Class Actions
has 41 methods (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
class Actions
SECONDS_PER_DAY = 86_400
attr_reader :user
File actions.rb
has 301 lines of code (exceeds 300 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
module Stats
class Actions
SECONDS_PER_DAY = 86_400
attr_reader :user
Complex method Stats::Actions#done_last12months_data (37.4) Open
def done_last12months_data
# get actions created and completed in the past 12+3 months. +3 for running
# - outermost set of entries needed for these calculations
actions_last12months = @user.todos.created_or_completed_after(@cut_off_year_plus3).select("completed_at,created_at")
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Flog calculates the ABC score for methods. The ABC score is based on assignments, branches (method calls), and conditions.
You can read more about ABC metrics or the flog tool
Complex method Stats::Actions#done_last30days_data (34.1) Open
def done_last30days_data
# get actions created and completed in the past 30 days.
@actions_done_last30days = @user.todos.completed_after(@cut_off_30days).select("completed_at")
@actions_created_last30days = @user.todos.created_after(@cut_off_30days).select("created_at")
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Flog calculates the ABC score for methods. The ABC score is based on assignments, branches (method calls), and conditions.
You can read more about ABC metrics or the flog tool
Complex method Stats::Actions#visible_running_time_data (27.0) Open
def visible_running_time_data
# running means
# - not completed (completed_at must be null)
# visible means
# - actions not part of a hidden project
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Flog calculates the ABC score for methods. The ABC score is based on assignments, branches (method calls), and conditions.
You can read more about ABC metrics or the flog tool
Stats::Actions#interpolate_avg_for_current_month refers to 'set' more than self (maybe move it to another class?) Open
(set[0] * (1 / percent_of_month) + set[1] + set[2]) / 3.0
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Feature Envy occurs when a code fragment references another object more often than it references itself, or when several clients do the same series of manipulations on a particular type of object.
Feature Envy reduces the code's ability to communicate intent: code that "belongs" on one class but which is located in another can be hard to find, and may upset the "System of Names" in the host class.
Feature Envy also affects the design's flexibility: A code fragment that is in the wrong class creates couplings that may not be natural within the application's domain, and creates a loss of cohesion in the unwilling host class.
Feature Envy often arises because it must manipulate other objects (usually its arguments) to get them into a useful form, and one force preventing them (the arguments) doing this themselves is that the common knowledge lives outside the arguments, or the arguments are of too basic a type to justify extending that type. Therefore there must be something which 'knows' about the contents or purposes of the arguments. That thing would have to be more than just a basic type, because the basic types are either containers which don't know about their contents, or they are single objects which can't capture their relationship with their fellows of the same type. So, this thing with the extra knowledge should be reified into a class, and the utility method will most likely belong there.
Example
Running Reek on:
class Warehouse
def sale_price(item)
(item.price - item.rebate) * @vat
end
end
would report:
Warehouse#total_price refers to item more than self (FeatureEnvy)
since this:
(item.price - item.rebate)
belongs to the Item class, not the Warehouse.
Stats::Actions#compute_running_avg_array refers to 'upper_bound' more than self (maybe move it to another class?) Open
result[upper_bound - 1] = result[upper_bound - 1] * 3 if upper_bound == set.length
result[upper_bound - 2] = result[upper_bound - 2] * 3 / 2 if upper_bound > 1 && upper_bound == set.length
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Feature Envy occurs when a code fragment references another object more often than it references itself, or when several clients do the same series of manipulations on a particular type of object.
Feature Envy reduces the code's ability to communicate intent: code that "belongs" on one class but which is located in another can be hard to find, and may upset the "System of Names" in the host class.
Feature Envy also affects the design's flexibility: A code fragment that is in the wrong class creates couplings that may not be natural within the application's domain, and creates a loss of cohesion in the unwilling host class.
Feature Envy often arises because it must manipulate other objects (usually its arguments) to get them into a useful form, and one force preventing them (the arguments) doing this themselves is that the common knowledge lives outside the arguments, or the arguments are of too basic a type to justify extending that type. Therefore there must be something which 'knows' about the contents or purposes of the arguments. That thing would have to be more than just a basic type, because the basic types are either containers which don't know about their contents, or they are single objects which can't capture their relationship with their fellows of the same type. So, this thing with the extra knowledge should be reified into a class, and the utility method will most likely belong there.
Example
Running Reek on:
class Warehouse
def sale_price(item)
(item.price - item.rebate) * @vat
end
end
would report:
Warehouse#total_price refers to item more than self (FeatureEnvy)
since this:
(item.price - item.rebate)
belongs to the Item class, not the Warehouse.
Stats::Actions#time_of_day_all_data has approx 12 statements Open
def time_of_day_all_data
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
A method with Too Many Statements
is any method that has a large number of lines.
Too Many Statements
warns about any method that has more than 5 statements. Reek's smell detector for Too Many Statements
counts +1 for every simple statement in a method and +1 for every statement within a control structure (if
, else
, case
, when
, for
, while
, until
, begin
, rescue
) but it doesn't count the control structure itself.
So the following method would score +6 in Reek's statement-counting algorithm:
def parse(arg, argv, &error)
if !(val = arg) and (argv.empty? or /\A-/ =~ (val = argv[0]))
return nil, block, nil # +1
end
opt = (val = parse_arg(val, &error))[1] # +2
val = conv_arg(*val) # +3
if opt and !arg
argv.shift # +4
else
val[0] = nil # +5
end
val # +6
end
(You might argue that the two assigments within the first @if@ should count as statements, and that perhaps the nested assignment should count as +2.)
Stats::Actions has at least 39 instance variables Open
class Actions
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Too Many Instance Variables
is a special case of LargeClass
.
Example
Given this configuration
TooManyInstanceVariables:
max_instance_variables: 3
and this code:
class TooManyInstanceVariables
def initialize
@arg_1 = :dummy
@arg_2 = :dummy
@arg_3 = :dummy
@arg_4 = :dummy
end
end
Reek would emit the following warning:
test.rb -- 5 warnings:
[1]:TooManyInstanceVariables has at least 4 instance variables (TooManyInstanceVariables)
Stats::Actions#completion_time_data has approx 13 statements Open
def completion_time_data
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
A method with Too Many Statements
is any method that has a large number of lines.
Too Many Statements
warns about any method that has more than 5 statements. Reek's smell detector for Too Many Statements
counts +1 for every simple statement in a method and +1 for every statement within a control structure (if
, else
, case
, when
, for
, while
, until
, begin
, rescue
) but it doesn't count the control structure itself.
So the following method would score +6 in Reek's statement-counting algorithm:
def parse(arg, argv, &error)
if !(val = arg) and (argv.empty? or /\A-/ =~ (val = argv[0]))
return nil, block, nil # +1
end
opt = (val = parse_arg(val, &error))[1] # +2
val = conv_arg(*val) # +3
if opt and !arg
argv.shift # +4
else
val[0] = nil # +5
end
val # +6
end
(You might argue that the two assigments within the first @if@ should count as statements, and that perhaps the nested assignment should count as +2.)
Stats::Actions#time_of_day_30days_data has approx 12 statements Open
def time_of_day_30days_data
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
A method with Too Many Statements
is any method that has a large number of lines.
Too Many Statements
warns about any method that has more than 5 statements. Reek's smell detector for Too Many Statements
counts +1 for every simple statement in a method and +1 for every statement within a control structure (if
, else
, case
, when
, for
, while
, until
, begin
, rescue
) but it doesn't count the control structure itself.
So the following method would score +6 in Reek's statement-counting algorithm:
def parse(arg, argv, &error)
if !(val = arg) and (argv.empty? or /\A-/ =~ (val = argv[0]))
return nil, block, nil # +1
end
opt = (val = parse_arg(val, &error))[1] # +2
val = conv_arg(*val) # +3
if opt and !arg
argv.shift # +4
else
val[0] = nil # +5
end
val # +6
end
(You might argue that the two assigments within the first @if@ should count as statements, and that perhaps the nested assignment should count as +2.)
Stats::Actions#visible_running_time_data has approx 12 statements Open
def visible_running_time_data
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
A method with Too Many Statements
is any method that has a large number of lines.
Too Many Statements
warns about any method that has more than 5 statements. Reek's smell detector for Too Many Statements
counts +1 for every simple statement in a method and +1 for every statement within a control structure (if
, else
, case
, when
, for
, while
, until
, begin
, rescue
) but it doesn't count the control structure itself.
So the following method would score +6 in Reek's statement-counting algorithm:
def parse(arg, argv, &error)
if !(val = arg) and (argv.empty? or /\A-/ =~ (val = argv[0]))
return nil, block, nil # +1
end
opt = (val = parse_arg(val, &error))[1] # +2
val = conv_arg(*val) # +3
if opt and !arg
argv.shift # +4
else
val[0] = nil # +5
end
val # +6
end
(You might argue that the two assigments within the first @if@ should count as statements, and that perhaps the nested assignment should count as +2.)
Stats::Actions#running_time_data has approx 12 statements Open
def running_time_data
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
A method with Too Many Statements
is any method that has a large number of lines.
Too Many Statements
warns about any method that has more than 5 statements. Reek's smell detector for Too Many Statements
counts +1 for every simple statement in a method and +1 for every statement within a control structure (if
, else
, case
, when
, for
, while
, until
, begin
, rescue
) but it doesn't count the control structure itself.
So the following method would score +6 in Reek's statement-counting algorithm:
def parse(arg, argv, &error)
if !(val = arg) and (argv.empty? or /\A-/ =~ (val = argv[0]))
return nil, block, nil # +1
end
opt = (val = parse_arg(val, &error))[1] # +2
val = conv_arg(*val) # +3
if opt and !arg
argv.shift # +4
else
val[0] = nil # +5
end
val # +6
end
(You might argue that the two assigments within the first @if@ should count as statements, and that perhaps the nested assignment should count as +2.)
Stats::Actions#done_last30days_data has approx 12 statements Open
def done_last30days_data
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
A method with Too Many Statements
is any method that has a large number of lines.
Too Many Statements
warns about any method that has more than 5 statements. Reek's smell detector for Too Many Statements
counts +1 for every simple statement in a method and +1 for every statement within a control structure (if
, else
, case
, when
, for
, while
, until
, begin
, rescue
) but it doesn't count the control structure itself.
So the following method would score +6 in Reek's statement-counting algorithm:
def parse(arg, argv, &error)
if !(val = arg) and (argv.empty? or /\A-/ =~ (val = argv[0]))
return nil, block, nil # +1
end
opt = (val = parse_arg(val, &error))[1] # +2
val = conv_arg(*val) # +3
if opt and !arg
argv.shift # +4
else
val[0] = nil # +5
end
val # +6
end
(You might argue that the two assigments within the first @if@ should count as statements, and that perhaps the nested assignment should count as +2.)
Stats::Actions#week_indexes_of has approx 7 statements Open
def week_indexes_of(record)
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
A method with Too Many Statements
is any method that has a large number of lines.
Too Many Statements
warns about any method that has more than 5 statements. Reek's smell detector for Too Many Statements
counts +1 for every simple statement in a method and +1 for every statement within a control structure (if
, else
, case
, when
, for
, while
, until
, begin
, rescue
) but it doesn't count the control structure itself.
So the following method would score +6 in Reek's statement-counting algorithm:
def parse(arg, argv, &error)
if !(val = arg) and (argv.empty? or /\A-/ =~ (val = argv[0]))
return nil, block, nil # +1
end
opt = (val = parse_arg(val, &error))[1] # +2
val = conv_arg(*val) # +3
if opt and !arg
argv.shift # +4
else
val[0] = nil # +5
end
val # +6
end
(You might argue that the two assigments within the first @if@ should count as statements, and that perhaps the nested assignment should count as +2.)
Stats::Actions#done_last12months_data has approx 13 statements Open
def done_last12months_data
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
A method with Too Many Statements
is any method that has a large number of lines.
Too Many Statements
warns about any method that has more than 5 statements. Reek's smell detector for Too Many Statements
counts +1 for every simple statement in a method and +1 for every statement within a control structure (if
, else
, case
, when
, for
, while
, until
, begin
, rescue
) but it doesn't count the control structure itself.
So the following method would score +6 in Reek's statement-counting algorithm:
def parse(arg, argv, &error)
if !(val = arg) and (argv.empty? or /\A-/ =~ (val = argv[0]))
return nil, block, nil # +1
end
opt = (val = parse_arg(val, &error))[1] # +2
val = conv_arg(*val) # +3
if opt and !arg
argv.shift # +4
else
val[0] = nil # +5
end
val # +6
end
(You might argue that the two assigments within the first @if@ should count as statements, and that perhaps the nested assignment should count as +2.)
Stats::Actions#day_of_week_30days_data has approx 12 statements Open
def day_of_week_30days_data
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
A method with Too Many Statements
is any method that has a large number of lines.
Too Many Statements
warns about any method that has more than 5 statements. Reek's smell detector for Too Many Statements
counts +1 for every simple statement in a method and +1 for every statement within a control structure (if
, else
, case
, when
, for
, while
, until
, begin
, rescue
) but it doesn't count the control structure itself.
So the following method would score +6 in Reek's statement-counting algorithm:
def parse(arg, argv, &error)
if !(val = arg) and (argv.empty? or /\A-/ =~ (val = argv[0]))
return nil, block, nil # +1
end
opt = (val = parse_arg(val, &error))[1] # +2
val = conv_arg(*val) # +3
if opt and !arg
argv.shift # +4
else
val[0] = nil # +5
end
val # +6
end
(You might argue that the two assigments within the first @if@ should count as statements, and that perhaps the nested assignment should count as +2.)
Stats::Actions#day_of_week_all_data has approx 12 statements Open
def day_of_week_all_data
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
A method with Too Many Statements
is any method that has a large number of lines.
Too Many Statements
warns about any method that has more than 5 statements. Reek's smell detector for Too Many Statements
counts +1 for every simple statement in a method and +1 for every statement within a control structure (if
, else
, case
, when
, for
, while
, until
, begin
, rescue
) but it doesn't count the control structure itself.
So the following method would score +6 in Reek's statement-counting algorithm:
def parse(arg, argv, &error)
if !(val = arg) and (argv.empty? or /\A-/ =~ (val = argv[0]))
return nil, block, nil # +1
end
opt = (val = parse_arg(val, &error))[1] # +2
val = conv_arg(*val) # +3
if opt and !arg
argv.shift # +4
else
val[0] = nil # +5
end
val # +6
end
(You might argue that the two assigments within the first @if@ should count as statements, and that perhaps the nested assignment should count as +2.)
Stats::Actions#convert_to_array contains iterators nested 2 deep Open
records.each { |r| (yield r).each { |i| a[i] += 1 if a[i] } }
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
A Nested Iterator
occurs when a block contains another block.
Example
Given
class Duck
class << self
def duck_names
%i!tick trick track!.each do |surname|
%i!duck!.each do |last_name|
puts "full name is #{surname} #{last_name}"
end
end
end
end
end
Reek would report the following warning:
test.rb -- 1 warning:
[5]:Duck#duck_names contains iterators nested 2 deep (NestedIterators)
Stats::Actions has at least 41 methods Open
class Actions
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Too Many Methods
is a special case of LargeClass
.
Example
Given this configuration
TooManyMethods:
max_methods: 3
and this code:
class TooManyMethods
def one; end
def two; end
def three; end
def four; end
end
Reek would emit the following warning:
test.rb -- 1 warning:
[1]:TooManyMethods has at least 4 methods (TooManyMethods)
Stats::Actions#open_per_week_data has approx 9 statements Open
def open_per_week_data
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
A method with Too Many Statements
is any method that has a large number of lines.
Too Many Statements
warns about any method that has more than 5 statements. Reek's smell detector for Too Many Statements
counts +1 for every simple statement in a method and +1 for every statement within a control structure (if
, else
, case
, when
, for
, while
, until
, begin
, rescue
) but it doesn't count the control structure itself.
So the following method would score +6 in Reek's statement-counting algorithm:
def parse(arg, argv, &error)
if !(val = arg) and (argv.empty? or /\A-/ =~ (val = argv[0]))
return nil, block, nil # +1
end
opt = (val = parse_arg(val, &error))[1] # +2
val = conv_arg(*val) # +3
if opt and !arg
argv.shift # +4
else
val[0] = nil # +5
end
val # +6
end
(You might argue that the two assigments within the first @if@ should count as statements, and that perhaps the nested assignment should count as +2.)
Complex method Stats::Actions#completion_time_data (25.9) Open
def completion_time_data
@actions_completion_time = @user.todos.completed.select("completed_at, created_at").reorder("completed_at DESC")
# convert to array and fill in non-existing weeks with 0
@max_weeks = @actions_completion_time.last ? difference_in_weeks(@today, @actions_completion_time.last.completed_at) : 1
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Flog calculates the ABC score for methods. The ABC score is based on assignments, branches (method calls), and conditions.
You can read more about ABC metrics or the flog tool
Complex method Stats::Actions#open_per_week_data (23.6) Open
def open_per_week_data
@actions_started = @user.todos.created_after(@today - 53.weeks)
.select("todos.created_at, todos.completed_at")
.reorder("todos.created_at DESC")
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Flog calculates the ABC score for methods. The ABC score is based on assignments, branches (method calls), and conditions.
You can read more about ABC metrics or the flog tool
Complex method Stats::Actions#running_time_data (23.5) Open
def running_time_data
@actions_running_time = @user.todos.not_completed.select("created_at").reorder("created_at DESC")
# convert to array and fill in non-existing weeks with 0
@max_weeks = difference_in_weeks(@today, @actions_running_time.last.created_at)
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Flog calculates the ABC score for methods. The ABC score is based on assignments, branches (method calls), and conditions.
You can read more about ABC metrics or the flog tool
Stats::Actions#convert_to_array calls 'a[i]' 2 times Open
records.each { |r| (yield r).each { |i| a[i] += 1 if a[i] } }
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Duplication occurs when two fragments of code look nearly identical, or when two fragments of code have nearly identical effects at some conceptual level.
Reek implements a check for Duplicate Method Call.
Example
Here's a very much simplified and contrived example. The following method will report a warning:
def double_thing()
@other.thing + @other.thing
end
One quick approach to silence Reek would be to refactor the code thus:
def double_thing()
thing = @other.thing
thing + thing
end
A slightly different approach would be to replace all calls of double_thing
by calls to @other.double_thing
:
class Other
def double_thing()
thing + thing
end
end
The approach you take will depend on balancing other factors in your code.
Stats::Actions#day_of_week_all_data calls 'Array.new(7) { |i| 0 }' 2 times Open
@actions_creation_day_array = Array.new(7) { |i| 0 }
@actions_creation_day.each { |t| @actions_creation_day_array[t.created_at.wday] += 1 }
@max = @actions_creation_day_array.max
# convert to array and fill in non-existing days
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Duplication occurs when two fragments of code look nearly identical, or when two fragments of code have nearly identical effects at some conceptual level.
Reek implements a check for Duplicate Method Call.
Example
Here's a very much simplified and contrived example. The following method will report a warning:
def double_thing()
@other.thing + @other.thing
end
One quick approach to silence Reek would be to refactor the code thus:
def double_thing()
thing = @other.thing
thing + thing
end
A slightly different approach would be to replace all calls of double_thing
by calls to @other.double_thing
:
class Other
def double_thing()
thing + thing
end
end
The approach you take will depend on balancing other factors in your code.
Stats::Actions#difference_in_months calls 'date2.utc' 2 times Open
return (date1.utc.year - date2.utc.year) * 12 + (date1.utc.month - date2.utc.month)
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Duplication occurs when two fragments of code look nearly identical, or when two fragments of code have nearly identical effects at some conceptual level.
Reek implements a check for Duplicate Method Call.
Example
Here's a very much simplified and contrived example. The following method will report a warning:
def double_thing()
@other.thing + @other.thing
end
One quick approach to silence Reek would be to refactor the code thus:
def double_thing()
thing = @other.thing
thing + thing
end
A slightly different approach would be to replace all calls of double_thing
by calls to @other.double_thing
:
class Other
def double_thing()
thing + thing
end
end
The approach you take will depend on balancing other factors in your code.
Stats::Actions#time_of_day_30days_data calls 'Array.new(24) { |i| 0 }' 2 times Open
@actions_creation_hour_array = Array.new(24) { |i| 0 }
@actions_creation_hour.each { |r| @actions_creation_hour_array[r.created_at.hour] += 1 }
# convert to hash to be able to fill in non-existing days
@actions_completion_hour_array = Array.new(24) { |i| 0 }
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Duplication occurs when two fragments of code look nearly identical, or when two fragments of code have nearly identical effects at some conceptual level.
Reek implements a check for Duplicate Method Call.
Example
Here's a very much simplified and contrived example. The following method will report a warning:
def double_thing()
@other.thing + @other.thing
end
One quick approach to silence Reek would be to refactor the code thus:
def double_thing()
thing = @other.thing
thing + thing
end
A slightly different approach would be to replace all calls of double_thing
by calls to @other.double_thing
:
class Other
def double_thing()
thing + thing
end
end
The approach you take will depend on balancing other factors in your code.
Stats::Actions#day_of_week_30days_data calls '@user.todos' 2 times Open
@actions_creation_day = @user.todos.created_after(@cut_off_month).select("created_at")
@actions_completion_day = @user.todos.completed_after(@cut_off_month).select("completed_at")
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Duplication occurs when two fragments of code look nearly identical, or when two fragments of code have nearly identical effects at some conceptual level.
Reek implements a check for Duplicate Method Call.
Example
Here's a very much simplified and contrived example. The following method will report a warning:
def double_thing()
@other.thing + @other.thing
end
One quick approach to silence Reek would be to refactor the code thus:
def double_thing()
thing = @other.thing
thing + thing
end
A slightly different approach would be to replace all calls of double_thing
by calls to @other.double_thing
:
class Other
def double_thing()
thing + thing
end
end
The approach you take will depend on balancing other factors in your code.
Stats::Actions#day_of_week_30days_data calls 'Array.new(7) { |i| 0 }' 2 times Open
@actions_creation_day_array = Array.new(7) { |i| 0 }
@actions_creation_day.each { |r| @actions_creation_day_array[r.created_at.wday] += 1 }
# convert to hash to be able to fill in non-existing days
@actions_completion_day_array = Array.new(7) { |i| 0 }
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Duplication occurs when two fragments of code look nearly identical, or when two fragments of code have nearly identical effects at some conceptual level.
Reek implements a check for Duplicate Method Call.
Example
Here's a very much simplified and contrived example. The following method will report a warning:
def double_thing()
@other.thing + @other.thing
end
One quick approach to silence Reek would be to refactor the code thus:
def double_thing()
thing = @other.thing
thing + thing
end
A slightly different approach would be to replace all calls of double_thing
by calls to @other.double_thing
:
class Other
def double_thing()
thing + thing
end
end
The approach you take will depend on balancing other factors in your code.
Stats::Actions#compute_running_avg_array calls 'upper_bound - 2' 2 times Open
result[upper_bound - 2] = result[upper_bound - 2] * 3 / 2 if upper_bound > 1 && upper_bound == set.length
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Duplication occurs when two fragments of code look nearly identical, or when two fragments of code have nearly identical effects at some conceptual level.
Reek implements a check for Duplicate Method Call.
Example
Here's a very much simplified and contrived example. The following method will report a warning:
def double_thing()
@other.thing + @other.thing
end
One quick approach to silence Reek would be to refactor the code thus:
def double_thing()
thing = @other.thing
thing + thing
end
A slightly different approach would be to replace all calls of double_thing
by calls to @other.double_thing
:
class Other
def double_thing()
thing + thing
end
end
The approach you take will depend on balancing other factors in your code.
Stats::Actions assumes too much for instance variable '@actions_completion_time_array' Open
class Actions
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Classes should not assume that instance variables are set or present outside of the current class definition.
Good:
class Foo
def initialize
@bar = :foo
end
def foo?
@bar == :foo
end
end
Good as well:
class Foo
def foo?
bar == :foo
end
def bar
@bar ||= :foo
end
end
Bad:
class Foo
def go_foo!
@bar = :foo
end
def foo?
@bar == :foo
end
end
Example
Running Reek on:
class Dummy
def test
@ivar
end
end
would report:
[1]:InstanceVariableAssumption: Dummy assumes too much for instance variable @ivar
Note that this example would trigger this smell warning as well:
class Parent
def initialize(omg)
@omg = omg
end
end
class Child < Parent
def foo
@omg
end
end
The way to address the smell warning is that you should create an attr_reader
to use @omg
in the subclass and not access @omg
directly like this:
class Parent
attr_reader :omg
def initialize(omg)
@omg = omg
end
end
class Child < Parent
def foo
omg
end
end
Directly accessing instance variables is considered a smell because it breaks encapsulation and makes it harder to reason about code.
If you don't want to expose those methods as public API just make them private like this:
class Parent
def initialize(omg)
@omg = omg
end
private
attr_reader :omg
end
class Child < Parent
def foo
omg
end
end
Current Support in Reek
An instance variable must:
- be set in the constructor
- or be accessed through a method with lazy initialization / memoization.
If not, Instance Variable Assumption will be reported.
Stats::Actions assumes too much for instance variable '@max_weeks' Open
class Actions
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Classes should not assume that instance variables are set or present outside of the current class definition.
Good:
class Foo
def initialize
@bar = :foo
end
def foo?
@bar == :foo
end
end
Good as well:
class Foo
def foo?
bar == :foo
end
def bar
@bar ||= :foo
end
end
Bad:
class Foo
def go_foo!
@bar = :foo
end
def foo?
@bar == :foo
end
end
Example
Running Reek on:
class Dummy
def test
@ivar
end
end
would report:
[1]:InstanceVariableAssumption: Dummy assumes too much for instance variable @ivar
Note that this example would trigger this smell warning as well:
class Parent
def initialize(omg)
@omg = omg
end
end
class Child < Parent
def foo
@omg
end
end
The way to address the smell warning is that you should create an attr_reader
to use @omg
in the subclass and not access @omg
directly like this:
class Parent
attr_reader :omg
def initialize(omg)
@omg = omg
end
end
class Child < Parent
def foo
omg
end
end
Directly accessing instance variables is considered a smell because it breaks encapsulation and makes it harder to reason about code.
If you don't want to expose those methods as public API just make them private like this:
class Parent
def initialize(omg)
@omg = omg
end
private
attr_reader :omg
end
class Child < Parent
def foo
omg
end
end
Current Support in Reek
An instance variable must:
- be set in the constructor
- or be accessed through a method with lazy initialization / memoization.
If not, Instance Variable Assumption will be reported.
Stats::Actions#compute_running_avg_array calls 'upper_bound == set.length' 2 times Open
result[upper_bound - 1] = result[upper_bound - 1] * 3 if upper_bound == set.length
result[upper_bound - 2] = result[upper_bound - 2] * 3 / 2 if upper_bound > 1 && upper_bound == set.length
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Duplication occurs when two fragments of code look nearly identical, or when two fragments of code have nearly identical effects at some conceptual level.
Reek implements a check for Duplicate Method Call.
Example
Here's a very much simplified and contrived example. The following method will report a warning:
def double_thing()
@other.thing + @other.thing
end
One quick approach to silence Reek would be to refactor the code thus:
def double_thing()
thing = @other.thing
thing + thing
end
A slightly different approach would be to replace all calls of double_thing
by calls to @other.double_thing
:
class Other
def double_thing()
thing + thing
end
end
The approach you take will depend on balancing other factors in your code.
Stats::Actions assumes too much for instance variable '@actions_completion_day' Open
class Actions
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Classes should not assume that instance variables are set or present outside of the current class definition.
Good:
class Foo
def initialize
@bar = :foo
end
def foo?
@bar == :foo
end
end
Good as well:
class Foo
def foo?
bar == :foo
end
def bar
@bar ||= :foo
end
end
Bad:
class Foo
def go_foo!
@bar = :foo
end
def foo?
@bar == :foo
end
end
Example
Running Reek on:
class Dummy
def test
@ivar
end
end
would report:
[1]:InstanceVariableAssumption: Dummy assumes too much for instance variable @ivar
Note that this example would trigger this smell warning as well:
class Parent
def initialize(omg)
@omg = omg
end
end
class Child < Parent
def foo
@omg
end
end
The way to address the smell warning is that you should create an attr_reader
to use @omg
in the subclass and not access @omg
directly like this:
class Parent
attr_reader :omg
def initialize(omg)
@omg = omg
end
end
class Child < Parent
def foo
omg
end
end
Directly accessing instance variables is considered a smell because it breaks encapsulation and makes it harder to reason about code.
If you don't want to expose those methods as public API just make them private like this:
class Parent
def initialize(omg)
@omg = omg
end
private
attr_reader :omg
end
class Child < Parent
def foo
omg
end
end
Current Support in Reek
An instance variable must:
- be set in the constructor
- or be accessed through a method with lazy initialization / memoization.
If not, Instance Variable Assumption will be reported.
Stats::Actions assumes too much for instance variable '@actions_completion_hour' Open
class Actions
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Classes should not assume that instance variables are set or present outside of the current class definition.
Good:
class Foo
def initialize
@bar = :foo
end
def foo?
@bar == :foo
end
end
Good as well:
class Foo
def foo?
bar == :foo
end
def bar
@bar ||= :foo
end
end
Bad:
class Foo
def go_foo!
@bar = :foo
end
def foo?
@bar == :foo
end
end
Example
Running Reek on:
class Dummy
def test
@ivar
end
end
would report:
[1]:InstanceVariableAssumption: Dummy assumes too much for instance variable @ivar
Note that this example would trigger this smell warning as well:
class Parent
def initialize(omg)
@omg = omg
end
end
class Child < Parent
def foo
@omg
end
end
The way to address the smell warning is that you should create an attr_reader
to use @omg
in the subclass and not access @omg
directly like this:
class Parent
attr_reader :omg
def initialize(omg)
@omg = omg
end
end
class Child < Parent
def foo
omg
end
end
Directly accessing instance variables is considered a smell because it breaks encapsulation and makes it harder to reason about code.
If you don't want to expose those methods as public API just make them private like this:
class Parent
def initialize(omg)
@omg = omg
end
private
attr_reader :omg
end
class Child < Parent
def foo
omg
end
end
Current Support in Reek
An instance variable must:
- be set in the constructor
- or be accessed through a method with lazy initialization / memoization.
If not, Instance Variable Assumption will be reported.
Stats::Actions assumes too much for instance variable '@actions_running_time_array' Open
class Actions
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Classes should not assume that instance variables are set or present outside of the current class definition.
Good:
class Foo
def initialize
@bar = :foo
end
def foo?
@bar == :foo
end
end
Good as well:
class Foo
def foo?
bar == :foo
end
def bar
@bar ||= :foo
end
end
Bad:
class Foo
def go_foo!
@bar = :foo
end
def foo?
@bar == :foo
end
end
Example
Running Reek on:
class Dummy
def test
@ivar
end
end
would report:
[1]:InstanceVariableAssumption: Dummy assumes too much for instance variable @ivar
Note that this example would trigger this smell warning as well:
class Parent
def initialize(omg)
@omg = omg
end
end
class Child < Parent
def foo
@omg
end
end
The way to address the smell warning is that you should create an attr_reader
to use @omg
in the subclass and not access @omg
directly like this:
class Parent
attr_reader :omg
def initialize(omg)
@omg = omg
end
end
class Child < Parent
def foo
omg
end
end
Directly accessing instance variables is considered a smell because it breaks encapsulation and makes it harder to reason about code.
If you don't want to expose those methods as public API just make them private like this:
class Parent
def initialize(omg)
@omg = omg
end
private
attr_reader :omg
end
class Child < Parent
def foo
omg
end
end
Current Support in Reek
An instance variable must:
- be set in the constructor
- or be accessed through a method with lazy initialization / memoization.
If not, Instance Variable Assumption will be reported.
Stats::Actions assumes too much for instance variable '@actions_done_last12months_array' Open
class Actions
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Classes should not assume that instance variables are set or present outside of the current class definition.
Good:
class Foo
def initialize
@bar = :foo
end
def foo?
@bar == :foo
end
end
Good as well:
class Foo
def foo?
bar == :foo
end
def bar
@bar ||= :foo
end
end
Bad:
class Foo
def go_foo!
@bar = :foo
end
def foo?
@bar == :foo
end
end
Example
Running Reek on:
class Dummy
def test
@ivar
end
end
would report:
[1]:InstanceVariableAssumption: Dummy assumes too much for instance variable @ivar
Note that this example would trigger this smell warning as well:
class Parent
def initialize(omg)
@omg = omg
end
end
class Child < Parent
def foo
@omg
end
end
The way to address the smell warning is that you should create an attr_reader
to use @omg
in the subclass and not access @omg
directly like this:
class Parent
attr_reader :omg
def initialize(omg)
@omg = omg
end
end
class Child < Parent
def foo
omg
end
end
Directly accessing instance variables is considered a smell because it breaks encapsulation and makes it harder to reason about code.
If you don't want to expose those methods as public API just make them private like this:
class Parent
def initialize(omg)
@omg = omg
end
private
attr_reader :omg
end
class Child < Parent
def foo
omg
end
end
Current Support in Reek
An instance variable must:
- be set in the constructor
- or be accessed through a method with lazy initialization / memoization.
If not, Instance Variable Assumption will be reported.
Stats::Actions assumes too much for instance variable '@actions_started' Open
class Actions
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Classes should not assume that instance variables are set or present outside of the current class definition.
Good:
class Foo
def initialize
@bar = :foo
end
def foo?
@bar == :foo
end
end
Good as well:
class Foo
def foo?
bar == :foo
end
def bar
@bar ||= :foo
end
end
Bad:
class Foo
def go_foo!
@bar = :foo
end
def foo?
@bar == :foo
end
end
Example
Running Reek on:
class Dummy
def test
@ivar
end
end
would report:
[1]:InstanceVariableAssumption: Dummy assumes too much for instance variable @ivar
Note that this example would trigger this smell warning as well:
class Parent
def initialize(omg)
@omg = omg
end
end
class Child < Parent
def foo
@omg
end
end
The way to address the smell warning is that you should create an attr_reader
to use @omg
in the subclass and not access @omg
directly like this:
class Parent
attr_reader :omg
def initialize(omg)
@omg = omg
end
end
class Child < Parent
def foo
omg
end
end
Directly accessing instance variables is considered a smell because it breaks encapsulation and makes it harder to reason about code.
If you don't want to expose those methods as public API just make them private like this:
class Parent
def initialize(omg)
@omg = omg
end
private
attr_reader :omg
end
class Child < Parent
def foo
omg
end
end
Current Support in Reek
An instance variable must:
- be set in the constructor
- or be accessed through a method with lazy initialization / memoization.
If not, Instance Variable Assumption will be reported.
Stats::Actions#percent_of_month calls 'Time.zone.now' 2 times Open
Time.zone.now.day / Time.zone.now.end_of_month.day.to_f
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Duplication occurs when two fragments of code look nearly identical, or when two fragments of code have nearly identical effects at some conceptual level.
Reek implements a check for Duplicate Method Call.
Example
Here's a very much simplified and contrived example. The following method will report a warning:
def double_thing()
@other.thing + @other.thing
end
One quick approach to silence Reek would be to refactor the code thus:
def double_thing()
thing = @other.thing
thing + thing
end
A slightly different approach would be to replace all calls of double_thing
by calls to @other.double_thing
:
class Other
def double_thing()
thing + thing
end
end
The approach you take will depend on balancing other factors in your code.
Stats::Actions#time_of_day_all_data calls 'Array.new(24) { |i| 0 }' 2 times Open
@actions_creation_hour_array = Array.new(24) { |i| 0 }
@actions_creation_hour.each { |r| @actions_creation_hour_array[r.created_at.hour] += 1 }
# convert to hash to be able to fill in non-existing days
@actions_completion_hour_array = Array.new(24) { |i| 0 }
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Duplication occurs when two fragments of code look nearly identical, or when two fragments of code have nearly identical effects at some conceptual level.
Reek implements a check for Duplicate Method Call.
Example
Here's a very much simplified and contrived example. The following method will report a warning:
def double_thing()
@other.thing + @other.thing
end
One quick approach to silence Reek would be to refactor the code thus:
def double_thing()
thing = @other.thing
thing + thing
end
A slightly different approach would be to replace all calls of double_thing
by calls to @other.double_thing
:
class Other
def double_thing()
thing + thing
end
end
The approach you take will depend on balancing other factors in your code.
Stats::Actions assumes too much for instance variable '@actions_created_avg_last12months_array' Open
class Actions
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Classes should not assume that instance variables are set or present outside of the current class definition.
Good:
class Foo
def initialize
@bar = :foo
end
def foo?
@bar == :foo
end
end
Good as well:
class Foo
def foo?
bar == :foo
end
def bar
@bar ||= :foo
end
end
Bad:
class Foo
def go_foo!
@bar = :foo
end
def foo?
@bar == :foo
end
end
Example
Running Reek on:
class Dummy
def test
@ivar
end
end
would report:
[1]:InstanceVariableAssumption: Dummy assumes too much for instance variable @ivar
Note that this example would trigger this smell warning as well:
class Parent
def initialize(omg)
@omg = omg
end
end
class Child < Parent
def foo
@omg
end
end
The way to address the smell warning is that you should create an attr_reader
to use @omg
in the subclass and not access @omg
directly like this:
class Parent
attr_reader :omg
def initialize(omg)
@omg = omg
end
end
class Child < Parent
def foo
omg
end
end
Directly accessing instance variables is considered a smell because it breaks encapsulation and makes it harder to reason about code.
If you don't want to expose those methods as public API just make them private like this:
class Parent
def initialize(omg)
@omg = omg
end
private
attr_reader :omg
end
class Child < Parent
def foo
omg
end
end
Current Support in Reek
An instance variable must:
- be set in the constructor
- or be accessed through a method with lazy initialization / memoization.
If not, Instance Variable Assumption will be reported.
Stats::Actions assumes too much for instance variable '@actions_created_last12months_array' Open
class Actions
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Classes should not assume that instance variables are set or present outside of the current class definition.
Good:
class Foo
def initialize
@bar = :foo
end
def foo?
@bar == :foo
end
end
Good as well:
class Foo
def foo?
bar == :foo
end
def bar
@bar ||= :foo
end
end
Bad:
class Foo
def go_foo!
@bar = :foo
end
def foo?
@bar == :foo
end
end
Example
Running Reek on:
class Dummy
def test
@ivar
end
end
would report:
[1]:InstanceVariableAssumption: Dummy assumes too much for instance variable @ivar
Note that this example would trigger this smell warning as well:
class Parent
def initialize(omg)
@omg = omg
end
end
class Child < Parent
def foo
@omg
end
end
The way to address the smell warning is that you should create an attr_reader
to use @omg
in the subclass and not access @omg
directly like this:
class Parent
attr_reader :omg
def initialize(omg)
@omg = omg
end
end
class Child < Parent
def foo
omg
end
end
Directly accessing instance variables is considered a smell because it breaks encapsulation and makes it harder to reason about code.
If you don't want to expose those methods as public API just make them private like this:
class Parent
def initialize(omg)
@omg = omg
end
private
attr_reader :omg
end
class Child < Parent
def foo
omg
end
end
Current Support in Reek
An instance variable must:
- be set in the constructor
- or be accessed through a method with lazy initialization / memoization.
If not, Instance Variable Assumption will be reported.
Stats::Actions assumes too much for instance variable '@actions_created_last30days_array' Open
class Actions
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Classes should not assume that instance variables are set or present outside of the current class definition.
Good:
class Foo
def initialize
@bar = :foo
end
def foo?
@bar == :foo
end
end
Good as well:
class Foo
def foo?
bar == :foo
end
def bar
@bar ||= :foo
end
end
Bad:
class Foo
def go_foo!
@bar = :foo
end
def foo?
@bar == :foo
end
end
Example
Running Reek on:
class Dummy
def test
@ivar
end
end
would report:
[1]:InstanceVariableAssumption: Dummy assumes too much for instance variable @ivar
Note that this example would trigger this smell warning as well:
class Parent
def initialize(omg)
@omg = omg
end
end
class Child < Parent
def foo
@omg
end
end
The way to address the smell warning is that you should create an attr_reader
to use @omg
in the subclass and not access @omg
directly like this:
class Parent
attr_reader :omg
def initialize(omg)
@omg = omg
end
end
class Child < Parent
def foo
omg
end
end
Directly accessing instance variables is considered a smell because it breaks encapsulation and makes it harder to reason about code.
If you don't want to expose those methods as public API just make them private like this:
class Parent
def initialize(omg)
@omg = omg
end
private
attr_reader :omg
end
class Child < Parent
def foo
omg
end
end
Current Support in Reek
An instance variable must:
- be set in the constructor
- or be accessed through a method with lazy initialization / memoization.
If not, Instance Variable Assumption will be reported.
Stats::Actions assumes too much for instance variable '@actions_done_last30days' Open
class Actions
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Classes should not assume that instance variables are set or present outside of the current class definition.
Good:
class Foo
def initialize
@bar = :foo
end
def foo?
@bar == :foo
end
end
Good as well:
class Foo
def foo?
bar == :foo
end
def bar
@bar ||= :foo
end
end
Bad:
class Foo
def go_foo!
@bar = :foo
end
def foo?
@bar == :foo
end
end
Example
Running Reek on:
class Dummy
def test
@ivar
end
end
would report:
[1]:InstanceVariableAssumption: Dummy assumes too much for instance variable @ivar
Note that this example would trigger this smell warning as well:
class Parent
def initialize(omg)
@omg = omg
end
end
class Child < Parent
def foo
@omg
end
end
The way to address the smell warning is that you should create an attr_reader
to use @omg
in the subclass and not access @omg
directly like this:
class Parent
attr_reader :omg
def initialize(omg)
@omg = omg
end
end
class Child < Parent
def foo
omg
end
end
Directly accessing instance variables is considered a smell because it breaks encapsulation and makes it harder to reason about code.
If you don't want to expose those methods as public API just make them private like this:
class Parent
def initialize(omg)
@omg = omg
end
private
attr_reader :omg
end
class Child < Parent
def foo
omg
end
end
Current Support in Reek
An instance variable must:
- be set in the constructor
- or be accessed through a method with lazy initialization / memoization.
If not, Instance Variable Assumption will be reported.
Stats::Actions assumes too much for instance variable '@actions_creation_hour' Open
class Actions
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Classes should not assume that instance variables are set or present outside of the current class definition.
Good:
class Foo
def initialize
@bar = :foo
end
def foo?
@bar == :foo
end
end
Good as well:
class Foo
def foo?
bar == :foo
end
def bar
@bar ||= :foo
end
end
Bad:
class Foo
def go_foo!
@bar = :foo
end
def foo?
@bar == :foo
end
end
Example
Running Reek on:
class Dummy
def test
@ivar
end
end
would report:
[1]:InstanceVariableAssumption: Dummy assumes too much for instance variable @ivar
Note that this example would trigger this smell warning as well:
class Parent
def initialize(omg)
@omg = omg
end
end
class Child < Parent
def foo
@omg
end
end
The way to address the smell warning is that you should create an attr_reader
to use @omg
in the subclass and not access @omg
directly like this:
class Parent
attr_reader :omg
def initialize(omg)
@omg = omg
end
end
class Child < Parent
def foo
omg
end
end
Directly accessing instance variables is considered a smell because it breaks encapsulation and makes it harder to reason about code.
If you don't want to expose those methods as public API just make them private like this:
class Parent
def initialize(omg)
@omg = omg
end
private
attr_reader :omg
end
class Child < Parent
def foo
omg
end
end
Current Support in Reek
An instance variable must:
- be set in the constructor
- or be accessed through a method with lazy initialization / memoization.
If not, Instance Variable Assumption will be reported.
Stats::Actions#time_of_day_all_data calls '@user.todos' 2 times Open
@actions_creation_hour = @user.todos.select("created_at")
@actions_completion_hour = @user.todos.completed.select("completed_at")
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Duplication occurs when two fragments of code look nearly identical, or when two fragments of code have nearly identical effects at some conceptual level.
Reek implements a check for Duplicate Method Call.
Example
Here's a very much simplified and contrived example. The following method will report a warning:
def double_thing()
@other.thing + @other.thing
end
One quick approach to silence Reek would be to refactor the code thus:
def double_thing()
thing = @other.thing
thing + thing
end
A slightly different approach would be to replace all calls of double_thing
by calls to @other.double_thing
:
class Other
def double_thing()
thing + thing
end
end
The approach you take will depend on balancing other factors in your code.
Stats::Actions assumes too much for instance variable '@actions_done_avg_last12months_array' Open
class Actions
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Classes should not assume that instance variables are set or present outside of the current class definition.
Good:
class Foo
def initialize
@bar = :foo
end
def foo?
@bar == :foo
end
end
Good as well:
class Foo
def foo?
bar == :foo
end
def bar
@bar ||= :foo
end
end
Bad:
class Foo
def go_foo!
@bar = :foo
end
def foo?
@bar == :foo
end
end
Example
Running Reek on:
class Dummy
def test
@ivar
end
end
would report:
[1]:InstanceVariableAssumption: Dummy assumes too much for instance variable @ivar
Note that this example would trigger this smell warning as well:
class Parent
def initialize(omg)
@omg = omg
end
end
class Child < Parent
def foo
@omg
end
end
The way to address the smell warning is that you should create an attr_reader
to use @omg
in the subclass and not access @omg
directly like this:
class Parent
attr_reader :omg
def initialize(omg)
@omg = omg
end
end
class Child < Parent
def foo
omg
end
end
Directly accessing instance variables is considered a smell because it breaks encapsulation and makes it harder to reason about code.
If you don't want to expose those methods as public API just make them private like this:
class Parent
def initialize(omg)
@omg = omg
end
private
attr_reader :omg
end
class Child < Parent
def foo
omg
end
end
Current Support in Reek
An instance variable must:
- be set in the constructor
- or be accessed through a method with lazy initialization / memoization.
If not, Instance Variable Assumption will be reported.
Stats::Actions assumes too much for instance variable '@actions_done_last30days_array' Open
class Actions
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Classes should not assume that instance variables are set or present outside of the current class definition.
Good:
class Foo
def initialize
@bar = :foo
end
def foo?
@bar == :foo
end
end
Good as well:
class Foo
def foo?
bar == :foo
end
def bar
@bar ||= :foo
end
end
Bad:
class Foo
def go_foo!
@bar = :foo
end
def foo?
@bar == :foo
end
end
Example
Running Reek on:
class Dummy
def test
@ivar
end
end
would report:
[1]:InstanceVariableAssumption: Dummy assumes too much for instance variable @ivar
Note that this example would trigger this smell warning as well:
class Parent
def initialize(omg)
@omg = omg
end
end
class Child < Parent
def foo
@omg
end
end
The way to address the smell warning is that you should create an attr_reader
to use @omg
in the subclass and not access @omg
directly like this:
class Parent
attr_reader :omg
def initialize(omg)
@omg = omg
end
end
class Child < Parent
def foo
omg
end
end
Directly accessing instance variables is considered a smell because it breaks encapsulation and makes it harder to reason about code.
If you don't want to expose those methods as public API just make them private like this:
class Parent
def initialize(omg)
@omg = omg
end
private
attr_reader :omg
end
class Child < Parent
def foo
omg
end
end
Current Support in Reek
An instance variable must:
- be set in the constructor
- or be accessed through a method with lazy initialization / memoization.
If not, Instance Variable Assumption will be reported.
Stats::Actions assumes too much for instance variable '@actions_completed_per_week_array' Open
class Actions
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Classes should not assume that instance variables are set or present outside of the current class definition.
Good:
class Foo
def initialize
@bar = :foo
end
def foo?
@bar == :foo
end
end
Good as well:
class Foo
def foo?
bar == :foo
end
def bar
@bar ||= :foo
end
end
Bad:
class Foo
def go_foo!
@bar = :foo
end
def foo?
@bar == :foo
end
end
Example
Running Reek on:
class Dummy
def test
@ivar
end
end
would report:
[1]:InstanceVariableAssumption: Dummy assumes too much for instance variable @ivar
Note that this example would trigger this smell warning as well:
class Parent
def initialize(omg)
@omg = omg
end
end
class Child < Parent
def foo
@omg
end
end
The way to address the smell warning is that you should create an attr_reader
to use @omg
in the subclass and not access @omg
directly like this:
class Parent
attr_reader :omg
def initialize(omg)
@omg = omg
end
end
class Child < Parent
def foo
omg
end
end
Directly accessing instance variables is considered a smell because it breaks encapsulation and makes it harder to reason about code.
If you don't want to expose those methods as public API just make them private like this:
class Parent
def initialize(omg)
@omg = omg
end
private
attr_reader :omg
end
class Child < Parent
def foo
omg
end
end
Current Support in Reek
An instance variable must:
- be set in the constructor
- or be accessed through a method with lazy initialization / memoization.
If not, Instance Variable Assumption will be reported.
Stats::Actions assumes too much for instance variable '@actions_open_per_week_array' Open
class Actions
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Classes should not assume that instance variables are set or present outside of the current class definition.
Good:
class Foo
def initialize
@bar = :foo
end
def foo?
@bar == :foo
end
end
Good as well:
class Foo
def foo?
bar == :foo
end
def bar
@bar ||= :foo
end
end
Bad:
class Foo
def go_foo!
@bar = :foo
end
def foo?
@bar == :foo
end
end
Example
Running Reek on:
class Dummy
def test
@ivar
end
end
would report:
[1]:InstanceVariableAssumption: Dummy assumes too much for instance variable @ivar
Note that this example would trigger this smell warning as well:
class Parent
def initialize(omg)
@omg = omg
end
end
class Child < Parent
def foo
@omg
end
end
The way to address the smell warning is that you should create an attr_reader
to use @omg
in the subclass and not access @omg
directly like this:
class Parent
attr_reader :omg
def initialize(omg)
@omg = omg
end
end
class Child < Parent
def foo
omg
end
end
Directly accessing instance variables is considered a smell because it breaks encapsulation and makes it harder to reason about code.
If you don't want to expose those methods as public API just make them private like this:
class Parent
def initialize(omg)
@omg = omg
end
private
attr_reader :omg
end
class Child < Parent
def foo
omg
end
end
Current Support in Reek
An instance variable must:
- be set in the constructor
- or be accessed through a method with lazy initialization / memoization.
If not, Instance Variable Assumption will be reported.
Stats::Actions#time_of_day_30days_data calls '@user.todos' 2 times Open
@actions_creation_hour = @user.todos.created_after(@cut_off_month).select("created_at")
@actions_completion_hour = @user.todos.completed_after(@cut_off_month).select("completed_at")
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Duplication occurs when two fragments of code look nearly identical, or when two fragments of code have nearly identical effects at some conceptual level.
Reek implements a check for Duplicate Method Call.
Example
Here's a very much simplified and contrived example. The following method will report a warning:
def double_thing()
@other.thing + @other.thing
end
One quick approach to silence Reek would be to refactor the code thus:
def double_thing()
thing = @other.thing
thing + thing
end
A slightly different approach would be to replace all calls of double_thing
by calls to @other.double_thing
:
class Other
def double_thing()
thing + thing
end
end
The approach you take will depend on balancing other factors in your code.
Stats::Actions assumes too much for instance variable '@actions_completion_time' Open
class Actions
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Classes should not assume that instance variables are set or present outside of the current class definition.
Good:
class Foo
def initialize
@bar = :foo
end
def foo?
@bar == :foo
end
end
Good as well:
class Foo
def foo?
bar == :foo
end
def bar
@bar ||= :foo
end
end
Bad:
class Foo
def go_foo!
@bar = :foo
end
def foo?
@bar == :foo
end
end
Example
Running Reek on:
class Dummy
def test
@ivar
end
end
would report:
[1]:InstanceVariableAssumption: Dummy assumes too much for instance variable @ivar
Note that this example would trigger this smell warning as well:
class Parent
def initialize(omg)
@omg = omg
end
end
class Child < Parent
def foo
@omg
end
end
The way to address the smell warning is that you should create an attr_reader
to use @omg
in the subclass and not access @omg
directly like this:
class Parent
attr_reader :omg
def initialize(omg)
@omg = omg
end
end
class Child < Parent
def foo
omg
end
end
Directly accessing instance variables is considered a smell because it breaks encapsulation and makes it harder to reason about code.
If you don't want to expose those methods as public API just make them private like this:
class Parent
def initialize(omg)
@omg = omg
end
private
attr_reader :omg
end
class Child < Parent
def foo
omg
end
end
Current Support in Reek
An instance variable must:
- be set in the constructor
- or be accessed through a method with lazy initialization / memoization.
If not, Instance Variable Assumption will be reported.
Stats::Actions has no descriptive comment Open
class Actions
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Classes and modules are the units of reuse and release. It is therefore considered good practice to annotate every class and module with a brief comment outlining its responsibilities.
Example
Given
class Dummy
# Do things...
end
Reek would emit the following warning:
test.rb -- 1 warning:
[1]:Dummy has no descriptive comment (IrresponsibleModule)
Fixing this is simple - just an explaining comment:
# The Dummy class is responsible for ...
class Dummy
# Do things...
end
Stats::Actions assumes too much for instance variable '@actions_creation_day' Open
class Actions
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Classes should not assume that instance variables are set or present outside of the current class definition.
Good:
class Foo
def initialize
@bar = :foo
end
def foo?
@bar == :foo
end
end
Good as well:
class Foo
def foo?
bar == :foo
end
def bar
@bar ||= :foo
end
end
Bad:
class Foo
def go_foo!
@bar = :foo
end
def foo?
@bar == :foo
end
end
Example
Running Reek on:
class Dummy
def test
@ivar
end
end
would report:
[1]:InstanceVariableAssumption: Dummy assumes too much for instance variable @ivar
Note that this example would trigger this smell warning as well:
class Parent
def initialize(omg)
@omg = omg
end
end
class Child < Parent
def foo
@omg
end
end
The way to address the smell warning is that you should create an attr_reader
to use @omg
in the subclass and not access @omg
directly like this:
class Parent
attr_reader :omg
def initialize(omg)
@omg = omg
end
end
class Child < Parent
def foo
omg
end
end
Directly accessing instance variables is considered a smell because it breaks encapsulation and makes it harder to reason about code.
If you don't want to expose those methods as public API just make them private like this:
class Parent
def initialize(omg)
@omg = omg
end
private
attr_reader :omg
end
class Child < Parent
def foo
omg
end
end
Current Support in Reek
An instance variable must:
- be set in the constructor
- or be accessed through a method with lazy initialization / memoization.
If not, Instance Variable Assumption will be reported.
Stats::Actions assumes too much for instance variable '@count' Open
class Actions
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Classes should not assume that instance variables are set or present outside of the current class definition.
Good:
class Foo
def initialize
@bar = :foo
end
def foo?
@bar == :foo
end
end
Good as well:
class Foo
def foo?
bar == :foo
end
def bar
@bar ||= :foo
end
end
Bad:
class Foo
def go_foo!
@bar = :foo
end
def foo?
@bar == :foo
end
end
Example
Running Reek on:
class Dummy
def test
@ivar
end
end
would report:
[1]:InstanceVariableAssumption: Dummy assumes too much for instance variable @ivar
Note that this example would trigger this smell warning as well:
class Parent
def initialize(omg)
@omg = omg
end
end
class Child < Parent
def foo
@omg
end
end
The way to address the smell warning is that you should create an attr_reader
to use @omg
in the subclass and not access @omg
directly like this:
class Parent
attr_reader :omg
def initialize(omg)
@omg = omg
end
end
class Child < Parent
def foo
omg
end
end
Directly accessing instance variables is considered a smell because it breaks encapsulation and makes it harder to reason about code.
If you don't want to expose those methods as public API just make them private like this:
class Parent
def initialize(omg)
@omg = omg
end
private
attr_reader :omg
end
class Child < Parent
def foo
omg
end
end
Current Support in Reek
An instance variable must:
- be set in the constructor
- or be accessed through a method with lazy initialization / memoization.
If not, Instance Variable Assumption will be reported.
Stats::Actions#convert_to_cumulative_array calls 'array.size' 2 times Open
a = Array.new(array.size) { |i| array[i] * 100.0 / max }
# make cumulative
1.upto(array.size - 1) { |i| a[i] += a[i - 1] }
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Duplication occurs when two fragments of code look nearly identical, or when two fragments of code have nearly identical effects at some conceptual level.
Reek implements a check for Duplicate Method Call.
Example
Here's a very much simplified and contrived example. The following method will report a warning:
def double_thing()
@other.thing + @other.thing
end
One quick approach to silence Reek would be to refactor the code thus:
def double_thing()
thing = @other.thing
thing + thing
end
A slightly different approach would be to replace all calls of double_thing
by calls to @other.double_thing
:
class Other
def double_thing()
thing + thing
end
end
The approach you take will depend on balancing other factors in your code.
Stats::Actions#difference_in_months calls 'date1.utc' 2 times Open
return (date1.utc.year - date2.utc.year) * 12 + (date1.utc.month - date2.utc.month)
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Duplication occurs when two fragments of code look nearly identical, or when two fragments of code have nearly identical effects at some conceptual level.
Reek implements a check for Duplicate Method Call.
Example
Here's a very much simplified and contrived example. The following method will report a warning:
def double_thing()
@other.thing + @other.thing
end
One quick approach to silence Reek would be to refactor the code thus:
def double_thing()
thing = @other.thing
thing + thing
end
A slightly different approach would be to replace all calls of double_thing
by calls to @other.double_thing
:
class Other
def double_thing()
thing + thing
end
end
The approach you take will depend on balancing other factors in your code.
Stats::Actions assumes too much for instance variable '@actions_creation_hour_array' Open
class Actions
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Classes should not assume that instance variables are set or present outside of the current class definition.
Good:
class Foo
def initialize
@bar = :foo
end
def foo?
@bar == :foo
end
end
Good as well:
class Foo
def foo?
bar == :foo
end
def bar
@bar ||= :foo
end
end
Bad:
class Foo
def go_foo!
@bar = :foo
end
def foo?
@bar == :foo
end
end
Example
Running Reek on:
class Dummy
def test
@ivar
end
end
would report:
[1]:InstanceVariableAssumption: Dummy assumes too much for instance variable @ivar
Note that this example would trigger this smell warning as well:
class Parent
def initialize(omg)
@omg = omg
end
end
class Child < Parent
def foo
@omg
end
end
The way to address the smell warning is that you should create an attr_reader
to use @omg
in the subclass and not access @omg
directly like this:
class Parent
attr_reader :omg
def initialize(omg)
@omg = omg
end
end
class Child < Parent
def foo
omg
end
end
Directly accessing instance variables is considered a smell because it breaks encapsulation and makes it harder to reason about code.
If you don't want to expose those methods as public API just make them private like this:
class Parent
def initialize(omg)
@omg = omg
end
private
attr_reader :omg
end
class Child < Parent
def foo
omg
end
end
Current Support in Reek
An instance variable must:
- be set in the constructor
- or be accessed through a method with lazy initialization / memoization.
If not, Instance Variable Assumption will be reported.
Stats::Actions#completion_time_data calls '@actions_completion_time.last' 2 times Open
@max_weeks = @actions_completion_time.last ? difference_in_weeks(@today, @actions_completion_time.last.completed_at) : 1
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Duplication occurs when two fragments of code look nearly identical, or when two fragments of code have nearly identical effects at some conceptual level.
Reek implements a check for Duplicate Method Call.
Example
Here's a very much simplified and contrived example. The following method will report a warning:
def double_thing()
@other.thing + @other.thing
end
One quick approach to silence Reek would be to refactor the code thus:
def double_thing()
thing = @other.thing
thing + thing
end
A slightly different approach would be to replace all calls of double_thing
by calls to @other.double_thing
:
class Other
def double_thing()
thing + thing
end
end
The approach you take will depend on balancing other factors in your code.
Stats::Actions#day_of_week_all_data calls '@user.todos' 2 times Open
@actions_creation_day = @user.todos.select("created_at")
@actions_completion_day = @user.todos.completed.select("completed_at")
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Duplication occurs when two fragments of code look nearly identical, or when two fragments of code have nearly identical effects at some conceptual level.
Reek implements a check for Duplicate Method Call.
Example
Here's a very much simplified and contrived example. The following method will report a warning:
def double_thing()
@other.thing + @other.thing
end
One quick approach to silence Reek would be to refactor the code thus:
def double_thing()
thing = @other.thing
thing + thing
end
A slightly different approach would be to replace all calls of double_thing
by calls to @other.double_thing
:
class Other
def double_thing()
thing + thing
end
end
The approach you take will depend on balancing other factors in your code.
Stats::Actions assumes too much for instance variable '@actions_completion_day_array' Open
class Actions
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Classes should not assume that instance variables are set or present outside of the current class definition.
Good:
class Foo
def initialize
@bar = :foo
end
def foo?
@bar == :foo
end
end
Good as well:
class Foo
def foo?
bar == :foo
end
def bar
@bar ||= :foo
end
end
Bad:
class Foo
def go_foo!
@bar = :foo
end
def foo?
@bar == :foo
end
end
Example
Running Reek on:
class Dummy
def test
@ivar
end
end
would report:
[1]:InstanceVariableAssumption: Dummy assumes too much for instance variable @ivar
Note that this example would trigger this smell warning as well:
class Parent
def initialize(omg)
@omg = omg
end
end
class Child < Parent
def foo
@omg
end
end
The way to address the smell warning is that you should create an attr_reader
to use @omg
in the subclass and not access @omg
directly like this:
class Parent
attr_reader :omg
def initialize(omg)
@omg = omg
end
end
class Child < Parent
def foo
omg
end
end
Directly accessing instance variables is considered a smell because it breaks encapsulation and makes it harder to reason about code.
If you don't want to expose those methods as public API just make them private like this:
class Parent
def initialize(omg)
@omg = omg
end
private
attr_reader :omg
end
class Child < Parent
def foo
omg
end
end
Current Support in Reek
An instance variable must:
- be set in the constructor
- or be accessed through a method with lazy initialization / memoization.
If not, Instance Variable Assumption will be reported.
Stats::Actions#compute_running_avg_array calls 'upper_bound - 1' 2 times Open
result[upper_bound - 1] = result[upper_bound - 1] * 3 if upper_bound == set.length
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Duplication occurs when two fragments of code look nearly identical, or when two fragments of code have nearly identical effects at some conceptual level.
Reek implements a check for Duplicate Method Call.
Example
Here's a very much simplified and contrived example. The following method will report a warning:
def double_thing()
@other.thing + @other.thing
end
One quick approach to silence Reek would be to refactor the code thus:
def double_thing()
thing = @other.thing
thing + thing
end
A slightly different approach would be to replace all calls of double_thing
by calls to @other.double_thing
:
class Other
def double_thing()
thing + thing
end
end
The approach you take will depend on balancing other factors in your code.
Stats::Actions#done_last30days_data calls '@user.todos' 2 times Open
@actions_done_last30days = @user.todos.completed_after(@cut_off_30days).select("completed_at")
@actions_created_last30days = @user.todos.created_after(@cut_off_30days).select("created_at")
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Duplication occurs when two fragments of code look nearly identical, or when two fragments of code have nearly identical effects at some conceptual level.
Reek implements a check for Duplicate Method Call.
Example
Here's a very much simplified and contrived example. The following method will report a warning:
def double_thing()
@other.thing + @other.thing
end
One quick approach to silence Reek would be to refactor the code thus:
def double_thing()
thing = @other.thing
thing + thing
end
A slightly different approach would be to replace all calls of double_thing
by calls to @other.double_thing
:
class Other
def double_thing()
thing + thing
end
end
The approach you take will depend on balancing other factors in your code.
Stats::Actions#percent_of_month calls 'Time.zone' 2 times Open
Time.zone.now.day / Time.zone.now.end_of_month.day.to_f
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Duplication occurs when two fragments of code look nearly identical, or when two fragments of code have nearly identical effects at some conceptual level.
Reek implements a check for Duplicate Method Call.
Example
Here's a very much simplified and contrived example. The following method will report a warning:
def double_thing()
@other.thing + @other.thing
end
One quick approach to silence Reek would be to refactor the code thus:
def double_thing()
thing = @other.thing
thing + thing
end
A slightly different approach would be to replace all calls of double_thing
by calls to @other.double_thing
:
class Other
def double_thing()
thing + thing
end
end
The approach you take will depend on balancing other factors in your code.
Stats::Actions assumes too much for instance variable '@actions_creation_day_array' Open
class Actions
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Classes should not assume that instance variables are set or present outside of the current class definition.
Good:
class Foo
def initialize
@bar = :foo
end
def foo?
@bar == :foo
end
end
Good as well:
class Foo
def foo?
bar == :foo
end
def bar
@bar ||= :foo
end
end
Bad:
class Foo
def go_foo!
@bar = :foo
end
def foo?
@bar == :foo
end
end
Example
Running Reek on:
class Dummy
def test
@ivar
end
end
would report:
[1]:InstanceVariableAssumption: Dummy assumes too much for instance variable @ivar
Note that this example would trigger this smell warning as well:
class Parent
def initialize(omg)
@omg = omg
end
end
class Child < Parent
def foo
@omg
end
end
The way to address the smell warning is that you should create an attr_reader
to use @omg
in the subclass and not access @omg
directly like this:
class Parent
attr_reader :omg
def initialize(omg)
@omg = omg
end
end
class Child < Parent
def foo
omg
end
end
Directly accessing instance variables is considered a smell because it breaks encapsulation and makes it harder to reason about code.
If you don't want to expose those methods as public API just make them private like this:
class Parent
def initialize(omg)
@omg = omg
end
private
attr_reader :omg
end
class Child < Parent
def foo
omg
end
end
Current Support in Reek
An instance variable must:
- be set in the constructor
- or be accessed through a method with lazy initialization / memoization.
If not, Instance Variable Assumption will be reported.
Stats::Actions assumes too much for instance variable '@actions_running_time' Open
class Actions
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Classes should not assume that instance variables are set or present outside of the current class definition.
Good:
class Foo
def initialize
@bar = :foo
end
def foo?
@bar == :foo
end
end
Good as well:
class Foo
def foo?
bar == :foo
end
def bar
@bar ||= :foo
end
end
Bad:
class Foo
def go_foo!
@bar = :foo
end
def foo?
@bar == :foo
end
end
Example
Running Reek on:
class Dummy
def test
@ivar
end
end
would report:
[1]:InstanceVariableAssumption: Dummy assumes too much for instance variable @ivar
Note that this example would trigger this smell warning as well:
class Parent
def initialize(omg)
@omg = omg
end
end
class Child < Parent
def foo
@omg
end
end
The way to address the smell warning is that you should create an attr_reader
to use @omg
in the subclass and not access @omg
directly like this:
class Parent
attr_reader :omg
def initialize(omg)
@omg = omg
end
end
class Child < Parent
def foo
omg
end
end
Directly accessing instance variables is considered a smell because it breaks encapsulation and makes it harder to reason about code.
If you don't want to expose those methods as public API just make them private like this:
class Parent
def initialize(omg)
@omg = omg
end
private
attr_reader :omg
end
class Child < Parent
def foo
omg
end
end
Current Support in Reek
An instance variable must:
- be set in the constructor
- or be accessed through a method with lazy initialization / memoization.
If not, Instance Variable Assumption will be reported.
Stats::Actions assumes too much for instance variable '@actions_created_last30days' Open
class Actions
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Classes should not assume that instance variables are set or present outside of the current class definition.
Good:
class Foo
def initialize
@bar = :foo
end
def foo?
@bar == :foo
end
end
Good as well:
class Foo
def foo?
bar == :foo
end
def bar
@bar ||= :foo
end
end
Bad:
class Foo
def go_foo!
@bar = :foo
end
def foo?
@bar == :foo
end
end
Example
Running Reek on:
class Dummy
def test
@ivar
end
end
would report:
[1]:InstanceVariableAssumption: Dummy assumes too much for instance variable @ivar
Note that this example would trigger this smell warning as well:
class Parent
def initialize(omg)
@omg = omg
end
end
class Child < Parent
def foo
@omg
end
end
The way to address the smell warning is that you should create an attr_reader
to use @omg
in the subclass and not access @omg
directly like this:
class Parent
attr_reader :omg
def initialize(omg)
@omg = omg
end
end
class Child < Parent
def foo
omg
end
end
Directly accessing instance variables is considered a smell because it breaks encapsulation and makes it harder to reason about code.
If you don't want to expose those methods as public API just make them private like this:
class Parent
def initialize(omg)
@omg = omg
end
private
attr_reader :omg
end
class Child < Parent
def foo
omg
end
end
Current Support in Reek
An instance variable must:
- be set in the constructor
- or be accessed through a method with lazy initialization / memoization.
If not, Instance Variable Assumption will be reported.
Stats::Actions assumes too much for instance variable '@created_count_array' Open
class Actions
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Classes should not assume that instance variables are set or present outside of the current class definition.
Good:
class Foo
def initialize
@bar = :foo
end
def foo?
@bar == :foo
end
end
Good as well:
class Foo
def foo?
bar == :foo
end
def bar
@bar ||= :foo
end
end
Bad:
class Foo
def go_foo!
@bar = :foo
end
def foo?
@bar == :foo
end
end
Example
Running Reek on:
class Dummy
def test
@ivar
end
end
would report:
[1]:InstanceVariableAssumption: Dummy assumes too much for instance variable @ivar
Note that this example would trigger this smell warning as well:
class Parent
def initialize(omg)
@omg = omg
end
end
class Child < Parent
def foo
@omg
end
end
The way to address the smell warning is that you should create an attr_reader
to use @omg
in the subclass and not access @omg
directly like this:
class Parent
attr_reader :omg
def initialize(omg)
@omg = omg
end
end
class Child < Parent
def foo
omg
end
end
Directly accessing instance variables is considered a smell because it breaks encapsulation and makes it harder to reason about code.
If you don't want to expose those methods as public API just make them private like this:
class Parent
def initialize(omg)
@omg = omg
end
private
attr_reader :omg
end
class Child < Parent
def foo
omg
end
end
Current Support in Reek
An instance variable must:
- be set in the constructor
- or be accessed through a method with lazy initialization / memoization.
If not, Instance Variable Assumption will be reported.
Stats::Actions#compute_running_avg_array calls 'set.length' 2 times Open
result[upper_bound - 1] = result[upper_bound - 1] * 3 if upper_bound == set.length
result[upper_bound - 2] = result[upper_bound - 2] * 3 / 2 if upper_bound > 1 && upper_bound == set.length
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Duplication occurs when two fragments of code look nearly identical, or when two fragments of code have nearly identical effects at some conceptual level.
Reek implements a check for Duplicate Method Call.
Example
Here's a very much simplified and contrived example. The following method will report a warning:
def double_thing()
@other.thing + @other.thing
end
One quick approach to silence Reek would be to refactor the code thus:
def double_thing()
thing = @other.thing
thing + thing
end
A slightly different approach would be to replace all calls of double_thing
by calls to @other.double_thing
:
class Other
def double_thing()
thing + thing
end
end
The approach you take will depend on balancing other factors in your code.
Stats::Actions#week_indexes_of calls 'record.completed_at' 2 times Open
end_week = record.completed_at ? difference_in_weeks(@today, record.completed_at) : 0
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Duplication occurs when two fragments of code look nearly identical, or when two fragments of code have nearly identical effects at some conceptual level.
Reek implements a check for Duplicate Method Call.
Example
Here's a very much simplified and contrived example. The following method will report a warning:
def double_thing()
@other.thing + @other.thing
end
One quick approach to silence Reek would be to refactor the code thus:
def double_thing()
thing = @other.thing
thing + thing
end
A slightly different approach would be to replace all calls of double_thing
by calls to @other.double_thing
:
class Other
def double_thing()
thing + thing
end
end
The approach you take will depend on balancing other factors in your code.
Stats::Actions assumes too much for instance variable '@cum_percent_done' Open
class Actions
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Classes should not assume that instance variables are set or present outside of the current class definition.
Good:
class Foo
def initialize
@bar = :foo
end
def foo?
@bar == :foo
end
end
Good as well:
class Foo
def foo?
bar == :foo
end
def bar
@bar ||= :foo
end
end
Bad:
class Foo
def go_foo!
@bar = :foo
end
def foo?
@bar == :foo
end
end
Example
Running Reek on:
class Dummy
def test
@ivar
end
end
would report:
[1]:InstanceVariableAssumption: Dummy assumes too much for instance variable @ivar
Note that this example would trigger this smell warning as well:
class Parent
def initialize(omg)
@omg = omg
end
end
class Child < Parent
def foo
@omg
end
end
The way to address the smell warning is that you should create an attr_reader
to use @omg
in the subclass and not access @omg
directly like this:
class Parent
attr_reader :omg
def initialize(omg)
@omg = omg
end
end
class Child < Parent
def foo
omg
end
end
Directly accessing instance variables is considered a smell because it breaks encapsulation and makes it harder to reason about code.
If you don't want to expose those methods as public API just make them private like this:
class Parent
def initialize(omg)
@omg = omg
end
private
attr_reader :omg
end
class Child < Parent
def foo
omg
end
end
Current Support in Reek
An instance variable must:
- be set in the constructor
- or be accessed through a method with lazy initialization / memoization.
If not, Instance Variable Assumption will be reported.
Stats::Actions assumes too much for instance variable '@done_count_array' Open
class Actions
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Classes should not assume that instance variables are set or present outside of the current class definition.
Good:
class Foo
def initialize
@bar = :foo
end
def foo?
@bar == :foo
end
end
Good as well:
class Foo
def foo?
bar == :foo
end
def bar
@bar ||= :foo
end
end
Bad:
class Foo
def go_foo!
@bar = :foo
end
def foo?
@bar == :foo
end
end
Example
Running Reek on:
class Dummy
def test
@ivar
end
end
would report:
[1]:InstanceVariableAssumption: Dummy assumes too much for instance variable @ivar
Note that this example would trigger this smell warning as well:
class Parent
def initialize(omg)
@omg = omg
end
end
class Child < Parent
def foo
@omg
end
end
The way to address the smell warning is that you should create an attr_reader
to use @omg
in the subclass and not access @omg
directly like this:
class Parent
attr_reader :omg
def initialize(omg)
@omg = omg
end
end
class Child < Parent
def foo
omg
end
end
Directly accessing instance variables is considered a smell because it breaks encapsulation and makes it harder to reason about code.
If you don't want to expose those methods as public API just make them private like this:
class Parent
def initialize(omg)
@omg = omg
end
private
attr_reader :omg
end
class Child < Parent
def foo
omg
end
end
Current Support in Reek
An instance variable must:
- be set in the constructor
- or be accessed through a method with lazy initialization / memoization.
If not, Instance Variable Assumption will be reported.
Stats::Actions assumes too much for instance variable '@actions_completion_hour_array' Open
class Actions
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Classes should not assume that instance variables are set or present outside of the current class definition.
Good:
class Foo
def initialize
@bar = :foo
end
def foo?
@bar == :foo
end
end
Good as well:
class Foo
def foo?
bar == :foo
end
def bar
@bar ||= :foo
end
end
Bad:
class Foo
def go_foo!
@bar = :foo
end
def foo?
@bar == :foo
end
end
Example
Running Reek on:
class Dummy
def test
@ivar
end
end
would report:
[1]:InstanceVariableAssumption: Dummy assumes too much for instance variable @ivar
Note that this example would trigger this smell warning as well:
class Parent
def initialize(omg)
@omg = omg
end
end
class Child < Parent
def foo
@omg
end
end
The way to address the smell warning is that you should create an attr_reader
to use @omg
in the subclass and not access @omg
directly like this:
class Parent
attr_reader :omg
def initialize(omg)
@omg = omg
end
end
class Child < Parent
def foo
omg
end
end
Directly accessing instance variables is considered a smell because it breaks encapsulation and makes it harder to reason about code.
If you don't want to expose those methods as public API just make them private like this:
class Parent
def initialize(omg)
@omg = omg
end
private
attr_reader :omg
end
class Child < Parent
def foo
omg
end
end
Current Support in Reek
An instance variable must:
- be set in the constructor
- or be accessed through a method with lazy initialization / memoization.
If not, Instance Variable Assumption will be reported.
Stats::Actions assumes too much for instance variable '@actions_running_per_week_array' Open
class Actions
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Classes should not assume that instance variables are set or present outside of the current class definition.
Good:
class Foo
def initialize
@bar = :foo
end
def foo?
@bar == :foo
end
end
Good as well:
class Foo
def foo?
bar == :foo
end
def bar
@bar ||= :foo
end
end
Bad:
class Foo
def go_foo!
@bar = :foo
end
def foo?
@bar == :foo
end
end
Example
Running Reek on:
class Dummy
def test
@ivar
end
end
would report:
[1]:InstanceVariableAssumption: Dummy assumes too much for instance variable @ivar
Note that this example would trigger this smell warning as well:
class Parent
def initialize(omg)
@omg = omg
end
end
class Child < Parent
def foo
@omg
end
end
The way to address the smell warning is that you should create an attr_reader
to use @omg
in the subclass and not access @omg
directly like this:
class Parent
attr_reader :omg
def initialize(omg)
@omg = omg
end
end
class Child < Parent
def foo
omg
end
end
Directly accessing instance variables is considered a smell because it breaks encapsulation and makes it harder to reason about code.
If you don't want to expose those methods as public API just make them private like this:
class Parent
def initialize(omg)
@omg = omg
end
private
attr_reader :omg
end
class Child < Parent
def foo
omg
end
end
Current Support in Reek
An instance variable must:
- be set in the constructor
- or be accessed through a method with lazy initialization / memoization.
If not, Instance Variable Assumption will be reported.
Complex method Stats::Actions#time_of_day_30days_data (22.3) Open
def time_of_day_30days_data
@actions_creation_hour = @user.todos.created_after(@cut_off_month).select("created_at")
@actions_completion_hour = @user.todos.completed_after(@cut_off_month).select("completed_at")
# convert to hash to be able to fill in non-existing days
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Flog calculates the ABC score for methods. The ABC score is based on assignments, branches (method calls), and conditions.
You can read more about ABC metrics or the flog tool
Complex method Stats::Actions#initialize (22.0) Open
def initialize(user)
@user = user
@today = Time.zone.now.utc.beginning_of_day
@cut_off_year = 12.months.ago.beginning_of_day
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Flog calculates the ABC score for methods. The ABC score is based on assignments, branches (method calls), and conditions.
You can read more about ABC metrics or the flog tool
Complex method Stats::Actions#compute_running_avg_array (21.9) Open
def compute_running_avg_array(set, upper_bound)
result = set_three_month_avg(set, upper_bound)
result[upper_bound - 1] = result[upper_bound - 1] * 3 if upper_bound == set.length
result[upper_bound - 2] = result[upper_bound - 2] * 3 / 2 if upper_bound > 1 && upper_bound == set.length
result[0] = "null"
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Flog calculates the ABC score for methods. The ABC score is based on assignments, branches (method calls), and conditions.
You can read more about ABC metrics or the flog tool
Complex method Stats::Actions#day_of_week_30days_data (21.1) Open
def day_of_week_30days_data
@actions_creation_day = @user.todos.created_after(@cut_off_month).select("created_at")
@actions_completion_day = @user.todos.completed_after(@cut_off_month).select("completed_at")
# convert to hash to be able to fill in non-existing days
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Flog calculates the ABC score for methods. The ABC score is based on assignments, branches (method calls), and conditions.
You can read more about ABC metrics or the flog tool
Stats::Actions#cut_off_array doesn't depend on instance state (maybe move it to another class?) Open
def cut_off_array(array, cut_off)
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
A Utility Function is any instance method that has no dependency on the state of the instance.
Stats::Actions#three_month_avg doesn't depend on instance state (maybe move it to another class?) Open
def three_month_avg(set, i)
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
A Utility Function is any instance method that has no dependency on the state of the instance.
Stats::Actions#difference_in_days doesn't depend on instance state (maybe move it to another class?) Open
def difference_in_days(date1, date2)
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
A Utility Function is any instance method that has no dependency on the state of the instance.
Stats::Actions#cut_off_array_with_sum doesn't depend on instance state (maybe move it to another class?) Open
def cut_off_array_with_sum(array, cut_off)
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
A Utility Function is any instance method that has no dependency on the state of the instance.
Stats::Actions takes parameters ['date1', 'date2'] to 3 methods Open
def difference_in_months(date1, date2)
return (date1.utc.year - date2.utc.year) * 12 + (date1.utc.month - date2.utc.month)
end
# assumes date1 > date2
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
In general, a Data Clump
occurs when the same two or three items frequently appear together in classes and parameter lists, or when a group of instance variable names start or end with similar substrings.
The recurrence of the items often means there is duplicate code spread around to handle them. There may be an abstraction missing from the code, making the system harder to understand.
Example
Given
class Dummy
def x(y1,y2); end
def y(y1,y2); end
def z(y1,y2); end
end
Reek would emit the following warning:
test.rb -- 1 warning:
[2, 3, 4]:Dummy takes parameters [y1, y2] to 3 methods (DataClump)
A possible way to fix this problem (quoting from Martin Fowler):
The first step is to replace data clumps with objects and use the objects whenever you see them. An immediate benefit is that you'll shrink some parameter lists. The interesting stuff happens as you begin to look for behavior to move into the new objects.
Stats::Actions#difference_in_months doesn't depend on instance state (maybe move it to another class?) Open
def difference_in_months(date1, date2)
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
A Utility Function is any instance method that has no dependency on the state of the instance.
Stats::Actions takes parameters ['array_size', 'date_method_on_todo', 'records'] to 3 methods Open
def put_events_into_month_buckets(records, array_size, date_method_on_todo)
convert_to_array(records.select { |x| x.send(date_method_on_todo) }, array_size) { |r| [difference_in_months(@today, r.send(date_method_on_todo))] }
end
def convert_to_days_from_today_array(records, array_size, date_method_on_todo)
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
In general, a Data Clump
occurs when the same two or three items frequently appear together in classes and parameter lists, or when a group of instance variable names start or end with similar substrings.
The recurrence of the items often means there is duplicate code spread around to handle them. There may be an abstraction missing from the code, making the system harder to understand.
Example
Given
class Dummy
def x(y1,y2); end
def y(y1,y2); end
def z(y1,y2); end
end
Reek would emit the following warning:
test.rb -- 1 warning:
[2, 3, 4]:Dummy takes parameters [y1, y2] to 3 methods (DataClump)
A possible way to fix this problem (quoting from Martin Fowler):
The first step is to replace data clumps with objects and use the objects whenever you see them. An immediate benefit is that you'll shrink some parameter lists. The interesting stuff happens as you begin to look for behavior to move into the new objects.
Stats::Actions#convert_to_cumulative_array doesn't depend on instance state (maybe move it to another class?) Open
def convert_to_cumulative_array(array, max)
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
A Utility Function is any instance method that has no dependency on the state of the instance.
Stats::Actions takes parameters ['array_size', 'records'] to 5 methods Open
def put_events_into_month_buckets(records, array_size, date_method_on_todo)
convert_to_array(records.select { |x| x.send(date_method_on_todo) }, array_size) { |r| [difference_in_months(@today, r.send(date_method_on_todo))] }
end
def convert_to_days_from_today_array(records, array_size, date_method_on_todo)
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
In general, a Data Clump
occurs when the same two or three items frequently appear together in classes and parameter lists, or when a group of instance variable names start or end with similar substrings.
The recurrence of the items often means there is duplicate code spread around to handle them. There may be an abstraction missing from the code, making the system harder to understand.
Example
Given
class Dummy
def x(y1,y2); end
def y(y1,y2); end
def z(y1,y2); end
end
Reek would emit the following warning:
test.rb -- 1 warning:
[2, 3, 4]:Dummy takes parameters [y1, y2] to 3 methods (DataClump)
A possible way to fix this problem (quoting from Martin Fowler):
The first step is to replace data clumps with objects and use the objects whenever you see them. An immediate benefit is that you'll shrink some parameter lists. The interesting stuff happens as you begin to look for behavior to move into the new objects.
Stats::Actions#convert_to_array doesn't depend on instance state (maybe move it to another class?) Open
def convert_to_array(records, upper_bound)
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
A Utility Function is any instance method that has no dependency on the state of the instance.
Stats::Actions#month_label doesn't depend on instance state (maybe move it to another class?) Open
def month_label(i)
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
A Utility Function is any instance method that has no dependency on the state of the instance.
Stats::Actions#percent_of_month doesn't depend on instance state (maybe move it to another class?) Open
def percent_of_month
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
A Utility Function is any instance method that has no dependency on the state of the instance.
Complex method Stats::Actions#time_of_day_all_data (21.0) Open
def time_of_day_all_data
@actions_creation_hour = @user.todos.select("created_at")
@actions_completion_hour = @user.todos.completed.select("completed_at")
# convert to hash to be able to fill in non-existing days
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Flog calculates the ABC score for methods. The ABC score is based on assignments, branches (method calls), and conditions.
You can read more about ABC metrics or the flog tool
Complex method Stats::Actions#day_of_week_all_data (20.8) Open
def day_of_week_all_data
@actions_creation_day = @user.todos.select("created_at")
@actions_completion_day = @user.todos.completed.select("completed_at")
# convert to array and fill in non-existing days
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Flog calculates the ABC score for methods. The ABC score is based on assignments, branches (method calls), and conditions.
You can read more about ABC metrics or the flog tool
Stats::Actions#difference_in_days has the parameter name 'date1' Open
def difference_in_days(date1, date2)
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
An Uncommunicative Parameter Name
is a parameter name that doesn't communicate its intent well enough.
Poor names make it hard for the reader to build a mental picture of what's going on in the code. They can also be mis-interpreted; and they hurt the flow of reading, because the reader must slow down to interpret the names.
Stats::Actions#convert_to_weeks_running_array has the variable name 'r' Open
return convert_to_array(records, array_size) { |r| [difference_in_weeks(r.completed_at, r.created_at)] }
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
An Uncommunicative Variable Name
is a variable name that doesn't communicate its intent well enough.
Poor names make it hard for the reader to build a mental picture of what's going on in the code. They can also be mis-interpreted; and they hurt the flow of reading, because the reader must slow down to interpret the names.
Stats::Actions#difference_in_months has the parameter name 'date2' Open
def difference_in_months(date1, date2)
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
An Uncommunicative Parameter Name
is a parameter name that doesn't communicate its intent well enough.
Poor names make it hard for the reader to build a mental picture of what's going on in the code. They can also be mis-interpreted; and they hurt the flow of reading, because the reader must slow down to interpret the names.
Stats::Actions#convert_to_array has the variable name 'i' Open
records.each { |r| (yield r).each { |i| a[i] += 1 if a[i] } }
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
An Uncommunicative Variable Name
is a variable name that doesn't communicate its intent well enough.
Poor names make it hard for the reader to build a mental picture of what's going on in the code. They can also be mis-interpreted; and they hurt the flow of reading, because the reader must slow down to interpret the names.
Stats::Actions#convert_to_cumulative_array has the variable name 'a' Open
a = Array.new(array.size) { |i| array[i] * 100.0 / max }
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
An Uncommunicative Variable Name
is a variable name that doesn't communicate its intent well enough.
Poor names make it hard for the reader to build a mental picture of what's going on in the code. They can also be mis-interpreted; and they hurt the flow of reading, because the reader must slow down to interpret the names.
Stats::Actions#set_three_month_avg has the variable name 'i' Open
(0..upper_bound - 1).map { |i| three_month_avg(set, i) }
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
An Uncommunicative Variable Name
is a variable name that doesn't communicate its intent well enough.
Poor names make it hard for the reader to build a mental picture of what's going on in the code. They can also be mis-interpreted; and they hurt the flow of reading, because the reader must slow down to interpret the names.
Stats::Actions has the variable name '@cut_off_year_plus3' Open
@cut_off_year_plus3 = 15.months.ago.beginning_of_day
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
An Uncommunicative Variable Name
is a variable name that doesn't communicate its intent well enough.
Poor names make it hard for the reader to build a mental picture of what's going on in the code. They can also be mis-interpreted; and they hurt the flow of reading, because the reader must slow down to interpret the names.
Stats::Actions#convert_to_array has the variable name 'r' Open
records.each { |r| (yield r).each { |i| a[i] += 1 if a[i] } }
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
An Uncommunicative Variable Name
is a variable name that doesn't communicate its intent well enough.
Poor names make it hard for the reader to build a mental picture of what's going on in the code. They can also be mis-interpreted; and they hurt the flow of reading, because the reader must slow down to interpret the names.
Stats::Actions#month_label has the parameter name 'i' Open
def month_label(i)
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
An Uncommunicative Parameter Name
is a parameter name that doesn't communicate its intent well enough.
Poor names make it hard for the reader to build a mental picture of what's going on in the code. They can also be mis-interpreted; and they hurt the flow of reading, because the reader must slow down to interpret the names.
Stats::Actions#array_of_month_labels has the variable name 'i' Open
Array.new(count) { |i| month_label(i) }
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
An Uncommunicative Variable Name
is a variable name that doesn't communicate its intent well enough.
Poor names make it hard for the reader to build a mental picture of what's going on in the code. They can also be mis-interpreted; and they hurt the flow of reading, because the reader must slow down to interpret the names.
Stats::Actions#cut_off_array_with_sum has the variable name 'a' Open
a = Array.new(cut_off + 1) { |i| array[i] || 0 }
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
An Uncommunicative Variable Name
is a variable name that doesn't communicate its intent well enough.
Poor names make it hard for the reader to build a mental picture of what's going on in the code. They can also be mis-interpreted; and they hurt the flow of reading, because the reader must slow down to interpret the names.
Stats::Actions#running_time_data has the variable name 'i' Open
time_labels = Array.new(@count) { |i| "#{i}-#{i + 1}" }
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
An Uncommunicative Variable Name
is a variable name that doesn't communicate its intent well enough.
Poor names make it hard for the reader to build a mental picture of what's going on in the code. They can also be mis-interpreted; and they hurt the flow of reading, because the reader must slow down to interpret the names.
Stats::Actions#week_indexes_of has the variable name 'a' Open
a = []
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
An Uncommunicative Variable Name
is a variable name that doesn't communicate its intent well enough.
Poor names make it hard for the reader to build a mental picture of what's going on in the code. They can also be mis-interpreted; and they hurt the flow of reading, because the reader must slow down to interpret the names.
Stats::Actions#put_events_into_month_buckets has the variable name 'x' Open
convert_to_array(records.select { |x| x.send(date_method_on_todo) }, array_size) { |r| [difference_in_months(@today, r.send(date_method_on_todo))] }
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
An Uncommunicative Variable Name
is a variable name that doesn't communicate its intent well enough.
Poor names make it hard for the reader to build a mental picture of what's going on in the code. They can also be mis-interpreted; and they hurt the flow of reading, because the reader must slow down to interpret the names.
Stats::Actions#difference_in_weeks has the parameter name 'date2' Open
def difference_in_weeks(date1, date2)
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
An Uncommunicative Parameter Name
is a parameter name that doesn't communicate its intent well enough.
Poor names make it hard for the reader to build a mental picture of what's going on in the code. They can also be mis-interpreted; and they hurt the flow of reading, because the reader must slow down to interpret the names.
Stats::Actions#time_of_day_30days_data has the variable name 'i' Open
@actions_creation_hour_array = Array.new(24) { |i| 0 }
@actions_creation_hour.each { |r| @actions_creation_hour_array[r.created_at.hour] += 1 }
# convert to hash to be able to fill in non-existing days
@actions_completion_hour_array = Array.new(24) { |i| 0 }
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
An Uncommunicative Variable Name
is a variable name that doesn't communicate its intent well enough.
Poor names make it hard for the reader to build a mental picture of what's going on in the code. They can also be mis-interpreted; and they hurt the flow of reading, because the reader must slow down to interpret the names.
Stats::Actions#three_month_avg has the parameter name 'i' Open
def three_month_avg(set, i)
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
An Uncommunicative Parameter Name
is a parameter name that doesn't communicate its intent well enough.
Poor names make it hard for the reader to build a mental picture of what's going on in the code. They can also be mis-interpreted; and they hurt the flow of reading, because the reader must slow down to interpret the names.
Stats::Actions#day_of_week_30days_data has the variable name 'i' Open
@actions_creation_day_array = Array.new(7) { |i| 0 }
@actions_creation_day.each { |r| @actions_creation_day_array[r.created_at.wday] += 1 }
# convert to hash to be able to fill in non-existing days
@actions_completion_day_array = Array.new(7) { |i| 0 }
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
An Uncommunicative Variable Name
is a variable name that doesn't communicate its intent well enough.
Poor names make it hard for the reader to build a mental picture of what's going on in the code. They can also be mis-interpreted; and they hurt the flow of reading, because the reader must slow down to interpret the names.
Stats::Actions#done_last30days_data has the variable name 'i' Open
created_count_array = Array.new(30) { |i| @actions_created_last30days.size / 30.0 }
done_count_array = Array.new(30) { |i| @actions_done_last30days.size / 30.0 }
# TODO: make the strftime i18n proof
time_labels = Array.new(30) { |i| I18n.l(Time.zone.now - i.days, :format => :stats) }
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
An Uncommunicative Variable Name
is a variable name that doesn't communicate its intent well enough.
Poor names make it hard for the reader to build a mental picture of what's going on in the code. They can also be mis-interpreted; and they hurt the flow of reading, because the reader must slow down to interpret the names.
Stats::Actions#time_of_day_30days_data has the variable name 'r' Open
@actions_creation_hour.each { |r| @actions_creation_hour_array[r.created_at.hour] += 1 }
# convert to hash to be able to fill in non-existing days
@actions_completion_hour_array = Array.new(24) { |i| 0 }
@actions_completion_hour.each { |r| @actions_completion_hour_array[r.completed_at.hour] += 1 }
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
An Uncommunicative Variable Name
is a variable name that doesn't communicate its intent well enough.
Poor names make it hard for the reader to build a mental picture of what's going on in the code. They can also be mis-interpreted; and they hurt the flow of reading, because the reader must slow down to interpret the names.
Stats::Actions#visible_running_time_data has the variable name 'i' Open
time_labels = Array.new(@count) { |i| "#{i}-#{i + 1}" }
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
An Uncommunicative Variable Name
is a variable name that doesn't communicate its intent well enough.
Poor names make it hard for the reader to build a mental picture of what's going on in the code. They can also be mis-interpreted; and they hurt the flow of reading, because the reader must slow down to interpret the names.
Stats::Actions#cut_off_array_with_sum has the variable name 'i' Open
a = Array.new(cut_off + 1) { |i| array[i] || 0 }
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
An Uncommunicative Variable Name
is a variable name that doesn't communicate its intent well enough.
Poor names make it hard for the reader to build a mental picture of what's going on in the code. They can also be mis-interpreted; and they hurt the flow of reading, because the reader must slow down to interpret the names.
Stats::Actions#time_of_day_all_data has the variable name 'r' Open
@actions_creation_hour.each { |r| @actions_creation_hour_array[r.created_at.hour] += 1 }
# convert to hash to be able to fill in non-existing days
@actions_completion_hour_array = Array.new(24) { |i| 0 }
@actions_completion_hour.each { |r| @actions_completion_hour_array[r.completed_at.hour] += 1 }
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
An Uncommunicative Variable Name
is a variable name that doesn't communicate its intent well enough.
Poor names make it hard for the reader to build a mental picture of what's going on in the code. They can also be mis-interpreted; and they hurt the flow of reading, because the reader must slow down to interpret the names.
Stats::Actions#convert_to_array has the variable name 'a' Open
a = Array.new(upper_bound, 0)
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
An Uncommunicative Variable Name
is a variable name that doesn't communicate its intent well enough.
Poor names make it hard for the reader to build a mental picture of what's going on in the code. They can also be mis-interpreted; and they hurt the flow of reading, because the reader must slow down to interpret the names.
Stats::Actions#day_of_week_all_data has the variable name 't' Open
@actions_creation_day.each { |t| @actions_creation_day_array[t.created_at.wday] += 1 }
@max = @actions_creation_day_array.max
# convert to array and fill in non-existing days
@actions_completion_day_array = Array.new(7) { |i| 0 }
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
An Uncommunicative Variable Name
is a variable name that doesn't communicate its intent well enough.
Poor names make it hard for the reader to build a mental picture of what's going on in the code. They can also be mis-interpreted; and they hurt the flow of reading, because the reader must slow down to interpret the names.
Stats::Actions#time_of_day_all_data has the variable name 'i' Open
@actions_creation_hour_array = Array.new(24) { |i| 0 }
@actions_creation_hour.each { |r| @actions_creation_hour_array[r.created_at.hour] += 1 }
# convert to hash to be able to fill in non-existing days
@actions_completion_hour_array = Array.new(24) { |i| 0 }
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
An Uncommunicative Variable Name
is a variable name that doesn't communicate its intent well enough.
Poor names make it hard for the reader to build a mental picture of what's going on in the code. They can also be mis-interpreted; and they hurt the flow of reading, because the reader must slow down to interpret the names.
Stats::Actions#difference_in_weeks has the parameter name 'date1' Open
def difference_in_weeks(date1, date2)
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
An Uncommunicative Parameter Name
is a parameter name that doesn't communicate its intent well enough.
Poor names make it hard for the reader to build a mental picture of what's going on in the code. They can also be mis-interpreted; and they hurt the flow of reading, because the reader must slow down to interpret the names.
Stats::Actions#convert_to_cumulative_array has the variable name 'i' Open
a = Array.new(array.size) { |i| array[i] * 100.0 / max }
# make cumulative
1.upto(array.size - 1) { |i| a[i] += a[i - 1] }
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
An Uncommunicative Variable Name
is a variable name that doesn't communicate its intent well enough.
Poor names make it hard for the reader to build a mental picture of what's going on in the code. They can also be mis-interpreted; and they hurt the flow of reading, because the reader must slow down to interpret the names.
Stats::Actions#day_of_week_30days_data has the variable name 'r' Open
@actions_creation_day.each { |r| @actions_creation_day_array[r.created_at.wday] += 1 }
# convert to hash to be able to fill in non-existing days
@actions_completion_day_array = Array.new(7) { |i| 0 }
@actions_completion_day.each { |r| @actions_completion_day_array[r.completed_at.wday] += 1 }
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
An Uncommunicative Variable Name
is a variable name that doesn't communicate its intent well enough.
Poor names make it hard for the reader to build a mental picture of what's going on in the code. They can also be mis-interpreted; and they hurt the flow of reading, because the reader must slow down to interpret the names.
Stats::Actions#week_indexes_of has the variable name 'i' Open
end_week.upto(start_week) { |i| a << i }
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
An Uncommunicative Variable Name
is a variable name that doesn't communicate its intent well enough.
Poor names make it hard for the reader to build a mental picture of what's going on in the code. They can also be mis-interpreted; and they hurt the flow of reading, because the reader must slow down to interpret the names.
Stats::Actions#convert_to_weeks_from_today_array has the variable name 'r' Open
return convert_to_array(records, array_size) { |r| [difference_in_weeks(@today, r.send(date_method_on_todo))] }
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
An Uncommunicative Variable Name
is a variable name that doesn't communicate its intent well enough.
Poor names make it hard for the reader to build a mental picture of what's going on in the code. They can also be mis-interpreted; and they hurt the flow of reading, because the reader must slow down to interpret the names.
Stats::Actions#convert_to_weeks_running_from_today_array has the variable name 'r' Open
return convert_to_array(records, array_size) { |r| week_indexes_of(r) }
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
An Uncommunicative Variable Name
is a variable name that doesn't communicate its intent well enough.
Poor names make it hard for the reader to build a mental picture of what's going on in the code. They can also be mis-interpreted; and they hurt the flow of reading, because the reader must slow down to interpret the names.
Stats::Actions#cut_off_array has the variable name 'i' Open
return Array.new(cut_off) { |i| array[i] || 0 }
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
An Uncommunicative Variable Name
is a variable name that doesn't communicate its intent well enough.
Poor names make it hard for the reader to build a mental picture of what's going on in the code. They can also be mis-interpreted; and they hurt the flow of reading, because the reader must slow down to interpret the names.
Stats::Actions#day_of_week_all_data has the variable name 'i' Open
@actions_creation_day_array = Array.new(7) { |i| 0 }
@actions_creation_day.each { |t| @actions_creation_day_array[t.created_at.wday] += 1 }
@max = @actions_creation_day_array.max
# convert to array and fill in non-existing days
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
An Uncommunicative Variable Name
is a variable name that doesn't communicate its intent well enough.
Poor names make it hard for the reader to build a mental picture of what's going on in the code. They can also be mis-interpreted; and they hurt the flow of reading, because the reader must slow down to interpret the names.
Stats::Actions#difference_in_days has the parameter name 'date2' Open
def difference_in_days(date1, date2)
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
An Uncommunicative Parameter Name
is a parameter name that doesn't communicate its intent well enough.
Poor names make it hard for the reader to build a mental picture of what's going on in the code. They can also be mis-interpreted; and they hurt the flow of reading, because the reader must slow down to interpret the names.
Stats::Actions#completion_time_data has the variable name 'i' Open
time_labels = Array.new(@count) { |i| "#{i}-#{i + 1}" }
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
An Uncommunicative Variable Name
is a variable name that doesn't communicate its intent well enough.
Poor names make it hard for the reader to build a mental picture of what's going on in the code. They can also be mis-interpreted; and they hurt the flow of reading, because the reader must slow down to interpret the names.
Stats::Actions#convert_to_days_from_today_array has the variable name 'r' Open
return convert_to_array(records, array_size) { |r| [difference_in_days(@today, r.send(date_method_on_todo))] }
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
An Uncommunicative Variable Name
is a variable name that doesn't communicate its intent well enough.
Poor names make it hard for the reader to build a mental picture of what's going on in the code. They can also be mis-interpreted; and they hurt the flow of reading, because the reader must slow down to interpret the names.
Stats::Actions#open_per_week_data has the variable name 'i' Open
time_labels = Array.new(@count + 1) { |i| "#{i}-#{i + 1}" }
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
An Uncommunicative Variable Name
is a variable name that doesn't communicate its intent well enough.
Poor names make it hard for the reader to build a mental picture of what's going on in the code. They can also be mis-interpreted; and they hurt the flow of reading, because the reader must slow down to interpret the names.
Stats::Actions#put_events_into_month_buckets has the variable name 'r' Open
convert_to_array(records.select { |x| x.send(date_method_on_todo) }, array_size) { |r| [difference_in_months(@today, r.send(date_method_on_todo))] }
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
An Uncommunicative Variable Name
is a variable name that doesn't communicate its intent well enough.
Poor names make it hard for the reader to build a mental picture of what's going on in the code. They can also be mis-interpreted; and they hurt the flow of reading, because the reader must slow down to interpret the names.
Stats::Actions#difference_in_months has the parameter name 'date1' Open
def difference_in_months(date1, date2)
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
An Uncommunicative Parameter Name
is a parameter name that doesn't communicate its intent well enough.
Poor names make it hard for the reader to build a mental picture of what's going on in the code. They can also be mis-interpreted; and they hurt the flow of reading, because the reader must slow down to interpret the names.
FIXME found Open
# FIXME: These should also be used.
- Exclude checks
TODO found Open
# TODO: make the strftime i18n proof
- Exclude checks
Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
return {
datasets: [
{ label: I18n.t('stats.labels.created'), data: @actions_creation_hour_array },
{ label: I18n.t('stats.labels.completed'), data: @actions_completion_hour_array },
],
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 26.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
def convert_to_array(records, upper_bound)
a = Array.new(upper_bound, 0)
records.each { |r| (yield r).each { |i| a[i] += 1 if a[i] } }
a
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 26.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
return {
datasets: [
{ label: I18n.t('stats.labels.created'), data: @actions_creation_hour_array },
{ label: I18n.t('stats.labels.completed'), data: @actions_completion_hour_array },
],
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 26.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Unused block argument - i
. You can omit the argument if you don't care about it. Open
@actions_creation_hour_array = Array.new(24) { |i| 0 }
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
This cop checks for unused block arguments.
Example:
# bad
do_something do |used, unused|
puts used
end
do_something do |bar|
puts :foo
end
define_method(:foo) do |bar|
puts :baz
end
Example:
#good
do_something do |used, _unused|
puts used
end
do_something do
puts :foo
end
define_method(:foo) do |_bar|
puts :baz
end
Line is too long. [125/120] Open
@actions_running_per_week_array = convert_to_weeks_from_today_array(@actions_running_time, @max_weeks + 1, :created_at)
- Exclude checks
Line is too long. [136/120] Open
{ label: I18n.t('stats.labels.month_avg_completed', :months => 3), data: @actions_done_avg_last12months_array, type: "line" },
- Exclude checks
Line is too long. [137/120] Open
{ label: I18n.t('stats.labels.month_avg_created', :months => 3), data: @actions_created_avg_last12months_array, type: "line" },
- Exclude checks
Redundant return
detected. Open
return {
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
This cop checks for redundant return
expressions.
Example:
def test
return something
end
def test
one
two
three
return something
end
It should be extended to handle methods whose body is if/else or a case expression with a default branch.
Line is too long. [154/120] Open
convert_to_array(records.select { |x| x.send(date_method_on_todo) }, array_size) { |r| [difference_in_months(@today, r.send(date_method_on_todo))] }
- Exclude checks
Do not place comments on the same line as the end
keyword. Open
end # unsolved, not triggered, edge case for set.length == upper_bound + 1
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
This cop checks for comments put on the same line as some keywords.
These keywords are: begin
, class
, def
, end
, module
.
Note that some comments (such as :nodoc:
and rubocop:disable
) are
allowed.
Example:
# bad
if condition
statement
end # end if
# bad
class X # comment
statement
end
# bad
def x; end # comment
# good
if condition
statement
end
# good
class X # :nodoc:
y
end
Redundant return
detected. Open
return {
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
This cop checks for redundant return
expressions.
Example:
def test
return something
end
def test
one
two
three
return something
end
It should be extended to handle methods whose body is if/else or a case expression with a default branch.
Line is too long. [125/120] Open
@actions_running_per_week_array = convert_to_weeks_from_today_array(@actions_running_time, @max_weeks + 1, :created_at)
- Exclude checks
Redundant return
detected. Open
return {
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
This cop checks for redundant return
expressions.
Example:
def test
return something
end
def test
one
two
three
return something
end
It should be extended to handle methods whose body is if/else or a case expression with a default branch.
Redundant return
detected. Open
return convert_to_array(records, array_size) { |r| [difference_in_weeks(@today, r.send(date_method_on_todo))] }
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
This cop checks for redundant return
expressions.
Example:
def test
return something
end
def test
one
two
three
return something
end
It should be extended to handle methods whose body is if/else or a case expression with a default branch.
Align .select
with .todos
on line 205. Open
.select("todos.created_at, todos.completed_at")
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
This cop checks the indentation of the method name part in method calls that span more than one line.
Example: EnforcedStyle: aligned
# bad
while myvariable
.b
# do something
end
# good
while myvariable
.b
# do something
end
# good
Thing.a
.b
.c
Example: EnforcedStyle: indented
# good
while myvariable
.b
# do something
end
Example: EnforcedStyle: indentedrelativeto_receiver
# good
while myvariable
.a
.b
# do something
end
# good
myvariable = Thing
.a
.b
.c
Unused block argument - i
. You can omit the argument if you don't care about it. Open
@actions_creation_hour_array = Array.new(24) { |i| 0 }
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
This cop checks for unused block arguments.
Example:
# bad
do_something do |used, unused|
puts used
end
do_something do |bar|
puts :foo
end
define_method(:foo) do |bar|
puts :baz
end
Example:
#good
do_something do |used, _unused|
puts used
end
do_something do
puts :foo
end
define_method(:foo) do |_bar|
puts :baz
end
Line is too long. [122/120] Open
actions_last12months = @user.todos.created_or_completed_after(@cut_off_year_plus3).select("completed_at,created_at")
- Exclude checks
Redundant return
detected. Open
return {
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
This cop checks for redundant return
expressions.
Example:
def test
return something
end
def test
one
two
three
return something
end
It should be extended to handle methods whose body is if/else or a case expression with a default branch.
Redundant return
detected. Open
return {
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
This cop checks for redundant return
expressions.
Example:
def test
return something
end
def test
one
two
three
return something
end
It should be extended to handle methods whose body is if/else or a case expression with a default branch.
Redundant return
detected. Open
return a
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
This cop checks for redundant return
expressions.
Example:
def test
return something
end
def test
one
two
three
return something
end
It should be extended to handle methods whose body is if/else or a case expression with a default branch.
Align .reorder
with .todos
on line 174. Open
.reorder("todos.created_at DESC")
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
This cop checks the indentation of the method name part in method calls that span more than one line.
Example: EnforcedStyle: aligned
# bad
while myvariable
.b
# do something
end
# good
while myvariable
.b
# do something
end
# good
Thing.a
.b
.c
Example: EnforcedStyle: indented
# good
while myvariable
.b
# do something
end
Example: EnforcedStyle: indentedrelativeto_receiver
# good
while myvariable
.a
.b
# do something
end
# good
myvariable = Thing
.a
.b
.c
Redundant return
detected. Open
return {
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
This cop checks for redundant return
expressions.
Example:
def test
return something
end
def test
one
two
three
return something
end
It should be extended to handle methods whose body is if/else or a case expression with a default branch.
Redundant return
detected. Open
return convert_to_array(records, array_size) { |r| [difference_in_weeks(r.completed_at, r.created_at)] }
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
This cop checks for redundant return
expressions.
Example:
def test
return something
end
def test
one
two
three
return something
end
It should be extended to handle methods whose body is if/else or a case expression with a default branch.
Redundant return
detected. Open
return a
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
This cop checks for redundant return
expressions.
Example:
def test
return something
end
def test
one
two
three
return something
end
It should be extended to handle methods whose body is if/else or a case expression with a default branch.
Unused block argument - total
. If it's necessary, use _
or _total
as an argument name to indicate that it won't be used. Open
labels: @actions_creation_hour_array.each_with_index.map { |total, hour| [hour] },
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
This cop checks for unused block arguments.
Example:
# bad
do_something do |used, unused|
puts used
end
do_something do |bar|
puts :foo
end
define_method(:foo) do |bar|
puts :baz
end
Example:
#good
do_something do |used, _unused|
puts used
end
do_something do
puts :foo
end
define_method(:foo) do |_bar|
puts :baz
end
Unused block argument - total
. If it's necessary, use _
or _total
as an argument name to indicate that it won't be used. Open
labels: @actions_creation_hour_array.each_with_index.map { |total, hour| [hour] },
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
This cop checks for unused block arguments.
Example:
# bad
do_something do |used, unused|
puts used
end
do_something do |bar|
puts :foo
end
define_method(:foo) do |bar|
puts :baz
end
Example:
#good
do_something do |used, _unused|
puts used
end
do_something do
puts :foo
end
define_method(:foo) do |_bar|
puts :baz
end
Redundant return
detected. Open
return ((date1.utc.at_midnight - date2.utc.at_midnight) / SECONDS_PER_DAY).to_i
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
This cop checks for redundant return
expressions.
Example:
def test
return something
end
def test
one
two
three
return something
end
It should be extended to handle methods whose body is if/else or a case expression with a default branch.
Unused block argument - i
. You can omit the argument if you don't care about it. Open
@actions_completion_hour_array = Array.new(24) { |i| 0 }
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
This cop checks for unused block arguments.
Example:
# bad
do_something do |used, unused|
puts used
end
do_something do |bar|
puts :foo
end
define_method(:foo) do |bar|
puts :baz
end
Example:
#good
do_something do |used, _unused|
puts used
end
do_something do
puts :foo
end
define_method(:foo) do |_bar|
puts :baz
end
Unused block argument - i
. You can omit the argument if you don't care about it. Open
@actions_completion_hour_array = Array.new(24) { |i| 0 }
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
This cop checks for unused block arguments.
Example:
# bad
do_something do |used, unused|
puts used
end
do_something do |bar|
puts :foo
end
define_method(:foo) do |bar|
puts :baz
end
Example:
#good
do_something do |used, _unused|
puts used
end
do_something do
puts :foo
end
define_method(:foo) do |_bar|
puts :baz
end
Line is too long. [126/120] Open
@max_weeks = @actions_completion_time.last ? difference_in_weeks(@today, @actions_completion_time.last.completed_at) : 1
- Exclude checks
Redundant return
detected. Open
return {
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
This cop checks for redundant return
expressions.
Example:
def test
return something
end
def test
one
two
three
return something
end
It should be extended to handle methods whose body is if/else or a case expression with a default branch.
Redundant return
detected. Open
return a
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
This cop checks for redundant return
expressions.
Example:
def test
return something
end
def test
one
two
three
return something
end
It should be extended to handle methods whose body is if/else or a case expression with a default branch.
Align .select
with .todos
on line 174. Open
.select("todos.created_at")
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
This cop checks the indentation of the method name part in method calls that span more than one line.
Example: EnforcedStyle: aligned
# bad
while myvariable
.b
# do something
end
# good
while myvariable
.b
# do something
end
# good
Thing.a
.b
.c
Example: EnforcedStyle: indented
# good
while myvariable
.b
# do something
end
Example: EnforcedStyle: indentedrelativeto_receiver
# good
while myvariable
.a
.b
# do something
end
# good
myvariable = Thing
.a
.b
.c
Unused block argument - i
. You can omit the argument if you don't care about it. Open
@actions_completion_day_array = Array.new(7) { |i| 0 }
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
This cop checks for unused block arguments.
Example:
# bad
do_something do |used, unused|
puts used
end
do_something do |bar|
puts :foo
end
define_method(:foo) do |bar|
puts :baz
end
Example:
#good
do_something do |used, _unused|
puts used
end
do_something do
puts :foo
end
define_method(:foo) do |_bar|
puts :baz
end
Unused block argument - i
. You can omit the argument if you don't care about it. Open
@actions_creation_day_array = Array.new(7) { |i| 0 }
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
This cop checks for unused block arguments.
Example:
# bad
do_something do |used, unused|
puts used
end
do_something do |bar|
puts :foo
end
define_method(:foo) do |bar|
puts :baz
end
Example:
#good
do_something do |used, _unused|
puts used
end
do_something do
puts :foo
end
define_method(:foo) do |_bar|
puts :baz
end
Redundant return
detected. Open
return {
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
This cop checks for redundant return
expressions.
Example:
def test
return something
end
def test
one
two
three
return something
end
It should be extended to handle methods whose body is if/else or a case expression with a default branch.
Redundant return
detected. Open
return {
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
This cop checks for redundant return
expressions.
Example:
def test
return something
end
def test
one
two
three
return something
end
It should be extended to handle methods whose body is if/else or a case expression with a default branch.
Redundant return
detected. Open
return difference_in_days(date1, date2) / 7
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
This cop checks for redundant return
expressions.
Example:
def test
return something
end
def test
one
two
three
return something
end
It should be extended to handle methods whose body is if/else or a case expression with a default branch.
Align .reorder
with .todos
on line 205. Open
.reorder("todos.created_at DESC")
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
This cop checks the indentation of the method name part in method calls that span more than one line.
Example: EnforcedStyle: aligned
# bad
while myvariable
.b
# do something
end
# good
while myvariable
.b
# do something
end
# good
Thing.a
.b
.c
Example: EnforcedStyle: indented
# good
while myvariable
.b
# do something
end
Example: EnforcedStyle: indentedrelativeto_receiver
# good
while myvariable
.a
.b
# do something
end
# good
myvariable = Thing
.a
.b
.c
Unused block argument - i
. You can omit the argument if you don't care about it. Open
@actions_completion_day_array = Array.new(7) { |i| 0 }
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
This cop checks for unused block arguments.
Example:
# bad
do_something do |used, unused|
puts used
end
do_something do |bar|
puts :foo
end
define_method(:foo) do |bar|
puts :baz
end
Example:
#good
do_something do |used, _unused|
puts used
end
do_something do
puts :foo
end
define_method(:foo) do |_bar|
puts :baz
end
Redundant return
detected. Open
return {
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
This cop checks for redundant return
expressions.
Example:
def test
return something
end
def test
one
two
three
return something
end
It should be extended to handle methods whose body is if/else or a case expression with a default branch.
Redundant return
detected. Open
return Array.new(cut_off) { |i| array[i] || 0 }
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
This cop checks for redundant return
expressions.
Example:
def test
return something
end
def test
one
two
three
return something
end
It should be extended to handle methods whose body is if/else or a case expression with a default branch.
Unused block argument - i
. You can omit the argument if you don't care about it. Open
created_count_array = Array.new(30) { |i| @actions_created_last30days.size / 30.0 }
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
This cop checks for unused block arguments.
Example:
# bad
do_something do |used, unused|
puts used
end
do_something do |bar|
puts :foo
end
define_method(:foo) do |bar|
puts :baz
end
Example:
#good
do_something do |used, _unused|
puts used
end
do_something do
puts :foo
end
define_method(:foo) do |_bar|
puts :baz
end
Unused block argument - i
. You can omit the argument if you don't care about it. Open
done_count_array = Array.new(30) { |i| @actions_done_last30days.size / 30.0 }
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
This cop checks for unused block arguments.
Example:
# bad
do_something do |used, unused|
puts used
end
do_something do |bar|
puts :foo
end
define_method(:foo) do |bar|
puts :baz
end
Example:
#good
do_something do |used, _unused|
puts used
end
do_something do
puts :foo
end
define_method(:foo) do |_bar|
puts :baz
end
Missing magic comment # frozen_string_literal: true
. Open
module Stats
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
This cop is designed to help upgrade to Ruby 3.0. It will add the
comment # frozen_string_literal: true
to the top of files to
enable frozen string literals. Frozen string literals may be default
in Ruby 3.0. The comment will be added below a shebang and encoding
comment. The frozen string literal comment is only valid in Ruby 2.3+.
Example: EnforcedStyle: when_needed (default)
# The `when_needed` style will add the frozen string literal comment
# to files only when the `TargetRubyVersion` is set to 2.3+.
# bad
module Foo
# ...
end
# good
# frozen_string_literal: true
module Foo
# ...
end
Example: EnforcedStyle: always
# The `always` style will always add the frozen string literal comment
# to a file, regardless of the Ruby version or if `freeze` or `<<` are
# called on a string literal.
# bad
module Bar
# ...
end
# good
# frozen_string_literal: true
module Bar
# ...
end
Example: EnforcedStyle: never
# The `never` will enforce that the frozen string literal comment does
# not exist in a file.
# bad
# frozen_string_literal: true
module Baz
# ...
end
# good
module Baz
# ...
end
Redundant return
detected. Open
return convert_to_array(records, array_size) { |r| [difference_in_days(@today, r.send(date_method_on_todo))] }
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
This cop checks for redundant return
expressions.
Example:
def test
return something
end
def test
one
two
three
return something
end
It should be extended to handle methods whose body is if/else or a case expression with a default branch.
Unused block argument - i
. You can omit the argument if you don't care about it. Open
@actions_creation_day_array = Array.new(7) { |i| 0 }
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
This cop checks for unused block arguments.
Example:
# bad
do_something do |used, unused|
puts used
end
do_something do |bar|
puts :foo
end
define_method(:foo) do |bar|
puts :baz
end
Example:
#good
do_something do |used, _unused|
puts used
end
do_something do
puts :foo
end
define_method(:foo) do |_bar|
puts :baz
end
Line is too long. [123/120] Open
@cum_percent_done = convert_to_cumulative_array(@actions_completion_time_array, @actions_completion_time.count(:all))
- Exclude checks
Redundant return
detected. Open
return convert_to_array(records, array_size) { |r| week_indexes_of(r) }
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
This cop checks for redundant return
expressions.
Example:
def test
return something
end
def test
one
two
three
return something
end
It should be extended to handle methods whose body is if/else or a case expression with a default branch.
Redundant return
detected. Open
return (date1.utc.year - date2.utc.year) * 12 + (date1.utc.month - date2.utc.month)
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
This cop checks for redundant return
expressions.
Example:
def test
return something
end
def test
one
two
three
return something
end
It should be extended to handle methods whose body is if/else or a case expression with a default branch.