src/metpy/calc/thermo.py
Function thickness_hydrostatic
has a Cognitive Complexity of 21 (exceeds 15 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
Open
def thickness_hydrostatic(pressure, temperature, mixing_ratio=None,
molecular_weight_ratio=mpconsts.nounit.epsilon, bottom=None,
depth=None):
r"""Calculate the thickness of a layer via the hypsometric equation.
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function lfc
has a Cognitive Complexity of 17 (exceeds 15 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
Open
def lfc(pressure, temperature, dewpoint, parcel_temperature_profile=None, dewpoint_start=None,
which='top'):
r"""Calculate the level of free convection (LFC).
This works by finding the first intersection of the ideal parcel path and
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Remove this commented out code. Invalid
Invalid
else: # LFC = LCL
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Programmers should not comment out code as it bloats programs and reduces readability.
Unused code should be deleted and can be retrieved from source control history if required.
See
- MISRA C:2004, 2.4 - Sections of code should not be "commented out".
- MISRA C++:2008, 2-7-2 - Sections of code shall not be "commented out" using C-style comments.
- MISRA C++:2008, 2-7-3 - Sections of code should not be "commented out" using C++ comments.
- MISRA C:2012, Dir. 4.4 - Sections of code should not be "commented out"