File class-wp-rest-font-faces-controller.php
has 591 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
<?php
/**
* REST API: WP_REST_Font_Faces_Controller class
*
* @package WordPress
Method get_item_schema
has 171 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
public function get_item_schema() {
if ( $this->schema ) {
return $this->add_additional_fields_schema( $this->schema );
}
Method register_routes
has 65 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
public function register_routes() {
register_rest_route(
$this->namespace,
'/' . $this->rest_base,
array(
WP_REST_Font_Faces_Controller
has 22 functions (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
class WP_REST_Font_Faces_Controller extends WP_REST_Posts_Controller {
/**
* The latest version of theme.json schema supported by the controller.
*
Method validate_create_font_face_settings
has 53 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
public function validate_create_font_face_settings( $value, $request ) {
$settings = json_decode( $value, true );
// Check settings string is valid JSON.
if ( null === $settings ) {
Method create_item
has 52 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
public function create_item( $request ) {
$font_family = $this->get_parent_font_family_post( $request['font_family_id'] );
if ( is_wp_error( $font_family ) ) {
return $font_family;
}
Function validate_create_font_face_settings
has a Cognitive Complexity of 15 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
public function validate_create_font_face_settings( $value, $request ) {
$settings = json_decode( $value, true );
// Check settings string is valid JSON.
if ( null === $settings ) {
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function create_item
has a Cognitive Complexity of 11 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
public function create_item( $request ) {
$font_family = $this->get_parent_font_family_post( $request['font_family_id'] );
if ( is_wp_error( $font_family ) ) {
return $font_family;
}
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Avoid too many return
statements within this method. Open
return true;
Avoid too many return
statements within this method. Open
return $font_face_post;
Avoid too many return
statements within this method. Open
return new WP_Error(
'rest_invalid_param',
/* translators: 1: Font face source parameter name: "font_face_settings[src]", 2: The invalid src value. */
sprintf( __( '%1$s value "%2$s" must be a valid URL or file reference.' ), 'font_face_settings[src]', $src ),
array( 'status' => 400 )
Avoid too many return
statements within this method. Open
return new WP_Error(
'rest_invalid_param',
/* translators: 1: File key (e.g. "file-0") in the request data, 2: Font face source parameter name: "font_face_settings[src]". */
sprintf( __( 'File %1$s must be used in %2$s.' ), $file, 'font_face_settings[src]' ),
array( 'status' => 400 )
Avoid too many return
statements within this method. Open
return parent::delete_item( $request );
Function prepare_item_for_response
has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
public function prepare_item_for_response( $item, $request ) {
$fields = $this->get_fields_for_response( $request );
$data = array();
if ( rest_is_field_included( 'id', $fields ) ) {
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
public function sanitize_font_face_settings( $value ) {
// Settings arrive as stringified JSON, since this is a multipart/form-data request.
$settings = json_decode( $value, true );
$schema = $this->get_item_schema()['properties']['font_face_settings']['properties'];
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 101.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 7 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
public function get_item_permissions_check( $request ) {
$post = $this->get_post( $request['id'] );
if ( is_wp_error( $post ) ) {
return $post;
}
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 98.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76