File Device.java has 1483 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
// Generated by the protocol buffer compiler. DO NOT EDIT!
// source: device.proto
package network.xyo.ble.flutter.protobuf;
BluetoothDevice has 56 methods (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
public static final class BluetoothDevice extends
com.google.protobuf.GeneratedMessageLite<
BluetoothDevice, BluetoothDevice.Builder> implements
// @@protoc_insertion_point(message_implements:BluetoothDevice)
BluetoothDeviceOrBuilder {Builder has 39 methods (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
public static final class Builder extends
com.google.protobuf.GeneratedMessageLite.Builder<
network.xyo.ble.flutter.protobuf.Device.BluetoothDevice, Builder> implements
// @@protoc_insertion_point(builder_implements:BluetoothDevice)
network.xyo.ble.flutter.protobuf.Device.BluetoothDeviceOrBuilder {Family has 37 methods (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
public static final class Family extends
com.google.protobuf.GeneratedMessageLite<
Family, Family.Builder> implements
// @@protoc_insertion_point(message_implements:Family)
FamilyOrBuilder {IBeacon has 28 methods (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
public static final class IBeacon extends
com.google.protobuf.GeneratedMessageLite<
IBeacon, IBeacon.Builder> implements
// @@protoc_insertion_point(message_implements:IBeacon)
IBeaconOrBuilder {Range has 23 methods (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
public static final class Range extends
com.google.protobuf.GeneratedMessageLite<
Range, Range.Builder> implements
// @@protoc_insertion_point(message_implements:Range)
RangeOrBuilder {Method dynamicMethod has 47 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
@java.lang.Override
@java.lang.SuppressWarnings({"unchecked", "fallthrough"})
protected final java.lang.Object dynamicMethod(
com.google.protobuf.GeneratedMessageLite.MethodToInvoke method,
java.lang.Object arg0, java.lang.Object arg1) {Method dynamicMethod has 43 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
@java.lang.Override
@java.lang.SuppressWarnings({"unchecked", "fallthrough"})
protected final java.lang.Object dynamicMethod(
com.google.protobuf.GeneratedMessageLite.MethodToInvoke method,
java.lang.Object arg0, java.lang.Object arg1) {Method dynamicMethod has 42 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
@java.lang.Override
@java.lang.SuppressWarnings({"unchecked", "fallthrough"})
protected final java.lang.Object dynamicMethod(
com.google.protobuf.GeneratedMessageLite.MethodToInvoke method,
java.lang.Object arg0, java.lang.Object arg1) {Method dynamicMethod has 41 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
@java.lang.Override
@java.lang.SuppressWarnings({"unchecked", "fallthrough"})
protected final java.lang.Object dynamicMethod(
com.google.protobuf.GeneratedMessageLite.MethodToInvoke method,
java.lang.Object arg0, java.lang.Object arg1) {Avoid too many return statements within this method. Open
return null;Avoid too many return statements within this method. Open
return parser;Avoid too many return statements within this method. Open
return (byte) 1;Avoid too many return statements within this method. Open
return null;Avoid too many return statements within this method. Open
return parser;Avoid too many return statements within this method. Open
return (byte) 1;Avoid too many return statements within this method. Open
return null;Avoid too many return statements within this method. Open
return parser;Avoid too many return statements within this method. Open
return parser;Avoid too many return statements within this method. Open
return (byte) 1;Avoid too many return statements within this method. Open
return (byte) 1;Avoid too many return statements within this method. Open
return null;Method dynamicMethod has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
@java.lang.Override
@java.lang.SuppressWarnings({"unchecked", "fallthrough"})
protected final java.lang.Object dynamicMethod(
com.google.protobuf.GeneratedMessageLite.MethodToInvoke method,
java.lang.Object arg0, java.lang.Object arg1) {- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method dynamicMethod has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
@java.lang.Override
@java.lang.SuppressWarnings({"unchecked", "fallthrough"})
protected final java.lang.Object dynamicMethod(
com.google.protobuf.GeneratedMessageLite.MethodToInvoke method,
java.lang.Object arg0, java.lang.Object arg1) {- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method dynamicMethod has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
@java.lang.Override
@java.lang.SuppressWarnings({"unchecked", "fallthrough"})
protected final java.lang.Object dynamicMethod(
com.google.protobuf.GeneratedMessageLite.MethodToInvoke method,
java.lang.Object arg0, java.lang.Object arg1) {- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method dynamicMethod has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
@java.lang.Override
@java.lang.SuppressWarnings({"unchecked", "fallthrough"})
protected final java.lang.Object dynamicMethod(
com.google.protobuf.GeneratedMessageLite.MethodToInvoke method,
java.lang.Object arg0, java.lang.Object arg1) {- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
// Generated by the protocol buffer compiler. DO NOT EDIT!
// source: device.proto
package network.xyo.ble.flutter.protobuf;
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 5110.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76