Method doImport
has a Cognitive Complexity of 110 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
public String doImport(final String filename, final JProgressBar progress, final boolean showResults) {
errorMessage = "";
Runnable runnable = new Runnable() {
public void run() {
try {
- Read upRead up
- Create a ticketCreate a ticket
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method run
has a Cognitive Complexity of 77 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
public void run() {
try {
MyLogger.handleMessage("Importing PEX-File: " + filename);
if (progress != null) {
progress.setVisible(true);
- Read upRead up
- Create a ticketCreate a ticket
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method doImport
has 183 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
public String doImport(final String filename, final JProgressBar progress, final boolean showResults) {
errorMessage = "";
Runnable runnable = new Runnable() {
public void run() {
try {
- Create a ticketCreate a ticket
Method getReihenfolge
has a Cognitive Complexity of 44 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
private Vector<Integer> getReihenfolge(Vector<Integer[]> org_dst) {
Vector<Integer> indexReihenfolge = new Vector<>();
Integer[] int2 = org_dst.get(0);
int[] valsA = new int[2];
int[] valsE = new int[2];
- Read upRead up
- Create a ticketCreate a ticket
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
File MyProzessXMLImporter.java
has 366 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
/*******************************************************************************
* Copyright (c) 2015 Federal Institute for Risk Assessment (BfR), Germany
*
* This program is free software: you can redistribute it and/or modify
* it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by
- Create a ticketCreate a ticket
Method getReihenfolgePrev
has a Cognitive Complexity of 30 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
private int getReihenfolgePrev(Vector<Integer[]> org_dst, Vector<Integer> indexReihenfolge) {
int wegPfeile = 0; // Ein Knoten kann mehrere Pfeile haben, die ihn verlassen ..., z.B. Salami_Test_Britta, gleich der erste Knoten "Wareneingang" führt zum einen zu "Speck (Meat, Raw)" zum anderen zu "Schweinefleich , roh (Meat, Raw)"
if (indexReihenfolge != null) {
Vector<Vector<Integer>> rhflgn = new Vector<>();
int firstIndex = indexReihenfolge.get(0);
- Read upRead up
- Create a ticketCreate a ticket
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method cleanReihenfolgeListe
has a Cognitive Complexity of 21 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
private void cleanReihenfolgeListe(Vector<Integer> indexReihenfolge, LinkedHashMap<Integer, Integer> index_processID, Vector<Integer[]> org_dst) {
for (int ii=0;ii<indexReihenfolge.size();ii++) {
Integer key = indexReihenfolge.get(ii);
Integer carverID = index_processID.get(key);
//System.out.println(key + "\t" + carverID + "\t" + isBlacklisted(carverID));
- Read upRead up
- Create a ticketCreate a ticket
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method getReihenfolge
has 48 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
private Vector<Integer> getReihenfolge(Vector<Integer[]> org_dst) {
Vector<Integer> indexReihenfolge = new Vector<>();
Integer[] int2 = org_dst.get(0);
int[] valsA = new int[2];
int[] valsE = new int[2];
- Create a ticketCreate a ticket
Consider simplifying this complex logical expression. Open
if (carverID >= 1 && carverID <= 31 || carverID == 332 ||
carverID >= 217 && carverID <= 220 ||
carverID >= 295 && carverID <= 307 ||
carverID >= 338 && carverID <= 340) result = true; // Material
else if (carverID >= 280 && carverID <= 290 || carverID == 342) result = true; // Verpackung
- Create a ticketCreate a ticket
Method getReihenfolgePrev
has 39 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
private int getReihenfolgePrev(Vector<Integer[]> org_dst, Vector<Integer> indexReihenfolge) {
int wegPfeile = 0; // Ein Knoten kann mehrere Pfeile haben, die ihn verlassen ..., z.B. Salami_Test_Britta, gleich der erste Knoten "Wareneingang" führt zum einen zu "Speck (Meat, Raw)" zum anderen zu "Schweinefleich , roh (Meat, Raw)"
if (indexReihenfolge != null) {
Vector<Vector<Integer>> rhflgn = new Vector<>();
int firstIndex = indexReihenfolge.get(0);
- Create a ticketCreate a ticket
Method isBlacklisted
has a Cognitive Complexity of 11 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
private boolean isBlacklisted(int carverID) {
boolean result = false;
if (carverID >= 1 && carverID <= 31 || carverID == 332 ||
carverID >= 217 && carverID <= 220 ||
carverID >= 295 && carverID <= 307 ||
- Read upRead up
- Create a ticketCreate a ticket
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Avoid deeply nested control flow statements. Open
if (int2[0] == indexReihenfolge.get(ii)) {
psmt.clearParameters();
psmt.setInt(1, index_ProzessdatenID.get(int2[0]));
Integer pid = index_ProzessdatenID.get(int2[1]);
if (pid != null) {
- Create a ticketCreate a ticket
Avoid deeply nested control flow statements. Open
for (int iii=0;iii<org_dst.size();iii++) {
Integer[] int22 = org_dst.get(iii);
if (int22[0] == int2[1]) {
org_dst.add(new Integer[]{int2[0],int22[1]});
}
- Create a ticketCreate a ticket
Avoid deeply nested control flow statements. Open
if (rs.next()) {
if (i==0) DBKernel.insertBLOB("Prozessdaten", "Workflow", xmlFile, rs.getInt(1));
index_ProzessdatenID.put(key, rs.getInt(1));
importedCarverIDs.add(value);
}
- Create a ticketCreate a ticket
Avoid deeply nested control flow statements. Open
if (indexReihenfolgeNewEnde.get(j) == indexReihenfolge.get(k)) {
if (k == indexReihenfolge.size()-1) errorMessage += "Ups, 2.Ende... hier ist was schiefgelaufen!\nBitte die Carver Datei (*.pex,*.xml) an Armin senden!\n";
System.err.println(indexReihenfolgeNewEnde.get(j));
for (int l=1;j+l < indexReihenfolgeNewEnde.size();l++) {
- Create a ticketCreate a ticket
Method findEnde
has 5 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
private void findEnde(Vector<Integer[]> org_dst, int aktuell, int step, int[] vals, boolean anfang) {
- Create a ticketCreate a ticket
Method findEnde
has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
private void findEnde(Vector<Integer[]> org_dst, int aktuell, int step, int[] vals, boolean anfang) {
Integer[] int2;
boolean found = false;
for (int i=0;i<org_dst.size();i++) {
int2 = org_dst.get(i);
- Read upRead up
- Create a ticketCreate a ticket
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Refactor this method to reduce its Cognitive Complexity from 21 to the 15 allowed. Open
private void cleanReihenfolgeListe(Vector<Integer> indexReihenfolge, LinkedHashMap<Integer, Integer> index_processID, Vector<Integer[]> org_dst) {
- Read upRead up
- Create a ticketCreate a ticket
- Exclude checks
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how hard the control flow of a method is to understand. Methods with high Cognitive Complexity will be difficult to maintain.
See
Refactor this method to reduce its Cognitive Complexity from 111 to the 15 allowed. Open
public String doImport(final String filename, final JProgressBar progress, final boolean showResults) {
- Read upRead up
- Create a ticketCreate a ticket
- Exclude checks
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how hard the control flow of a method is to understand. Methods with high Cognitive Complexity will be difficult to maintain.
See
Refactor this method to reduce its Cognitive Complexity from 29 to the 15 allowed. Open
private int getReihenfolgePrev(Vector<Integer[]> org_dst, Vector<Integer> indexReihenfolge) {
- Read upRead up
- Create a ticketCreate a ticket
- Exclude checks
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how hard the control flow of a method is to understand. Methods with high Cognitive Complexity will be difficult to maintain.
See
Refactor this method to reduce its Cognitive Complexity from 44 to the 15 allowed. Open
private Vector<Integer> getReihenfolge(Vector<Integer[]> org_dst) {
- Read upRead up
- Create a ticketCreate a ticket
- Exclude checks
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how hard the control flow of a method is to understand. Methods with high Cognitive Complexity will be difficult to maintain.
See
Define a constant instead of duplicating this literal "INSERT INTO " 3 times. Open
String sql = "INSERT INTO " + DBKernel.delimitL("ProzessWorkflow") +
- Read upRead up
- Create a ticketCreate a ticket
- Exclude checks
Duplicated string literals make the process of refactoring error-prone, since you must be sure to update all occurrences.
On the other hand, constants can be referenced from many places, but only need to be updated in a single place.
Noncompliant Code Example
With the default threshold of 3:
public void run() { prepare("action1"); // Noncompliant - "action1" is duplicated 3 times execute("action1"); release("action1"); } @SuppressWarning("all") // Compliant - annotations are excluded private void method1() { /* ... */ } @SuppressWarning("all") private void method2() { /* ... */ } public String method3(String a) { System.out.println("'" + a + "'"); // Compliant - literal "'" has less than 5 characters and is excluded return ""; // Compliant - literal "" has less than 5 characters and is excluded }
Compliant Solution
private static final String ACTION_1 = "action1"; // Compliant public void run() { prepare(ACTION_1); // Compliant execute(ACTION_1); release(ACTION_1); }
Exceptions
To prevent generating some false-positives, literals having less than 5 characters are excluded.
Define a constant instead of duplicating this literal "ProzessWorkflow" 4 times. Open
String sql = "INSERT INTO " + DBKernel.delimitL("ProzessWorkflow") +
- Read upRead up
- Create a ticketCreate a ticket
- Exclude checks
Duplicated string literals make the process of refactoring error-prone, since you must be sure to update all occurrences.
On the other hand, constants can be referenced from many places, but only need to be updated in a single place.
Noncompliant Code Example
With the default threshold of 3:
public void run() { prepare("action1"); // Noncompliant - "action1" is duplicated 3 times execute("action1"); release("action1"); } @SuppressWarning("all") // Compliant - annotations are excluded private void method1() { /* ... */ } @SuppressWarning("all") private void method2() { /* ... */ } public String method3(String a) { System.out.println("'" + a + "'"); // Compliant - literal "'" has less than 5 characters and is excluded return ""; // Compliant - literal "" has less than 5 characters and is excluded }
Compliant Solution
private static final String ACTION_1 = "action1"; // Compliant public void run() { prepare(ACTION_1); // Compliant execute(ACTION_1); release(ACTION_1); }
Exceptions
To prevent generating some false-positives, literals having less than 5 characters are excluded.
Define a constant instead of duplicating this literal "Prozessdaten" 4 times. Open
sql = "INSERT INTO " + DBKernel.delimitL("Prozessdaten") +
- Read upRead up
- Create a ticketCreate a ticket
- Exclude checks
Duplicated string literals make the process of refactoring error-prone, since you must be sure to update all occurrences.
On the other hand, constants can be referenced from many places, but only need to be updated in a single place.
Noncompliant Code Example
With the default threshold of 3:
public void run() { prepare("action1"); // Noncompliant - "action1" is duplicated 3 times execute("action1"); release("action1"); } @SuppressWarning("all") // Compliant - annotations are excluded private void method1() { /* ... */ } @SuppressWarning("all") private void method2() { /* ... */ } public String method3(String a) { System.out.println("'" + a + "'"); // Compliant - literal "'" has less than 5 characters and is excluded return ""; // Compliant - literal "" has less than 5 characters and is excluded }
Compliant Solution
private static final String ACTION_1 = "action1"; // Compliant public void run() { prepare(ACTION_1); // Compliant execute(ACTION_1); release(ACTION_1); }
Exceptions
To prevent generating some false-positives, literals having less than 5 characters are excluded.
Identical blocks of code found in 5 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
private String getExtension(File f) {
String s = f.getName();
int i = s.lastIndexOf('.');
if (i > 0 && i < s.length() - 1) return s.substring(i+1).toLowerCase();
return "";
- Read upRead up
- Create a ticketCreate a ticket
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 66.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
if (progress != null) {
progress.setVisible(true);
progress.setStringPainted(true);
progress.setString("Importiere Carver-Datei...");
progress.setMinimum(0);
- Read upRead up
- Create a ticketCreate a ticket
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 42.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76