Showing 6 of 6 total issues
Similar blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
test('should return a success status code 200', () => {
const res = success({ success: true });
expect(res.statusCode).toEqual(200);
expect(JSON.parse(res.body).success).toEqual(true);
});
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 80.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
test('should return a failure status code 500', () => {
const res = failure({ success: false });
expect(res.statusCode).toEqual(500);
expect(JSON.parse(res.body).success).toEqual(false);
});
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 80.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
test('should return a success status code 200', () => {
const res = unauthorized({ forbidden: true });
expect(res.statusCode).toEqual(403);
expect(JSON.parse(res.body).forbidden).toEqual(true);
});
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 80.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Avoid too many return
statements within this function. Open
return null;
Unexpected newline after '('. Open
expect(getHeadersUsefulData(headers[0])).toEqual(
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
enforce consistent line breaks inside function parentheses (function-paren-newline)
Many style guides require or disallow newlines inside of function parentheses.
Rule Details
This rule enforces consistent line breaks inside parentheses of function parameters or arguments.
Options
This rule has a single option, which can either be a string or an object.
-
"always"
requires line breaks inside all function parentheses. -
"never"
disallows line breaks inside all function parentheses. -
"multiline"
(default) requires linebreaks inside function parentheses if any of the parameters/arguments have a line break between them. Otherwise, it disallows linebreaks. -
"consistent"
requires consistent usage of linebreaks for each pair of parentheses. It reports an error if one parenthesis in the pair has a linebreak inside it and the other parenthesis does not. -
{ "minItems": value }
requires linebreaks inside function parentheses if the number of parameters/arguments is at leastvalue
. Otherwise, it disallows linebreaks.
Example configurations:
{
"rules": {
"function-paren-newline": ["error", "never"]
}
}
{
"rules": {
"function-paren-newline": ["error", { "minItems": 3 }]
}
}
Examples of incorrect code for this rule with the "always"
option:
/* eslint function-paren-newline: ["error", "always"] */
function foo(bar, baz) {}
var foo = function(bar, baz) {};
var foo = (bar, baz) => {};
foo(bar, baz);
Examples of correct code for this rule with the "always"
option:
/* eslint function-paren-newline: ["error", "always"] */
function foo(
bar,
baz
) {}
var foo = function(
bar, baz
) {};
var foo = (
bar,
baz
) => {};
foo(
bar,
baz
);
Examples of incorrect code for this rule with the "never"
option:
/* eslint function-paren-newline: ["error", "never"] */
function foo(
bar,
baz
) {}
var foo = function(
bar, baz
) {};
var foo = (
bar,
baz
) => {};
foo(
bar,
baz
);
Examples of correct code for this rule with the "never"
option:
/* eslint function-paren-newline: ["error", "never"] */
function foo(bar, baz) {}
function foo(bar,
baz) {}
var foo = function(bar, baz) {};
var foo = (bar, baz) => {};
foo(bar, baz);
foo(bar,
baz);
Examples of incorrect code for this rule with the default "multiline"
option:
/* eslint function-paren-newline: ["error", "multiline"] */
function foo(bar,
baz
) {}
var foo = function(
bar, baz
) {};
var foo = (
bar,
baz) => {};
foo(bar,
baz);
foo(
function() {
return baz;
}
);
Examples of correct code for this rule with the default "multiline"
option:
/* eslint function-paren-newline: ["error", "multiline"] */
function foo(bar, baz) {}
var foo = function(
bar,
baz
) {};
var foo = (bar, baz) => {};
foo(bar, baz, qux);
foo(
bar,
baz,
qux
);
foo(function() {
return baz;
});
Examples of incorrect code for this rule with the "consistent"
option:
/* eslint function-paren-newline: ["error", "consistent"] */
function foo(bar,
baz
) {}
var foo = function(bar,
baz
) {};
var foo = (
bar,
baz) => {};
foo(
bar,
baz);
foo(
function() {
return baz;
});
Examples of correct code for this rule with the consistent "consistent"
option:
/* eslint function-paren-newline: ["error", "consistent"] */
function foo(bar,
baz) {}
var foo = function(bar, baz) {};
var foo = (
bar,
baz
) => {};
foo(
bar, baz
);
foo(
function() {
return baz;
}
);
Examples of incorrect code for this rule with the { "minItems": 3 }
option:
/* eslint function-paren-newline: ["error", { "minItems": 3 }] */
function foo(
bar,
baz
) {}
function foo(bar, baz, qux) {}
var foo = function(
bar, baz
) {};
var foo = (bar,
baz) => {};
foo(bar,
baz);
Examples of correct code for this rule with the { "minItems": 3 }
option:
/* eslint function-paren-newline: ["error", { "minItems": 3 }] */
function foo(bar, baz) {}
var foo = function(
bar,
baz,
qux
) {};
var foo = (
bar, baz, qux
) => {};
foo(bar, baz);
foo(
bar, baz, qux
);
When Not To Use It
If don't want to enforce consistent linebreaks inside function parentheses, do not turn on this rule. Source: http://eslint.org/docs/rules/
Unexpected newline before ')'. Open
);
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
enforce consistent line breaks inside function parentheses (function-paren-newline)
Many style guides require or disallow newlines inside of function parentheses.
Rule Details
This rule enforces consistent line breaks inside parentheses of function parameters or arguments.
Options
This rule has a single option, which can either be a string or an object.
-
"always"
requires line breaks inside all function parentheses. -
"never"
disallows line breaks inside all function parentheses. -
"multiline"
(default) requires linebreaks inside function parentheses if any of the parameters/arguments have a line break between them. Otherwise, it disallows linebreaks. -
"consistent"
requires consistent usage of linebreaks for each pair of parentheses. It reports an error if one parenthesis in the pair has a linebreak inside it and the other parenthesis does not. -
{ "minItems": value }
requires linebreaks inside function parentheses if the number of parameters/arguments is at leastvalue
. Otherwise, it disallows linebreaks.
Example configurations:
{
"rules": {
"function-paren-newline": ["error", "never"]
}
}
{
"rules": {
"function-paren-newline": ["error", { "minItems": 3 }]
}
}
Examples of incorrect code for this rule with the "always"
option:
/* eslint function-paren-newline: ["error", "always"] */
function foo(bar, baz) {}
var foo = function(bar, baz) {};
var foo = (bar, baz) => {};
foo(bar, baz);
Examples of correct code for this rule with the "always"
option:
/* eslint function-paren-newline: ["error", "always"] */
function foo(
bar,
baz
) {}
var foo = function(
bar, baz
) {};
var foo = (
bar,
baz
) => {};
foo(
bar,
baz
);
Examples of incorrect code for this rule with the "never"
option:
/* eslint function-paren-newline: ["error", "never"] */
function foo(
bar,
baz
) {}
var foo = function(
bar, baz
) {};
var foo = (
bar,
baz
) => {};
foo(
bar,
baz
);
Examples of correct code for this rule with the "never"
option:
/* eslint function-paren-newline: ["error", "never"] */
function foo(bar, baz) {}
function foo(bar,
baz) {}
var foo = function(bar, baz) {};
var foo = (bar, baz) => {};
foo(bar, baz);
foo(bar,
baz);
Examples of incorrect code for this rule with the default "multiline"
option:
/* eslint function-paren-newline: ["error", "multiline"] */
function foo(bar,
baz
) {}
var foo = function(
bar, baz
) {};
var foo = (
bar,
baz) => {};
foo(bar,
baz);
foo(
function() {
return baz;
}
);
Examples of correct code for this rule with the default "multiline"
option:
/* eslint function-paren-newline: ["error", "multiline"] */
function foo(bar, baz) {}
var foo = function(
bar,
baz
) {};
var foo = (bar, baz) => {};
foo(bar, baz, qux);
foo(
bar,
baz,
qux
);
foo(function() {
return baz;
});
Examples of incorrect code for this rule with the "consistent"
option:
/* eslint function-paren-newline: ["error", "consistent"] */
function foo(bar,
baz
) {}
var foo = function(bar,
baz
) {};
var foo = (
bar,
baz) => {};
foo(
bar,
baz);
foo(
function() {
return baz;
});
Examples of correct code for this rule with the consistent "consistent"
option:
/* eslint function-paren-newline: ["error", "consistent"] */
function foo(bar,
baz) {}
var foo = function(bar, baz) {};
var foo = (
bar,
baz
) => {};
foo(
bar, baz
);
foo(
function() {
return baz;
}
);
Examples of incorrect code for this rule with the { "minItems": 3 }
option:
/* eslint function-paren-newline: ["error", { "minItems": 3 }] */
function foo(
bar,
baz
) {}
function foo(bar, baz, qux) {}
var foo = function(
bar, baz
) {};
var foo = (bar,
baz) => {};
foo(bar,
baz);
Examples of correct code for this rule with the { "minItems": 3 }
option:
/* eslint function-paren-newline: ["error", { "minItems": 3 }] */
function foo(bar, baz) {}
var foo = function(
bar,
baz,
qux
) {};
var foo = (
bar, baz, qux
) => {};
foo(bar, baz);
foo(
bar, baz, qux
);
When Not To Use It
If don't want to enforce consistent linebreaks inside function parentheses, do not turn on this rule. Source: http://eslint.org/docs/rules/