Sign upLogin

SpeciesFileGroup/taxonworks

View on GitHub
Star

Showing 12,636 of 12,636 total issues

Method unambiguous_at? has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

      def unambiguous_at?(rank)
        return protonym_result[rank].first if protonym_result[rank].size == 1
        if protonym_result[rank].size == 2
          n1 = protonym_result[rank].first
          n2 = protonym_result[rank].last
Severity: Minor
Found in lib/vendor/biodiversity.rb - About 25 mins to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Method data has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

  def data
    r = raw_data
    d = {} # country => [state => [county]]

    items.each do |i|
Severity: Minor
Found in lib/catalog/distribution/entry.rb - About 25 mins to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Method geographic_name_classification has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

  def geographic_name_classification
    return @geographic_name_classification if @geographic_name_classification
    case object.class.base_class.name
    when 'AssertedDistribution'
      @geographic_name_classification ||= object.geographic_area.geographic_name_classification
Severity: Minor
Found in lib/catalog/distribution/entry_item.rb - About 25 mins to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Method compare has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

    def self.compare(object, opts = {} )
      r = {
        object: object,
        comparing_current: false,
        version_a: opts[:version_a].to_i,
Severity: Minor
Found in lib/vendor/papertrail.rb - About 25 mins to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Method collection_object_scientific_name has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

    def self.collection_object_scientific_name(collection_object)
      return nil if collection_object.nil?
      if a = collection_object.taxon_determinations.order(:position)&.first
        if a.otu.taxon_name
          a.otu.taxon_name.cached
Severity: Minor
Found in lib/vendor/colrapi.rb - About 25 mins to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Method total_batch_sessions has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

  def self.total_batch_sessions(sessions)
    return 0 if sessions.nil?
    i = 0
    sessions.each do |s|
      next if !s[:batch]
Severity: Minor
Found in lib/work.rb - About 25 mins to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Method eliminated_taxa has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

  def eliminated_taxa
    h = {}
    row_hash.each do |r_key, r_value|
      obj = r_value[:object_at_rank].class.to_s + '|' + r_value[:object_at_rank].id.to_s
      if r_value[:status] == 'eliminated' && !remaining.include?(r_value[:object_at_rank].class.to_s + '|' + r_value[:object_at_rank].id.to_s)
Severity: Minor
Found in lib/tools/interactive_key.rb - About 25 mins to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

    if a = @data.first
      data_labels.each do |k|
        if a[:data][k].nil?
          a[:data][k] = 0
        end
Severity: Minor
Found in app/controllers/tasks/projects/activity_controller.rb and 1 other location - About 25 mins to fix
app/controllers/administration_controller.rb on lines 59..65

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 30.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

       r.merge! %I{order family genus}.inject({}) { |hsh, r| hsh[('object_' + r.to_s).to_sym] = [b.biological_association_object.taxonomy[r.to_s]].flatten.compact.join(' '); hsh }
Severity: Minor
Found in app/helpers/biological_associations_helper.rb and 1 other location - About 25 mins to fix
app/helpers/biological_associations_helper.rb on lines 87..87

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 30.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

    if a = @data.first
      data_labels.each do |k|
        if a[:data][k].nil?
          a[:data][k] = 0
        end
Severity: Minor
Found in app/controllers/administration_controller.rb and 1 other location - About 25 mins to fix
app/controllers/tasks/projects/activity_controller.rb on lines 43..49

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 30.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

       r.merge! %I{order family genus}.inject({}) { |hsh, r| hsh[('object_' + r.to_s).to_sym] = [b.biological_association_object.taxonomy[r.to_s]].flatten.compact.join(' '); hsh }
Severity: Minor
Found in app/helpers/biological_associations_helper.rb and 1 other location - About 25 mins to fix
app/helpers/biological_associations_helper.rb on lines 57..57

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 30.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

        a = a + content_tag(:span, "#{person.roles.select(:type).distinct.pluck(:type).map(&:safe_constantize).collect{|r| r.human_name}.join(', ')}", class: [:feedback, 'feedback-thin', 'feedback-secondary'] )
Severity: Minor
Found in app/helpers/people_helper.rb and 1 other location - About 25 mins to fix
app/helpers/people_helper.rb on lines 69..69

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 30.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Similar blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

  def attribution_creators_tag(attribution)
    a = attribution.creator_roles.eager_load(:organization, :person).collect{|b| b.agent}
    return nil unless a.any?
    ('Created by ' + Utilities::Strings.authorship_sentence(a.collect{|b| b.name})).html_safe
Severity: Minor
Found in app/helpers/attributions_helper.rb and 2 other locations - About 25 mins to fix
app/helpers/attributions_helper.rb on lines 82..85
app/helpers/attributions_helper.rb on lines 88..91

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 30.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

        a = a + content_tag(:span, "#{person.roles.select(:type).distinct.pluck(:type).map(&:safe_constantize).collect{|r| r.human_name}.join(', ')}", class: [:feedback, 'feedback-thin', 'feedback-secondary'] )
Severity: Minor
Found in app/helpers/people_helper.rb and 1 other location - About 25 mins to fix
app/helpers/people_helper.rb on lines 80..80

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 30.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Similar blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

    scope :summary, controller: 'tasks/people/summary' do
      get '/', action: :index, as: 'people_summary_task'
      post 'data', action: :data, defaults: {format: :json}
      get  :data, defaults: {format: :json}
    end
Severity: Minor
Found in config/routes/tasks.rb and 2 other locations - About 25 mins to fix
config/routes/tasks.rb on lines 487..491
config/routes/tasks.rb on lines 493..497

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 30.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Similar blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

      def collection_object_query_facet
        return nil if collection_object_query.nil?
        s = 'WITH query_co_ce AS (' + collection_object_query.all.to_sql + ') ' +
          ::CollectingEvent
          .joins(:collection_objects)
Severity: Minor
Found in lib/queries/collecting_event/filter.rb and 2 other locations - About 25 mins to fix
lib/queries/collecting_event/filter.rb on lines 383..390
lib/queries/descriptor/filter.rb on lines 153..161

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 30.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Similar blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

      def otu_query_facet
        return nil if otu_query.nil?
        s = 'WITH query_otu_ob AS (' + otu_query.all.to_sql + ') ' +
          ::Descriptor
          .joins(:observations)
Severity: Minor
Found in lib/queries/descriptor/filter.rb and 2 other locations - About 25 mins to fix
lib/queries/collecting_event/filter.rb on lines 383..390
lib/queries/collecting_event/filter.rb on lines 393..401

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 30.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Similar blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

    scope :graph, controller: 'tasks/biological_associations/graph' do
      get '/', action: :index, as: 'biological_associations_graph_task'
      post 'data', action: :data, defaults: {format: :json}
      get  :data, defaults: {format: :json}
    end
Severity: Minor
Found in config/routes/tasks.rb and 2 other locations - About 25 mins to fix
config/routes/tasks.rb on lines 493..497
config/routes/tasks.rb on lines 678..682

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 30.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Similar blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

  def update
    respond_to do |format|
      if @observation_matrix_column_item.update(observation_matrix_column_item_params)
        format.json { render :show, status: :ok, location: @observation_matrix_column_item.metamorphosize }
      else
Severity: Minor
Found in app/controllers/observation_matrix_column_items_controller.rb and 2 other locations - About 25 mins to fix
app/controllers/controlled_vocabulary_terms_controller.rb on lines 52..57
app/controllers/observation_matrix_row_items_controller.rb on lines 49..54

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 30.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Similar blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

  def attribution_owners_tag(attribution)
    a = attribution.owner_roles.eager_load(:organization, :person).collect{|b| b.agent}
    return nil unless a.any?
    ('Owned by ' + Utilities::Strings.authorship_sentence(a.collect{|b| b.name})).html_safe
Severity: Minor
Found in app/helpers/attributions_helper.rb and 2 other locations - About 25 mins to fix
app/helpers/attributions_helper.rb on lines 76..79
app/helpers/attributions_helper.rb on lines 82..85

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 30.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Severity
Category
Status
Source
Language