XingFramework/xing-frontend-utils

View on GitHub

Showing 208 of 208 total issues

Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

    this.$get = ['$injector', 'Inflector', function ($injector, Inflector) {
      defaultOptions.underscore = defaultOptions.underscore || Inflector.underscore;
      defaultOptions.camelize = defaultOptions.camelize || Inflector.camelize;
      defaultOptions.pluralize = defaultOptions.pluralize || Inflector.pluralize;

Severity: Major
Found in dist/xing-frontend-utils.js and 1 other location - About 1 wk to fix
src/xing-frontend-utils/serializer.js on lines 64..430

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 1899.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

    this.$get = ['$injector', 'Inflector', function ($injector, Inflector) {
      defaultOptions.underscore = defaultOptions.underscore || Inflector.underscore;
      defaultOptions.camelize = defaultOptions.camelize || Inflector.camelize;
      defaultOptions.pluralize = defaultOptions.pluralize || Inflector.pluralize;

Severity: Major
Found in src/xing-frontend-utils/serializer.js and 1 other location - About 1 wk to fix
dist/xing-frontend-utils.js on lines 4081..4443

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 1899.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

File xing-frontend-utils.js has 3326 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

(function(f){if(typeof exports==="object"&&typeof module!=="undefined"){module.exports=f()}else if(typeof define==="function"&&define.amd){define([],f)}else{var g;if(typeof window!=="undefined"){g=window}else if(typeof global!=="undefined"){g=global}else if(typeof self!=="undefined"){g=self}else{g=this}g.xingFrontendUtils = f()}})(function(){var define,module,exports;return (function e(t,n,r){function s(o,u){if(!n[o]){if(!t[o]){var a=typeof require=="function"&&require;if(!u&&a)return a(o,!0);if(i)return i(o,!0);var f=new Error("Cannot find module '"+o+"'");throw f.code="MODULE_NOT_FOUND",f}var l=n[o]={exports:{}};t[o][0].call(l.exports,function(e){var n=t[o][1][e];return s(n?n:e)},l,l.exports,e,t,n,r)}return n[o].exports}var i=typeof require=="function"&&require;for(var o=0;o<r.length;o++)s(r[o]);return s})({1:[function(require,module,exports){
(function(e, a) { for(var i in a) e[i] = a[i]; }(exports, /******/ (function(modules) { // webpackBootstrap
/******/     // The module cache
/******/     var installedModules = {};
/******/
Severity: Major
Found in dist/xing-frontend-utils.js - About 1 wk to fix

    Function 1 has 1831 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.
    Open

    (function(f){if(typeof exports==="object"&&typeof module!=="undefined"){module.exports=f()}else if(typeof define==="function"&&define.amd){define([],f)}else{var g;if(typeof window!=="undefined"){g=window}else if(typeof global!=="undefined"){g=global}else if(typeof self!=="undefined"){g=self}else{g=this}g.xingFrontendUtils = f()}})(function(){var define,module,exports;return (function e(t,n,r){function s(o,u){if(!n[o]){if(!t[o]){var a=typeof require=="function"&&require;if(!u&&a)return a(o,!0);if(i)return i(o,!0);var f=new Error("Cannot find module '"+o+"'");throw f.code="MODULE_NOT_FOUND",f}var l=n[o]={exports:{}};t[o][0].call(l.exports,function(e){var n=t[o][1][e];return s(n?n:e)},l,l.exports,e,t,n,r)}return n[o].exports}var i=typeof require=="function"&&require;for(var o=0;o<r.length;o++)s(r[o]);return s})({1:[function(require,module,exports){
    (function(e, a) { for(var i in a) e[i] = a[i]; }(exports, /******/ (function(modules) { // webpackBootstrap
    /******/     // The module cache
    /******/     var installedModules = {};
    /******/
    Severity: Major
    Found in dist/xing-frontend-utils.js - About 1 wk to fix

      Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
      Open

      function xngCompilerService($q, $http, $injector, $compile, $controller, $templateCache) {
      
        /**
         * @ngdoc service
         * @name $xngCompiler
      Severity: Major
      Found in dist/xing-frontend-utils.js and 1 other location - About 3 days to fix
      src/xing-frontend-utils/components/toast/compiler.js on lines 1..132

      Duplicated Code

      Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

      Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

      When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

      Tuning

      This issue has a mass of 522.

      We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

      The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

      If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

      See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

      Refactorings

      Further Reading

      Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
      Open

      function xngCompilerService($q, $http, $injector, $compile, $controller, $templateCache) {
      
        /**
         * @ngdoc service
         * @name $xngCompiler
      Severity: Major
      Found in src/xing-frontend-utils/components/toast/compiler.js and 1 other location - About 3 days to fix
      dist/xing-frontend-utils.js on lines 3012..3142

      Duplicated Code

      Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

      Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

      When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

      Tuning

      This issue has a mass of 522.

      We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

      The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

      If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

      See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

      Refactorings

      Further Reading

      Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
      Open

            return function SwipeService(scope, eventTypes) {
              if ( !eventTypes ) { eventTypes = "swipeleft swiperight"; }
      
              // publish configureFor() method for specific element instance
              return function configureFor(element, onSwipeCallback, attachLater ) {
      Severity: Major
      Found in src/xing-frontend-utils/components/toast/swipe.js and 1 other location - About 2 days to fix
      dist/xing-frontend-utils.js on lines 3395..3468

      Duplicated Code

      Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

      Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

      When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

      Tuning

      This issue has a mass of 375.

      We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

      The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

      If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

      See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

      Refactorings

      Further Reading

      Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
      Open

          return function SwipeService(scope, eventTypes) {
            if (!eventTypes) {
              eventTypes = "swipeleft swiperight";
            }
      
      
      Severity: Major
      Found in dist/xing-frontend-utils.js and 1 other location - About 2 days to fix
      src/xing-frontend-utils/components/toast/swipe.js on lines 33..103

      Duplicated Code

      Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

      Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

      When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

      Tuning

      This issue has a mass of 375.

      We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

      The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

      If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

      See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

      Refactorings

      Further Reading

      Function constructor has a Cognitive Complexity of 68 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
      Open

        constructor() {
          var defaultOptions = {
            underscore: undefined,
            camelize: undefined,
            pluralize: undefined,
      Severity: Minor
      Found in src/xing-frontend-utils/serializer.js - About 1 day to fix

      Cognitive Complexity

      Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

      A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

      • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
      • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
      • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

      Further reading

      Similar blocks of code found in 7 locations. Consider refactoring.
      Open

          var _get = function get(_x2, _x3, _x4) { var _again = true; _function: while (_again) { var object = _x2, property = _x3, receiver = _x4; desc = parent = getter = undefined; _again = false; if (object === null) object = Function.prototype; var desc = Object.getOwnPropertyDescriptor(object, property); if (desc === undefined) { var parent = Object.getPrototypeOf(object); if (parent === null) { return undefined; } else { _x2 = parent; _x3 = property; _x4 = receiver; _again = true; continue _function; } } else if ('value' in desc) { return desc.value; } else { var getter = desc.get; if (getter === undefined) { return undefined; } return getter.call(receiver); } } };
      Severity: Major
      Found in dist/xing-frontend-utils.js and 6 other locations - About 1 day to fix
      dist/xing-frontend-utils.js on lines 238..238
      dist/xing-frontend-utils.js on lines 932..932
      dist/xing-frontend-utils.js on lines 1545..1545
      dist/xing-frontend-utils.js on lines 2064..2064
      dist/xing-frontend-utils.js on lines 2220..2220
      dist/xing-frontend-utils.js on lines 2269..2269

      Duplicated Code

      Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

      Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

      When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

      Tuning

      This issue has a mass of 243.

      We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

      The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

      If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

      See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

      Refactorings

      Further Reading

      Similar blocks of code found in 7 locations. Consider refactoring.
      Open

          var _get = function get(_x2, _x3, _x4) { var _again = true; _function: while (_again) { var object = _x2, property = _x3, receiver = _x4; desc = parent = getter = undefined; _again = false; if (object === null) object = Function.prototype; var desc = Object.getOwnPropertyDescriptor(object, property); if (desc === undefined) { var parent = Object.getPrototypeOf(object); if (parent === null) { return undefined; } else { _x2 = parent; _x3 = property; _x4 = receiver; _again = true; continue _function; } } else if ('value' in desc) { return desc.value; } else { var getter = desc.get; if (getter === undefined) { return undefined; } return getter.call(receiver); } } };
      Severity: Major
      Found in dist/xing-frontend-utils.js and 6 other locations - About 1 day to fix
      dist/xing-frontend-utils.js on lines 238..238
      dist/xing-frontend-utils.js on lines 566..566
      dist/xing-frontend-utils.js on lines 932..932
      dist/xing-frontend-utils.js on lines 1545..1545
      dist/xing-frontend-utils.js on lines 2064..2064
      dist/xing-frontend-utils.js on lines 2220..2220

      Duplicated Code

      Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

      Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

      When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

      Tuning

      This issue has a mass of 243.

      We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

      The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

      If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

      See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

      Refactorings

      Further Reading

      Similar blocks of code found in 7 locations. Consider refactoring.
      Open

          var _get = function get(_x, _x2, _x3) { var _again = true; _function: while (_again) { var object = _x, property = _x2, receiver = _x3; desc = parent = getter = undefined; _again = false; if (object === null) object = Function.prototype; var desc = Object.getOwnPropertyDescriptor(object, property); if (desc === undefined) { var parent = Object.getPrototypeOf(object); if (parent === null) { return undefined; } else { _x = parent; _x2 = property; _x3 = receiver; _again = true; continue _function; } } else if ("value" in desc) { return desc.value; } else { var getter = desc.get; if (getter === undefined) { return undefined; } return getter.call(receiver); } } };
      Severity: Major
      Found in dist/xing-frontend-utils.js and 6 other locations - About 1 day to fix
      dist/xing-frontend-utils.js on lines 238..238
      dist/xing-frontend-utils.js on lines 566..566
      dist/xing-frontend-utils.js on lines 932..932
      dist/xing-frontend-utils.js on lines 1545..1545
      dist/xing-frontend-utils.js on lines 2220..2220
      dist/xing-frontend-utils.js on lines 2269..2269

      Duplicated Code

      Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

      Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

      When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

      Tuning

      This issue has a mass of 243.

      We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

      The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

      If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

      See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

      Refactorings

      Further Reading

      Similar blocks of code found in 7 locations. Consider refactoring.
      Open

          var _get = function get(_x, _x2, _x3) { var _again = true; _function: while (_again) { var object = _x, property = _x2, receiver = _x3; desc = parent = getter = undefined; _again = false; if (object === null) object = Function.prototype; var desc = Object.getOwnPropertyDescriptor(object, property); if (desc === undefined) { var parent = Object.getPrototypeOf(object); if (parent === null) { return undefined; } else { _x = parent; _x2 = property; _x3 = receiver; _again = true; continue _function; } } else if ('value' in desc) { return desc.value; } else { var getter = desc.get; if (getter === undefined) { return undefined; } return getter.call(receiver); } } };
      Severity: Major
      Found in dist/xing-frontend-utils.js and 6 other locations - About 1 day to fix
      dist/xing-frontend-utils.js on lines 566..566
      dist/xing-frontend-utils.js on lines 932..932
      dist/xing-frontend-utils.js on lines 1545..1545
      dist/xing-frontend-utils.js on lines 2064..2064
      dist/xing-frontend-utils.js on lines 2220..2220
      dist/xing-frontend-utils.js on lines 2269..2269

      Duplicated Code

      Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

      Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

      When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

      Tuning

      This issue has a mass of 243.

      We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

      The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

      If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

      See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

      Refactorings

      Further Reading

      Similar blocks of code found in 7 locations. Consider refactoring.
      Open

          var _get = function get(_x, _x2, _x3) { var _again = true; _function: while (_again) { var object = _x, property = _x2, receiver = _x3; desc = parent = getter = undefined; _again = false; if (object === null) object = Function.prototype; var desc = Object.getOwnPropertyDescriptor(object, property); if (desc === undefined) { var parent = Object.getPrototypeOf(object); if (parent === null) { return undefined; } else { _x = parent; _x2 = property; _x3 = receiver; _again = true; continue _function; } } else if ('value' in desc) { return desc.value; } else { var getter = desc.get; if (getter === undefined) { return undefined; } return getter.call(receiver); } } };
      Severity: Major
      Found in dist/xing-frontend-utils.js and 6 other locations - About 1 day to fix
      dist/xing-frontend-utils.js on lines 238..238
      dist/xing-frontend-utils.js on lines 566..566
      dist/xing-frontend-utils.js on lines 1545..1545
      dist/xing-frontend-utils.js on lines 2064..2064
      dist/xing-frontend-utils.js on lines 2220..2220
      dist/xing-frontend-utils.js on lines 2269..2269

      Duplicated Code

      Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

      Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

      When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

      Tuning

      This issue has a mass of 243.

      We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

      The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

      If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

      See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

      Refactorings

      Further Reading

      Similar blocks of code found in 7 locations. Consider refactoring.
      Open

          var _get = function get(_x, _x2, _x3) { var _again = true; _function: while (_again) { var object = _x, property = _x2, receiver = _x3; desc = parent = getter = undefined; _again = false; if (object === null) object = Function.prototype; var desc = Object.getOwnPropertyDescriptor(object, property); if (desc === undefined) { var parent = Object.getPrototypeOf(object); if (parent === null) { return undefined; } else { _x = parent; _x2 = property; _x3 = receiver; _again = true; continue _function; } } else if ("value" in desc) { return desc.value; } else { var getter = desc.get; if (getter === undefined) { return undefined; } return getter.call(receiver); } } };
      Severity: Major
      Found in dist/xing-frontend-utils.js and 6 other locations - About 1 day to fix
      dist/xing-frontend-utils.js on lines 238..238
      dist/xing-frontend-utils.js on lines 566..566
      dist/xing-frontend-utils.js on lines 932..932
      dist/xing-frontend-utils.js on lines 1545..1545
      dist/xing-frontend-utils.js on lines 2064..2064
      dist/xing-frontend-utils.js on lines 2269..2269

      Duplicated Code

      Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

      Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

      When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

      Tuning

      This issue has a mass of 243.

      We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

      The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

      If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

      See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

      Refactorings

      Further Reading

      Similar blocks of code found in 7 locations. Consider refactoring.
      Open

          var _get = function get(_x, _x2, _x3) { var _again = true; _function: while (_again) { var object = _x, property = _x2, receiver = _x3; desc = parent = getter = undefined; _again = false; if (object === null) object = Function.prototype; var desc = Object.getOwnPropertyDescriptor(object, property); if (desc === undefined) { var parent = Object.getPrototypeOf(object); if (parent === null) { return undefined; } else { _x = parent; _x2 = property; _x3 = receiver; _again = true; continue _function; } } else if ('value' in desc) { return desc.value; } else { var getter = desc.get; if (getter === undefined) { return undefined; } return getter.call(receiver); } } };
      Severity: Major
      Found in dist/xing-frontend-utils.js and 6 other locations - About 1 day to fix
      dist/xing-frontend-utils.js on lines 238..238
      dist/xing-frontend-utils.js on lines 566..566
      dist/xing-frontend-utils.js on lines 932..932
      dist/xing-frontend-utils.js on lines 2064..2064
      dist/xing-frontend-utils.js on lines 2220..2220
      dist/xing-frontend-utils.js on lines 2269..2269

      Duplicated Code

      Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

      Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

      When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

      Tuning

      This issue has a mass of 243.

      We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

      The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

      If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

      See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

      Refactorings

      Further Reading

      Function 23 has 247 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.
      Open

      },{}],23:[function(require,module,exports){
      'use strict';
      
      Object.defineProperty(exports, '__esModule', {
        value: true
      Severity: Major
      Found in dist/xing-frontend-utils.js - About 1 day to fix

        Function SerializerProvider has 210 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.
        Open

        var SerializerProvider = (function () {
          function SerializerProvider() {
            _classCallCheck(this, _SerializerProvider);
        
            var defaultOptions = {
        Severity: Major
        Found in dist/xing-frontend-utils.js - About 1 day to fix

          Function constructor has 206 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.
          Open

            constructor() {
              var defaultOptions = {
                underscore: undefined,
                camelize: undefined,
                pluralize: undefined,
          Severity: Major
          Found in src/xing-frontend-utils/serializer.js - About 1 day to fix

            Function SerializerProvider has 205 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.
            Open

              function SerializerProvider() {
                _classCallCheck(this, _SerializerProvider);
            
                var defaultOptions = {
                  underscore: undefined,
            Severity: Major
            Found in dist/xing-frontend-utils.js - About 1 day to fix
              Severity
              Category
              Status
              Source
              Language