Showing 361 of 365 total issues
File japanese.ts
has 2048 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
/* eslint-disable max-lines */
/** @deprecated use @scure/bip39 instead */
export const wordlist: string[] = `あいこくしん
あいさつ
あいだ
File simplified-chinese.ts
has 2048 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
/* eslint-disable max-lines */
/** @deprecated use @scure/bip39 instead */
export const wordlist: string[] = `的
一
是
File english.ts
has 2048 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
/* eslint-disable max-lines */
/** @deprecated use @scure/bip39 instead */
export const wordlist: string[] = `abandon
ability
able
File french.ts
has 2048 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
/* eslint-disable max-lines */
/** @deprecated use @scure/bip39 instead */
export const wordlist: string[] = `abaisser
abandon
abdiquer
File italian.ts
has 2048 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
/* eslint-disable max-lines */
/** @deprecated use @scure/bip39 instead */
export const wordlist: string[] = `abaco
abbaglio
abbinato
File czech.ts
has 2048 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
/* eslint-disable max-lines */
/** @deprecated use @scure/bip39 instead */
export const wordlist: string[] = `abdikace
abeceda
adresa
File spanish.ts
has 2048 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
/* eslint-disable max-lines */
/** @deprecated use @scure/bip39 instead */
export const wordlist: string[] = `ábaco
abdomen
abeja
File traditional-chinese.ts
has 2048 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
/* eslint-disable max-lines */
/** @deprecated use @scure/bip39 instead */
export const wordlist: string[] = `的
一
是
File korean.ts
has 2048 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
/* eslint-disable max-lines */
/** @deprecated use @scure/bip39 instead */
export const wordlist: string[] = `가격
가끔
가난
Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
export const checkIpfsUrl = (urlToCheck: string, ipfsGateway?: string): string => {
try {
const url = new URL(urlToCheck)
let protocol = url.protocol
let host = url.host
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 400.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
export const checkIpfsUrl = (urlToCheck: string, ipfsGateway?: string): string => {
try {
const url = new URL(urlToCheck)
let protocol = url.protocol
let host = url.host
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 400.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
export const getProviderFromEnv = (
chainId: number = 0x01,
{ providerSource = 'infura', providerType = 'rpc' }: GetProvidersFromEnvOptions = {},
): Provider => {
let provider: Provider | undefined = undefined
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 283.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
export const getProviderFromEnv = (
chainId: number = 0x01,
{ providerSource = 'infura', providerType = 'rpc' }: GetProvidersFromEnvOptions = {},
): Provider => {
let provider: Provider | undefined = undefined
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 283.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Function resolveHandler
has a Cognitive Complexity of 62 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
async resolveHandler<T extends ModuleInstance = ModuleInstance>(
idOrFilter: ModuleFilter<T> | ModuleIdentifier = '*',
options: ModuleFilterOptions<T> = {},
): Promise<T[]> {
const mutatedOptions = { ...options, maxDepth: options?.maxDepth ?? CompositeModuleResolver.defaultMaxDepth }
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
private async registerModule(wallet: WalletInstance, node: MemoryNode, manifest: ModuleManifest): Promise<ModuleInstance> {
const creatableModule = this.locator.locate(manifest.config.schema, manifest.config.labels)
const path = manifest.config.accountPath
const account = path ? await wallet.derivePath(path) : 'random'
const params: ModuleParams = {
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 212.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
private async registerModule(wallet: WalletInstance, node: MemoryNode, manifest: ModuleManifest): Promise<ModuleInstance> {
const creatableModule = this.locator.locate(manifest.config.schema, manifest.config.labels)
const path = manifest.config.accountPath
const account = path ? await wallet.derivePath(path) : 'random'
const params: ModuleParams = {
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 212.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Function resolve
has a Cognitive Complexity of 54 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
async resolve<T extends ModuleInstance = ModuleInstance>(
idOrFilter: ModuleFilter<T> | ModuleIdentifier = '*',
options?: ModuleFilterOptions<T>,
): Promise<T | T[] | undefined> {
// console.log(`childAddressMap: ${toJsonString(this.childAddressMap, 10)}`)
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function resolve
has a Cognitive Complexity of 50 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
static async resolve<T extends ModuleInstance = ModuleInstance>(
config: ResolveHelperConfig,
idOrFilter: ModuleFilter<T> | ModuleIdentifier = '*',
{
maxDepth = 3, required = 'log', ...options
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
ModuleWrapper
has 54 functions (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
@constructableModuleWrapper()
export class ModuleWrapper<TWrappedModule extends Module = Module>
extends Base<Exclude<Omit<TWrappedModule['params'], 'config'> & { config: Exclude<TWrappedModule['params']['config'], undefined> }, undefined>>
implements AttachableModuleInstance<TWrappedModule['params'], TWrappedModule['eventData']> {
static instanceIdentityCheck: InstanceTypeCheck = isModuleInstance
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
export const attachedPrivateModules = async (node: NodeInstance, maxDepth = 1): Promise<ModuleInstance[]> => {
const remainingDepth = maxDepth - 1
const mods: ModuleInstance[] = []
const publicChildren = await node.privateChildren()
mods.push(...publicChildren)
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 183.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76