Showing 33 of 47 total issues
Function getValueFallback
has a Cognitive Complexity of 25 (exceeds 10 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
export const getValueFallback = (fallbacks: Array<FallbackConfig>, defaultValue: null | any = null, missingPropStrategy: LOGGING_STRATEGY = STRATEGY_LOG_ERROR): any => {
let value = defaultValue;
let foundFallback;
if (isArray(fallbacks)) {
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Consider simplifying this complex logical expression. Open
if ((value === NOT_FOUND || value === '' || value === '<p></p>' || (typeof value === 'object' && isEmpty(value))) && value !== 0 && value !== false) {
return false;
} else {
return !!value;
}
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
} else {
return {
message: () => (`expected ${this.utils.printReceived(received)} to contain object ${this.utils.printExpected(argument)}`),
pass: false,
};
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 57.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
if (pass) {
return {
message: () => (`expected ${this.utils.printReceived(received)} not to contain object ${this.utils.printExpected(argument)}`),
pass: true,
};
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 57.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Avoid deeply nested control flow statements. Open
if (transform) {
value = transform(getValue(record, key, defaultValue), { fallbacks, record, key, defaultValue });
} else {
value = getValue(record, key, defaultValue);
}
Function render
has a Cognitive Complexity of 12 (exceeds 10 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
render(): JSX.Element {
const {
Component,
pageProps, // Type of AppPageProps
router,
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
TODO found Open
const defaultOGURL = ''; // TODO
- Exclude checks
No licenses found for enhanced-resolve
. Either the library reports the licenses in an unsupported format, or the library is unlicensed. Open
enhanced-resolve@^4.1.0:
- Exclude checks
No licenses found for ext
. Either the library reports the licenses in an unsupported format, or the library is unlicensed. Open
ext@^1.1.2:
- Exclude checks
TODO found Open
const defaultDescription = ''; // TODO
- Exclude checks
HACK found Open
import '../utils/ignoreNoisyWarningsHacks'; // HACK
- Exclude checks
No licenses found for url
. Either the library reports the licenses in an unsupported format, or the library is unlicensed. Open
url@0.11.0, url@^0.11.0:
- Exclude checks
No licenses found for jest-util
. Either the library reports the licenses in an unsupported format, or the library is unlicensed. Open
jest-util@^25.1.0:
- Exclude checks
No licenses found for makeerror
. Either the library reports the licenses in an unsupported format, or the library is unlicensed. Open
makeerror@1.0.x:
- Exclude checks
HACK found Open
// HACK: Muting warning, fix as soon as https://github.com/amplitude/react-amplitude/issues/19 gets resolved
- Exclude checks
TODO found Open
const defaultOGImage = ''; // TODO
- Exclude checks
No licenses found for jest-get-type
. Either the library reports the licenses in an unsupported format, or the library is unlicensed. Open
jest-get-type@^22.4.3:
- Exclude checks
No licenses found for util
. Either the library reports the licenses in an unsupported format, or the library is unlicensed. Open
util@0.10.3:
- Exclude checks
HACK found Open
// HACK: Muting warning, fix as soon as https://github.com/amplitude/react-amplitude/issues/19 gets resolved
- Exclude checks
No licenses found for type
. Either the library reports the licenses in an unsupported format, or the library is unlicensed. Open
type@^1.0.1:
- Exclude checks