr.knime.fsklab.service;

import static spark.Spark.awaitInitialization;
import static spark.Spark.before;
import static spark.Spark.get;

Method setValue has a Cognitive Complexity of 26 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

    private void setValue(Object o, String fieldName, Object oldValue, Object newValue) {
        // todo: checken, ob "oldValue = oldValue"?
        try {
            if (fieldName.indexOf("#") >= 0) { // z.B. '#parameter#elementSet/2'
                String fn = fieldName.substring(0, fieldName.indexOf("#"));// "parameter"

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Method passesFilter has a Cognitive Complexity of 26 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

    public static boolean passesFilter(final String literatureString, final Integer literatureID, final KnimeTuple tuple) throws PmmException {
        if (literatureString == null || literatureString.trim().isEmpty()) return true;
            PmmXmlDoc litXmlDoc = tuple.getPmmXml(TimeSeriesSchema.ATT_LITMD);
            for (PmmXmlElementConvertable el : litXmlDoc.getElementSet()) {
                if (el instanceof LiteratureItem) {

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Method manageDate has a Cognitive Complexity of 26 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

    private Date manageDate(PreparedStatement ps, PreparedStatement psUpdate, int lfdCol, HSSFCell cell) throws SQLException {
        Date result = null;
        if (cell == null || cell.getCellType() == HSSFCell.CELL_TYPE_BLANK) {
        } else if (cell.getCellType() == HSSFCell.CELL_TYPE_STRING) {
            if (cell.getStringCellValue().trim().length() > 0) {
Severity: Minor
Found in org.hsh.bfr.db/src/org/hsh/bfr/db/imports/GeneralXLSImporter.java - About 3 hrs to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Method getCharge_Lieferung has a Cognitive Complexity of 26 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

    private Integer[] getCharge_Lieferung(String id, String name, String street, String streetNumber, String zip, String city, String county, String country, String kind,
            String vat, String article, String articleNumber, String prodTreatment, String charge, String dayMHD, String monthMHD, String yearMHD, String dayP, String monthP,
            String yearP, String originCountry, String dayD, String monthD, String yearD, String amountKG, String typePU, String numPU, String idTo, String nameTo,
            String streetTo, String streetNumberTo, String zipTo, String cityTo, String countyTo, String countryTo, String kindTo, String vatTo, String serial, String cqr,
            String EndChain, String Explanation_EndChain, String Further_Traceback, String MicrobiologicalSample) {

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Method isPlotable has a Cognitive Complexity of 26 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

    public boolean isPlotable() {
        if (type == FUNCTION || type == FUNCTION_SAMPLE) {
            for (String param : functionParameters.keySet()) {
                if (functionParameters.get(param) == null) {
                    return false;

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Method getValueX has a Cognitive Complexity of 26 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

    private Double getValueX(String paramX, String paramY, String unitX,
            String unitY, String transformX, String transformY, Double y,
            double minX, double maxX, Double minY, Double maxY, DJep parser,
            Node f) {
        if (y == null) {

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Method addMiscs has a Cognitive Complexity of 26 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

    public void addMiscs(final PmmXmlDoc misc) throws PmmException {
        PmmXmlDoc miscXmlDoc = getMisc();
        if (miscXmlDoc == null) {
            setValue(TimeSeriesSchema.ATT_MISC, misc);            
        }

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

          while (state.stack[0] === stateType._string && !stream.eol()) {
            if (stream.peek() === state.stringType) {
              stream.next(); // Skip quote
              state.stack.shift(); // Clear flag
            } else if (stream.peek() === "\\") {
de.bund.bfr.knime.js/js-lib/codemirror-5.49.2/mode/spreadsheet/spreadsheet.js on lines 39..49

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 110.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Similar blocks of code found in 4 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

      if (state.waitDot) {
        state.waitDot = false;

        if (stream.peek() != ".") {
          return "null";
de.bund.bfr.knime.js/js-lib/codemirror-5.49.2/mode/django/django.js on lines 115..131
de.bund.bfr.knime.js/js-lib/codemirror-5.49.2/mode/django/django.js on lines 195..211
de.bund.bfr.knime.js/js-lib/codemirror-5.49.2/mode/django/django.js on lines 214..230

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 110.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

        destroy: function(){
            this.hide();
            this._detachEvents();
            this._detachSecondaryEvents();
            this.picker.remove();
Severity: Major
Found in de.bund.bfr.knime.js/src/js/lib/bootstrap-datepicker.js and 1 other location - About 3 hrs to fix
de.bund.bfr.knime.fsklab.deprecatednodes/js-src/bootstrap-datepicker/1_6_4/debug/js/bootstrap-datepicker.js on lines 502..512

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 110.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

          while (state.stack[0] === "string" && !stream.eol()) {
            if (stream.peek() === state.stringType) {
              stream.next(); // Skip quote
              state.stack.shift(); // Clear flag
            } else if (stream.peek() === "\\") {
de.bund.bfr.knime.js/js-lib/codemirror-5.49.2/mode/ebnf/ebnf.js on lines 57..67

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 110.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Similar blocks of code found in 4 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

      if (state.waitPipe) {
        state.waitPipe = false;

        if (stream.peek() != "|") {
          return "null";
de.bund.bfr.knime.js/js-lib/codemirror-5.49.2/mode/django/django.js on lines 96..112
de.bund.bfr.knime.js/js-lib/codemirror-5.49.2/mode/django/django.js on lines 195..211
de.bund.bfr.knime.js/js-lib/codemirror-5.49.2/mode/django/django.js on lines 214..230

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 110.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

        destroy: function(){
            this.hide();
            this._detachEvents();
            this._detachSecondaryEvents();
            this.picker.remove();
de.bund.bfr.knime.js/src/js/lib/bootstrap-datepicker.js on lines 498..508

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 110.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Similar blocks of code found in 4 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

      if (state.waitDot) {
        state.waitDot = false;

        if (stream.peek() != ".") {
          return "null";
de.bund.bfr.knime.js/js-lib/codemirror-5.49.2/mode/django/django.js on lines 96..112
de.bund.bfr.knime.js/js-lib/codemirror-5.49.2/mode/django/django.js on lines 115..131
de.bund.bfr.knime.js/js-lib/codemirror-5.49.2/mode/django/django.js on lines 214..230

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 110.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Similar blocks of code found in 4 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

      if (state.waitPipe) {
        state.waitPipe = false;

        if (stream.peek() != "|") {
          return "null";
de.bund.bfr.knime.js/js-lib/codemirror-5.49.2/mode/django/django.js on lines 96..112
de.bund.bfr.knime.js/js-lib/codemirror-5.49.2/mode/django/django.js on lines 115..131
de.bund.bfr.knime.js/js-lib/codemirror-5.49.2/mode/django/django.js on lines 195..211

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 110.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

                co.left+(over ? Math.max(ce.scrollWidth,ce.offsetWidth) : ce.offsetWidth) - (parseInt($(ce).css("borderLeftWidth"),10) || 0) - (parseInt($(ce).css("paddingRight"),10) || 0) - this.helperProportions.width - this.margins.left,
de.bund.bfr.knime.pmm.nodes/js-src/de/bund/bfr/knime/pmm/js/modelplotter/jquery-ui.js on lines 5534..5534

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 110.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

                co.top+(over ? Math.max(ce.scrollHeight,ce.offsetHeight) : ce.offsetHeight) - (parseInt($(ce).css("borderTopWidth"),10) || 0) - (parseInt($(ce).css("paddingBottom"),10) || 0) - this.helperProportions.height - this.margins.top
de.bund.bfr.knime.pmm.nodes/js-src/de/bund/bfr/knime/pmm/js/modelplotter/jquery-ui.js on lines 5533..5533

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 110.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Severity
Category
Status
Source
Language