Sign upLogin

XYOracleNetwork/sdk-xyo-swift

View on GitHub
Star
Carthage/Checkouts/sdk-ble-swift/Sources/XyBleSdk/XYSmartScan.swift

Summary

Maintainability
F
4 days
Test Coverage

File XYSmartScan.swift has 277 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

import Foundation
import CoreBluetooth

public protocol XYSmartScanDelegate {
  func smartScan(status: XYSmartScanStatus)
Severity: Minor
Found in Carthage/Checkouts/sdk-ble-swift/Sources/XyBleSdk/XYSmartScan.swift - About 2 hrs to fix

    Function updateStatus has 37 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.
    Open

      public func updateStatus() {
    #if os(iOS)
    var newStatus = XYSmartScanStatus.enabled
    let central = XYCentral.instance
    if !XYLocation.instance.locationServicesEnabled {
    Severity: Minor
    Found in Carthage/Checkouts/sdk-ble-swift/Sources/XyBleSdk/XYSmartScan.swift - About 1 hr to fix

      Function updateStatus has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
      Open

        public func updateStatus() {
    #if os(iOS)
    var newStatus = XYSmartScanStatus.enabled
    let central = XYCentral.instance
    if !XYLocation.instance.locationServicesEnabled {
      Severity: Minor
      Found in Carthage/Checkouts/sdk-ble-swift/Sources/XyBleSdk/XYSmartScan.swift - About 35 mins to fix

      Cognitive Complexity

      Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

      A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

      • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
      • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
      • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

      Further reading

      Function checkExits has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
      Open

        fileprivate func checkExits() {
    XYSmartScan.queue.asyncAfter(deadline: DispatchTime.now() + TimeInterval(XYConstants.DEVICE_TUNING_SECONDS_EXIT_CHECK_INTERVAL)) {
      guard self.isCheckingExits else {
        return
      }
      Severity: Minor
      Found in Carthage/Checkouts/sdk-ble-swift/Sources/XyBleSdk/XYSmartScan.swift - About 35 mins to fix

      Cognitive Complexity

      Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

      A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

      • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
      • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
      • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

      Further reading

      Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
      Open

      import Foundation
import CoreBluetooth

public protocol XYSmartScanDelegate {
  func smartScan(status: XYSmartScanStatus)
      Severity: Major
      Found in Carthage/Checkouts/sdk-ble-swift/Sources/XyBleSdk/XYSmartScan.swift and 1 other location - About 4 days to fix
      Carthage/Checkouts/sdk-ble-swift/Source/XYSmartScan.swift on lines 9..372

      Duplicated Code

      Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

      Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

      When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

      Tuning

      This issue has a mass of 2040.

      We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

      The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

      If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

      See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

      Refactorings

      Further Reading

      There are no issues that match your filters.

      Category
      Status