Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

• Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
• Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
• Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

• Cognitive Complexity docs
• Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

• Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
• Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
• Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

• Cognitive Complexity docs
• Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

• Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
• Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
• Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

• Cognitive Complexity docs
• Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

• Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
• Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
• Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

• Cognitive Complexity docs
• Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

• Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
• Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
• Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

• Cognitive Complexity docs
• Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

• Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
• Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
• Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

• Cognitive Complexity docs
• Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

• Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
• Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
• Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

• Cognitive Complexity docs
• Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

• Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
• Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
• Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

• Cognitive Complexity docs
• Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

• Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
• Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
• Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

• Cognitive Complexity docs
• Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

• Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
• Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
• Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

• Cognitive Complexity docs
• Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

• Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
• Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
• Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

• Cognitive Complexity docs
• Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how hard the control flow of a method is to understand. Methods with high Cognitive Complexity will be difficult to maintain.

See

• Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how hard the control flow of a method is to understand. Methods with high Cognitive Complexity will be difficult to maintain.

See

• Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how hard the control flow of a method is to understand. Methods with high Cognitive Complexity will be difficult to maintain.

See

• Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how hard the control flow of a method is to understand. Methods with high Cognitive Complexity will be difficult to maintain.

See

• Cognitive Complexity

Calling System.gc() or Runtime.getRuntime().gc() is a bad idea for a simple reason: there is no way to know exactly what will be done under the hood by the JVM because the behavior will depend on its vendor, version and options:

• Will the whole application be frozen during the call?
• Is the -XX:DisableExplicitGC option activated?
• Will the JVM simply ignore the call?
• ...

Like for System.gc(), there is no reason to manually call runFinalization() to force the call of finalization methods of any objects pending finalization.

An application relying on these unpredictable methods is also unpredictable and therefore broken. The task of running the garbage collector and calling finalize() methods should be left exclusively to the JVM.

Connections, streams, files, and other classes that implement the Closeable interface or its super-interface, AutoCloseable, needs to be closed after use. Further, that close call must be made in a finally block otherwise an exception could keep the call from being made. Preferably, when class implements AutoCloseable, resource should be created using "try-with-resources" pattern and will be closed automatically.

Failure to properly close resources will result in a resource leak which could bring first the application and then perhaps the box the application is on to their knees.

Noncompliant Code Example

private void readTheFile() throws IOException {
  Path path = Paths.get(this.fileName);
  BufferedReader reader = Files.newBufferedReader(path, this.charset);
  // ...
  reader.close();  // Noncompliant
  // ...
  Files.lines("input.txt").forEach(System.out::println); // Noncompliant: The stream needs to be closed
}

private void doSomething() {
  OutputStream stream = null;
  try {
    for (String property : propertyList) {
      stream = new FileOutputStream("myfile.txt");  // Noncompliant
      // ...
    }
  } catch (Exception e) {
    // ...
  } finally {
    stream.close();  // Multiple streams were opened. Only the last is closed.
  }
}

Compliant Solution

private void readTheFile(String fileName) throws IOException {
    Path path = Paths.get(fileName);
    try (BufferedReader reader = Files.newBufferedReader(path, StandardCharsets.UTF_8)) {
      reader.readLine();
      // ...
    }
    // ..
    try (Stream<String> input = Files.lines("input.txt"))  {
      input.forEach(System.out::println);
    }
}

private void doSomething() {
  OutputStream stream = null;
  try {
    stream = new FileOutputStream("myfile.txt");
    for (String property : propertyList) {
      // ...
    }
  } catch (Exception e) {
    // ...
  } finally {
    stream.close();
  }
}

Exceptions

Instances of the following classes are ignored by this rule because close has no effect:

• java.io.ByteArrayOutputStream
• java.io.ByteArrayInputStream
• java.io.CharArrayReader
• java.io.CharArrayWriter
• java.io.StringReader
• java.io.StringWriter

Java 7 introduced the try-with-resources statement, which implicitly closes Closeables. All resources opened in a try-with-resources statement are ignored by this rule.

try (BufferedReader br = new BufferedReader(new FileReader(fileName))) {
  //...
}
catch ( ... ) {
  //...
}

See

• MITRE, CWE-459 - Incomplete Cleanup
• MITRE, CWE-772 - Missing Release of Resource after Effective Lifetime
• CERT, FIO04-J. - Release resources when they are no longer needed
• CERT, FIO42-C. - Close files when they are no longer needed
• Try With Resources

Calling System.gc() or Runtime.getRuntime().gc() is a bad idea for a simple reason: there is no way to know exactly what will be done under the hood by the JVM because the behavior will depend on its vendor, version and options:

• Will the whole application be frozen during the call?
• Is the -XX:DisableExplicitGC option activated?
• Will the JVM simply ignore the call?
• ...

Like for System.gc(), there is no reason to manually call runFinalization() to force the call of finalization methods of any objects pending finalization.

An application relying on these unpredictable methods is also unpredictable and therefore broken. The task of running the garbage collector and calling finalize() methods should be left exclusively to the JVM.

Connections, streams, files, and other classes that implement the Closeable interface or its super-interface, AutoCloseable, needs to be closed after use. Further, that close call must be made in a finally block otherwise an exception could keep the call from being made. Preferably, when class implements AutoCloseable, resource should be created using "try-with-resources" pattern and will be closed automatically.

Failure to properly close resources will result in a resource leak which could bring first the application and then perhaps the box the application is on to their knees.

Noncompliant Code Example

private void readTheFile() throws IOException {
  Path path = Paths.get(this.fileName);
  BufferedReader reader = Files.newBufferedReader(path, this.charset);
  // ...
  reader.close();  // Noncompliant
  // ...
  Files.lines("input.txt").forEach(System.out::println); // Noncompliant: The stream needs to be closed
}

private void doSomething() {
  OutputStream stream = null;
  try {
    for (String property : propertyList) {
      stream = new FileOutputStream("myfile.txt");  // Noncompliant
      // ...
    }
  } catch (Exception e) {
    // ...
  } finally {
    stream.close();  // Multiple streams were opened. Only the last is closed.
  }
}

Compliant Solution

private void readTheFile(String fileName) throws IOException {
    Path path = Paths.get(fileName);
    try (BufferedReader reader = Files.newBufferedReader(path, StandardCharsets.UTF_8)) {
      reader.readLine();
      // ...
    }
    // ..
    try (Stream<String> input = Files.lines("input.txt"))  {
      input.forEach(System.out::println);
    }
}

private void doSomething() {
  OutputStream stream = null;
  try {
    stream = new FileOutputStream("myfile.txt");
    for (String property : propertyList) {
      // ...
    }
  } catch (Exception e) {
    // ...
  } finally {
    stream.close();
  }
}

Exceptions

Instances of the following classes are ignored by this rule because close has no effect:

• java.io.ByteArrayOutputStream
• java.io.ByteArrayInputStream
• java.io.CharArrayReader
• java.io.CharArrayWriter
• java.io.StringReader
• java.io.StringWriter

Java 7 introduced the try-with-resources statement, which implicitly closes Closeables. All resources opened in a try-with-resources statement are ignored by this rule.

try (BufferedReader br = new BufferedReader(new FileReader(fileName))) {
  //...
}
catch ( ... ) {
  //...
}

See

• MITRE, CWE-459 - Incomplete Cleanup
• MITRE, CWE-772 - Missing Release of Resource after Effective Lifetime
• CERT, FIO04-J. - Release resources when they are no longer needed
• CERT, FIO42-C. - Close files when they are no longer needed
• Try With Resources

Connections, streams, files, and other classes that implement the Closeable interface or its super-interface, AutoCloseable, needs to be closed after use. Further, that close call must be made in a finally block otherwise an exception could keep the call from being made. Preferably, when class implements AutoCloseable, resource should be created using "try-with-resources" pattern and will be closed automatically.

Failure to properly close resources will result in a resource leak which could bring first the application and then perhaps the box the application is on to their knees.

Noncompliant Code Example

private void readTheFile() throws IOException {
  Path path = Paths.get(this.fileName);
  BufferedReader reader = Files.newBufferedReader(path, this.charset);
  // ...
  reader.close();  // Noncompliant
  // ...
  Files.lines("input.txt").forEach(System.out::println); // Noncompliant: The stream needs to be closed
}

private void doSomething() {
  OutputStream stream = null;
  try {
    for (String property : propertyList) {
      stream = new FileOutputStream("myfile.txt");  // Noncompliant
      // ...
    }
  } catch (Exception e) {
    // ...
  } finally {
    stream.close();  // Multiple streams were opened. Only the last is closed.
  }
}

Compliant Solution

private void readTheFile(String fileName) throws IOException {
    Path path = Paths.get(fileName);
    try (BufferedReader reader = Files.newBufferedReader(path, StandardCharsets.UTF_8)) {
      reader.readLine();
      // ...
    }
    // ..
    try (Stream<String> input = Files.lines("input.txt"))  {
      input.forEach(System.out::println);
    }
}

private void doSomething() {
  OutputStream stream = null;
  try {
    stream = new FileOutputStream("myfile.txt");
    for (String property : propertyList) {
      // ...
    }
  } catch (Exception e) {
    // ...
  } finally {
    stream.close();
  }
}

Exceptions

Instances of the following classes are ignored by this rule because close has no effect:

• java.io.ByteArrayOutputStream
• java.io.ByteArrayInputStream
• java.io.CharArrayReader
• java.io.CharArrayWriter
• java.io.StringReader
• java.io.StringWriter

Java 7 introduced the try-with-resources statement, which implicitly closes Closeables. All resources opened in a try-with-resources statement are ignored by this rule.

try (BufferedReader br = new BufferedReader(new FileReader(fileName))) {
  //...
}
catch ( ... ) {
  //...
}

See

• MITRE, CWE-459 - Incomplete Cleanup
• MITRE, CWE-772 - Missing Release of Resource after Effective Lifetime
• CERT, FIO04-J. - Release resources when they are no longer needed
• CERT, FIO42-C. - Close files when they are no longer needed
• Try With Resources

Calling System.gc() or Runtime.getRuntime().gc() is a bad idea for a simple reason: there is no way to know exactly what will be done under the hood by the JVM because the behavior will depend on its vendor, version and options:

• Will the whole application be frozen during the call?
• Is the -XX:DisableExplicitGC option activated?
• Will the JVM simply ignore the call?
• ...

Like for System.gc(), there is no reason to manually call runFinalization() to force the call of finalization methods of any objects pending finalization.

An application relying on these unpredictable methods is also unpredictable and therefore broken. The task of running the garbage collector and calling finalize() methods should be left exclusively to the JVM.

Calling System.gc() or Runtime.getRuntime().gc() is a bad idea for a simple reason: there is no way to know exactly what will be done under the hood by the JVM because the behavior will depend on its vendor, version and options:

• Will the whole application be frozen during the call?
• Is the -XX:DisableExplicitGC option activated?
• Will the JVM simply ignore the call?
• ...

Like for System.gc(), there is no reason to manually call runFinalization() to force the call of finalization methods of any objects pending finalization.

An application relying on these unpredictable methods is also unpredictable and therefore broken. The task of running the garbage collector and calling finalize() methods should be left exclusively to the JVM.

Connections, streams, files, and other classes that implement the Closeable interface or its super-interface, AutoCloseable, needs to be closed after use. Further, that close call must be made in a finally block otherwise an exception could keep the call from being made. Preferably, when class implements AutoCloseable, resource should be created using "try-with-resources" pattern and will be closed automatically.

Failure to properly close resources will result in a resource leak which could bring first the application and then perhaps the box the application is on to their knees.

Noncompliant Code Example

private void readTheFile() throws IOException {
  Path path = Paths.get(this.fileName);
  BufferedReader reader = Files.newBufferedReader(path, this.charset);
  // ...
  reader.close();  // Noncompliant
  // ...
  Files.lines("input.txt").forEach(System.out::println); // Noncompliant: The stream needs to be closed
}

private void doSomething() {
  OutputStream stream = null;
  try {
    for (String property : propertyList) {
      stream = new FileOutputStream("myfile.txt");  // Noncompliant
      // ...
    }
  } catch (Exception e) {
    // ...
  } finally {
    stream.close();  // Multiple streams were opened. Only the last is closed.
  }
}

Compliant Solution

private void readTheFile(String fileName) throws IOException {
    Path path = Paths.get(fileName);
    try (BufferedReader reader = Files.newBufferedReader(path, StandardCharsets.UTF_8)) {
      reader.readLine();
      // ...
    }
    // ..
    try (Stream<String> input = Files.lines("input.txt"))  {
      input.forEach(System.out::println);
    }
}

private void doSomething() {
  OutputStream stream = null;
  try {
    stream = new FileOutputStream("myfile.txt");
    for (String property : propertyList) {
      // ...
    }
  } catch (Exception e) {
    // ...
  } finally {
    stream.close();
  }
}

Exceptions

Instances of the following classes are ignored by this rule because close has no effect:

• java.io.ByteArrayOutputStream
• java.io.ByteArrayInputStream
• java.io.CharArrayReader
• java.io.CharArrayWriter
• java.io.StringReader
• java.io.StringWriter

Java 7 introduced the try-with-resources statement, which implicitly closes Closeables. All resources opened in a try-with-resources statement are ignored by this rule.

try (BufferedReader br = new BufferedReader(new FileReader(fileName))) {
  //...
}
catch ( ... ) {
  //...
}

See

• MITRE, CWE-459 - Incomplete Cleanup
• MITRE, CWE-772 - Missing Release of Resource after Effective Lifetime
• CERT, FIO04-J. - Release resources when they are no longer needed
• CERT, FIO42-C. - Close files when they are no longer needed
• Try With Resources

Connections, streams, files, and other classes that implement the Closeable interface or its super-interface, AutoCloseable, needs to be closed after use. Further, that close call must be made in a finally block otherwise an exception could keep the call from being made. Preferably, when class implements AutoCloseable, resource should be created using "try-with-resources" pattern and will be closed automatically.

Failure to properly close resources will result in a resource leak which could bring first the application and then perhaps the box the application is on to their knees.

Noncompliant Code Example

private void readTheFile() throws IOException {
  Path path = Paths.get(this.fileName);
  BufferedReader reader = Files.newBufferedReader(path, this.charset);
  // ...
  reader.close();  // Noncompliant
  // ...
  Files.lines("input.txt").forEach(System.out::println); // Noncompliant: The stream needs to be closed
}

private void doSomething() {
  OutputStream stream = null;
  try {
    for (String property : propertyList) {
      stream = new FileOutputStream("myfile.txt");  // Noncompliant
      // ...
    }
  } catch (Exception e) {
    // ...
  } finally {
    stream.close();  // Multiple streams were opened. Only the last is closed.
  }
}

Compliant Solution

private void readTheFile(String fileName) throws IOException {
    Path path = Paths.get(fileName);
    try (BufferedReader reader = Files.newBufferedReader(path, StandardCharsets.UTF_8)) {
      reader.readLine();
      // ...
    }
    // ..
    try (Stream<String> input = Files.lines("input.txt"))  {
      input.forEach(System.out::println);
    }
}

private void doSomething() {
  OutputStream stream = null;
  try {
    stream = new FileOutputStream("myfile.txt");
    for (String property : propertyList) {
      // ...
    }
  } catch (Exception e) {
    // ...
  } finally {
    stream.close();
  }
}

Exceptions

Instances of the following classes are ignored by this rule because close has no effect:

• java.io.ByteArrayOutputStream
• java.io.ByteArrayInputStream
• java.io.CharArrayReader
• java.io.CharArrayWriter
• java.io.StringReader
• java.io.StringWriter

Java 7 introduced the try-with-resources statement, which implicitly closes Closeables. All resources opened in a try-with-resources statement are ignored by this rule.

try (BufferedReader br = new BufferedReader(new FileReader(fileName))) {
  //...
}
catch ( ... ) {
  //...
}

See

• MITRE, CWE-459 - Incomplete Cleanup
• MITRE, CWE-772 - Missing Release of Resource after Effective Lifetime
• CERT, FIO04-J. - Release resources when they are no longer needed
• CERT, FIO42-C. - Close files when they are no longer needed
• Try With Resources

Calling System.gc() or Runtime.getRuntime().gc() is a bad idea for a simple reason: there is no way to know exactly what will be done under the hood by the JVM because the behavior will depend on its vendor, version and options:

• Will the whole application be frozen during the call?
• Is the -XX:DisableExplicitGC option activated?
• Will the JVM simply ignore the call?
• ...

Like for System.gc(), there is no reason to manually call runFinalization() to force the call of finalization methods of any objects pending finalization.

An application relying on these unpredictable methods is also unpredictable and therefore broken. The task of running the garbage collector and calling finalize() methods should be left exclusively to the JVM.

Connections, streams, files, and other classes that implement the Closeable interface or its super-interface, AutoCloseable, needs to be closed after use. Further, that close call must be made in a finally block otherwise an exception could keep the call from being made. Preferably, when class implements AutoCloseable, resource should be created using "try-with-resources" pattern and will be closed automatically.

Failure to properly close resources will result in a resource leak which could bring first the application and then perhaps the box the application is on to their knees.

Noncompliant Code Example

private void readTheFile() throws IOException {
  Path path = Paths.get(this.fileName);
  BufferedReader reader = Files.newBufferedReader(path, this.charset);
  // ...
  reader.close();  // Noncompliant
  // ...
  Files.lines("input.txt").forEach(System.out::println); // Noncompliant: The stream needs to be closed
}

private void doSomething() {
  OutputStream stream = null;
  try {
    for (String property : propertyList) {
      stream = new FileOutputStream("myfile.txt");  // Noncompliant
      // ...
    }
  } catch (Exception e) {
    // ...
  } finally {
    stream.close();  // Multiple streams were opened. Only the last is closed.
  }
}

Compliant Solution

private void readTheFile(String fileName) throws IOException {
    Path path = Paths.get(fileName);
    try (BufferedReader reader = Files.newBufferedReader(path, StandardCharsets.UTF_8)) {
      reader.readLine();
      // ...
    }
    // ..
    try (Stream<String> input = Files.lines("input.txt"))  {
      input.forEach(System.out::println);
    }
}

private void doSomething() {
  OutputStream stream = null;
  try {
    stream = new FileOutputStream("myfile.txt");
    for (String property : propertyList) {
      // ...
    }
  } catch (Exception e) {
    // ...
  } finally {
    stream.close();
  }
}

Exceptions

Instances of the following classes are ignored by this rule because close has no effect:

• java.io.ByteArrayOutputStream
• java.io.ByteArrayInputStream
• java.io.CharArrayReader
• java.io.CharArrayWriter
• java.io.StringReader
• java.io.StringWriter

Java 7 introduced the try-with-resources statement, which implicitly closes Closeables. All resources opened in a try-with-resources statement are ignored by this rule.

try (BufferedReader br = new BufferedReader(new FileReader(fileName))) {
  //...
}
catch ( ... ) {
  //...
}

See

• MITRE, CWE-459 - Incomplete Cleanup
• MITRE, CWE-772 - Missing Release of Resource after Effective Lifetime
• CERT, FIO04-J. - Release resources when they are no longer needed
• CERT, FIO42-C. - Close files when they are no longer needed
• Try With Resources

Connections, streams, files, and other classes that implement the Closeable interface or its super-interface, AutoCloseable, needs to be closed after use. Further, that close call must be made in a finally block otherwise an exception could keep the call from being made. Preferably, when class implements AutoCloseable, resource should be created using "try-with-resources" pattern and will be closed automatically.

Failure to properly close resources will result in a resource leak which could bring first the application and then perhaps the box the application is on to their knees.

Noncompliant Code Example

private void readTheFile() throws IOException {
  Path path = Paths.get(this.fileName);
  BufferedReader reader = Files.newBufferedReader(path, this.charset);
  // ...
  reader.close();  // Noncompliant
  // ...
  Files.lines("input.txt").forEach(System.out::println); // Noncompliant: The stream needs to be closed
}

private void doSomething() {
  OutputStream stream = null;
  try {
    for (String property : propertyList) {
      stream = new FileOutputStream("myfile.txt");  // Noncompliant
      // ...
    }
  } catch (Exception e) {
    // ...
  } finally {
    stream.close();  // Multiple streams were opened. Only the last is closed.
  }
}

Compliant Solution

private void readTheFile(String fileName) throws IOException {
    Path path = Paths.get(fileName);
    try (BufferedReader reader = Files.newBufferedReader(path, StandardCharsets.UTF_8)) {
      reader.readLine();
      // ...
    }
    // ..
    try (Stream<String> input = Files.lines("input.txt"))  {
      input.forEach(System.out::println);
    }
}

private void doSomething() {
  OutputStream stream = null;
  try {
    stream = new FileOutputStream("myfile.txt");
    for (String property : propertyList) {
      // ...
    }
  } catch (Exception e) {
    // ...
  } finally {
    stream.close();
  }
}

Exceptions

Instances of the following classes are ignored by this rule because close has no effect:

• java.io.ByteArrayOutputStream
• java.io.ByteArrayInputStream
• java.io.CharArrayReader
• java.io.CharArrayWriter
• java.io.StringReader
• java.io.StringWriter

Java 7 introduced the try-with-resources statement, which implicitly closes Closeables. All resources opened in a try-with-resources statement are ignored by this rule.

try (BufferedReader br = new BufferedReader(new FileReader(fileName))) {
  //...
}
catch ( ... ) {
  //...
}

See

• MITRE, CWE-459 - Incomplete Cleanup
• MITRE, CWE-772 - Missing Release of Resource after Effective Lifetime
• CERT, FIO04-J. - Release resources when they are no longer needed
• CERT, FIO42-C. - Close files when they are no longer needed
• Try With Resources

Connections, streams, files, and other classes that implement the Closeable interface or its super-interface, AutoCloseable, needs to be closed after use. Further, that close call must be made in a finally block otherwise an exception could keep the call from being made. Preferably, when class implements AutoCloseable, resource should be created using "try-with-resources" pattern and will be closed automatically.

Failure to properly close resources will result in a resource leak which could bring first the application and then perhaps the box the application is on to their knees.

Noncompliant Code Example

private void readTheFile() throws IOException {
  Path path = Paths.get(this.fileName);
  BufferedReader reader = Files.newBufferedReader(path, this.charset);
  // ...
  reader.close();  // Noncompliant
  // ...
  Files.lines("input.txt").forEach(System.out::println); // Noncompliant: The stream needs to be closed
}

private void doSomething() {
  OutputStream stream = null;
  try {
    for (String property : propertyList) {
      stream = new FileOutputStream("myfile.txt");  // Noncompliant
      // ...
    }
  } catch (Exception e) {
    // ...
  } finally {
    stream.close();  // Multiple streams were opened. Only the last is closed.
  }
}

Compliant Solution

private void readTheFile(String fileName) throws IOException {
    Path path = Paths.get(fileName);
    try (BufferedReader reader = Files.newBufferedReader(path, StandardCharsets.UTF_8)) {
      reader.readLine();
      // ...
    }
    // ..
    try (Stream<String> input = Files.lines("input.txt"))  {
      input.forEach(System.out::println);
    }
}

private void doSomething() {
  OutputStream stream = null;
  try {
    stream = new FileOutputStream("myfile.txt");
    for (String property : propertyList) {
      // ...
    }
  } catch (Exception e) {
    // ...
  } finally {
    stream.close();
  }
}

Exceptions

Instances of the following classes are ignored by this rule because close has no effect:

• java.io.ByteArrayOutputStream
• java.io.ByteArrayInputStream
• java.io.CharArrayReader
• java.io.CharArrayWriter
• java.io.StringReader
• java.io.StringWriter

Java 7 introduced the try-with-resources statement, which implicitly closes Closeables. All resources opened in a try-with-resources statement are ignored by this rule.

try (BufferedReader br = new BufferedReader(new FileReader(fileName))) {
  //...
}
catch ( ... ) {
  //...
}

See

• MITRE, CWE-459 - Incomplete Cleanup
• MITRE, CWE-772 - Missing Release of Resource after Effective Lifetime
• CERT, FIO04-J. - Release resources when they are no longer needed
• CERT, FIO42-C. - Close files when they are no longer needed
• Try With Resources

Connections, streams, files, and other classes that implement the Closeable interface or its super-interface, AutoCloseable, needs to be closed after use. Further, that close call must be made in a finally block otherwise an exception could keep the call from being made. Preferably, when class implements AutoCloseable, resource should be created using "try-with-resources" pattern and will be closed automatically.

Failure to properly close resources will result in a resource leak which could bring first the application and then perhaps the box the application is on to their knees.

Noncompliant Code Example

private void readTheFile() throws IOException {
  Path path = Paths.get(this.fileName);
  BufferedReader reader = Files.newBufferedReader(path, this.charset);
  // ...
  reader.close();  // Noncompliant
  // ...
  Files.lines("input.txt").forEach(System.out::println); // Noncompliant: The stream needs to be closed
}

private void doSomething() {
  OutputStream stream = null;
  try {
    for (String property : propertyList) {
      stream = new FileOutputStream("myfile.txt");  // Noncompliant
      // ...
    }
  } catch (Exception e) {
    // ...
  } finally {
    stream.close();  // Multiple streams were opened. Only the last is closed.
  }
}

Compliant Solution

private void readTheFile(String fileName) throws IOException {
    Path path = Paths.get(fileName);
    try (BufferedReader reader = Files.newBufferedReader(path, StandardCharsets.UTF_8)) {
      reader.readLine();
      // ...
    }
    // ..
    try (Stream<String> input = Files.lines("input.txt"))  {
      input.forEach(System.out::println);
    }
}

private void doSomething() {
  OutputStream stream = null;
  try {
    stream = new FileOutputStream("myfile.txt");
    for (String property : propertyList) {
      // ...
    }
  } catch (Exception e) {
    // ...
  } finally {
    stream.close();
  }
}

Exceptions

Instances of the following classes are ignored by this rule because close has no effect:

• java.io.ByteArrayOutputStream
• java.io.ByteArrayInputStream
• java.io.CharArrayReader
• java.io.CharArrayWriter
• java.io.StringReader
• java.io.StringWriter

Java 7 introduced the try-with-resources statement, which implicitly closes Closeables. All resources opened in a try-with-resources statement are ignored by this rule.

try (BufferedReader br = new BufferedReader(new FileReader(fileName))) {
  //...
}
catch ( ... ) {
  //...
}

See

• MITRE, CWE-459 - Incomplete Cleanup
• MITRE, CWE-772 - Missing Release of Resource after Effective Lifetime
• CERT, FIO04-J. - Release resources when they are no longer needed
• CERT, FIO42-C. - Close files when they are no longer needed
• Try With Resources

Duplicated string literals make the process of refactoring error-prone, since you must be sure to update all occurrences.

On the other hand, constants can be referenced from many places, but only need to be updated in a single place.

Noncompliant Code Example

With the default threshold of 3:

public void run() {
  prepare("action1");                              // Noncompliant - "action1" is duplicated 3 times
  execute("action1");
  release("action1");
}

@SuppressWarning("all")                            // Compliant - annotations are excluded
private void method1() { /* ... */ }
@SuppressWarning("all")
private void method2() { /* ... */ }

public String method3(String a) {
  System.out.println("'" + a + "'");               // Compliant - literal "'" has less than 5 characters and is excluded
  return "";                                       // Compliant - literal "" has less than 5 characters and is excluded
}

Compliant Solution

private static final String ACTION_1 = "action1";  // Compliant

public void run() {
  prepare(ACTION_1);                               // Compliant
  execute(ACTION_1);
  release(ACTION_1);
}

Exceptions

To prevent generating some false-positives, literals having less than 5 characters are excluded.

Duplicated string literals make the process of refactoring error-prone, since you must be sure to update all occurrences.

On the other hand, constants can be referenced from many places, but only need to be updated in a single place.

Noncompliant Code Example

With the default threshold of 3:

public void run() {
  prepare("action1");                              // Noncompliant - "action1" is duplicated 3 times
  execute("action1");
  release("action1");
}

@SuppressWarning("all")                            // Compliant - annotations are excluded
private void method1() { /* ... */ }
@SuppressWarning("all")
private void method2() { /* ... */ }

public String method3(String a) {
  System.out.println("'" + a + "'");               // Compliant - literal "'" has less than 5 characters and is excluded
  return "";                                       // Compliant - literal "" has less than 5 characters and is excluded
}

Compliant Solution

private static final String ACTION_1 = "action1";  // Compliant

public void run() {
  prepare(ACTION_1);                               // Compliant
  execute(ACTION_1);
  release(ACTION_1);
}

Exceptions

To prevent generating some false-positives, literals having less than 5 characters are excluded.

In the interest of code clarity, static members of a base class should never be accessed using a derived type's name. Doing so is confusing and could create the illusion that two different static members exist.

Noncompliant Code Example

class Parent {
  public static int counter;
}

class Child extends Parent {
  public Child() {
    Child.counter++;  // Noncompliant
  }
}

Compliant Solution

class Parent {
  public static int counter;
}

class Child extends Parent {
  public Child() {
    Parent.counter++;
  }
}

In the interest of code clarity, static members of a base class should never be accessed using a derived type's name. Doing so is confusing and could create the illusion that two different static members exist.

Noncompliant Code Example

class Parent {
  public static int counter;
}

class Child extends Parent {
  public Child() {
    Child.counter++;  // Noncompliant
  }
}

Compliant Solution

class Parent {
  public static int counter;
}

class Child extends Parent {
  public Child() {
    Parent.counter++;
  }
}

Duplicated string literals make the process of refactoring error-prone, since you must be sure to update all occurrences.

On the other hand, constants can be referenced from many places, but only need to be updated in a single place.

Noncompliant Code Example

With the default threshold of 3:

public void run() {
  prepare("action1");                              // Noncompliant - "action1" is duplicated 3 times
  execute("action1");
  release("action1");
}

@SuppressWarning("all")                            // Compliant - annotations are excluded
private void method1() { /* ... */ }
@SuppressWarning("all")
private void method2() { /* ... */ }

public String method3(String a) {
  System.out.println("'" + a + "'");               // Compliant - literal "'" has less than 5 characters and is excluded
  return "";                                       // Compliant - literal "" has less than 5 characters and is excluded
}

Compliant Solution

private static final String ACTION_1 = "action1";  // Compliant

public void run() {
  prepare(ACTION_1);                               // Compliant
  execute(ACTION_1);
  release(ACTION_1);
}

Exceptions

To prevent generating some false-positives, literals having less than 5 characters are excluded.

Duplicated string literals make the process of refactoring error-prone, since you must be sure to update all occurrences.

On the other hand, constants can be referenced from many places, but only need to be updated in a single place.

Noncompliant Code Example

With the default threshold of 3:

public void run() {
  prepare("action1");                              // Noncompliant - "action1" is duplicated 3 times
  execute("action1");
  release("action1");
}

@SuppressWarning("all")                            // Compliant - annotations are excluded
private void method1() { /* ... */ }
@SuppressWarning("all")
private void method2() { /* ... */ }

public String method3(String a) {
  System.out.println("'" + a + "'");               // Compliant - literal "'" has less than 5 characters and is excluded
  return "";                                       // Compliant - literal "" has less than 5 characters and is excluded
}

Compliant Solution

private static final String ACTION_1 = "action1";  // Compliant

public void run() {
  prepare(ACTION_1);                               // Compliant
  execute(ACTION_1);
  release(ACTION_1);
}

Exceptions

To prevent generating some false-positives, literals having less than 5 characters are excluded.

In the interest of code clarity, static members of a base class should never be accessed using a derived type's name. Doing so is confusing and could create the illusion that two different static members exist.

Noncompliant Code Example

class Parent {
  public static int counter;
}

class Child extends Parent {
  public Child() {
    Child.counter++;  // Noncompliant
  }
}

Compliant Solution

class Parent {
  public static int counter;
}

class Child extends Parent {
  public Child() {
    Parent.counter++;
  }
}

In the interest of code clarity, static members of a base class should never be accessed using a derived type's name. Doing so is confusing and could create the illusion that two different static members exist.

Noncompliant Code Example

class Parent {
  public static int counter;
}

class Child extends Parent {
  public Child() {
    Child.counter++;  // Noncompliant
  }
}

Compliant Solution

class Parent {
  public static int counter;
}

class Child extends Parent {
  public Child() {
    Parent.counter++;
  }
}

Duplicated string literals make the process of refactoring error-prone, since you must be sure to update all occurrences.

On the other hand, constants can be referenced from many places, but only need to be updated in a single place.

Noncompliant Code Example

With the default threshold of 3:

public void run() {
  prepare("action1");                              // Noncompliant - "action1" is duplicated 3 times
  execute("action1");
  release("action1");
}

@SuppressWarning("all")                            // Compliant - annotations are excluded
private void method1() { /* ... */ }
@SuppressWarning("all")
private void method2() { /* ... */ }

public String method3(String a) {
  System.out.println("'" + a + "'");               // Compliant - literal "'" has less than 5 characters and is excluded
  return "";                                       // Compliant - literal "" has less than 5 characters and is excluded
}

Compliant Solution

private static final String ACTION_1 = "action1";  // Compliant

public void run() {
  prepare(ACTION_1);                               // Compliant
  execute(ACTION_1);
  release(ACTION_1);
}

Exceptions

To prevent generating some false-positives, literals having less than 5 characters are excluded.

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 540.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

• Extract Method
• Extract Class
• Form Template Method
• Introduce Null Object
• Pull Up Method
• Pull Up Field
• Substitute Algorithm

Further Reading

• Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
• Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
• Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 336.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

• Extract Method
• Extract Class
• Form Template Method
• Introduce Null Object
• Pull Up Method
• Pull Up Field
• Substitute Algorithm

Further Reading

• Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
• Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
• Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 112.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

• Extract Method
• Extract Class
• Form Template Method
• Introduce Null Object
• Pull Up Method
• Pull Up Field
• Substitute Algorithm

Further Reading

• Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
• Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
• Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 110.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

• Extract Method
• Extract Class
• Form Template Method
• Introduce Null Object
• Pull Up Method
• Pull Up Field
• Substitute Algorithm

Further Reading

• Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
• Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
• Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 74.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

• Extract Method
• Extract Class
• Form Template Method
• Introduce Null Object
• Pull Up Method
• Pull Up Field
• Substitute Algorithm

Further Reading

• Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
• Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
• Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 64.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

• Extract Method
• Extract Class
• Form Template Method
• Introduce Null Object
• Pull Up Method
• Pull Up Field
• Substitute Algorithm

Further Reading

• Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
• Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
• Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 60.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

• Extract Method
• Extract Class
• Form Template Method
• Introduce Null Object
• Pull Up Method
• Pull Up Field
• Substitute Algorithm

Further Reading

• Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
• Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
• Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 58.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

• Extract Method
• Extract Class
• Form Template Method
• Introduce Null Object
• Pull Up Method
• Pull Up Field
• Substitute Algorithm

Further Reading

• Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
• Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
• Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 56.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

• Extract Method
• Extract Class
• Form Template Method
• Introduce Null Object
• Pull Up Method
• Pull Up Field
• Substitute Algorithm

Further Reading

• Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
• Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
• Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 54.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

• Extract Method
• Extract Class
• Form Template Method
• Introduce Null Object
• Pull Up Method
• Pull Up Field
• Substitute Algorithm

Further Reading

• Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
• Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
• Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 50.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

• Extract Method
• Extract Class
• Form Template Method
• Introduce Null Object
• Pull Up Method
• Pull Up Field
• Substitute Algorithm

Further Reading

• Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
• Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
• Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 44.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

• Extract Method
• Extract Class
• Form Template Method
• Introduce Null Object
• Pull Up Method
• Pull Up Field
• Substitute Algorithm

Further Reading

• Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
• Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
• Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76