Showing 41 of 41 total issues
Similar blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
if (!user.admin && user._id.toString() !== id) {
res.status(UNAUTHORIZED).json({ success: false, message: 'You are not authorised to request this user.' });
return;
}
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 63.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
if (!user.admin && user._id.toString() !== id) {
res.status(UNAUTHORIZED).json({ success: false, message: 'Request denied' });
return;
}
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 63.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Function getPolicyEditor
has 35 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
const getPolicyEditor = (policyName: string, policySetName: string) => {
const name = createPolicyName(policySetName, policyName);
const ruleCollection = db.getCollection<IRule>(name);
const getRules = (req: IPermissionRequest) => {
return ruleCollection
Function verifyEmail
has 31 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
export function verifyEmail(req: Request, res: Response) {
const id = req.params['id'];
const token = req.query['t'];
if (!id || !token) {
res.status(BAD_REQUEST).json({ success: false, message: 'Please create a valid request!' });
Function createApiRoute
has 28 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function createApiRoute(apiRoutes: express.Router, options: INodeAuthOptions) {
let routes = [];
const apiRoute = (options.api && typeof options.api === 'string') ? options.api : '/api';
Function login
has 27 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
export function login(req: Request, res: Response) {
const email = req['body'].email;
const pwd = req['body'].password;
const token = getToken(req);
Function authenticateUser
has 26 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function authenticateUser(secretKey: string, blockUnauthenticatedUser = true) {
const authnErrorHandler = blockUnauthenticatedUser
? (req: express.Request, res: express.Response, next: express.NextFunction, msg?: string) => {
// AuthN failed, so return an error.
res.status(UNAUTHORIZED).json({
Function updateUser
has 26 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
export function updateUser(req: Request, res: Response) {
const updatedUser: IUser = req['body'];
const id: string = req.params['id'];
const user: IUser = req['user'];
Function createPrivileges
has a Cognitive Complexity of 9 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
export function createPrivileges(req: Request, res: Response) {
const handler = (newPrivilegeReq: IPrivilegeRequest) => {
return (msg: ResponseMessage) => {
if (msg.success) {
const ruleStatus = createPrivilege(newPrivilegeReq);
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function deletePrivileges
has a Cognitive Complexity of 9 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
export function deletePrivileges(req: Request, res: Response) {
const handler = (newPrivilege: IPrivilegeRequest) => {
return (msg: ResponseMessage) => {
if (msg.success) {
const ruleStatus = deletePrivilege(newPrivilege);
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function updatePrivileges
has a Cognitive Complexity of 9 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
export function updatePrivileges(req: Request, res: Response) {
const handler = (newPrivilege: IPrivilegeRequest) => {
return (msg: ResponseMessage) => {
if (msg.success) {
const ruleStatus = updatePrivilege(newPrivilege);
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function createApiRoute
has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function createApiRoute(apiRoutes: express.Router, options: INodeAuthOptions) {
let routes = [];
const apiRoute = (options.api && typeof options.api === 'string') ? options.api : '/api';
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function getPolicyEditor
has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function getPolicyEditor(newPrivilege: IPrivilegeRequest) {
const policy = newPrivilege.policy || -1;
if (typeof policy === 'number') {
const policySet = policyStore.getPolicySet(newPrivilege.policySet);
if (policy >= policySet.policies.length) { return null; }
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Similar blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
function createPrivilege(newPrivilege: IPrivilegeRequest) {
const policyEditor = getPolicyEditor(newPrivilege);
if (!policyEditor) { return null; }
return policyEditor('add', newPrivilege);
}
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 46.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
function deletePrivilege(newPrivilege: IPrivilegeRequest) {
const policyEditor = getPolicyEditor(newPrivilege);
if (!policyEditor) { return null; }
return policyEditor('delete', newPrivilege);
}
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 46.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
function updatePrivilege(newPrivilege: IPrivilegeRequest) {
const policyEditor = getPolicyEditor(newPrivilege);
if (!policyEditor) { return null; }
return policyEditor('update', newPrivilege);
}
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 46.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Avoid too many return
statements within this function. Open
if (!matchProperties(rule.resource[key], req.resource[key])) { return false; };
Avoid too many return
statements within this function. Open
return ruleProp === reqProp[0];
Avoid too many return
statements within this function. Open
return true;
Avoid too many return
statements within this function. Open
return ruleProp === reqProp;