Sign upLogin

SpamExperts/OrangeAssassin

View on GitHub
Star
oa/rules/ruleset.py

Summary

Maintainability
D
1 day
Test Coverage

Cyclomatic complexity is too high in method _interpolate. (16)
Open

    def _interpolate(self, text, msg):
        if msg.interpolate_data:
            return text % msg.interpolate_data

        spam = msg.score >= self.conf["required_score"]
Severity: Minor
Found in oa/rules/ruleset.py by radon

Cyclomatic Complexity

Cyclomatic Complexity corresponds to the number of decisions a block of code contains plus 1. This number (also called McCabe number) is equal to the number of linearly independent paths through the code. This number can be used as a guide when testing conditional logic in blocks.

Radon analyzes the AST tree of a Python program to compute Cyclomatic Complexity. Statements have the following effects on Cyclomatic Complexity:

Construct Effect on CC Reasoning
if +1 An if statement is a single decision.
elif +1 The elif statement adds another decision.
else +0 The else statement does not cause a new decision. The decision is at the if.
for +1 There is a decision at the start of the loop.
while +1 There is a decision at the while statement.
except +1 Each except branch adds a new conditional path of execution.
finally +0 The finally block is unconditionally executed.
with +1 The with statement roughly corresponds to a try/except block (see PEP 343 for details).
assert +1 The assert statement internally roughly equals a conditional statement.
Comprehension +1 A list/set/dict comprehension of generator expression is equivalent to a for loop.
Boolean Operator +1 Every boolean operator (and, or) adds a decision point.

Source: http://radon.readthedocs.org/en/latest/intro.html

File ruleset.py has 306 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

"""A set of rules."""

from builtins import dict
from builtins import object
from builtins import str
Severity: Minor
Found in oa/rules/ruleset.py - About 3 hrs to fix

    Cyclomatic complexity is too high in method post_parsing. (9)
    Open

        def post_parsing(self):
        """Run all post processing hooks."""
        self.checked = collections.OrderedDict(
            sorted(self.checked.items(), key=itemgetter(1), reverse=False))
        self.call_postparsing()
    Severity: Minor
    Found in oa/rules/ruleset.py by radon

    Cyclomatic Complexity

    Cyclomatic Complexity corresponds to the number of decisions a block of code contains plus 1. This number (also called McCabe number) is equal to the number of linearly independent paths through the code. This number can be used as a guide when testing conditional logic in blocks.

    Radon analyzes the AST tree of a Python program to compute Cyclomatic Complexity. Statements have the following effects on Cyclomatic Complexity:

    Construct Effect on CC Reasoning
    if +1 An if statement is a single decision.
    elif +1 The elif statement adds another decision.
    else +0 The else statement does not cause a new decision. The decision is at the if.
    for +1 There is a decision at the start of the loop.
    while +1 There is a decision at the while statement.
    except +1 Each except branch adds a new conditional path of execution.
    finally +0 The finally block is unconditionally executed.
    with +1 The with statement roughly corresponds to a try/except block (see PEP 343 for details).
    assert +1 The assert statement internally roughly equals a conditional statement.
    Comprehension +1 A list/set/dict comprehension of generator expression is equivalent to a for loop.
    Boolean Operator +1 Every boolean operator (and, or) adds a decision point.

    Source: http://radon.readthedocs.org/en/latest/intro.html

    Cyclomatic complexity is too high in method match. (8)
    Open

        def match(self, msg):
        """Match the message against all the rules in this ruleset."""
        try:
            for name, rule in self.checked.items():
                try:
    Severity: Minor
    Found in oa/rules/ruleset.py by radon

    Cyclomatic Complexity

    Cyclomatic Complexity corresponds to the number of decisions a block of code contains plus 1. This number (also called McCabe number) is equal to the number of linearly independent paths through the code. This number can be used as a guide when testing conditional logic in blocks.

    Radon analyzes the AST tree of a Python program to compute Cyclomatic Complexity. Statements have the following effects on Cyclomatic Complexity:

    Construct Effect on CC Reasoning
    if +1 An if statement is a single decision.
    elif +1 The elif statement adds another decision.
    else +0 The else statement does not cause a new decision. The decision is at the if.
    for +1 There is a decision at the start of the loop.
    while +1 There is a decision at the while statement.
    except +1 Each except branch adds a new conditional path of execution.
    finally +0 The finally block is unconditionally executed.
    with +1 The with statement roughly corresponds to a try/except block (see PEP 343 for details).
    assert +1 The assert statement internally roughly equals a conditional statement.
    Comprehension +1 A list/set/dict comprehension of generator expression is equivalent to a for loop.
    Boolean Operator +1 Every boolean operator (and, or) adds a decision point.

    Source: http://radon.readthedocs.org/en/latest/intro.html

    Cyclomatic complexity is too high in method get_adjusted_message. (7)
    Open

        def get_adjusted_message(self, msg, header_only=False):
        """Get message adjusted by the rules."""
        spam = msg.score >= self.conf["required_score"]
        if not spam or header_only or self.conf["report_safe"] == 0:
            newmsg = email.message_from_string(msg.raw_msg)
    Severity: Minor
    Found in oa/rules/ruleset.py by radon

    Cyclomatic Complexity

    Cyclomatic Complexity corresponds to the number of decisions a block of code contains plus 1. This number (also called McCabe number) is equal to the number of linearly independent paths through the code. This number can be used as a guide when testing conditional logic in blocks.

    Radon analyzes the AST tree of a Python program to compute Cyclomatic Complexity. Statements have the following effects on Cyclomatic Complexity:

    Construct Effect on CC Reasoning
    if +1 An if statement is a single decision.
    elif +1 The elif statement adds another decision.
    else +0 The else statement does not cause a new decision. The decision is at the if.
    for +1 There is a decision at the start of the loop.
    while +1 There is a decision at the while statement.
    except +1 Each except branch adds a new conditional path of execution.
    finally +0 The finally block is unconditionally executed.
    with +1 The with statement roughly corresponds to a try/except block (see PEP 343 for details).
    assert +1 The assert statement internally roughly equals a conditional statement.
    Comprehension +1 A list/set/dict comprehension of generator expression is equivalent to a for loop.
    Boolean Operator +1 Every boolean operator (and, or) adds a decision point.

    Source: http://radon.readthedocs.org/en/latest/intro.html

    Function _interpolate has a Cognitive Complexity of 15 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
    Open

        def _interpolate(self, text, msg):
        if msg.interpolate_data:
            return text % msg.interpolate_data

        spam = msg.score >= self.conf["required_score"]
    Severity: Minor
    Found in oa/rules/ruleset.py - About 1 hr to fix

    Cognitive Complexity

    Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

    A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

    • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
    • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
    • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

    Further reading

    Cyclomatic complexity is too high in method _get_bounce_message. (6)
    Open

        def _get_bounce_message(self, msg):
        """Create a bounce message from the original."""
        newmsg = email.mime.multipart.MIMEMultipart("mixed")
        newmsg["Received"] = (
            "from localhost by %s with OrangeAssassin (version %s); %s" %
    Severity: Minor
    Found in oa/rules/ruleset.py by radon

    Cyclomatic Complexity

    Cyclomatic Complexity corresponds to the number of decisions a block of code contains plus 1. This number (also called McCabe number) is equal to the number of linearly independent paths through the code. This number can be used as a guide when testing conditional logic in blocks.

    Radon analyzes the AST tree of a Python program to compute Cyclomatic Complexity. Statements have the following effects on Cyclomatic Complexity:

    Construct Effect on CC Reasoning
    if +1 An if statement is a single decision.
    elif +1 The elif statement adds another decision.
    else +0 The else statement does not cause a new decision. The decision is at the if.
    for +1 There is a decision at the start of the loop.
    while +1 There is a decision at the while statement.
    except +1 Each except branch adds a new conditional path of execution.
    finally +0 The finally block is unconditionally executed.
    with +1 The with statement roughly corresponds to a try/except block (see PEP 343 for details).
    assert +1 The assert statement internally roughly equals a conditional statement.
    Comprehension +1 A list/set/dict comprehension of generator expression is equivalent to a for loop.
    Boolean Operator +1 Every boolean operator (and, or) adds a decision point.

    Source: http://radon.readthedocs.org/en/latest/intro.html

    Function match has a Cognitive Complexity of 11 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
    Open

        def match(self, msg):
        """Match the message against all the rules in this ruleset."""
        try:
            for name, rule in self.checked.items():
                try:
    Severity: Minor
    Found in oa/rules/ruleset.py - About 1 hr to fix

    Cognitive Complexity

    Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

    A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

    • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
    • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
    • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

    Further reading

    Function call_postparsing has a Cognitive Complexity of 10 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
    Open

        def call_postparsing(self):
        """Call postparsing on ALL loaded rules."""
        for rule_list in (self.checked, self.not_checked):
            for name, rule in list(rule_list.items()):
                try:
    Severity: Minor
    Found in oa/rules/ruleset.py - About 1 hr to fix

    Cognitive Complexity

    Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

    A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

    • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
    • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
    • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

    Further reading

    Function post_parsing has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
    Open

        def post_parsing(self):
        """Run all post processing hooks."""
        self.checked = collections.OrderedDict(
            sorted(self.checked.items(), key=itemgetter(1), reverse=False))
        self.call_postparsing()
    Severity: Minor
    Found in oa/rules/ruleset.py - About 45 mins to fix

    Cognitive Complexity

    Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

    A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

    • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
    • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
    • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

    Further reading

    Function get_adjusted_message has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
    Open

        def get_adjusted_message(self, msg, header_only=False):
        """Get message adjusted by the rules."""
        spam = msg.score >= self.conf["required_score"]
        if not spam or header_only or self.conf["report_safe"] == 0:
            newmsg = email.message_from_string(msg.raw_msg)
    Severity: Minor
    Found in oa/rules/ruleset.py - About 35 mins to fix

    Cognitive Complexity

    Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

    A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

    • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
    • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
    • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

    Further reading

    Function get_summary_report has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
    Open

        def get_summary_report(self, msg):
        """Get summary report."""
        summary = []
        for name, result in msg.rules_checked.items():
            if not result:
    Severity: Minor
    Found in oa/rules/ruleset.py - About 25 mins to fix

    Cognitive Complexity

    Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

    A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

    • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
    • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
    • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

    Further reading

    XXX found
    Open

            # XXX Hardcoded at the moment, should be loaded from configuration.
    Severity: Minor
    Found in oa/rules/ruleset.py by fixme

    Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
    Open

            self.conf["unsafe_report"] = "\n".join(
            self._convert_tags(value)
            for value in self.conf["unsafe_report"]
    Severity: Major
    Found in oa/rules/ruleset.py and 1 other location - About 1 hr to fix
    oa/rules/ruleset.py on lines 295..297

    Duplicated Code

    Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

    Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

    When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

    Tuning

    This issue has a mass of 41.

    We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

    The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

    If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

    See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

    Refactorings

    Further Reading

    Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
    Open

            self.conf["report"] = "\n".join(
            self._convert_tags(value)
            for value in self.conf["report"]
    Severity: Major
    Found in oa/rules/ruleset.py and 1 other location - About 1 hr to fix
    oa/rules/ruleset.py on lines 299..301

    Duplicated Code

    Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

    Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

    When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

    Tuning

    This issue has a mass of 41.

    We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

    The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

    If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

    See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

    Refactorings

    Further Reading

    Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
    Open

                if not matched_rules:
                data["TESTSSCORES"] = "none"
            else:
                data["TESTSSCORES"] = ",".join(matched_rules)
    Severity: Minor
    Found in oa/rules/ruleset.py and 1 other location - About 55 mins to fix
    oa/rules/ruleset.py on lines 86..89

    Duplicated Code

    Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

    Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

    When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

    Tuning

    This issue has a mass of 37.

    We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

    The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

    If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

    See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

    Refactorings

    Further Reading

    Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
    Open

                if not matched_rules:
                data["TESTS"] = "none"
            else:
                data["TESTS"] = ",".join(matched_rules)
    Severity: Minor
    Found in oa/rules/ruleset.py and 1 other location - About 55 mins to fix
    oa/rules/ruleset.py on lines 95..98

    Duplicated Code

    Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

    Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

    When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

    Tuning

    This issue has a mass of 37.

    We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

    The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

    If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

    See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

    Refactorings

    Further Reading

    Line too long (80 > 79 characters)
    Open

                                           "original message before OrangeAssassin")
    Severity: Minor
    Found in oa/rules/ruleset.py by pep8

    Limit all lines to a maximum of 79 characters.

    There are still many devices around that are limited to 80 character
lines; plus, limiting windows to 80 characters makes it possible to
have several windows side-by-side.  The default wrapping on such
devices looks ugly.  Therefore, please limit all lines to a maximum
of 79 characters. For flowing long blocks of text (docstrings or
comments), limiting the length to 72 characters is recommended.

Reports error E501.

    Line too long (86 > 79 characters)
    Open

                    (rule.score, rule.name, rule._rule_type, msg.rules_descriptions[name])
    Severity: Minor
    Found in oa/rules/ruleset.py by pep8

    Limit all lines to a maximum of 79 characters.

    There are still many devices around that are limited to 80 character
lines; plus, limiting windows to 80 characters makes it possible to
have several windows side-by-side.  The default wrapping on such
devices looks ugly.  Therefore, please limit all lines to a maximum
of 79 characters. For flowing long blocks of text (docstrings or
comments), limiting the length to 72 characters is recommended.

Reports error E501.

    There are no issues that match your filters.

    Category
    Status