File adminer.php
has 799 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
<?php
/** Adminer - Compact database management
* @link https://www.adminer.org/
* @author Jakub Vrana, http://www.vrana.cz/
* @copyright 2007 Jakub Vrana
Function select
has a Cognitive Complexity of 68 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
Min_Driver($e);if(!is_object($e)||($pd=$b->login($_GET["username"],get_password()))!==true)auth_error((is_string($e)?$e:(is_string($pd)?$pd:'Invalid credentials.')));if($xa&&$_POST["token"])$_POST["token"]=$T;$k='';if($_POST){if(!verify_token()){$Nc="max_input_vars";$xd=ini_get($Nc);if(extension_loaded("suhosin")){foreach(array("suhosin.request.max_vars","suhosin.post.max_vars")as$z){$X=ini_get($z);if($X&&(!$xd||$X<$xd)){$Nc=$z;$xd=$X;}}}$k=(!$_POST["token"]&&$xd?sprintf('Maximum number of allowed fields exceeded. Please increase %s.',"'$Nc'"):'Invalid CSRF token. Send the form again.'.' '.'If you did not send this request from Adminer then close this page.');}}elseif($_SERVER["REQUEST_METHOD"]=="POST"){$k=sprintf('Too big POST data. Reduce the data or increase the %s configuration directive.',"'post_max_size'");if(isset($_GET["sql"]))$k.=' '.'You can upload a big SQL file via FTP and import it from server.';}if(!ini_bool("session.use_cookies")||@ini_set("session.use_cookies",false)!==false)session_write_close();function
select($J,$f=null,$ge=array(),$_=0){global$y;$od=array();$w=array();$d=array();$Fa=array();$tg=array();$K=array();odd('');for($t=0;(!$_||$t<$_)&&($L=$J->fetch_row());$t++){if(!$t){echo"<table cellspacing='0' class='nowrap'>\n","<thead><tr>";for($x=0;$x<count($L);$x++){$l=$J->fetch_field();$F=$l->name;$fe=$l->orgtable;$ee=$l->orgname;$K[$l->table]=$fe;if($ge&&$y=="sql")$od[$x]=($F=="table"?"table=":($F=="possible_keys"?"indexes=":null));elseif($fe!=""){if(!isset($w[$fe])){$w[$fe]=array();foreach(indexes($fe,$f)as$v){if($v["type"]=="PRIMARY"){$w[$fe]=array_flip($v["columns"]);break;}}$d[$fe]=$w[$fe];}if(isset($d[$fe][$ee])){unset($d[$fe][$ee]);$w[$fe][$ee]=$x;$od[$x]=$fe;}}if($l->charsetnr==63)$Fa[$x]=true;$tg[$x]=$l->type;echo"<th".($fe!=""||$l->name!=$ee?" title='".h(($fe!=""?"$fe.":"").$ee)."'":"").">".h($F).($ge?doc_link(array('sql'=>"explain-output.html#explain_".strtolower($F))):"");}echo"</thead>\n";}echo"<tr".odd().">";foreach($L
as$z=>$X){if($X===null)$X="<i>NULL</i>";elseif($Fa[$z]&&!is_utf8($X))$X="<i>".lang(array('%d byte','%d bytes'),strlen($X))."</i>";elseif(!strlen($X))$X=" ";else{$X=h($X);if($tg[$z]==254)$X="<code>$X</code>";}if(isset($od[$z])&&!$d[$od[$z]]){if($ge&&$y=="sql"){$Q=$L[array_search("table=",$od)];$A=$od[$z].urlencode($ge[$Q]!=""?$ge[$Q]:$Q);}else{$A="edit=".urlencode($od[$z]);foreach($w[$od[$z]]as$Ua=>$x)$A.="&where".urlencode("[".bracket_escape($Ua)."]")."=".urlencode($L[$x]);}$X="<a href='".h(ME.$A)."'>$X</a>";}echo"<td>$X";}}echo($t?"</table>":"<p class='message'>".'No rows.')."\n";return$K;}function
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function navigation
has a Cognitive Complexity of 57 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
true;}function
navigation($Dd){global$ga,$y,$Eb,$e;echo'<h1>
',$this->name(),' <span class="version">',$ga,'</span>
<a href="https://www.adminer.org/#download" target="_blank" id="version">',(version_compare($ga,$_COOKIE["adminer_version"])<0?h($_COOKIE["adminer_version"]):""),'</a>
</h1>
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function dumpData
has a Cognitive Complexity of 51 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
dumpTable($Q,$If,$Yc=0){if($_POST["format"]!="sql"){echo"\xef\xbb\xbf";if($If)dump_csv(array_keys(fields($Q)));}else{if($Yc==2){$m=array();foreach(fields($Q)as$F=>$l)$m[]=idf_escape($F)." $l[full_type]";$g="CREATE TABLE ".table($Q)." (".implode(", ",$m).")";}else$g=create_sql($Q,$_POST["auto_increment"]);set_utf8mb4($g);if($If&&$g){if($If=="DROP+CREATE"||$Yc==1)echo"DROP ".($Yc==2?"VIEW":"TABLE")." IF EXISTS ".table($Q).";\n";if($Yc==1)$g=remove_definer($g);echo"$g;\n\n";}}}function
dumpData($Q,$If,$I){global$e,$y;$td=($y=="sqlite"?0:1048576);if($If){if($_POST["format"]=="sql"){if($If=="TRUNCATE+INSERT")echo
truncate_sql($Q).";\n";$m=fields($Q);}$J=$e->query($I,1);if($J){$Qc="";$Ia="";$ad=array();$Kf="";$lc=($Q!=''?'fetch_assoc':'fetch_row');while($L=$J->$lc()){if(!$ad){$Hg=array();foreach($L
as$X){$l=$J->fetch_field();$ad[]=$l->name;$z=idf_escape($l->name);$Hg[]="$z = VALUES($z)";}$Kf=($If=="INSERT+UPDATE"?"\nON DUPLICATE KEY UPDATE ".implode(", ",$Hg):"").";\n";}if($_POST["format"]!="sql"){if($If=="table"){dump_csv($ad);$If="INSERT";}dump_csv($L);}else{if(!$Qc)$Qc="INSERT INTO ".table($Q)." (".implode(", ",array_map('idf_escape',$ad)).") VALUES";foreach($L
as$z=>$X){$l=$m[$z];$L[$z]=($X!==null?unconvert_field($l,preg_match('~(^|[^o])int|float|double|decimal~',$l["type"])&&$X!=''?$X:q($X)):"NULL");}$lf=($td?"\n":" ")."(".implode(",\t",$L).")";if(!$Ia)$Ia=$Qc.$lf;elseif(strlen($Ia)+4+strlen($lf)+strlen($Kf)<$td)$Ia.=",$lf";else{echo$Ia.$Kf;$Ia=$Qc.$lf;}}}if($Ia)echo$Ia.$Kf;}elseif($_POST["format"]=="sql")echo"-- ".str_replace("\n"," ",$e->error)."\n";}}function
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Adminer
has 55 functions (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
max_connections(){global$e;return$e->result("SELECT @@max_connections");}$y="sql";$tg=array();$Hf=array();foreach(array('Numbers'=>array("tinyint"=>3,"smallint"=>5,"mediumint"=>8,"int"=>10,"bigint"=>20,"decimal"=>66,"float"=>12,"double"=>21),'Date and time'=>array("date"=>10,"datetime"=>19,"timestamp"=>19,"time"=>10,"year"=>4),'Strings'=>array("char"=>255,"varchar"=>65535,"tinytext"=>255,"text"=>65535,"mediumtext"=>16777215,"longtext"=>4294967295),'Lists'=>array("enum"=>65535,"set"=>64),'Binary'=>array("bit"=>20,"binary"=>255,"varbinary"=>65535,"tinyblob"=>255,"blob"=>65535,"mediumblob"=>16777215,"longblob"=>4294967295),'Geometry'=>array("geometry"=>0,"point"=>0,"linestring"=>0,"polygon"=>0,"multipoint"=>0,"multilinestring"=>0,"multipolygon"=>0,"geometrycollection"=>0),)as$z=>$X){$tg+=$X;$Hf[$z]=array_keys($X);}$_g=array("unsigned","zerofill","unsigned zerofill");$Zd=array("=","<",">","<=",">=","!=","LIKE","LIKE %%","REGEXP","IN","IS NULL","NOT LIKE","NOT REGEXP","NOT IN","IS NOT NULL","SQL");$xc=array("char_length","date","from_unixtime","lower","round","sec_to_time","time_to_sec","upper");$_c=array("avg","count","count distinct","group_concat","max","min","sum");$Lb=array(array("char"=>"md5/sha1/password/encrypt/uuid","binary"=>"md5/sha1","date|time"=>"now",),array("(^|[^o])int|float|double|decimal"=>"+/-","date"=>"+ interval/- interval","time"=>"addtime/subtime","char|text"=>"concat",));}define("SERVER",$_GET[DRIVER]);define("DB",$_GET["db"]);define("ME",preg_replace('~^[^?]*/([^?]*).*~','\\1',$_SERVER["REQUEST_URI"]).'?'.(sid()?SID.'&':'').(SERVER!==null?DRIVER."=".urlencode(SERVER).'&':'').(isset($_GET["username"])?"username=".urlencode($_GET["username"]).'&':'').(DB!=""?'db='.urlencode(DB).'&'.(isset($_GET["ns"])?"ns=".urlencode($_GET["ns"])."&":""):''));$ga="4.2.5";class
Adminer{var$operators;function
name(){return"<a href='https://www.adminer.org/' target='_blank' id='h1'>Adminer</a>";}function
credentials(){return
array(SERVER,$_GET["username"],get_password());}function
Function input
has a Cognitive Complexity of 36 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
enum_input($U,$wa,$l,$Y,$Sb=null){global$b;preg_match_all("~'((?:[^']|'')*)'~",$l["length"],$rd);$K=($Sb!==null?"<label><input type='$U'$wa value='$Sb'".((is_array($Y)?in_array($Sb,$Y):$Y===0)?" checked":"")."><i>".'empty'."</i></label>":"");foreach($rd[1]as$t=>$X){$X=stripcslashes(str_replace("''","'",$X));$Na=(is_int($Y)?$Y==$t+1:(is_array($Y)?in_array($t+1,$Y):$Y===$X));$K.=" <label><input type='$U'$wa value='".($t+1)."'".($Na?' checked':'').'>'.h($b->editVal($X,$l)).'</label>';}return$K;}function
input($l,$Y,$q){global$e,$tg,$b,$y;$F=h(bracket_escape($l["field"]));echo"<td class='function'>";if(is_array($Y)&&!$q){$ta=array($Y);if(version_compare(PHP_VERSION,5.4)>=0)$ta[]=JSON_PRETTY_PRINT;$Y=call_user_func_array('json_encode',$ta);$q="json";}$cf=($y=="mssql"&&$l["auto_increment"]);if($cf&&!$_POST["save"])$q=null;$xc=(isset($_GET["select"])||$cf?array("orig"=>'original'):array())+$b->editFunctions($l);$wa=" name='fields[$F]'";if($l["type"]=="enum")echo
nbsp($xc[""])."<td>".$b->editInput($_GET["edit"],$l,$wa,$Y);else{$pc=0;foreach($xc
as$z=>$X){if($z===""||!$X)break;$pc++;}$Wd=($pc?" onchange=\"var f = this.form['function[".h(js_escape(bracket_escape($l["field"])))."]']; if ($pc > f.selectedIndex) f.selectedIndex = $pc;\" onkeyup='keyupChange.call(this);'":"");$wa.=$Wd;$Cc=(in_array($q,$xc)||isset($xc[$q]));echo(count($xc)>1?"<select name='function[$F]' onchange='functionChange(this);'".on_help("getTarget(event).value.replace(/^SQL\$/, '')",1).">".optionlist($xc,$q===null||$Cc?$q:"")."</select>":nbsp(reset($xc))).'<td>';$Pc=$b->editInput($_GET["edit"],$l,$wa,$Y);if($Pc!="")echo$Pc;elseif($l["type"]=="set"){preg_match_all("~'((?:[^']|'')*)'~",$l["length"],$rd);foreach($rd[1]as$t=>$X){$X=stripcslashes(str_replace("''","'",$X));$Na=(is_int($Y)?($Y>>$t)&1:in_array($X,explode(",",$Y),true));echo" <label><input type='checkbox' name='fields[$F][$t]' value='".(1<<$t)."'".($Na?' checked':'')."$Wd>".h($b->editVal($X,$l)).'</label>';}}elseif(preg_match('~blob|bytea|raw|file~',$l["type"])&&ini_bool("file_uploads"))echo"<input type='file' name='fields-$F'$Wd>";elseif(($Zf=preg_match('~text|lob~',$l["type"]))||preg_match("~\n~",$Y)){if($Zf&&$y!="sqlite")$wa.=" cols='50' rows='12'";else{$M=min(12,substr_count($Y,"\n")+1);$wa.=" cols='30' rows='$M'".($M==1?" style='height: 1.2em;'":"");}echo"<textarea$wa>".h($Y).'</textarea>';}elseif($q=="json")echo"<textarea$wa cols='50' rows='12' class='jush-js'>".h($Y).'</textarea>';else{$yd=(!preg_match('~int~',$l["type"])&&preg_match('~^(\\d+)(,(\\d+))?$~',$l["length"],$C)?((preg_match("~binary~",$l["type"])?2:1)*$C[1]+($C[3]?1:0)+($C[2]&&!$l["unsigned"]?1:0)):($tg[$l["type"]]?$tg[$l["type"]]+($l["unsigned"]?0:1):0));if($y=='sql'&&$e->server_info>=5.6&&preg_match('~time~',$l["type"]))$yd+=7;echo"<input".((!$Cc||$q==="")&&preg_match('~(?<!o)int~',$l["type"])?" type='number'":"")." value='".h($Y)."'".($yd?" maxlength='$yd'":"").(preg_match('~char|binary~',$l["type"])&&$yd>20?" size='40'":"")."$wa>";}}}function
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function selectSearchProcess
has a Cognitive Complexity of 31 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
array($N,$s);}function
selectSearchProcess($m,$w){global$e,$y;$K=array();foreach($w
as$t=>$v){if($v["type"]=="FULLTEXT"&&$_GET["fulltext"][$t]!="")$K[]="MATCH (".implode(", ",array_map('idf_escape',$v["columns"])).") AGAINST (".q($_GET["fulltext"][$t]).(isset($_GET["boolean"][$t])?" IN BOOLEAN MODE":"").")";}foreach((array)$_GET["where"]as$X){if("$X[col]$X[val]"!=""&&in_array($X["op"],$this->operators)){$db=" $X[op]";if(preg_match('~IN$~',$X["op"])){$Lc=process_length($X["val"]);$db.=" ".($Lc!=""?$Lc:"(NULL)");}elseif($X["op"]=="SQL")$db=" $X[val]";elseif($X["op"]=="LIKE %%")$db=" LIKE ".$this->processInput($m[$X["col"]],"%$X[val]%");elseif($X["op"]=="ILIKE %%")$db=" ILIKE ".$this->processInput($m[$X["col"]],"%$X[val]%");elseif(!preg_match('~NULL$~',$X["op"]))$db.=" ".$this->processInput($m[$X["col"]],$X["val"]);if($X["col"]!="")$K[]=idf_escape($X["col"]).$db;else{$Ya=array();foreach($m
as$F=>$l){$Xc=preg_match('~char|text|enum|set~',$l["type"]);if((is_numeric($X["val"])||!preg_match('~(^|[^o])int|float|double|decimal|bit~',$l["type"]))&&(!preg_match("~[\x80-\xFF]~",$X["val"])||$Xc)){$F=idf_escape($F);$Ya[]=($y=="sql"&&$Xc&&!preg_match("~^utf8_~",$l["collation"])?"CONVERT($F USING ".charset($e).")":$F);}}$K[]=($Ya?"(".implode("$db OR ",$Ya)."$db)":"0");}}}return$K;}function
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function page_header
has a Cognitive Complexity of 31 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
Adminer);if($b->operators===null)$b->operators=$Zd;function
page_header($eg,$k="",$Ha=array(),$fg=""){global$ca,$ga,$b,$Eb,$y;page_headers();if(is_ajax()&&$k){page_messages($k);exit;}$gg=$eg.($fg!=""?": $fg":"");$hg=strip_tags($gg.(SERVER!=""&&SERVER!="localhost"?h(" - ".SERVER):"")." - ".$b->name());echo'<!DOCTYPE html>
<html lang="en" dir="ltr">
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8">
<meta http-equiv="Content-Script-Type" content="text/javascript">
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function edit_form
has a Cognitive Complexity of 26 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
on_help($Za,$xf=0){return" onmouseover='helpMouseover(this, event, ".h($Za).", $xf);' onmouseout='helpMouseout(this, event);'";}function
edit_form($a,$m,$L,$Ag){global$b,$y,$T,$k;$Pf=$b->tableName(table_status1($a,true));page_header(($Ag?'Edit':'Insert'),$k,array("select"=>array($a,$Pf)),$Pf);if($L===false)echo"<p class='error'>".'No rows.'."\n";echo'<form action="" method="post" enctype="multipart/form-data" id="form">
';if(!$m)echo"<p class='error'>".'You have no privileges to update this table.'."\n";else{echo"<table cellspacing='0' onkeydown='return editingKeydown(event);'>\n";foreach($m
as$F=>$l){echo"<tr><th>".$b->fieldName($l);$vb=$_GET["set"][bracket_escape($F)];if($vb===null){$vb=$l["default"];if($l["type"]=="bit"&&preg_match("~^b'([01]*)'\$~",$vb,$af))$vb=$af[1];}$Y=($L!==null?($L[$F]!=""&&$y=="sql"&&preg_match("~enum|set~",$l["type"])?(is_array($L[$F])?array_sum($L[$F]):+$L[$F]):$L[$F]):(!$Ag&&$l["auto_increment"]?"":(isset($_GET["select"])?false:$vb)));if(!$_POST["save"]&&is_string($Y))$Y=$b->editVal($Y,$l);$q=($_POST["save"]?(string)$_POST["function"][$F]:($Ag&&$l["on_update"]=="CURRENT_TIMESTAMP"?"now":($Y===false?null:($Y!==null?'':'NULL'))));if(preg_match("~time~",$l["type"])&&$Y=="CURRENT_TIMESTAMP"){$Y="";$q="now";}input($l,$Y,$q);echo"\n";}if(!support("table"))echo"<tr>"."<th><input name='field_keys[]' onkeyup='keyupChange.call(this);' onchange='fieldChange(this);' value=''>"."<td class='function'>".html_select("field_funs[]",$b->editFunctions(array("null"=>isset($_GET["select"]))))."<td><input name='field_vals[]'>"."\n";echo"</table>\n";}echo"<p>\n";if($m){echo"<input type='submit' value='".'Save'."'>\n";if(!isset($_GET["select"]))echo"<input type='submit' name='insert' value='".($Ag?'Save and continue edit'."' onclick='return !ajaxForm(this.form, \"".'Saving'.'...", this)':'Save and insert next')."' title='Ctrl+Shift+Enter'>\n";}echo($Ag?"<input type='submit' name='delete' value='".'Delete'."'".confirm().">\n":($_POST||!$m?"":"<script type='text/javascript'>focus(document.getElementById('form').getElementsByTagName('td')[1].firstChild);</script>\n"));if(isset($_GET["select"]))hidden_fields(array("check"=>(array)$_POST["check"],"clone"=>$_POST["clone"],"all"=>$_POST["all"]));echo'<input type="hidden" name="referer" value="',h(isset($_POST["referer"])?$_POST["referer"]:$_SERVER["HTTP_REFERER"]),'">
<input type="hidden" name="save" value="1">
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function process_fields
has a Cognitive Complexity of 23 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
',(support("comment")?"<td".($cb?"":" class='hidden'")."><input name='fields[$t][comment]' value='".h($l["comment"])."' maxlength='".($e->server_info>=5.5?1024:255)."'>":"");}echo"<td>",(support("move_col")?"<input type='image' class='icon' name='add[$t]' src='".h(preg_replace("~\\?.*~","",ME))."?file=plus.gif&version=4.2.5&driver=mysql' alt='+' title='".'Add next'."' onclick='return !editingAddRow(this, 1);'> "."<input type='image' class='icon' name='up[$t]' src='".h(preg_replace("~\\?.*~","",ME))."?file=up.gif&version=4.2.5&driver=mysql' alt='^' title='".'Move up'."'> "."<input type='image' class='icon' name='down[$t]' src='".h(preg_replace("~\\?.*~","",ME))."?file=down.gif&version=4.2.5&driver=mysql' alt='v' title='".'Move down'."'> ":""),($he==""||support("drop_col")?"<input type='image' class='icon' name='drop_col[$t]' src='".h(preg_replace("~\\?.*~","",ME))."?file=cross.gif&version=4.2.5&driver=mysql' alt='x' title='".'Remove'."' onclick=\"return !editingRemoveRow(this, 'fields\$1[field]');\">":""),"\n";}}function
process_fields(&$m){ksort($m);$Od=0;if($_POST["up"]){$fd=0;foreach($m
as$z=>$l){if(key($_POST["up"])==$z){unset($m[$z]);array_splice($m,$fd,0,array($l));break;}if(isset($l["field"]))$fd=$Od;$Od++;}}elseif($_POST["down"]){$uc=false;foreach($m
as$z=>$l){if(isset($l["field"])&&$uc){unset($m[key($_POST["down"])]);array_splice($m,$Od,0,array($uc));break;}if(key($_POST["down"])==$z)$uc=$l;$Od++;}}elseif($_POST["add"]){$m=array_values($m);array_splice($m,key($_POST["add"]),0,array(array()));}elseif(!$_POST["drop_col"])return
false;return
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Consider simplifying this complex logical expression. Open
send(){fseek($this->handler,0);fpassthru($this->handler);fclose($this->handler);}}$Vb="'(?:''|[^'\\\\]|\\\\.)*'";$Oc="IN|OUT|INOUT";if(isset($_GET["select"])&&($_POST["edit"]||$_POST["clone"])&&!$_POST["save"])$_GET["edit"]=$_GET["select"];if(isset($_GET["callf"]))$_GET["call"]=$_GET["callf"];if(isset($_GET["function"]))$_GET["procedure"]=$_GET["function"];if(isset($_GET["download"])){$a=$_GET["download"];$m=fields($a);header("Content-Type: application/octet-stream");header("Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=".friendly_url("$a-".implode("_",$_GET["where"])).".".friendly_url($_GET["field"]));$N=array(idf_escape($_GET["field"]));$J=$j->select($a,$N,array(where($_GET,$m)),$N);$L=($J?$J->fetch_row():array());echo$L[0];exit;}elseif(isset($_GET["table"])){$a=$_GET["table"];$m=fields($a);if(!$m)$k=error();$R=table_status1($a,true);page_header(($m&&is_view($R)?'View':'Table').": ".h($a),$k);$b->selectLinks($R);$bb=$R["Comment"];if($bb!="")echo"<p>".'Comment'.": ".h($bb)."\n";if($m){echo"<table cellspacing='0'>\n","<thead><tr><th>".'Column'."<td>".'Type'.(support("comment")?"<td>".'Comment':"")."</thead>\n";foreach($m
as$l){echo"<tr".odd()."><th>".h($l["field"]),"<td><span title='".h($l["collation"])."'>".h($l["full_type"])."</span>",($l["null"]?" <i>NULL</i>":""),($l["auto_increment"]?" <i>".'Auto Increment'."</i>":""),(isset($l["default"])?" <span title='".'Default value'."'>[<b>".h($l["default"])."</b>]</span>":""),(support("comment")?"<td>".nbsp($l["comment"]):""),"\n";}echo"</table>\n";}if(!is_view($R)){if(support("indexes")){echo"<h3 id='indexes'>".'Indexes'."</h3>\n";$w=indexes($a);if($w){echo"<table cellspacing='0'>\n";foreach($w
as$F=>$v){ksort($v["columns"]);$Ie=array();foreach($v["columns"]as$z=>$X)$Ie[]="<i>".h($X)."</i>".($v["lengths"][$z]?"(".$v["lengths"][$z].")":"").($v["descs"][$z]?" DESC":"");echo"<tr title='".h($F)."'><th>$v[type]<td>".implode(", ",$Ie)."\n";}echo"</table>\n";}echo'<p class="links"><a href="'.h(ME).'indexes='.urlencode($a).'">'.'Alter indexes'."</a>\n";}if(fk_support($R)){echo"<h3 id='foreign-keys'>".'Foreign keys'."</h3>\n";$o=foreign_keys($a);if($o){echo"<table cellspacing='0'>\n","<thead><tr><th>".'Source'."<td>".'Target'."<td>".'ON DELETE'."<td>".'ON UPDATE'."<td> </thead>\n";foreach($o
as$F=>$n){echo"<tr title='".h($F)."'>","<th><i>".implode("</i>, <i>",array_map('h',$n["source"]))."</i>","<td><a href='".h($n["db"]!=""?preg_replace('~db=[^&]*~',"db=".urlencode($n["db"]),ME):($n["ns"]!=""?preg_replace('~ns=[^&]*~',"ns=".urlencode($n["ns"]),ME):ME))."table=".urlencode($n["table"])."'>".($n["db"]!=""?"<b>".h($n["db"])."</b>.":"").($n["ns"]!=""?"<b>".h($n["ns"])."</b>.":"").h($n["table"])."</a>","(<i>".implode("</i>, <i>",array_map('h',$n["target"]))."</i>)","<td>".nbsp($n["on_delete"])."\n","<td>".nbsp($n["on_update"])."\n",'<td><a href="'.h(ME.'foreign='.urlencode($a).'&name='.urlencode($F)).'">'.'Alter'.'</a>';}echo"</table>\n";}echo'<p class="links"><a href="'.h(ME).'foreign='.urlencode($a).'">'.'Add foreign key'."</a>\n";}}if(support(is_view($R)?"view_trigger":"trigger")){echo"<h3 id='triggers'>".'Triggers'."</h3>\n";$qg=triggers($a);if($qg){echo"<table cellspacing='0'>\n";foreach($qg
as$z=>$X)echo"<tr valign='top'><td>".h($X[0])."<td>".h($X[1])."<th>".h($z)."<td><a href='".h(ME.'trigger='.urlencode($a).'&name='.urlencode($z))."'>".'Alter'."</a>\n";echo"</table>\n";}echo'<p class="links"><a href="'.h(ME).'trigger='.urlencode($a).'">'.'Add trigger'."</a>\n";}}elseif(isset($_GET["schema"])){page_header('Database schema',"",array(),h(DB.($_GET["ns"]?".$_GET[ns]":"")));$Qf=array();$Rf=array();$ea=($_GET["schema"]?$_GET["schema"]:$_COOKIE["adminer_schema-".str_replace(".","_",DB)]);preg_match_all('~([^:]+):([-0-9.]+)x([-0-9.]+)(_|$)~',$ea,$rd,PREG_SET_ORDER);foreach($rd
Function dumpTable
has a Cognitive Complexity of 20 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
dumpDatabase($i){}function
dumpTable($Q,$If,$Yc=0){if($_POST["format"]!="sql"){echo"\xef\xbb\xbf";if($If)dump_csv(array_keys(fields($Q)));}else{if($Yc==2){$m=array();foreach(fields($Q)as$F=>$l)$m[]=idf_escape($F)." $l[full_type]";$g="CREATE TABLE ".table($Q)." (".implode(", ",$m).")";}else$g=create_sql($Q,$_POST["auto_increment"]);set_utf8mb4($g);if($If&&$g){if($If=="DROP+CREATE"||$Yc==1)echo"DROP ".($Yc==2?"VIEW":"TABLE")." IF EXISTS ".table($Q).";\n";if($Yc==1)$g=remove_definer($g);echo"$g;\n\n";}}}function
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function select_value
has a Cognitive Complexity of 19 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
md5(uniqid(mt_rand(),true));}function
select_value($X,$A,$l,$ag){global$b,$ba;if(is_array($X)){$K="";foreach($X
as$Zc=>$W)$K.="<tr>".($X!=array_values($X)?"<th>".h($Zc):"")."<td>".select_value($W,$A,$l,$ag);return"<table cellspacing='0'>$K</table>";}if(!$A)$A=$b->selectLink($X,$l);if($A===null){if(is_mail($X))$A="mailto:$X";if($Oe=is_url($X))$A=(($Oe=="http"&&$ba)||preg_match('~WebKit~i',$_SERVER["HTTP_USER_AGENT"])?$X:"https://www.adminer.org/redirect/?url=".urlencode($X));}$K=$b->editVal($X,$l);if($K!==null){if($K==="")$K=" ";elseif(!is_utf8($K))$K="\0";elseif($ag!=""&&is_shortable($l))$K=shorten_utf8($K,max(0,+$ag));else$K=h($K);}return$b->selectVal($K,$A,$l,$X);}function
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function editFunctions
has a Cognitive Complexity of 18 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
messageQuery($I,$bg){global$y;restart_session();$Ec=&get_session("queries");$u="sql-".count($Ec[$_GET["db"]]);if(strlen($I)>1e6)$I=preg_replace('~[\x80-\xFF]+$~','',substr($I,0,1e6))."\n...";$Ec[$_GET["db"]][]=array($I,time(),$bg);return" <span class='time'>".@date("H:i:s")."</span> <a href='#$u' onclick=\"return !toggle('$u');\">".'SQL command'."</a>"."<div id='$u' class='hidden'><pre><code class='jush-$y'>".shorten_utf8($I,1000).'</code></pre>'.($bg?" <span class='time'>($bg)</span>":'').(support("sql")?'<p><a href="'.h(str_replace("db=".urlencode(DB),"db=".urlencode($_GET["db"]),ME).'sql=&history='.(count($Ec[$_GET["db"]])-1)).'">'.'Edit'.'</a>':'').'</div>';}function
editFunctions($l){global$Lb;$K=($l["null"]?"NULL/":"");foreach($Lb
as$z=>$xc){if(!$z||(!isset($_GET["call"])&&(isset($_GET["select"])||where($_GET)))){foreach($xc
as$ye=>$X){if(!$ye||preg_match("~$ye~",$l["type"]))$K.="/$X";}if($z&&!preg_match('~set|blob|bytea|raw|file~',$l["type"]))$K.="/SQL";}}if($l["auto_increment"]&&!isset($_GET["select"])&&!where($_GET))$K='Auto Increment';return
explode("/",$K);}function
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function referencable_primary
has a Cognitive Complexity of 17 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
as$z=>$X){if($X===null)$X="<i>NULL</i>";elseif($Fa[$z]&&!is_utf8($X))$X="<i>".lang(array('%d byte','%d bytes'),strlen($X))."</i>";elseif(!strlen($X))$X=" ";else{$X=h($X);if($tg[$z]==254)$X="<code>$X</code>";}if(isset($od[$z])&&!$d[$od[$z]]){if($ge&&$y=="sql"){$Q=$L[array_search("table=",$od)];$A=$od[$z].urlencode($ge[$Q]!=""?$ge[$Q]:$Q);}else{$A="edit=".urlencode($od[$z]);foreach($w[$od[$z]]as$Ua=>$x)$A.="&where".urlencode("[".bracket_escape($Ua)."]")."=".urlencode($L[$x]);}$X="<a href='".h(ME.$A)."'>$X</a>";}echo"<td>$X";}}echo($t?"</table>":"<p class='message'>".'No rows.')."\n";return$K;}function
referencable_primary($rf){$K=array();foreach(table_status('',true)as$Pf=>$Q){if($Pf!=$rf&&fk_support($Q)){foreach(fields($Pf)as$l){if($l["primary"]){if($K[$Pf]){unset($K[$Pf]);break;}$K[$Pf]=$l;}}}}return$K;}function
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function process_input
has a Cognitive Complexity of 16 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
as$z=>$X){if($z===""||!$X)break;$pc++;}$Wd=($pc?" onchange=\"var f = this.form['function[".h(js_escape(bracket_escape($l["field"])))."]']; if ($pc > f.selectedIndex) f.selectedIndex = $pc;\" onkeyup='keyupChange.call(this);'":"");$wa.=$Wd;$Cc=(in_array($q,$xc)||isset($xc[$q]));echo(count($xc)>1?"<select name='function[$F]' onchange='functionChange(this);'".on_help("getTarget(event).value.replace(/^SQL\$/, '')",1).">".optionlist($xc,$q===null||$Cc?$q:"")."</select>":nbsp(reset($xc))).'<td>';$Pc=$b->editInput($_GET["edit"],$l,$wa,$Y);if($Pc!="")echo$Pc;elseif($l["type"]=="set"){preg_match_all("~'((?:[^']|'')*)'~",$l["length"],$rd);foreach($rd[1]as$t=>$X){$X=stripcslashes(str_replace("''","'",$X));$Na=(is_int($Y)?($Y>>$t)&1:in_array($X,explode(",",$Y),true));echo" <label><input type='checkbox' name='fields[$F][$t]' value='".(1<<$t)."'".($Na?' checked':'')."$Wd>".h($b->editVal($X,$l)).'</label>';}}elseif(preg_match('~blob|bytea|raw|file~',$l["type"])&&ini_bool("file_uploads"))echo"<input type='file' name='fields-$F'$Wd>";elseif(($Zf=preg_match('~text|lob~',$l["type"]))||preg_match("~\n~",$Y)){if($Zf&&$y!="sqlite")$wa.=" cols='50' rows='12'";else{$M=min(12,substr_count($Y,"\n")+1);$wa.=" cols='30' rows='$M'".($M==1?" style='height: 1.2em;'":"");}echo"<textarea$wa>".h($Y).'</textarea>';}elseif($q=="json")echo"<textarea$wa cols='50' rows='12' class='jush-js'>".h($Y).'</textarea>';else{$yd=(!preg_match('~int~',$l["type"])&&preg_match('~^(\\d+)(,(\\d+))?$~',$l["length"],$C)?((preg_match("~binary~",$l["type"])?2:1)*$C[1]+($C[3]?1:0)+($C[2]&&!$l["unsigned"]?1:0)):($tg[$l["type"]]?$tg[$l["type"]]+($l["unsigned"]?0:1):0));if($y=='sql'&&$e->server_info>=5.6&&preg_match('~time~',$l["type"]))$yd+=7;echo"<input".((!$Cc||$q==="")&&preg_match('~(?<!o)int~',$l["type"])?" type='number'":"")." value='".h($Y)."'".($yd?" maxlength='$yd'":"").(preg_match('~char|binary~',$l["type"])&&$yd>20?" size='40'":"")."$wa>";}}}function
process_input($l){global$b;$Jc=bracket_escape($l["field"]);$q=$_POST["function"][$Jc];$Y=$_POST["fields"][$Jc];if($l["type"]=="enum"){if($Y==-1)return
false;if($Y=="")return"NULL";return+$Y;}if($l["auto_increment"]&&$Y=="")return
null;if($q=="orig")return($l["on_update"]=="CURRENT_TIMESTAMP"?idf_escape($l["field"]):false);if($q=="NULL")return"NULL";if($l["type"]=="set")return
array_sum((array)$Y);if($q=="json"){$q="";$Y=json_decode($Y,true);if(!is_array($Y))return
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Consider simplifying this complex logical expression. Open
queries("ROLLBACK");}}$Eb=array("server"=>"MySQL")+$Eb;if(!defined("DRIVER")){$Ee=array("MySQLi","MySQL","PDO_MySQL");define("DRIVER","server");if(extension_loaded("mysqli")){class
Min_DB
extends
MySQLi{var$extension="MySQLi";function
__construct(){parent::init();}function
Function auto_increment
has a Cognitive Complexity of 15 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
rename_database($F,$Wa){$K=false;if(create_database($F,$Wa)){$bf=array();foreach(tables_list()as$Q=>$U)$bf[]=table($Q)." TO ".idf_escape($F).".".table($Q);$K=(!$bf||queries("RENAME TABLE ".implode(", ",$bf)));if($K)queries("DROP DATABASE ".idf_escape(DB));restart_session();set_session("dbs",null);}return$K;}function
auto_increment(){$za=" PRIMARY KEY";if($_GET["create"]!=""&&$_POST["auto_increment_col"]){foreach(indexes($_GET["create"])as$v){if(in_array($_POST["fields"][$_POST["auto_increment_col"]]["orig"],$v["columns"],true)){$za="";break;}if($v["type"]=="PRIMARY")$za=" UNIQUE";}}return" AUTO_INCREMENT$za";}function
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function connect_error
has a Cognitive Complexity of 15 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
set_utf8mb4($g){global$e;static$P=false;if(!$P&&preg_match('~\butf8mb4~i',$g)){$P=true;echo"SET NAMES ".charset($e).";\n\n";}}function
connect_error(){global$b,$e,$T,$k,$Eb;if(DB!=""){header("HTTP/1.1 404 Not Found");page_header('Database'.": ".h(DB),'Invalid database.',true);}else{if($_POST["db"]&&!$k)queries_redirect(substr(ME,0,-1),'Databases have been dropped.',drop_databases($_POST["db"]));page_header('Select database',$k,false);echo"<p class='links'>\n";foreach(array('database'=>'Create new database','privileges'=>'Privileges','processlist'=>'Process list','variables'=>'Variables','status'=>'Status',)as$z=>$X){if(support($z))echo"<a href='".h(ME)."$z='>$X</a>\n";}echo"<p>".sprintf('%s version: %s through PHP extension %s',$Eb[DRIVER],"<b>".h($e->server_info)."</b>","<b>$e->extension</b>")."\n","<p>".sprintf('Logged as: %s',"<b>".h(logged_user())."</b>")."\n";$h=$b->databases();if($h){$of=support("scheme");$Xa=collations();echo"<form action='' method='post'>\n","<table cellspacing='0' class='checkable' onclick='tableClick(event);' ondblclick='tableClick(event, true);'>\n","<thead><tr>".(support("database")?"<td> ":"")."<th>".'Database'." - <a href='".h(ME)."refresh=1'>".'Refresh'."</a>"."<td>".'Collation'."<td>".'Tables'."<td>".'Size'." - <a href='".h(ME)."dbsize=1' onclick=\"return !ajaxSetHtml('".h(js_escape(ME))."script=connect');\">".'Compute'."</a>"."</thead>\n";$h=($_GET["dbsize"]?count_tables($h):array_flip($h));foreach($h
as$i=>$S){$hf=h(ME)."db=".urlencode($i);echo"<tr".odd().">".(support("database")?"<td>".checkbox("db[]",$i,in_array($i,(array)$_POST["db"])):""),"<th><a href='$hf'>".h($i)."</a>";$Wa=nbsp(db_collation($i,$Xa));echo"<td>".(support("database")?"<a href='$hf".($of?"&ns=":"")."&database=' title='".'Alter database'."'>$Wa</a>":$Wa),"<td align='right'><a href='$hf&schema=' id='tables-".h($i)."' title='".'Database schema'."'>".($_GET["dbsize"]?$S:"?")."</a>","<td align='right' id='size-".h($i)."'>".($_GET["dbsize"]?db_size($i):"?"),"\n";}echo"</table>\n",(support("database")?"<fieldset><legend>".'Selected'." <span id='selected'></span></legend><div>\n"."<input type='hidden' name='all' value='' onclick=\"selectCount('selected', formChecked(this, /^db/));\">\n"."<input type='submit' name='drop' value='".'Drop'."'".confirm().">\n"."</div></fieldset>\n":""),"<script type='text/javascript'>tableCheck();</script>\n","<input type='hidden' name='token' value='$T'>\n","</form>\n";}}page_footer("db");}if(isset($_GET["status"]))$_GET["variables"]=$_GET["status"];if(isset($_GET["import"]))$_GET["sql"]=$_GET["import"];if(!(DB!=""?$e->select_db(DB):isset($_GET["sql"])||isset($_GET["dump"])||isset($_GET["database"])||isset($_GET["processlist"])||isset($_GET["privileges"])||isset($_GET["user"])||isset($_GET["variables"])||$_GET["script"]=="connect"||$_GET["script"]=="kill")){if(DB!=""||$_GET["refresh"]){restart_session();set_session("dbs",null);}connect_error();exit;}$Vd="RESTRICT|NO ACTION|CASCADE|SET NULL|SET DEFAULT";class
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function auth_error
has a Cognitive Complexity of 14 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
as$z=>$X){list($Jg,$O,$V,$i)=array_map('base64_decode',explode("-",$z));if($Jg==DRIVER&&$O==SERVER&&$V==$_GET["username"]&&$i==DB)unset($ze[$z]);}cookie("adminer_permanent",implode(" ",$ze));}function
auth_error($k){global$b,$Dc;$k=h($k);$wf=session_name();if(isset($_GET["username"])){header("HTTP/1.1 403 Forbidden");if(($_COOKIE[$wf]||$_GET[$wf])&&!$Dc)$k='Session expired, please login again.';else{add_invalid_login();$we=get_password();if($we!==null){if($we===false)$k.='<br>'.sprintf('Master password expired. <a href="https://www.adminer.org/en/extension/" target="_blank">Implement</a> %s method to make it permanent.','<code>permanentLogin()</code>');set_password(DRIVER,SERVER,$_GET["username"],null);}unset_permanent();}}if(!$_COOKIE[$wf]&&$_GET[$wf]&&ini_bool("session.use_only_cookies"))$k='Session support must be enabled.';$pe=session_get_cookie_params();cookie("adminer_key",($_COOKIE["adminer_key"]?$_COOKIE["adminer_key"]:rand_string()),$pe["lifetime"]);page_header('Login',$k,null);echo"<form action='' method='post'>\n";$b->loginForm();echo"<div>";hidden_fields($_POST,array("auth"));echo"</div>\n","</form>\n";page_footer("auth");exit;}if(isset($_GET["username"])){if(!class_exists("Min_DB")){unset($_SESSION["pwds"][DRIVER]);unset_permanent();page_header('No extension',sprintf('None of the supported PHP extensions (%s) are available.',implode(", ",$Ee)),false);page_footer("auth");exit;}$e=connect();}$j=new
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Consider simplifying this complex logical expression. Open
as$i=>$S){$hf=h(ME)."db=".urlencode($i);echo"<tr".odd().">".(support("database")?"<td>".checkbox("db[]",$i,in_array($i,(array)$_POST["db"])):""),"<th><a href='$hf'>".h($i)."</a>";$Wa=nbsp(db_collation($i,$Xa));echo"<td>".(support("database")?"<a href='$hf".($of?"&ns=":"")."&database=' title='".'Alter database'."'>$Wa</a>":$Wa),"<td align='right'><a href='$hf&schema=' id='tables-".h($i)."' title='".'Database schema'."'>".($_GET["dbsize"]?$S:"?")."</a>","<td align='right' id='size-".h($i)."'>".($_GET["dbsize"]?db_size($i):"?"),"\n";}echo"</table>\n",(support("database")?"<fieldset><legend>".'Selected'." <span id='selected'></span></legend><div>\n"."<input type='hidden' name='all' value='' onclick=\"selectCount('selected', formChecked(this, /^db/));\">\n"."<input type='submit' name='drop' value='".'Drop'."'".confirm().">\n"."</div></fieldset>\n":""),"<script type='text/javascript'>tableCheck();</script>\n","<input type='hidden' name='token' value='$T'>\n","</form>\n";}}page_footer("db");}if(isset($_GET["status"]))$_GET["variables"]=$_GET["status"];if(isset($_GET["import"]))$_GET["sql"]=$_GET["import"];if(!(DB!=""?$e->select_db(DB):isset($_GET["sql"])||isset($_GET["dump"])||isset($_GET["database"])||isset($_GET["processlist"])||isset($_GET["privileges"])||isset($_GET["user"])||isset($_GET["variables"])||$_GET["script"]=="connect"||$_GET["script"]=="kill")){if(DB!=""||$_GET["refresh"]){restart_session();set_session("dbs",null);}connect_error();exit;}$Vd="RESTRICT|NO ACTION|CASCADE|SET NULL|SET DEFAULT";class
Function get_file
has a Cognitive Complexity of 13 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
pagination($G,$nb){return" ".($G==$nb?$G+1:'<a href="'.h(remove_from_uri("page").($G?"&page=$G".($_GET["next"]?"&next=".urlencode($_GET["next"]):""):"")).'">'.($G+1)."</a>");}function
get_file($z,$ub=false){$mc=$_FILES[$z];if(!$mc)return
null;foreach($mc
as$z=>$X)$mc[$z]=(array)$X;$K='';foreach($mc["error"]as$z=>$k){if($k)return$k;$F=$mc["name"][$z];$jg=$mc["tmp_name"][$z];$fb=file_get_contents($ub&&preg_match('~\\.gz$~',$F)?"compress.zlib://$jg":$jg);if($ub){$Cf=substr($fb,0,3);if(function_exists("iconv")&&preg_match("~^\xFE\xFF|^\xFF\xFE~",$Cf,$af))$fb=iconv("utf-16","utf-8",$fb);elseif($Cf=="\xEF\xBB\xBF")$fb=substr($fb,3);$K.=$fb."\n\n";}else$K.=$fb;}return$K;}function
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function edit_fields
has a Cognitive Complexity of 13 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
type_class($U){foreach(array('char'=>'text','date'=>'time|year','binary'=>'blob','enum'=>'set',)as$z=>$X){if(preg_match("~$z|$X~",$U))return" class='$z'";}}function
edit_fields($m,$Xa,$U="TABLE",$o=array(),$cb=false){global$e,$Oc;$m=array_values($m);echo'<thead><tr class="wrap">
';if($U=="PROCEDURE"){echo'<td> ';}echo'<th>',($U=="TABLE"?'Column name':'Parameter name'),'<td>Type<textarea id="enum-edit" rows="4" cols="12" wrap="off" style="display: none;" onblur="editingLengthBlur(this);"></textarea>
<td>Length
<td>Options
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function insertUpdate
has a Cognitive Complexity of 12 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
insert($Q,$P){return($P?parent::insert($Q,$P):queries("INSERT INTO ".table($Q)." ()\nVALUES ()"));}function
insertUpdate($Q,$M,$He){$d=array_keys(reset($M));$Fe="INSERT INTO ".table($Q)." (".implode(", ",$d).") VALUES\n";$Hg=array();foreach($d
as$z)$Hg[$z]="$z = VALUES($z)";$Kf="\nON DUPLICATE KEY UPDATE ".implode(", ",$Hg);$Hg=array();$ld=0;foreach($M
as$P){$Y="(".implode(", ",$P).")";if($Hg&&(strlen($Fe)+$ld+strlen($Y)+strlen($Kf)>1e6)){if(!queries($Fe.implode(",\n",$Hg).$Kf))return
false;$Hg=array();$ld=0;}$Hg[]=$Y;$ld+=strlen($Y)+2;}return
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function search_tables
has a Cognitive Complexity of 12 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
fields_from_edit(){global$j;$K=array();foreach((array)$_POST["field_keys"]as$z=>$X){if($X!=""){$X=bracket_escape($X);$_POST["function"][$X]=$_POST["field_funs"][$z];$_POST["fields"][$X]=$_POST["field_vals"][$z];}}foreach((array)$_POST["fields"]as$z=>$X){$F=bracket_escape($z,1);$K[$F]=array("field"=>$F,"privileges"=>array("insert"=>1,"update"=>1),"null"=>1,"auto_increment"=>($z==$j->primary),);}return$K;}function
search_tables(){global$b,$e;$_GET["where"][0]["op"]="LIKE %%";$_GET["where"][0]["val"]=$_POST["query"];$uc=false;foreach(table_status('',true)as$Q=>$R){$F=$b->tableName($R);if(isset($R["Engine"])&&$F!=""&&(!$_POST["tables"]||in_array($Q,$_POST["tables"]))){$J=$e->query("SELECT".limit("1 FROM ".table($Q)," WHERE ".implode(" AND ",$b->selectSearchProcess(fields($Q),array())),1));if(!$J||$J->fetch_row()){if(!$uc){echo"<ul>\n";$uc=true;}echo"<li>".($J?"<a href='".h(ME."select=".urlencode($Q)."&where[0][op]=".urlencode($_GET["where"][0]["op"])."&where[0][val]=".urlencode($_GET["where"][0]["val"]))."'>$F</a>\n":"$F: <span class='error'>".error()."</span>\n");}}}echo($uc?"</ul>":"<p class='message'>".'No tables.')."\n";}function
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method drop_create
has 11 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
drop_create($Fb,$g,$Gb,$Yf,$Hb,$B,$Ad,$zd,$_d,$Rd,$Id){if($_POST["drop"])query_redirect($Fb,$B,$Ad);elseif($Rd=="")query_redirect($g,$B,$_d);elseif($Rd!=$Id){$lb=queries($g);queries_redirect($B,$zd,$lb&&queries($Fb));if($lb)queries($Gb);}else
Consider simplifying this complex logical expression. Open
as$z=>$X){if($z===""||!$X)break;$pc++;}$Wd=($pc?" onchange=\"var f = this.form['function[".h(js_escape(bracket_escape($l["field"])))."]']; if ($pc > f.selectedIndex) f.selectedIndex = $pc;\" onkeyup='keyupChange.call(this);'":"");$wa.=$Wd;$Cc=(in_array($q,$xc)||isset($xc[$q]));echo(count($xc)>1?"<select name='function[$F]' onchange='functionChange(this);'".on_help("getTarget(event).value.replace(/^SQL\$/, '')",1).">".optionlist($xc,$q===null||$Cc?$q:"")."</select>":nbsp(reset($xc))).'<td>';$Pc=$b->editInput($_GET["edit"],$l,$wa,$Y);if($Pc!="")echo$Pc;elseif($l["type"]=="set"){preg_match_all("~'((?:[^']|'')*)'~",$l["length"],$rd);foreach($rd[1]as$t=>$X){$X=stripcslashes(str_replace("''","'",$X));$Na=(is_int($Y)?($Y>>$t)&1:in_array($X,explode(",",$Y),true));echo" <label><input type='checkbox' name='fields[$F][$t]' value='".(1<<$t)."'".($Na?' checked':'')."$Wd>".h($b->editVal($X,$l)).'</label>';}}elseif(preg_match('~blob|bytea|raw|file~',$l["type"])&&ini_bool("file_uploads"))echo"<input type='file' name='fields-$F'$Wd>";elseif(($Zf=preg_match('~text|lob~',$l["type"]))||preg_match("~\n~",$Y)){if($Zf&&$y!="sqlite")$wa.=" cols='50' rows='12'";else{$M=min(12,substr_count($Y,"\n")+1);$wa.=" cols='30' rows='$M'".($M==1?" style='height: 1.2em;'":"");}echo"<textarea$wa>".h($Y).'</textarea>';}elseif($q=="json")echo"<textarea$wa cols='50' rows='12' class='jush-js'>".h($Y).'</textarea>';else{$yd=(!preg_match('~int~',$l["type"])&&preg_match('~^(\\d+)(,(\\d+))?$~',$l["length"],$C)?((preg_match("~binary~",$l["type"])?2:1)*$C[1]+($C[3]?1:0)+($C[2]&&!$l["unsigned"]?1:0)):($tg[$l["type"]]?$tg[$l["type"]]+($l["unsigned"]?0:1):0));if($y=='sql'&&$e->server_info>=5.6&&preg_match('~time~',$l["type"]))$yd+=7;echo"<input".((!$Cc||$q==="")&&preg_match('~(?<!o)int~',$l["type"])?" type='number'":"")." value='".h($Y)."'".($yd?" maxlength='$yd'":"").(preg_match('~char|binary~',$l["type"])&&$yd>20?" size='40'":"")."$wa>";}}}function
Function hidden_fields
has a Cognitive Complexity of 11 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
preg_replace('~[^a-z0-9_]~i','-',$X);}function
hidden_fields($Me,$Kc=array()){while(list($z,$X)=each($Me)){if(!in_array($z,$Kc)){if(is_array($X)){foreach($X
as$Zc=>$W)$Me[$z."[$Zc]"]=$W;}else
echo'<input type="hidden" name="'.h($z).'" value="'.h($X).'">';}}}function
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function remove_slashes
has a Cognitive Complexity of 11 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
preg_replace('~[^0-9]+~','',$X);}function
remove_slashes($Me,$oc=false){if(get_magic_quotes_gpc()){while(list($z,$X)=each($Me)){foreach($X
as$Zc=>$W){unset($Me[$z][$Zc]);if(is_array($W)){$Me[$z][stripslashes($Zc)]=$W;$Me[]=&$Me[$z][stripslashes($Zc)];}else$Me[$z][stripslashes($Zc)]=($oc?$W:stripslashes($W));}}}}function
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function lzw_decompress
has a Cognitive Complexity of 11 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
verify_token(){list($T,$Se)=explode(":",$_POST["token"]);return($Se^$_SESSION["token"])==$T;}function
lzw_decompress($Da){$_b=256;$Ea=8;$Ta=array();$df=0;$ef=0;for($t=0;$t<strlen($Da);$t++){$df=($df<<8)+ord($Da[$t]);$ef+=8;if($ef>=$Ea){$ef-=$Ea;$Ta[]=$df>>$ef;$df&=(1<<$ef)-1;$_b++;if($_b>>$Ea)$Ea++;}}$zb=range("\0","\xFF");$K="";foreach($Ta
as$t=>$Sa){$Ob=$zb[$Sa];if(!isset($Ob))$Ob=$Qg.$Qg[0];$K.=$Ob;if($t)$zb[]=$Qg.$Ob[0];$Qg=$Ob;}return$K;}function
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function table_status
has a Cognitive Complexity of 11 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
as$i)$K[$i]=count(get_vals("SHOW TABLES IN ".idf_escape($i)));return$K;}function
table_status($F="",$jc=false){global$e;$K=array();foreach(get_rows($jc&&$e->server_info>=5?"SELECT TABLE_NAME AS Name, Engine, TABLE_COMMENT AS Comment FROM information_schema.TABLES WHERE TABLE_SCHEMA = DATABASE() ".($F!=""?"AND TABLE_NAME = ".q($F):"ORDER BY Name"):"SHOW TABLE STATUS".($F!=""?" LIKE ".q(addcslashes($F,"%_\\")):""))as$L){if($L["Engine"]=="InnoDB")$L["Comment"]=preg_replace('~(?:(.+); )?InnoDB free: .*~','\\1',$L["Comment"]);if(!isset($L["Engine"]))$L["Comment"]="";if($F!="")return$L;$K[$L["Name"]]=$L;}return$K;}function
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function unique_array
has a Cognitive Complexity of 11 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
get_rows($I,$f=null,$k="<p class='error'>"){global$e;$eb=(is_object($f)?$f:$e);$K=array();$J=$eb->query($I);if(is_object($J)){while($L=$J->fetch_assoc())$K[]=$L;}elseif(!$J&&!is_object($f)&&$k&&defined("PAGE_HEADER"))echo$k.error()."\n";return$K;}function
unique_array($L,$w){foreach($w
as$v){if(preg_match("~PRIMARY|UNIQUE~",$v["type"])){$K=array();foreach($v["columns"]as$z){if(!isset($L[$z]))continue
2;$K[$z]=$L[$z];}return$K;}}}function
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function copy_tables
has a Cognitive Complexity of 11 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
queries("RENAME TABLE ".implode(", ",$bf));}function
copy_tables($S,$Lg,$Vf){queries("SET sql_mode = 'NO_AUTO_VALUE_ON_ZERO'");foreach($S
as$Q){$F=($Vf==DB?table("copy_$Q"):idf_escape($Vf).".".table($Q));if(!queries("\nDROP TABLE IF EXISTS $F")||!queries("CREATE TABLE $F LIKE ".table($Q))||!queries("INSERT INTO $F SELECT * FROM ".table($Q)))return
false;}foreach($Lg
as$Q){$F=($Vf==DB?table("copy_$Q"):idf_escape($Vf).".".table($Q));$Kg=view($Q);if(!queries("DROP VIEW IF EXISTS $F")||!queries("CREATE VIEW $F AS $Kg[select]"))return
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method alter_table
has 9 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
alter_table($Q,$F,$m,$rc,$bb,$Tb,$Wa,$ya,$te){$sa=array();foreach($m
Function add_invalid_login
has a Cognitive Complexity of 10 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
long2str($W,true);}$e='';$Dc=$_SESSION["token"];if(!$Dc)$_SESSION["token"]=rand(1,1e6);$T=get_token();$ze=array();if($_COOKIE["adminer_permanent"]){foreach(explode(" ",$_COOKIE["adminer_permanent"])as$X){list($z)=explode(":",$X);$ze[$z]=$X;}}function
add_invalid_login(){global$b;$nc=get_temp_dir()."/adminer.invalid";$p=@fopen($nc,"r+");if(!$p){$p=@fopen($nc,"w");if(!$p)return;}flock($p,LOCK_EX);$Tc=unserialize(stream_get_contents($p));$bg=time();if($Tc){foreach($Tc
as$Uc=>$X){if($X[0]<$bg)unset($Tc[$Uc]);}}$Sc=&$Tc[$b->bruteForceKey()];if(!$Sc)$Sc=array($bg+30*60,0);$Sc[1]++;$tf=serialize($Tc);rewind($p);fwrite($p,$tf);ftruncate($p,strlen($tf));flock($p,LOCK_UN);fclose($p);}$xa=$_POST["auth"];if($xa){$Tc=unserialize(@file_get_contents(get_temp_dir()."/adminer.invalid"));$Sc=$Tc[$b->bruteForceKey()];$Kd=($Sc[1]>30?$Sc[0]-time():0);if($Kd>0)auth_error(lang(array('Too many unsuccessful logins, try again in %d minute.','Too many unsuccessful logins, try again in %d minutes.'),ceil($Kd/60)));session_regenerate_id();$Jg=$xa["driver"];$O=$xa["server"];$V=$xa["username"];$we=(string)$xa["password"];$i=$xa["db"];set_password($Jg,$O,$V,$we);$_SESSION["db"][$Jg][$O][$V][$i]=true;if($xa["permanent"]){$z=base64_encode($Jg)."-".base64_encode($O)."-".base64_encode($V)."-".base64_encode($i);$Je=$b->permanentLogin(true);$ze[$z]="$z:".base64_encode($Je?encrypt_string($we,$Je):"");cookie("adminer_permanent",implode(" ",$ze));}if(count($_POST)==1||DRIVER!=$Jg||SERVER!=$O||$_GET["username"]!==$V||DB!=$i)redirect(auth_url($Jg,$O,$V,$i));}elseif($_POST["logout"]){if($Dc&&!verify_token()){page_header('Logout','Invalid CSRF token. Send the form again.');page_footer("db");exit;}else{foreach(array("pwds","db","dbs","queries")as$z)set_session($z,null);unset_permanent();redirect(substr(preg_replace('~\b(username|db|ns)=[^&]*&~','',ME),0,-1),'Logout successful.');}}elseif($ze&&!$_SESSION["pwds"]){session_regenerate_id();$Je=$b->permanentLogin();foreach($ze
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method select
has 8 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
select($Q,$N,$Z,$s,$de=array(),$_=1,$G=0,$Ie=false){global$b,$y;$Vc=(count($s)<count($N));$I=$b->selectQueryBuild($N,$Z,$s,$de,$_,$G);if(!$I)$I="SELECT".limit(($_GET["page"]!="last"&&+$_&&$s&&$Vc&&$y=="sql"?"SQL_CALC_FOUND_ROWS ":"").implode(", ",$N)."\nFROM ".table($Q),($Z?"\nWHERE ".implode(" AND ",$Z):"").($s&&$Vc?"\nGROUP BY ".implode(", ",$s):"").($de?"\nORDER BY ".implode(", ",$de):""),($_!=""?+$_:null),($G?$_*$G:0),"\n");$Cf=microtime(true);$K=$this->_conn->query($I);if($Ie)echo$b->selectQuery($I,format_time($Cf));return$K;}function
Function selectColumnsProcess
has a Cognitive Complexity of 9 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
selectEmailPrint($Qb,$d){}function
selectColumnsProcess($d,$w){global$xc,$_c;$N=array();$s=array();foreach((array)$_GET["columns"]as$z=>$X){if($X["fun"]=="count"||($X["col"]!=""&&(!$X["fun"]||in_array($X["fun"],$xc)||in_array($X["fun"],$_c)))){$N[$z]=apply_sql_function($X["fun"],($X["col"]!=""?idf_escape($X["col"]):"*"));if(!in_array($X["fun"],$_c))$s[]=$N[$z];}}return
array($N,$s);}function
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function rename_database
has a Cognitive Complexity of 9 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
drop_databases($h){$K=apply_queries("DROP DATABASE",$h,'idf_escape');restart_session();set_session("dbs",null);return$K;}function
rename_database($F,$Wa){$K=false;if(create_database($F,$Wa)){$bf=array();foreach(tables_list()as$Q=>$U)$bf[]=table($Q)." TO ".idf_escape($F).".".table($Q);$K=(!$bf||queries("RENAME TABLE ".implode(", ",$bf)));if($K)queries("DROP DATABASE ".idf_escape(DB));restart_session();set_session("dbs",null);}return$K;}function
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function alter_table
has a Cognitive Complexity of 9 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
auto_increment(){$za=" PRIMARY KEY";if($_GET["create"]!=""&&$_POST["auto_increment_col"]){foreach(indexes($_GET["create"])as$v){if(in_array($_POST["fields"][$_POST["auto_increment_col"]]["orig"],$v["columns"],true)){$za="";break;}if($v["type"]=="PRIMARY")$za=" UNIQUE";}}return" AUTO_INCREMENT$za";}function
alter_table($Q,$F,$m,$rc,$bb,$Tb,$Wa,$ya,$te){$sa=array();foreach($m
as$l)$sa[]=($l[1]?($Q!=""?($l[0]!=""?"CHANGE ".idf_escape($l[0]):"ADD"):" ")." ".implode($l[1]).($Q!=""?$l[2]:""):"DROP ".idf_escape($l[0]));$sa=array_merge($sa,$rc);$Df=($bb!==null?" COMMENT=".q($bb):"").($Tb?" ENGINE=".q($Tb):"").($Wa?" COLLATE ".q($Wa):"").($ya!=""?" AUTO_INCREMENT=$ya":"");if($Q=="")return
queries("CREATE TABLE ".table($F)." (\n".implode(",\n",$sa)."\n)$Df$te");if($Q!=$F)$sa[]="RENAME TO ".table($F);if($Df)$sa[]=ltrim($Df);return($sa||$te?queries("ALTER TABLE ".table($Q)."\n".implode(",\n",$sa).$te):true);}function
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method query_redirect
has 7 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
query_redirect($I,$B,$D,$Ue=true,$cc=true,$ic=false,$bg=""){global$e,$k,$b;if($cc){$Cf=microtime(true);$ic=!$e->query($I);$bg=format_time($Cf);}$Bf="";if($I)$Bf=$b->messageQuery($I,$bg);if($ic){$k=error().$Bf;return
Method checkbox
has 6 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
checkbox($F,$Y,$Na,$dd="",$Xd="",$Ra=""){$K="<input type='checkbox' name='$F' value='".h($Y)."'".($Na?" checked":"").($Xd?' onclick="'.h($Xd).'"':'').">";return($dd!=""||$Ra?"<label".($Ra?" class='$Ra'":"").">$K".h($dd)."</label>":$K);}function
Method selectQueryBuild
has 6 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
selectQueryBuild($N,$Z,$s,$de,$_,$G){return"";}function
Method connect
has 6 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
connect($O="",$V="",$we="",$qb=null,$Ae=null,$zf=null){mysqli_report(MYSQLI_REPORT_OFF);list($Gc,$Ae)=explode(":",$O,2);$K=@$this->real_connect(($O!=""?$Gc:ini_get("mysqli.default_host")),($O.$V!=""?$V:ini_get("mysqli.default_user")),($O.$V.$we!=""?$we:ini_get("mysqli.default_pw")),$qb,(is_numeric($Ae)?$Ae:ini_get("mysqli.default_port")),(!is_numeric($Ae)?$Ae:$zf));return$K;}function
Function optionlist
has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
checkbox($F,$Y,$Na,$dd="",$Xd="",$Ra=""){$K="<input type='checkbox' name='$F' value='".h($Y)."'".($Na?" checked":"").($Xd?' onclick="'.h($Xd).'"':'').">";return($dd!=""||$Ra?"<label".($Ra?" class='$Ra'":"").">$K".h($dd)."</label>":$K);}function
optionlist($be,$qf=null,$Eg=false){$K="";foreach($be
as$Zc=>$W){$ce=array($Zc=>$W);if(is_array($W)){$K.='<optgroup label="'.h($Zc).'">';$ce=$W;}foreach($ce
as$z=>$X)$K.='<option'.($Eg||is_string($z)?' value="'.h($z).'"':'').(($Eg||is_string($z)?(string)$z:$X)===$qf?' selected':'').'>'.h($X);if(is_array($W))$K.='</optgroup>';}return$K;}function
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Avoid deeply nested control flow statements. Open
use_sql($i).";\n\n";$le="";if($_POST["routines"]){foreach(array("FUNCTION","PROCEDURE")as$if){foreach(get_rows("SHOW $if STATUS WHERE Db = ".q($i),null,"-- ")as$L){$g=remove_definer($e->result("SHOW CREATE $if ".idf_escape($L["Name"]),2));set_utf8mb4($g);$le.=($If!='DROP+CREATE'?"DROP $if IF EXISTS ".idf_escape($L["Name"]).";;\n":"")."$g;;\n\n";}}}if($_POST["events"]){foreach(get_rows("SHOW EVENTS",null,"-- ")as$L){$g=remove_definer($e->result("SHOW CREATE EVENT ".idf_escape($L["Name"]),3));set_utf8mb4($g);$le.=($If!='DROP+CREATE'?"DROP EVENT IF EXISTS ".idf_escape($L["Name"]).";;\n":"")."$g;;\n\n";}}if($le)echo"DELIMITER ;;\n\n$le"."DELIMITER ;\n\n";}if($_POST["table_style"]||$_POST["data_style"]){$Lg=array();foreach(table_status('',true)as$F=>$R){$Q=(DB==""||in_array($F,(array)$_POST["tables"]));$ob=(DB==""||in_array($F,(array)$_POST["data"]));if($Q||$ob){if($gc=="tar"){$ig=new
TmpFile;ob_start(array($ig,'write'),1e5);}$b->dumpTable($F,($Q?$_POST["table_style"]:""),(is_view($R)?2:0));if(is_view($R))$Lg[]=$F;elseif($ob){$m=fields($F);$b->dumpData($F,$_POST["data_style"],"SELECT *".convert_fields($m,$m)." FROM ".table($F));}if($Wc&&$_POST["triggers"]&&$Q&&($qg=trigger_sql($F,$_POST["table_style"])))echo"\nDELIMITER ;;\n$qg\nDELIMITER ;\n";if($gc=="tar"){ob_end_flush();tar_file((DB!=""?"":"$i/")."$F.csv",$ig);}elseif($Wc)echo"\n";}}foreach($Lg
Function selectLinks
has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
fieldName($l,$de=0){return'<span title="'.h($l["full_type"]).'">'.h($l["field"]).'</span>';}function
selectLinks($Of,$P=""){echo'<p class="links">';$od=array("select"=>'Select data');if(support("table")||support("indexes"))$od["table"]='Show structure';if(support("table")){if(is_view($Of))$od["view"]='Alter view';else$od["create"]='Alter table';}if($P!==null)$od["edit"]='New item';foreach($od
as$z=>$X)echo" <a href='".h(ME)."$z=".urlencode($Of["Name"]).($z=="edit"?$P:"")."'".bold(isset($_GET[$z])).">$X</a>";echo"\n";}function
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Avoid deeply nested control flow statements. Open
TmpFile;ob_start(array($ig,'write'),1e5);}$b->dumpTable($F,($Q?$_POST["table_style"]:""),(is_view($R)?2:0));if(is_view($R))$Lg[]=$F;elseif($ob){$m=fields($F);$b->dumpData($F,$_POST["data_style"],"SELECT *".convert_fields($m,$m)." FROM ".table($F));}if($Wc&&$_POST["triggers"]&&$Q&&($qg=trigger_sql($F,$_POST["table_style"])))echo"\nDELIMITER ;;\n$qg\nDELIMITER ;\n";if($gc=="tar"){ob_end_flush();tar_file((DB!=""?"":"$i/")."$F.csv",$ig);}elseif($Wc)echo"\n";}}foreach($Lg
Function collations
has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
array("select"=>preg_replace('~^(?:[^`]|`[^`]*`)*\\s+AS\\s+~isU','',$e->result("SHOW CREATE VIEW ".table($F),1)));}function
collations(){$K=array();foreach(get_rows("SHOW COLLATION")as$L){if($L["Default"])$K[$L["Charset"]][-1]=$L["Collation"];else$K[$L["Charset"]][]=$L["Collation"];}ksort($K);foreach($K
as$z=>$X)asort($K[$z]);return$K;}function
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Avoid deeply nested control flow statements. Open
TmpFile;ob_start(array($ig,'write'),1e5);}$b->dumpTable($F,($Q?$_POST["table_style"]:""),(is_view($R)?2:0));if(is_view($R))$Lg[]=$F;elseif($ob){$m=fields($F);$b->dumpData($F,$_POST["data_style"],"SELECT *".convert_fields($m,$m)." FROM ".table($F));}if($Wc&&$_POST["triggers"]&&$Q&&($qg=trigger_sql($F,$_POST["table_style"])))echo"\nDELIMITER ;;\n$qg\nDELIMITER ;\n";if($gc=="tar"){ob_end_flush();tar_file((DB!=""?"":"$i/")."$F.csv",$ig);}elseif($Wc)echo"\n";}}foreach($Lg
Avoid deeply nested control flow statements. Open
TmpFile;ob_start(array($ig,'write'),1e5);}$b->dumpTable($F,($Q?$_POST["table_style"]:""),(is_view($R)?2:0));if(is_view($R))$Lg[]=$F;elseif($ob){$m=fields($F);$b->dumpData($F,$_POST["data_style"],"SELECT *".convert_fields($m,$m)." FROM ".table($F));}if($Wc&&$_POST["triggers"]&&$Q&&($qg=trigger_sql($F,$_POST["table_style"])))echo"\nDELIMITER ;;\n$qg\nDELIMITER ;\n";if($gc=="tar"){ob_end_flush();tar_file((DB!=""?"":"$i/")."$F.csv",$ig);}elseif($Wc)echo"\n";}}foreach($Lg
Function selectSearchPrint
has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
as$z=>$X){$X=$_GET["columns"][$z];$c=select_input(" name='columns[$t][col]' onchange='".($z!==""?"selectFieldChange(this.form)":"selectAddRow(this)").";'",$d,$X["col"]);echo"<div>".($xc||$_c?"<select name='columns[$t][fun]' onchange='helpClose();".($z!==""?"":" this.nextSibling.nextSibling.onchange();")."'".on_help("getTarget(event).value && getTarget(event).value.replace(/ |\$/, '(') + ')'",1).">".optionlist(array(-1=>"")+array_filter(array('Functions'=>$xc,'Aggregation'=>$_c)),$X["fun"])."</select>"."($c)":$c)."</div>\n";$t++;}echo"</div></fieldset>\n";}function
selectSearchPrint($Z,$d,$w){print_fieldset("search",'Search',$Z);foreach($w
as$t=>$v){if($v["type"]=="FULLTEXT"){echo"(<i>".implode("</i>, <i>",array_map('h',$v["columns"]))."</i>) AGAINST"," <input type='search' name='fulltext[$t]' value='".h($_GET["fulltext"][$t])."' onchange='selectFieldChange(this.form);'>",checkbox("boolean[$t]",1,isset($_GET["boolean"][$t]),"BOOL"),"<br>\n";}}$_GET["where"]=(array)$_GET["where"];reset($_GET["where"]);$Ka="this.nextSibling.onchange();";for($t=0;$t<=count($_GET["where"]);$t++){list(,$X)=each($_GET["where"]);if(!$X||("$X[col]$X[val]"!=""&&in_array($X["op"],$this->operators))){echo"<div>".select_input(" name='where[$t][col]' onchange='$Ka'",$d,$X["col"],"(".'anywhere'.")"),html_select("where[$t][op]",$this->operators,$X["op"],$Ka),"<input type='search' name='where[$t][val]' value='".h($X["val"])."' onchange='".($X?"selectFieldChange(this.form)":"selectAddRow(this)").";' onkeydown='selectSearchKeydown(this, event);' onsearch='selectSearchSearch(this);'></div>\n";}}echo"</div></fieldset>\n";}function
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Avoid deeply nested control flow statements. Open
select($J,$f=null,$ge=array(),$_=0){global$y;$od=array();$w=array();$d=array();$Fa=array();$tg=array();$K=array();odd('');for($t=0;(!$_||$t<$_)&&($L=$J->fetch_row());$t++){if(!$t){echo"<table cellspacing='0' class='nowrap'>\n","<thead><tr>";for($x=0;$x<count($L);$x++){$l=$J->fetch_field();$F=$l->name;$fe=$l->orgtable;$ee=$l->orgname;$K[$l->table]=$fe;if($ge&&$y=="sql")$od[$x]=($F=="table"?"table=":($F=="possible_keys"?"indexes=":null));elseif($fe!=""){if(!isset($w[$fe])){$w[$fe]=array();foreach(indexes($fe,$f)as$v){if($v["type"]=="PRIMARY"){$w[$fe]=array_flip($v["columns"]);break;}}$d[$fe]=$w[$fe];}if(isset($d[$fe][$ee])){unset($d[$fe][$ee]);$w[$fe][$ee]=$x;$od[$x]=$fe;}}if($l->charsetnr==63)$Fa[$x]=true;$tg[$x]=$l->type;echo"<th".($fe!=""||$l->name!=$ee?" title='".h(($fe!=""?"$fe.":"").$ee)."'":"").">".h($F).($ge?doc_link(array('sql'=>"explain-output.html#explain_".strtolower($F))):"");}echo"</thead>\n";}echo"<tr".odd().">";foreach($L
Avoid deeply nested control flow statements. Open
';}elseif(isset($_GET["indexes"])){$a=$_GET["indexes"];$Mc=array("PRIMARY","UNIQUE","INDEX");$R=table_status($a,true);if(preg_match('~MyISAM|M?aria'.($e->server_info>=5.6?'|InnoDB':'').'~i',$R["Engine"]))$Mc[]="FULLTEXT";$w=indexes($a);$He=array();if($y=="mongo"){$He=$w["_id_"];unset($Mc[0]);unset($w["_id_"]);}$L=$_POST;if($_POST&&!$k&&!$_POST["add"]&&!$_POST["drop_col"]){$sa=array();foreach($L["indexes"]as$v){$F=$v["name"];if(in_array($v["type"],$Mc)){$d=array();$md=array();$yb=array();$P=array();ksort($v["columns"]);foreach($v["columns"]as$z=>$c){if($c!=""){$ld=$v["lengths"][$z];$xb=$v["descs"][$z];$P[]=idf_escape($c).($ld?"(".(+$ld).")":"").($xb?" DESC":"");$d[]=$c;$md[]=($ld?$ld:null);$yb[]=$xb;}}if($d){$dc=$w[$F];if($dc){ksort($dc["columns"]);ksort($dc["lengths"]);ksort($dc["descs"]);if($v["type"]==$dc["type"]&&array_values($dc["columns"])===$d&&(!$dc["lengths"]||array_values($dc["lengths"])===$md)&&array_values($dc["descs"])===$yb){unset($w[$F]);continue;}}$sa[]=array($v["type"],$F,$P);}}}foreach($w
Avoid deeply nested control flow statements. Open
as$L){echo"<tr>","<th>".h($L["Name"]),"<td>".($L["Execute at"]?'At given time'."<td>".$L["Execute at"]:'Every'." ".$L["Interval value"]." ".$L["Interval field"]."<td>$L[Starts]"),"<td>$L[Ends]",'<td><a href="'.h(ME).'event='.urlencode($L["Name"]).'">'.'Alter'.'</a>';}echo"</table>\n";$Zb=$e->result("SELECT @@event_scheduler");if($Zb&&$Zb!="ON")echo"<p class='error'><code class='jush-sqlset'>event_scheduler</code>: ".h($Zb)."\n";}echo'<p class="links"><a href="'.h(ME).'event=">'.'Create event'."</a>\n";}if($Tf)echo"<script type='text/javascript'>ajaxSetHtml('".js_escape(ME)."script=db');</script>\n";}}}page_footer();
Avoid deeply nested control flow statements. Open
select($J,$f=null,$ge=array(),$_=0){global$y;$od=array();$w=array();$d=array();$Fa=array();$tg=array();$K=array();odd('');for($t=0;(!$_||$t<$_)&&($L=$J->fetch_row());$t++){if(!$t){echo"<table cellspacing='0' class='nowrap'>\n","<thead><tr>";for($x=0;$x<count($L);$x++){$l=$J->fetch_field();$F=$l->name;$fe=$l->orgtable;$ee=$l->orgname;$K[$l->table]=$fe;if($ge&&$y=="sql")$od[$x]=($F=="table"?"table=":($F=="possible_keys"?"indexes=":null));elseif($fe!=""){if(!isset($w[$fe])){$w[$fe]=array();foreach(indexes($fe,$f)as$v){if($v["type"]=="PRIMARY"){$w[$fe]=array_flip($v["columns"]);break;}}$d[$fe]=$w[$fe];}if(isset($d[$fe][$ee])){unset($d[$fe][$ee]);$w[$fe][$ee]=$x;$od[$x]=$fe;}}if($l->charsetnr==63)$Fa[$x]=true;$tg[$x]=$l->type;echo"<th".($fe!=""||$l->name!=$ee?" title='".h(($fe!=""?"$fe.":"").$ee)."'":"").">".h($F).($ge?doc_link(array('sql'=>"explain-output.html#explain_".strtolower($F))):"");}echo"</thead>\n";}echo"<tr".odd().">";foreach($L
Consider simplifying this complex logical expression. Open
select($Q,$N,$Z,$s,$de=array(),$_=1,$G=0,$Ie=false){global$b,$y;$Vc=(count($s)<count($N));$I=$b->selectQueryBuild($N,$Z,$s,$de,$_,$G);if(!$I)$I="SELECT".limit(($_GET["page"]!="last"&&+$_&&$s&&$Vc&&$y=="sql"?"SQL_CALC_FOUND_ROWS ":"").implode(", ",$N)."\nFROM ".table($Q),($Z?"\nWHERE ".implode(" AND ",$Z):"").($s&&$Vc?"\nGROUP BY ".implode(", ",$s):"").($de?"\nORDER BY ".implode(", ",$de):""),($_!=""?+$_:null),($G?$_*$G:0),"\n");$Cf=microtime(true);$K=$this->_conn->query($I);if($Ie)echo$b->selectQuery($I,format_time($Cf));return$K;}function
Consider simplifying this complex logical expression. Open
as$F=>$l){$Xc=preg_match('~char|text|enum|set~',$l["type"]);if((is_numeric($X["val"])||!preg_match('~(^|[^o])int|float|double|decimal|bit~',$l["type"]))&&(!preg_match("~[\x80-\xFF]~",$X["val"])||$Xc)){$F=idf_escape($F);$Ya[]=($y=="sql"&&$Xc&&!preg_match("~^utf8_~",$l["collation"])?"CONVERT($F USING ".charset($e).")":$F);}}$K[]=($Ya?"(".implode("$db OR ",$Ya)."$db)":"0");}}}return$K;}function
Method update
has 5 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
update($Q,$P,$Qe,$_=0,$sf="\n"){$Hg=array();foreach($P
Method enum_input
has 5 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
enum_input($U,$wa,$l,$Y,$Sb=null){global$b;preg_match_all("~'((?:[^']|'')*)'~",$l["length"],$rd);$K=($Sb!==null?"<label><input type='$U'$wa value='$Sb'".((is_array($Y)?in_array($Sb,$Y):$Y===0)?" checked":"")."><i>".'empty'."</i></label>":"");foreach($rd[1]as$t=>$X){$X=stripcslashes(str_replace("''","'",$X));$Na=(is_int($Y)?$Y==$t+1:(is_array($Y)?in_array($t+1,$Y):$Y===$X));$K.=" <label><input type='$U'$wa value='".($t+1)."'".($Na?' checked':'').'>'.h($b->editVal($X,$l)).'</label>';}return$K;}function
Method limit
has 5 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
limit($I,$Z,$_,$Od=0,$sf=" "){return" $I$Z".($_!==null?$sf."LIMIT $_".($Od?" OFFSET $Od":""):"");}function
Method edit_fields
has 5 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
edit_fields($m,$Xa,$U="TABLE",$o=array(),$cb=false){global$e,$Oc;$m=array_values($m);echo'<thead><tr class="wrap">
Function set_charset
has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
connect($O,$V,$we){$this->_link=@mysql_connect(($O!=""?$O:ini_get("mysql.default_host")),("$O$V"!=""?$V:ini_get("mysql.default_user")),("$O$V$we"!=""?$we:ini_get("mysql.default_password")),true,131072);if($this->_link)$this->server_info=mysql_get_server_info($this->_link);else$this->error=mysql_error();return(bool)$this->_link;}function
set_charset($La){if(function_exists('mysql_set_charset')){if(mysql_set_charset($La,$this->_link))return
true;mysql_set_charset('utf8',$this->_link);}return$this->query("SET NAMES $La");}function
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function where
has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
idf_escape($z);}function
where($Z,$m=array()){global$e,$y;$K=array();foreach((array)$Z["where"]as$z=>$X){$z=bracket_escape($z,1);$c=escape_key($z);$K[]=$c.(($y=="sql"&&preg_match('~^[0-9]*\\.[0-9]*$~',$X))||$y=="mssql"?" LIKE ".q(addcslashes($X,"%_\\")):" = ".unconvert_field($m[$z],q($X)));if($y=="sql"&&preg_match('~char|text~',$m[$z]["type"])&&preg_match("~[^ -@]~",$X))$K[]="$c = ".q($X)." COLLATE ".charset($e)."_bin";}foreach((array)$Z["null"]as$z)$K[]=escape_key($z)." IS NULL";return
implode(" AND ",$K);}function
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function store_result
has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
multi_query($I){return$this->_result=$this->query($I);}function
store_result($J=null){if(!$J){$J=$this->_result;if(!$J)return
false;}if($J->columnCount()){$J->num_rows=$J->rowCount();return$J;}$this->affected_rows=$J->rowCount();return
true;}function
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function get_temp_dir
has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
apply_sql_function($q,$c){return($q?($q=="unixepoch"?"DATETIME($c, '$q')":($q=="count distinct"?"COUNT(DISTINCT ":strtoupper("$q("))."$c)"):$c);}function
get_temp_dir(){$K=ini_get("upload_tmp_dir");if(!$K){if(function_exists('sys_get_temp_dir'))$K=sys_get_temp_dir();else{$nc=@tempnam("","");if(!$nc)return
false;$K=dirname($nc);unlink($nc);}}return$K;}function
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function convert_fields
has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
where_link($t,$c,$Y,$Yd="="){return"&where%5B$t%5D%5Bcol%5D=".urlencode($c)."&where%5B$t%5D%5Bop%5D=".urlencode(($Y!==null?$Yd:"IS NULL"))."&where%5B$t%5D%5Bval%5D=".urlencode($Y);}function
convert_fields($d,$m,$N=array()){$K="";foreach($d
as$z=>$X){if($N&&!in_array(idf_escape($z),$N))continue;$ua=convert_field($m[$z]);if($ua)$K.=", $ua AS ".idf_escape($z);}return$K;}function
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function processInput
has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
editInput($Q,$l,$wa,$Y){if($l["type"]=="enum")return(isset($_GET["select"])?"<label><input type='radio'$wa value='-1' checked><i>".'original'."</i></label> ":"").($l["null"]?"<label><input type='radio'$wa value=''".($Y!==null||isset($_GET["select"])?"":" checked")."><i>NULL</i></label> ":"").enum_input("radio",$wa,$l,$Y,0);return"";}function
processInput($l,$Y,$q=""){if($q=="SQL")return$Y;$F=$l["field"];$K=q($Y);if(preg_match('~^(now|getdate|uuid)$~',$q))$K="$q()";elseif(preg_match('~^current_(date|timestamp)$~',$q))$K=$q;elseif(preg_match('~^([+-]|\\|\\|)$~',$q))$K=idf_escape($F)." $q $K";elseif(preg_match('~^[+-] interval$~',$q))$K=idf_escape($F)." $q ".(preg_match("~^(\\d+|'[0-9.: -]') [A-Z_]+$~i",$Y)?$Y:$K);elseif(preg_match('~^(addtime|subtime|concat)$~',$q))$K="$q(".idf_escape($F).", $K)";elseif(preg_match('~^(md5|sha1|password|encrypt)$~',$q))$K="$q($K)";return
unconvert_field($l,$K);}function
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function process_field
has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
process_type($l,$Va="COLLATE"){global$_g;return" $l[type]".process_length($l["length"]).(preg_match('~(^|[^o])int|float|double|decimal~',$l["type"])&&in_array($l["unsigned"],$_g)?" $l[unsigned]":"").(preg_match('~char|text|enum|set~',$l["type"])&&$l["collation"]?" $Va ".q($l["collation"]):"");}function
process_field($l,$rg){global$y;$vb=$l["default"];return
array(idf_escape(trim($l["field"])),process_type($rg),($l["null"]?" NULL":" NOT NULL"),(isset($vb)?" DEFAULT ".((preg_match('~time~',$l["type"])&&preg_match('~^CURRENT_TIMESTAMP$~i',$vb))||($y=="sqlite"&&preg_match('~^CURRENT_(TIME|TIMESTAMP|DATE)$~i',$vb))||($l["type"]=="bit"&&preg_match("~^([0-9]+|b'[0-1]+')\$~",$vb))||($y=="pgsql"&&preg_match("~^[a-z]+\\(('[^']*')+\\)\$~",$vb))?$vb:q($vb)):""),(preg_match('~timestamp|datetime~',$l["type"])&&$l["on_update"]?" ON UPDATE $l[on_update]":""),(support("comment")&&$l["comment"]!=""?" COMMENT ".q($l["comment"]):""),($l["auto_increment"]?auto_increment():null),);}function
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Avoid too many return
statements within this method. Open
null;if($q=="orig")return($l["on_update"]=="CURRENT_TIMESTAMP"?idf_escape($l["field"]):false);if($q=="NULL")return"NULL";if($l["type"]=="set")return
Avoid too many return
statements within this method. Open
false;return$Y;}if(preg_match('~blob|bytea|raw|file~',$l["type"])&&ini_bool("file_uploads")){$mc=get_file("fields-$Jc");if(!is_string($mc))return
Avoid too many return
statements within this method. Open
false;return
q($mc);}return$b->processInput($l,$Y,$q);}function
Avoid too many return
statements within this method. Open
null;if($q=="orig")return($l["on_update"]=="CURRENT_TIMESTAMP"?idf_escape($l["field"]):false);if($q=="NULL")return"NULL";if($l["type"]=="set")return
array_sum((array)$Y);if($q=="json"){$q="";$Y=json_decode($Y,true);if(!is_array($Y))return
Avoid too many return
statements within this method. Open
null;if($q=="orig")return($l["on_update"]=="CURRENT_TIMESTAMP"?idf_escape($l["field"]):false);if($q=="NULL")return"NULL";if($l["type"]=="set")return
Avoid too many return
statements within this method. Open
false;return$Y;}if(preg_match('~blob|bytea|raw|file~',$l["type"])&&ini_bool("file_uploads")){$mc=get_file("fields-$Jc");if(!is_string($mc))return
false;return
Avoid too many return
statements within this method. Open
q($mc);}return$b->processInput($l,$Y,$q);}function
Avoid too many return
statements within this method. Open
array_sum((array)$Y);if($q=="json"){$q="";$Y=json_decode($Y,true);if(!is_array($Y))return
false;return$Y;}if(preg_match('~blob|bytea|raw|file~',$l["type"])&&ini_bool("file_uploads")){$mc=get_file("fields-$Jc");if(!is_string($mc))return
Function query
has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
mysql_select_db($qb,$this->_link);}function
query($I,$ug=false){$J=@($ug?mysql_unbuffered_query($I,$this->_link):mysql_query($I,$this->_link));$this->error="";if(!$J){$this->errno=mysql_errno($this->_link);$this->error=mysql_error($this->_link);return
false;}if($J===true){$this->affected_rows=mysql_affected_rows($this->_link);$this->info=mysql_info($this->_link);return
true;}return
new
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function convert_field
has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
get_key_vals("SHOW STATUS");}function
convert_field($l){if(preg_match("~binary~",$l["type"]))return"HEX(".idf_escape($l["field"]).")";if($l["type"]=="bit")return"BIN(".idf_escape($l["field"])." + 0)";if(preg_match("~geometry|point|linestring|polygon~",$l["type"]))return"AsWKT(".idf_escape($l["field"]).")";}function
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function unconvert_field
has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
convert_field($l){if(preg_match("~binary~",$l["type"]))return"HEX(".idf_escape($l["field"]).")";if($l["type"]=="bit")return"BIN(".idf_escape($l["field"])." + 0)";if(preg_match("~geometry|point|linestring|polygon~",$l["type"]))return"AsWKT(".idf_escape($l["field"]).")";}function
unconvert_field($l,$K){if(preg_match("~binary~",$l["type"]))$K="UNHEX($K)";if($l["type"]=="bit")$K="CONV($K, 2, 10) + 0";if(preg_match("~geometry|point|linestring|polygon~",$l["type"]))$K="GeomFromText($K)";return$K;}function
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function drop_create
has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
queries("$r ".preg_replace('~(GRANT OPTION)\\([^)]*\\)~','\\1',implode("$d, ",$Le).$d).$Ud);}function
drop_create($Fb,$g,$Gb,$Yf,$Hb,$B,$Ad,$zd,$_d,$Rd,$Id){if($_POST["drop"])query_redirect($Fb,$B,$Ad);elseif($Rd=="")query_redirect($g,$B,$_d);elseif($Rd!=$Id){$lb=queries($g);queries_redirect($B,$zd,$lb&&queries($Fb));if($lb)queries($Gb);}else
queries_redirect($B,$zd,queries($Yf)&&queries($Hb)&&queries($Fb)&&queries($g));}function
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
queries("ROLLBACK");}}$Eb=array("server"=>"MySQL")+$Eb;if(!defined("DRIVER")){$Ee=array("MySQLi","MySQL","PDO_MySQL");define("DRIVER","server");if(extension_loaded("mysqli")){class
Min_DB
extends
MySQLi{var$extension="MySQLi";function
__construct(){parent::init();}function
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 7379.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
';}elseif(isset($_GET["select"])){$a=$_GET["select"];$R=table_status1($a);$w=indexes($a);$m=fields($a);$o=column_foreign_keys($a);$Pd="";if($R["Oid"]){$Pd=($y=="sqlite"?"rowid":"oid");$w[]=array("type"=>"PRIMARY","columns"=>array($Pd));}parse_str($_COOKIE["adminer_import"],$ma);$gf=array();$d=array();$ag=null;foreach($m
as$z=>$l){$F=$b->fieldName($l);if(isset($l["privileges"]["select"])&&$F!=""){$d[$z]=html_entity_decode(strip_tags($F),ENT_QUOTES);if(is_shortable($l))$ag=$b->selectLengthProcess();}$gf+=$l["privileges"];}list($N,$s)=$b->selectColumnsProcess($d,$w);$Vc=count($s)<count($N);$Z=$b->selectSearchProcess($m,$w);$de=$b->selectOrderProcess($m,$w);$_=$b->selectLimitProcess();$wc=($N?implode(", ",$N):"*".($Pd?", $Pd":"")).convert_fields($d,$m,$N)."\nFROM ".table($a);$zc=($s&&$Vc?"\nGROUP BY ".implode(", ",$s):"").($de?"\nORDER BY ".implode(", ",$de):"");if($_GET["val"]&&is_ajax()){header("Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8");foreach($_GET["val"]as$xg=>$L){$ua=convert_field($m[key($L)]);$N=array($ua?$ua:idf_escape(key($L)));$Z[]=where_check($xg,$m);$K=$j->select($a,$N,$Z,$N);if($K)echo
reset($K->fetch_row());}exit;}if($_POST&&!$k){$Pg=$Z;if(!$_POST["all"]&&is_array($_POST["check"])){$Oa=array();foreach($_POST["check"]as$Ma)$Oa[]=where_check($Ma,$m);$Pg[]="((".implode(") OR (",$Oa)."))";}$Pg=($Pg?"\nWHERE ".implode(" AND ",$Pg):"");$He=$zg=null;foreach($w
as$v){if($v["type"]=="PRIMARY"){$He=array_flip($v["columns"]);$zg=($N?$He:array());break;}}foreach((array)$zg
as$z=>$X){if(in_array(idf_escape($z),$N))unset($zg[$z]);}if($_POST["export"]){cookie("adminer_import","output=".urlencode($_POST["output"])."&format=".urlencode($_POST["format"]));dump_headers($a);$b->dumpTable($a,"");if(!is_array($_POST["check"])||$zg===array())$I="SELECT $wc$Pg$zc";else{$vg=array();foreach($_POST["check"]as$X)$vg[]="(SELECT".limit($wc,"\nWHERE ".($Z?implode(" AND ",$Z)." AND ":"").where_check($X,$m).$zc,1).")";$I=implode(" UNION ALL ",$vg);}$b->dumpData($a,"table",$I);exit;}if(!$b->selectEmailProcess($Z,$o)){if($_POST["save"]||$_POST["delete"]){$J=true;$na=0;$P=array();if(!$_POST["delete"]){foreach($d
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 6643.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
enum_input($U,$wa,$l,$Y,$Sb=null){global$b;preg_match_all("~'((?:[^']|'')*)'~",$l["length"],$rd);$K=($Sb!==null?"<label><input type='$U'$wa value='$Sb'".((is_array($Y)?in_array($Sb,$Y):$Y===0)?" checked":"")."><i>".'empty'."</i></label>":"");foreach($rd[1]as$t=>$X){$X=stripcslashes(str_replace("''","'",$X));$Na=(is_int($Y)?$Y==$t+1:(is_array($Y)?in_array($t+1,$Y):$Y===$X));$K.=" <label><input type='$U'$wa value='".($t+1)."'".($Na?' checked':'').'>'.h($b->editVal($X,$l)).'</label>';}return$K;}function
input($l,$Y,$q){global$e,$tg,$b,$y;$F=h(bracket_escape($l["field"]));echo"<td class='function'>";if(is_array($Y)&&!$q){$ta=array($Y);if(version_compare(PHP_VERSION,5.4)>=0)$ta[]=JSON_PRETTY_PRINT;$Y=call_user_func_array('json_encode',$ta);$q="json";}$cf=($y=="mssql"&&$l["auto_increment"]);if($cf&&!$_POST["save"])$q=null;$xc=(isset($_GET["select"])||$cf?array("orig"=>'original'):array())+$b->editFunctions($l);$wa=" name='fields[$F]'";if($l["type"]=="enum")echo
nbsp($xc[""])."<td>".$b->editInput($_GET["edit"],$l,$wa,$Y);else{$pc=0;foreach($xc
as$z=>$X){if($z===""||!$X)break;$pc++;}$Wd=($pc?" onchange=\"var f = this.form['function[".h(js_escape(bracket_escape($l["field"])))."]']; if ($pc > f.selectedIndex) f.selectedIndex = $pc;\" onkeyup='keyupChange.call(this);'":"");$wa.=$Wd;$Cc=(in_array($q,$xc)||isset($xc[$q]));echo(count($xc)>1?"<select name='function[$F]' onchange='functionChange(this);'".on_help("getTarget(event).value.replace(/^SQL\$/, '')",1).">".optionlist($xc,$q===null||$Cc?$q:"")."</select>":nbsp(reset($xc))).'<td>';$Pc=$b->editInput($_GET["edit"],$l,$wa,$Y);if($Pc!="")echo$Pc;elseif($l["type"]=="set"){preg_match_all("~'((?:[^']|'')*)'~",$l["length"],$rd);foreach($rd[1]as$t=>$X){$X=stripcslashes(str_replace("''","'",$X));$Na=(is_int($Y)?($Y>>$t)&1:in_array($X,explode(",",$Y),true));echo" <label><input type='checkbox' name='fields[$F][$t]' value='".(1<<$t)."'".($Na?' checked':'')."$Wd>".h($b->editVal($X,$l)).'</label>';}}elseif(preg_match('~blob|bytea|raw|file~',$l["type"])&&ini_bool("file_uploads"))echo"<input type='file' name='fields-$F'$Wd>";elseif(($Zf=preg_match('~text|lob~',$l["type"]))||preg_match("~\n~",$Y)){if($Zf&&$y!="sqlite")$wa.=" cols='50' rows='12'";else{$M=min(12,substr_count($Y,"\n")+1);$wa.=" cols='30' rows='$M'".($M==1?" style='height: 1.2em;'":"");}echo"<textarea$wa>".h($Y).'</textarea>';}elseif($q=="json")echo"<textarea$wa cols='50' rows='12' class='jush-js'>".h($Y).'</textarea>';else{$yd=(!preg_match('~int~',$l["type"])&&preg_match('~^(\\d+)(,(\\d+))?$~',$l["length"],$C)?((preg_match("~binary~",$l["type"])?2:1)*$C[1]+($C[3]?1:0)+($C[2]&&!$l["unsigned"]?1:0)):($tg[$l["type"]]?$tg[$l["type"]]+($l["unsigned"]?0:1):0));if($y=='sql'&&$e->server_info>=5.6&&preg_match('~time~',$l["type"]))$yd+=7;echo"<input".((!$Cc||$q==="")&&preg_match('~(?<!o)int~',$l["type"])?" type='number'":"")." value='".h($Y)."'".($yd?" maxlength='$yd'":"").(preg_match('~char|binary~',$l["type"])&&$yd>20?" size='40'":"")."$wa>";}}}function
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 1248.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
';}elseif(isset($_GET["edit"])){$a=$_GET["edit"];$m=fields($a);$Z=(isset($_GET["select"])?(count($_POST["check"])==1?where_check($_POST["check"][0],$m):""):where($_GET,$m));$Ag=(isset($_GET["select"])?$_POST["edit"]:$Z);foreach($m
as$F=>$l){if(!isset($l["privileges"][$Ag?"update":"insert"])||$b->fieldName($l)=="")unset($m[$F]);}if($_POST&&!$k&&!isset($_GET["select"])){$B=$_POST["referer"];if($_POST["insert"])$B=($Ag?null:$_SERVER["REQUEST_URI"]);elseif(!preg_match('~^.+&select=.+$~',$B))$B=ME."select=".urlencode($a);$w=indexes($a);$wg=unique_array($_GET["where"],$w);$Re="\nWHERE $Z";if(isset($_POST["delete"]))queries_redirect($B,'Item has been deleted.',$j->delete($a,$Re,!$wg));else{$P=array();foreach($m
as$F=>$l){$X=process_input($l);if($X!==false&&$X!==null)$P[idf_escape($F)]=$X;}if($Ag){if(!$P)redirect($B);queries_redirect($B,'Item has been updated.',$j->update($a,$P,$Re,!$wg));if(is_ajax()){page_headers();page_messages($k);exit;}}else{$J=$j->insert($a,$P);$gd=($J?last_id():0);queries_redirect($B,sprintf('Item%s has been inserted.',($gd?" $gd":"")),$J);}}}$L=null;if($_POST["save"])$L=(array)$_POST["fields"];elseif($Z){$N=array();foreach($m
as$F=>$l){if(isset($l["privileges"]["select"])){$ua=convert_field($l);if($_POST["clone"]&&$l["auto_increment"])$ua="''";if($y=="sql"&&preg_match("~enum|set~",$l["type"]))$ua="1*".idf_escape($F);$N[]=($ua?"$ua AS ":"").idf_escape($F);}}$L=array();if(!support("table"))$N=array("*");if($N){$J=$j->select($a,$N,array($Z),$N,array(),(isset($_GET["select"])?2:1));$L=$J->fetch_assoc();if(!$L)$L=false;if(isset($_GET["select"])&&(!$L||$J->fetch_assoc()))$L=null;}}if(!support("table")&&!$m){if(!$Z){$J=$j->select($a,array("*"),$Z,array("*"));$L=($J?$J->fetch_assoc():false);if(!$L)$L=array($j->primary=>"");}if($L){foreach($L
as$z=>$X){if(!$Z)$L[$z]=null;$m[$z]=array("field"=>$z,"null"=>($z!=$j->primary),"auto_increment"=>($z==$j->primary));}}}edit_form($a,$m,$L,$Ag);}elseif(isset($_GET["create"])){$a=$_GET["create"];$re=array();foreach(array('HASH','LINEAR HASH','KEY','LINEAR KEY','RANGE','LIST')as$z)$re[$z]=$z;$Xe=referencable_primary($a);$o=array();foreach($Xe
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 1110.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
Adminer);if($b->operators===null)$b->operators=$Zd;function
page_header($eg,$k="",$Ha=array(),$fg=""){global$ca,$ga,$b,$Eb,$y;page_headers();if(is_ajax()&&$k){page_messages($k);exit;}$gg=$eg.($fg!=""?": $fg":"");$hg=strip_tags($gg.(SERVER!=""&&SERVER!="localhost"?h(" - ".SERVER):"")." - ".$b->name());echo'<!DOCTYPE html>
<html lang="en" dir="ltr">
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8">
<meta http-equiv="Content-Script-Type" content="text/javascript">
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 955.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
on_help($Za,$xf=0){return" onmouseover='helpMouseover(this, event, ".h($Za).", $xf);' onmouseout='helpMouseout(this, event);'";}function
edit_form($a,$m,$L,$Ag){global$b,$y,$T,$k;$Pf=$b->tableName(table_status1($a,true));page_header(($Ag?'Edit':'Insert'),$k,array("select"=>array($a,$Pf)),$Pf);if($L===false)echo"<p class='error'>".'No rows.'."\n";echo'<form action="" method="post" enctype="multipart/form-data" id="form">
';if(!$m)echo"<p class='error'>".'You have no privileges to update this table.'."\n";else{echo"<table cellspacing='0' onkeydown='return editingKeydown(event);'>\n";foreach($m
as$F=>$l){echo"<tr><th>".$b->fieldName($l);$vb=$_GET["set"][bracket_escape($F)];if($vb===null){$vb=$l["default"];if($l["type"]=="bit"&&preg_match("~^b'([01]*)'\$~",$vb,$af))$vb=$af[1];}$Y=($L!==null?($L[$F]!=""&&$y=="sql"&&preg_match("~enum|set~",$l["type"])?(is_array($L[$F])?array_sum($L[$F]):+$L[$F]):$L[$F]):(!$Ag&&$l["auto_increment"]?"":(isset($_GET["select"])?false:$vb)));if(!$_POST["save"]&&is_string($Y))$Y=$b->editVal($Y,$l);$q=($_POST["save"]?(string)$_POST["function"][$F]:($Ag&&$l["on_update"]=="CURRENT_TIMESTAMP"?"now":($Y===false?null:($Y!==null?'':'NULL'))));if(preg_match("~time~",$l["type"])&&$Y=="CURRENT_TIMESTAMP"){$Y="";$q="now";}input($l,$Y,$q);echo"\n";}if(!support("table"))echo"<tr>"."<th><input name='field_keys[]' onkeyup='keyupChange.call(this);' onchange='fieldChange(this);' value=''>"."<td class='function'>".html_select("field_funs[]",$b->editFunctions(array("null"=>isset($_GET["select"]))))."<td><input name='field_vals[]'>"."\n";echo"</table>\n";}echo"<p>\n";if($m){echo"<input type='submit' value='".'Save'."'>\n";if(!isset($_GET["select"]))echo"<input type='submit' name='insert' value='".($Ag?'Save and continue edit'."' onclick='return !ajaxForm(this.form, \"".'Saving'.'...", this)':'Save and insert next')."' title='Ctrl+Shift+Enter'>\n";}echo($Ag?"<input type='submit' name='delete' value='".'Delete'."'".confirm().">\n":($_POST||!$m?"":"<script type='text/javascript'>focus(document.getElementById('form').getElementsByTagName('td')[1].firstChild);</script>\n"));if(isset($_GET["select"]))hidden_fields(array("check"=>(array)$_POST["check"],"clone"=>$_POST["clone"],"all"=>$_POST["all"]));echo'<input type="hidden" name="referer" value="',h(isset($_POST["referer"])?$_POST["referer"]:$_SERVER["HTTP_REFERER"]),'">
<input type="hidden" name="save" value="1">
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 803.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
as$Uc=>$X){if($X[0]<$bg)unset($Tc[$Uc]);}}$Sc=&$Tc[$b->bruteForceKey()];if(!$Sc)$Sc=array($bg+30*60,0);$Sc[1]++;$tf=serialize($Tc);rewind($p);fwrite($p,$tf);ftruncate($p,strlen($tf));flock($p,LOCK_UN);fclose($p);}$xa=$_POST["auth"];if($xa){$Tc=unserialize(@file_get_contents(get_temp_dir()."/adminer.invalid"));$Sc=$Tc[$b->bruteForceKey()];$Kd=($Sc[1]>30?$Sc[0]-time():0);if($Kd>0)auth_error(lang(array('Too many unsuccessful logins, try again in %d minute.','Too many unsuccessful logins, try again in %d minutes.'),ceil($Kd/60)));session_regenerate_id();$Jg=$xa["driver"];$O=$xa["server"];$V=$xa["username"];$we=(string)$xa["password"];$i=$xa["db"];set_password($Jg,$O,$V,$we);$_SESSION["db"][$Jg][$O][$V][$i]=true;if($xa["permanent"]){$z=base64_encode($Jg)."-".base64_encode($O)."-".base64_encode($V)."-".base64_encode($i);$Je=$b->permanentLogin(true);$ze[$z]="$z:".base64_encode($Je?encrypt_string($we,$Je):"");cookie("adminer_permanent",implode(" ",$ze));}if(count($_POST)==1||DRIVER!=$Jg||SERVER!=$O||$_GET["username"]!==$V||DB!=$i)redirect(auth_url($Jg,$O,$V,$i));}elseif($_POST["logout"]){if($Dc&&!verify_token()){page_header('Logout','Invalid CSRF token. Send the form again.');page_footer("db");exit;}else{foreach(array("pwds","db","dbs","queries")as$z)set_session($z,null);unset_permanent();redirect(substr(preg_replace('~\b(username|db|ns)=[^&]*&~','',ME),0,-1),'Logout successful.');}}elseif($ze&&!$_SESSION["pwds"]){session_regenerate_id();$Je=$b->permanentLogin();foreach($ze
as$z=>$X){list(,$Qa)=explode(":",$X);list($Jg,$O,$V,$i)=array_map('base64_decode',explode("-",$z));set_password($Jg,$O,$V,decrypt_string(base64_decode($Qa),$Je));$_SESSION["db"][$Jg][$O][$V][$i]=true;}}function
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 782.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
fetch_field(){$L=(object)$this->getColumnMeta($this->_offset++);$L->orgtable=$L->table;$L->orgname=$L->name;$L->charsetnr=(in_array("blob",(array)$L->flags)?63:0);return$L;}}}$Eb=array();class
Min_SQL{var$_conn;function
__construct($e){$this->_conn=$e;}function
select($Q,$N,$Z,$s,$de=array(),$_=1,$G=0,$Ie=false){global$b,$y;$Vc=(count($s)<count($N));$I=$b->selectQueryBuild($N,$Z,$s,$de,$_,$G);if(!$I)$I="SELECT".limit(($_GET["page"]!="last"&&+$_&&$s&&$Vc&&$y=="sql"?"SQL_CALC_FOUND_ROWS ":"").implode(", ",$N)."\nFROM ".table($Q),($Z?"\nWHERE ".implode(" AND ",$Z):"").($s&&$Vc?"\nGROUP BY ".implode(", ",$s):"").($de?"\nORDER BY ".implode(", ",$de):""),($_!=""?+$_:null),($G?$_*$G:0),"\n");$Cf=microtime(true);$K=$this->_conn->query($I);if($Ie)echo$b->selectQuery($I,format_time($Cf));return$K;}function
delete($Q,$Qe,$_=0){$I="FROM ".table($Q);return
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 737.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
sprintf($ng,$Md);}if(extension_loaded('pdo')){class
Min_PDO
extends
PDO{var$_result,$server_info,$affected_rows,$errno,$error;function
__construct(){global$b;$Be=array_search("SQL",$b->operators);if($Be!==false)unset($b->operators[$Be]);}function
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 566.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
long2str($W,false);}function
decrypt_string($Ff,$z){if($Ff=="")return"";if(!$z)return
false;$z=array_values(unpack("V*",pack("H*",md5($z))));$W=str2long($Ff,false);$E=count($W)-1;$Sg=$W[$E];$Rg=$W[0];$H=floor(6+52/($E+1));$Lf=int32($H*0x9E3779B9);while($Lf){$Kb=$Lf>>2&3;for($ne=$E;$ne>0;$ne--){$Sg=$W[$ne-1];$Fd=xxtea_mx($Sg,$Rg,$Lf,$z[$ne&3^$Kb]);$Rg=int32($W[$ne]-$Fd);$W[$ne]=$Rg;}$Sg=$W[$E];$Fd=xxtea_mx($Sg,$Rg,$Lf,$z[$ne&3^$Kb]);$Rg=int32($W[0]-$Fd);$W[0]=$Rg;$Lf=int32($Lf-0x9E3779B9);}return
long2str($W,true);}$e='';$Dc=$_SESSION["token"];if(!$Dc)$_SESSION["token"]=rand(1,1e6);$T=get_token();$ze=array();if($_COOKIE["adminer_permanent"]){foreach(explode(" ",$_COOKIE["adminer_permanent"])as$X){list($z)=explode(":",$X);$ze[$z]=$X;}}function
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 415.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
int32((($Sg>>5&0x7FFFFFF)^$Rg<<2)+(($Rg>>3&0x1FFFFFFF)^$Sg<<4))^int32(($Lf^$Rg)+($Zc^$Sg));}function
encrypt_string($Ff,$z){if($Ff=="")return"";$z=array_values(unpack("V*",pack("H*",md5($z))));$W=str2long($Ff,true);$E=count($W)-1;$Sg=$W[$E];$Rg=$W[0];$H=floor(6+52/($E+1));$Lf=0;while($H-->0){$Lf=int32($Lf+0x9E3779B9);$Kb=$Lf>>2&3;for($ne=0;$ne<$E;$ne++){$Rg=$W[$ne+1];$Fd=xxtea_mx($Sg,$Rg,$Lf,$z[$ne&3^$Kb]);$Sg=int32($W[$ne]+$Fd);$W[$ne]=$Sg;}$Rg=$W[0];$Fd=xxtea_mx($Sg,$Rg,$Lf,$z[$ne&3^$Kb]);$Sg=int32($W[$E]+$Fd);$W[$E]=$Sg;}return
long2str($W,false);}function
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 397.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
md5(uniqid(mt_rand(),true));}function
select_value($X,$A,$l,$ag){global$b,$ba;if(is_array($X)){$K="";foreach($X
as$Zc=>$W)$K.="<tr>".($X!=array_values($X)?"<th>".h($Zc):"")."<td>".select_value($W,$A,$l,$ag);return"<table cellspacing='0'>$K</table>";}if(!$A)$A=$b->selectLink($X,$l);if($A===null){if(is_mail($X))$A="mailto:$X";if($Oe=is_url($X))$A=(($Oe=="http"&&$ba)||preg_match('~WebKit~i',$_SERVER["HTTP_USER_AGENT"])?$X:"https://www.adminer.org/redirect/?url=".urlencode($X));}$K=$b->editVal($X,$l);if($K!==null){if($K==="")$K=" ";elseif(!is_utf8($K))$K="\0";elseif($ag!=""&&is_shortable($l))$K=shorten_utf8($K,max(0,+$ag));else$K=h($K);}return$b->selectVal($K,$A,$l,$X);}function
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 391.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
fields_from_edit(){global$j;$K=array();foreach((array)$_POST["field_keys"]as$z=>$X){if($X!=""){$X=bracket_escape($X);$_POST["function"][$X]=$_POST["field_funs"][$z];$_POST["fields"][$X]=$_POST["field_vals"][$z];}}foreach((array)$_POST["fields"]as$z=>$X){$F=bracket_escape($z,1);$K[$F]=array("field"=>$F,"privileges"=>array("insert"=>1,"update"=>1),"null"=>1,"auto_increment"=>($z==$j->primary),);}return$K;}function
search_tables(){global$b,$e;$_GET["where"][0]["op"]="LIKE %%";$_GET["where"][0]["val"]=$_POST["query"];$uc=false;foreach(table_status('',true)as$Q=>$R){$F=$b->tableName($R);if(isset($R["Engine"])&&$F!=""&&(!$_POST["tables"]||in_array($Q,$_POST["tables"]))){$J=$e->query("SELECT".limit("1 FROM ".table($Q)," WHERE ".implode(" AND ",$b->selectSearchProcess(fields($Q),array())),1));if(!$J||$J->fetch_row()){if(!$uc){echo"<ul>\n";$uc=true;}echo"<li>".($J?"<a href='".h(ME."select=".urlencode($Q)."&where[0][op]=".urlencode($_GET["where"][0]["op"])."&where[0][val]=".urlencode($_GET["where"][0]["val"]))."'>$F</a>\n":"$F: <span class='error'>".error()."</span>\n");}}}echo($uc?"</ul>":"<p class='message'>".'No tables.')."\n";}function
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 383.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
as$z=>$X){if($z===""||!$X)break;$pc++;}$Wd=($pc?" onchange=\"var f = this.form['function[".h(js_escape(bracket_escape($l["field"])))."]']; if ($pc > f.selectedIndex) f.selectedIndex = $pc;\" onkeyup='keyupChange.call(this);'":"");$wa.=$Wd;$Cc=(in_array($q,$xc)||isset($xc[$q]));echo(count($xc)>1?"<select name='function[$F]' onchange='functionChange(this);'".on_help("getTarget(event).value.replace(/^SQL\$/, '')",1).">".optionlist($xc,$q===null||$Cc?$q:"")."</select>":nbsp(reset($xc))).'<td>';$Pc=$b->editInput($_GET["edit"],$l,$wa,$Y);if($Pc!="")echo$Pc;elseif($l["type"]=="set"){preg_match_all("~'((?:[^']|'')*)'~",$l["length"],$rd);foreach($rd[1]as$t=>$X){$X=stripcslashes(str_replace("''","'",$X));$Na=(is_int($Y)?($Y>>$t)&1:in_array($X,explode(",",$Y),true));echo" <label><input type='checkbox' name='fields[$F][$t]' value='".(1<<$t)."'".($Na?' checked':'')."$Wd>".h($b->editVal($X,$l)).'</label>';}}elseif(preg_match('~blob|bytea|raw|file~',$l["type"])&&ini_bool("file_uploads"))echo"<input type='file' name='fields-$F'$Wd>";elseif(($Zf=preg_match('~text|lob~',$l["type"]))||preg_match("~\n~",$Y)){if($Zf&&$y!="sqlite")$wa.=" cols='50' rows='12'";else{$M=min(12,substr_count($Y,"\n")+1);$wa.=" cols='30' rows='$M'".($M==1?" style='height: 1.2em;'":"");}echo"<textarea$wa>".h($Y).'</textarea>';}elseif($q=="json")echo"<textarea$wa cols='50' rows='12' class='jush-js'>".h($Y).'</textarea>';else{$yd=(!preg_match('~int~',$l["type"])&&preg_match('~^(\\d+)(,(\\d+))?$~',$l["length"],$C)?((preg_match("~binary~",$l["type"])?2:1)*$C[1]+($C[3]?1:0)+($C[2]&&!$l["unsigned"]?1:0)):($tg[$l["type"]]?$tg[$l["type"]]+($l["unsigned"]?0:1):0));if($y=='sql'&&$e->server_info>=5.6&&preg_match('~time~',$l["type"]))$yd+=7;echo"<input".((!$Cc||$q==="")&&preg_match('~(?<!o)int~',$l["type"])?" type='number'":"")." value='".h($Y)."'".($yd?" maxlength='$yd'":"").(preg_match('~char|binary~',$l["type"])&&$yd>20?" size='40'":"")."$wa>";}}}function
process_input($l){global$b;$Jc=bracket_escape($l["field"]);$q=$_POST["function"][$Jc];$Y=$_POST["fields"][$Jc];if($l["type"]=="enum"){if($Y==-1)return
false;if($Y=="")return"NULL";return+$Y;}if($l["auto_increment"]&&$Y=="")return
null;if($q=="orig")return($l["on_update"]=="CURRENT_TIMESTAMP"?idf_escape($l["field"]):false);if($q=="NULL")return"NULL";if($l["type"]=="set")return
array_sum((array)$Y);if($q=="json"){$q="";$Y=json_decode($Y,true);if(!is_array($Y))return
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 357.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
as$z=>$X){list($Jg,$O,$V,$i)=array_map('base64_decode',explode("-",$z));if($Jg==DRIVER&&$O==SERVER&&$V==$_GET["username"]&&$i==DB)unset($ze[$z]);}cookie("adminer_permanent",implode(" ",$ze));}function
auth_error($k){global$b,$Dc;$k=h($k);$wf=session_name();if(isset($_GET["username"])){header("HTTP/1.1 403 Forbidden");if(($_COOKIE[$wf]||$_GET[$wf])&&!$Dc)$k='Session expired, please login again.';else{add_invalid_login();$we=get_password();if($we!==null){if($we===false)$k.='<br>'.sprintf('Master password expired. <a href="https://www.adminer.org/en/extension/" target="_blank">Implement</a> %s method to make it permanent.','<code>permanentLogin()</code>');set_password(DRIVER,SERVER,$_GET["username"],null);}unset_permanent();}}if(!$_COOKIE[$wf]&&$_GET[$wf]&&ini_bool("session.use_only_cookies"))$k='Session support must be enabled.';$pe=session_get_cookie_params();cookie("adminer_key",($_COOKIE["adminer_key"]?$_COOKIE["adminer_key"]:rand_string()),$pe["lifetime"]);page_header('Login',$k,null);echo"<form action='' method='post'>\n";$b->loginForm();echo"<div>";hidden_fields($_POST,array("auth"));echo"</div>\n","</form>\n";page_footer("auth");exit;}if(isset($_GET["username"])){if(!class_exists("Min_DB")){unset($_SESSION["pwds"][DRIVER]);unset_permanent();page_header('No extension',sprintf('None of the supported PHP extensions (%s) are available.',implode(", ",$Ee)),false);page_footer("auth");exit;}$e=connect();}$j=new
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 344.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
idf_escape($z);}function
where($Z,$m=array()){global$e,$y;$K=array();foreach((array)$Z["where"]as$z=>$X){$z=bracket_escape($z,1);$c=escape_key($z);$K[]=$c.(($y=="sql"&&preg_match('~^[0-9]*\\.[0-9]*$~',$X))||$y=="mssql"?" LIKE ".q(addcslashes($X,"%_\\")):" = ".unconvert_field($m[$z],q($X)));if($y=="sql"&&preg_match('~char|text~',$m[$z]["type"])&&preg_match("~[^ -@]~",$X))$K[]="$c = ".q($X)." COLLATE ".charset($e)."_bin";}foreach((array)$Z["null"]as$z)$K[]=escape_key($z)." IS NULL";return
implode(" AND ",$K);}function
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 295.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
column_foreign_keys($Q){global$b;$K=array();foreach($b->foreignKeys($Q)as$n){foreach($n["source"]as$X)$K[$X][]=$n;}return$K;}function
enum_input($U,$wa,$l,$Y,$Sb=null){global$b;preg_match_all("~'((?:[^']|'')*)'~",$l["length"],$rd);$K=($Sb!==null?"<label><input type='$U'$wa value='$Sb'".((is_array($Y)?in_array($Sb,$Y):$Y===0)?" checked":"")."><i>".'empty'."</i></label>":"");foreach($rd[1]as$t=>$X){$X=stripcslashes(str_replace("''","'",$X));$Na=(is_int($Y)?$Y==$t+1:(is_array($Y)?in_array($t+1,$Y):$Y===$X));$K.=" <label><input type='$U'$wa value='".($t+1)."'".($Na?' checked':'').'>'.h($b->editVal($X,$l)).'</label>';}return$K;}function
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 293.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
long2str($W,true);}$e='';$Dc=$_SESSION["token"];if(!$Dc)$_SESSION["token"]=rand(1,1e6);$T=get_token();$ze=array();if($_COOKIE["adminer_permanent"]){foreach(explode(" ",$_COOKIE["adminer_permanent"])as$X){list($z)=explode(":",$X);$ze[$z]=$X;}}function
add_invalid_login(){global$b;$nc=get_temp_dir()."/adminer.invalid";$p=@fopen($nc,"r+");if(!$p){$p=@fopen($nc,"w");if(!$p)return;}flock($p,LOCK_EX);$Tc=unserialize(stream_get_contents($p));$bg=time();if($Tc){foreach($Tc
as$Uc=>$X){if($X[0]<$bg)unset($Tc[$Uc]);}}$Sc=&$Tc[$b->bruteForceKey()];if(!$Sc)$Sc=array($bg+30*60,0);$Sc[1]++;$tf=serialize($Tc);rewind($p);fwrite($p,$tf);ftruncate($p,strlen($tf));flock($p,LOCK_UN);fclose($p);}$xa=$_POST["auth"];if($xa){$Tc=unserialize(@file_get_contents(get_temp_dir()."/adminer.invalid"));$Sc=$Tc[$b->bruteForceKey()];$Kd=($Sc[1]>30?$Sc[0]-time():0);if($Kd>0)auth_error(lang(array('Too many unsuccessful logins, try again in %d minute.','Too many unsuccessful logins, try again in %d minutes.'),ceil($Kd/60)));session_regenerate_id();$Jg=$xa["driver"];$O=$xa["server"];$V=$xa["username"];$we=(string)$xa["password"];$i=$xa["db"];set_password($Jg,$O,$V,$we);$_SESSION["db"][$Jg][$O][$V][$i]=true;if($xa["permanent"]){$z=base64_encode($Jg)."-".base64_encode($O)."-".base64_encode($V)."-".base64_encode($i);$Je=$b->permanentLogin(true);$ze[$z]="$z:".base64_encode($Je?encrypt_string($we,$Je):"");cookie("adminer_permanent",implode(" ",$ze));}if(count($_POST)==1||DRIVER!=$Jg||SERVER!=$O||$_GET["username"]!==$V||DB!=$i)redirect(auth_url($Jg,$O,$V,$i));}elseif($_POST["logout"]){if($Dc&&!verify_token()){page_header('Logout','Invalid CSRF token. Send the form again.');page_footer("db");exit;}else{foreach(array("pwds","db","dbs","queries")as$z)set_session($z,null);unset_permanent();redirect(substr(preg_replace('~\b(username|db|ns)=[^&]*&~','',ME),0,-1),'Logout successful.');}}elseif($ze&&!$_SESSION["pwds"]){session_regenerate_id();$Je=$b->permanentLogin();foreach($ze
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 291.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
pagination($G,$nb){return" ".($G==$nb?$G+1:'<a href="'.h(remove_from_uri("page").($G?"&page=$G".($_GET["next"]?"&next=".urlencode($_GET["next"]):""):"")).'">'.($G+1)."</a>");}function
get_file($z,$ub=false){$mc=$_FILES[$z];if(!$mc)return
null;foreach($mc
as$z=>$X)$mc[$z]=(array)$X;$K='';foreach($mc["error"]as$z=>$k){if($k)return$k;$F=$mc["name"][$z];$jg=$mc["tmp_name"][$z];$fb=file_get_contents($ub&&preg_match('~\\.gz$~',$F)?"compress.zlib://$jg":$jg);if($ub){$Cf=substr($fb,0,3);if(function_exists("iconv")&&preg_match("~^\xFE\xFF|^\xFF\xFE~",$Cf,$af))$fb=iconv("utf-16","utf-8",$fb);elseif($Cf=="\xEF\xBB\xBF")$fb=substr($fb,3);$K.=$fb."\n\n";}else$K.=$fb;}return$K;}function
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 279.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
verify_token(){list($T,$Se)=explode(":",$_POST["token"]);return($Se^$_SESSION["token"])==$T;}function
lzw_decompress($Da){$_b=256;$Ea=8;$Ta=array();$df=0;$ef=0;for($t=0;$t<strlen($Da);$t++){$df=($df<<8)+ord($Da[$t]);$ef+=8;if($ef>=$Ea){$ef-=$Ea;$Ta[]=$df>>$ef;$df&=(1<<$ef)-1;$_b++;if($_b>>$Ea)$Ea++;}}$zb=range("\0","\xFF");$K="";foreach($Ta
as$t=>$Sa){$Ob=$zb[$Sa];if(!isset($Ob))$Ob=$Qg.$Qg[0];$K.=$Ob;if($t)$zb[]=$Qg.$Ob[0];$Qg=$Ob;}return$K;}function
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 271.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
set_session($z,$X){$_SESSION[$z][DRIVER][SERVER][$_GET["username"]]=$X;}function
auth_url($Jg,$O,$V,$i=null){global$Eb;preg_match('~([^?]*)\\??(.*)~',remove_from_uri(implode("|",array_keys($Eb))."|username|".($i!==null?"db|":"").session_name()),$C);return"$C[1]?".(sid()?SID."&":"").($Jg!="server"||$O!=""?urlencode($Jg)."=".urlencode($O)."&":"")."username=".urlencode($V).($i!=""?"&db=".urlencode($i):"").($C[2]?"&$C[2]":"");}function
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 237.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
checkbox($F,$Y,$Na,$dd="",$Xd="",$Ra=""){$K="<input type='checkbox' name='$F' value='".h($Y)."'".($Na?" checked":"").($Xd?' onclick="'.h($Xd).'"':'').">";return($dd!=""||$Ra?"<label".($Ra?" class='$Ra'":"").">$K".h($dd)."</label>":$K);}function
optionlist($be,$qf=null,$Eg=false){$K="";foreach($be
as$Zc=>$W){$ce=array($Zc=>$W);if(is_array($W)){$K.='<optgroup label="'.h($Zc).'">';$ce=$W;}foreach($ce
as$z=>$X)$K.='<option'.($Eg||is_string($z)?' value="'.h($z).'"':'').(($Eg||is_string($z)?(string)$z:$X)===$qf?' selected':'').'>'.h($X);if(is_array($W))$K.='</optgroup>';}return$K;}function
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 216.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
max_connections(){global$e;return$e->result("SELECT @@max_connections");}$y="sql";$tg=array();$Hf=array();foreach(array('Numbers'=>array("tinyint"=>3,"smallint"=>5,"mediumint"=>8,"int"=>10,"bigint"=>20,"decimal"=>66,"float"=>12,"double"=>21),'Date and time'=>array("date"=>10,"datetime"=>19,"timestamp"=>19,"time"=>10,"year"=>4),'Strings'=>array("char"=>255,"varchar"=>65535,"tinytext"=>255,"text"=>65535,"mediumtext"=>16777215,"longtext"=>4294967295),'Lists'=>array("enum"=>65535,"set"=>64),'Binary'=>array("bit"=>20,"binary"=>255,"varbinary"=>65535,"tinyblob"=>255,"blob"=>65535,"mediumblob"=>16777215,"longblob"=>4294967295),'Geometry'=>array("geometry"=>0,"point"=>0,"linestring"=>0,"polygon"=>0,"multipoint"=>0,"multilinestring"=>0,"multipolygon"=>0,"geometrycollection"=>0),)as$z=>$X){$tg+=$X;$Hf[$z]=array_keys($X);}$_g=array("unsigned","zerofill","unsigned zerofill");$Zd=array("=","<",">","<=",">=","!=","LIKE","LIKE %%","REGEXP","IN","IS NULL","NOT LIKE","NOT REGEXP","NOT IN","IS NOT NULL","SQL");$xc=array("char_length","date","from_unixtime","lower","round","sec_to_time","time_to_sec","upper");$_c=array("avg","count","count distinct","group_concat","max","min","sum");$Lb=array(array("char"=>"md5/sha1/password/encrypt/uuid","binary"=>"md5/sha1","date|time"=>"now",),array("(^|[^o])int|float|double|decimal"=>"+/-","date"=>"+ interval/- interval","time"=>"addtime/subtime","char|text"=>"concat",));}define("SERVER",$_GET[DRIVER]);define("DB",$_GET["db"]);define("ME",preg_replace('~^[^?]*/([^?]*).*~','\\1',$_SERVER["REQUEST_URI"]).'?'.(sid()?SID.'&':'').(SERVER!==null?DRIVER."=".urlencode(SERVER).'&':'').(isset($_GET["username"])?"username=".urlencode($_GET["username"]).'&':'').(DB!=""?'db='.urlencode(DB).'&'.(isset($_GET["ns"])?"ns=".urlencode($_GET["ns"])."&":""):''));$ga="4.2.5";class
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 205.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
Min_Driver($e);if(!is_object($e)||($pd=$b->login($_GET["username"],get_password()))!==true)auth_error((is_string($e)?$e:(is_string($pd)?$pd:'Invalid credentials.')));if($xa&&$_POST["token"])$_POST["token"]=$T;$k='';if($_POST){if(!verify_token()){$Nc="max_input_vars";$xd=ini_get($Nc);if(extension_loaded("suhosin")){foreach(array("suhosin.request.max_vars","suhosin.post.max_vars")as$z){$X=ini_get($z);if($X&&(!$xd||$X<$xd)){$Nc=$z;$xd=$X;}}}$k=(!$_POST["token"]&&$xd?sprintf('Maximum number of allowed fields exceeded. Please increase %s.',"'$Nc'"):'Invalid CSRF token. Send the form again.'.' '.'If you did not send this request from Adminer then close this page.');}}elseif($_SERVER["REQUEST_METHOD"]=="POST"){$k=sprintf('Too big POST data. Reduce the data or increase the %s configuration directive.',"'post_max_size'");if(isset($_GET["sql"]))$k.=' '.'You can upload a big SQL file via FTP and import it from server.';}if(!ini_bool("session.use_cookies")||@ini_set("session.use_cookies",false)!==false)session_write_close();function
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 205.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
count_rows($Q,$Z,$Vc,$s){global$y;$I=" FROM ".table($Q).($Z?" WHERE ".implode(" AND ",$Z):"");return($Vc&&($y=="sql"||count($s)==1)?"SELECT COUNT(DISTINCT ".implode(", ",$s).")$I":"SELECT COUNT(*)".($Vc?" FROM (SELECT 1$I$zc) x":$I));}function
slow_query($I){global$b,$T;$i=$b->database();$cg=$b->queryTimeout();if(support("kill")&&is_object($f=connect())&&($i==""||$f->select_db($i))){$bd=$f->result("SELECT CONNECTION_ID()");echo'<script type="text/javascript">
var timeout = setTimeout(function () {
ajax(\'',js_escape(ME),'script=kill\', function () {
}, \'token=',$T,'&kill=',$bd,'\');
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 200.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
as$z=>$X)$K.='<option'.($Eg||is_string($z)?' value="'.h($z).'"':'').(($Eg||is_string($z)?(string)$z:$X)===$qf?' selected':'').'>'.h($X);if(is_array($W))$K.='</optgroup>';}return$K;}function
html_select($F,$be,$Y="",$Wd=true){if($Wd)return"<select name='".h($F)."'".(is_string($Wd)?' onchange="'.h($Wd).'"':"").">".optionlist($be,$Y)."</select>";$K="";foreach($be
as$z=>$X)$K.="<label><input type='radio' name='".h($F)."' value='".h($z)."'".($z==$Y?" checked":"").">".h($X)."</label>";return$K;}function
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 192.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
redirect($B,$D=null){if($D!==null){restart_session();$_SESSION["messages"][preg_replace('~^[^?]*~','',($B!==null?$B:$_SERVER["REQUEST_URI"]))][]=$D;}if($B!==null){if($B=="")$B=".";header("Location: $B");exit;}}function
query_redirect($I,$B,$D,$Ue=true,$cc=true,$ic=false,$bg=""){global$e,$k,$b;if($cc){$Cf=microtime(true);$ic=!$e->query($I);$bg=format_time($Cf);}$Bf="";if($I)$Bf=$b->messageQuery($I,$bg);if($ic){$k=error().$Bf;return
false;}if($Ue)redirect($B,$D.$Bf);return
true;}function
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 187.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
send(){fseek($this->handler,0);fpassthru($this->handler);fclose($this->handler);}}$Vb="'(?:''|[^'\\\\]|\\\\.)*'";$Oc="IN|OUT|INOUT";if(isset($_GET["select"])&&($_POST["edit"]||$_POST["clone"])&&!$_POST["save"])$_GET["edit"]=$_GET["select"];if(isset($_GET["callf"]))$_GET["call"]=$_GET["callf"];if(isset($_GET["function"]))$_GET["procedure"]=$_GET["function"];if(isset($_GET["download"])){$a=$_GET["download"];$m=fields($a);header("Content-Type: application/octet-stream");header("Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=".friendly_url("$a-".implode("_",$_GET["where"])).".".friendly_url($_GET["field"]));$N=array(idf_escape($_GET["field"]));$J=$j->select($a,$N,array(where($_GET,$m)),$N);$L=($J?$J->fetch_row():array());echo$L[0];exit;}elseif(isset($_GET["table"])){$a=$_GET["table"];$m=fields($a);if(!$m)$k=error();$R=table_status1($a,true);page_header(($m&&is_view($R)?'View':'Table').": ".h($a),$k);$b->selectLinks($R);$bb=$R["Comment"];if($bb!="")echo"<p>".'Comment'.": ".h($bb)."\n";if($m){echo"<table cellspacing='0'>\n","<thead><tr><th>".'Column'."<td>".'Type'.(support("comment")?"<td>".'Comment':"")."</thead>\n";foreach($m
as$l){echo"<tr".odd()."><th>".h($l["field"]),"<td><span title='".h($l["collation"])."'>".h($l["full_type"])."</span>",($l["null"]?" <i>NULL</i>":""),($l["auto_increment"]?" <i>".'Auto Increment'."</i>":""),(isset($l["default"])?" <span title='".'Default value'."'>[<b>".h($l["default"])."</b>]</span>":""),(support("comment")?"<td>".nbsp($l["comment"]):""),"\n";}echo"</table>\n";}if(!is_view($R)){if(support("indexes")){echo"<h3 id='indexes'>".'Indexes'."</h3>\n";$w=indexes($a);if($w){echo"<table cellspacing='0'>\n";foreach($w
as$F=>$v){ksort($v["columns"]);$Ie=array();foreach($v["columns"]as$z=>$X)$Ie[]="<i>".h($X)."</i>".($v["lengths"][$z]?"(".$v["lengths"][$z].")":"").($v["descs"][$z]?" DESC":"");echo"<tr title='".h($F)."'><th>$v[type]<td>".implode(", ",$Ie)."\n";}echo"</table>\n";}echo'<p class="links"><a href="'.h(ME).'indexes='.urlencode($a).'">'.'Alter indexes'."</a>\n";}if(fk_support($R)){echo"<h3 id='foreign-keys'>".'Foreign keys'."</h3>\n";$o=foreign_keys($a);if($o){echo"<table cellspacing='0'>\n","<thead><tr><th>".'Source'."<td>".'Target'."<td>".'ON DELETE'."<td>".'ON UPDATE'."<td> </thead>\n";foreach($o
as$F=>$n){echo"<tr title='".h($F)."'>","<th><i>".implode("</i>, <i>",array_map('h',$n["source"]))."</i>","<td><a href='".h($n["db"]!=""?preg_replace('~db=[^&]*~',"db=".urlencode($n["db"]),ME):($n["ns"]!=""?preg_replace('~ns=[^&]*~',"ns=".urlencode($n["ns"]),ME):ME))."table=".urlencode($n["table"])."'>".($n["db"]!=""?"<b>".h($n["db"])."</b>.":"").($n["ns"]!=""?"<b>".h($n["ns"])."</b>.":"").h($n["table"])."</a>","(<i>".implode("</i>, <i>",array_map('h',$n["target"]))."</i>)","<td>".nbsp($n["on_delete"])."\n","<td>".nbsp($n["on_update"])."\n",'<td><a href="'.h(ME.'foreign='.urlencode($a).'&name='.urlencode($F)).'">'.'Alter'.'</a>';}echo"</table>\n";}echo'<p class="links"><a href="'.h(ME).'foreign='.urlencode($a).'">'.'Add foreign key'."</a>\n";}}if(support(is_view($R)?"view_trigger":"trigger")){echo"<h3 id='triggers'>".'Triggers'."</h3>\n";$qg=triggers($a);if($qg){echo"<table cellspacing='0'>\n";foreach($qg
as$z=>$X)echo"<tr valign='top'><td>".h($X[0])."<td>".h($X[1])."<th>".h($z)."<td><a href='".h(ME.'trigger='.urlencode($a).'&name='.urlencode($z))."'>".'Alter'."</a>\n";echo"</table>\n";}echo'<p class="links"><a href="'.h(ME).'trigger='.urlencode($a).'">'.'Add trigger'."</a>\n";}}elseif(isset($_GET["schema"])){page_header('Database schema',"",array(),h(DB.($_GET["ns"]?".$_GET[ns]":"")));$Qf=array();$Rf=array();$ea=($_GET["schema"]?$_GET["schema"]:$_COOKIE["adminer_schema-".str_replace(".","_",DB)]);preg_match_all('~([^:]+):([-0-9.]+)x([-0-9.]+)(_|$)~',$ea,$rd,PREG_SET_ORDER);foreach($rd
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 182.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
q($mc);}return$b->processInput($l,$Y,$q);}function
fields_from_edit(){global$j;$K=array();foreach((array)$_POST["field_keys"]as$z=>$X){if($X!=""){$X=bracket_escape($X);$_POST["function"][$X]=$_POST["field_funs"][$z];$_POST["fields"][$X]=$_POST["field_vals"][$z];}}foreach((array)$_POST["fields"]as$z=>$X){$F=bracket_escape($z,1);$K[$F]=array("field"=>$F,"privileges"=>array("insert"=>1,"update"=>1),"null"=>1,"auto_increment"=>($z==$j->primary),);}return$K;}function
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 181.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
preg_replace('~[^0-9]+~','',$X);}function
remove_slashes($Me,$oc=false){if(get_magic_quotes_gpc()){while(list($z,$X)=each($Me)){foreach($X
as$Zc=>$W){unset($Me[$z][$Zc]);if(is_array($W)){$Me[$z][stripslashes($Zc)]=$W;$Me[]=&$Me[$z][stripslashes($Zc)];}else$Me[$z][stripslashes($Zc)]=($oc?$W:stripslashes($W));}}}}function
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 163.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
str_replace("\n","<br>",$Gf);}function
checkbox($F,$Y,$Na,$dd="",$Xd="",$Ra=""){$K="<input type='checkbox' name='$F' value='".h($Y)."'".($Na?" checked":"").($Xd?' onclick="'.h($Xd).'"':'').">";return($dd!=""||$Ra?"<label".($Ra?" class='$Ra'":"").">$K".h($dd)."</label>":$K);}function
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 152.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
get_key_vals($I,$f=null,$cg=0){global$e;if(!is_object($f))$f=$e;$K=array();$f->timeout=$cg;$J=$f->query($I);$f->timeout=0;if(is_object($J)){while($L=$J->fetch_row())$K[$L[0]]=$L[1];}return$K;}function
get_rows($I,$f=null,$k="<p class='error'>"){global$e;$eb=(is_object($f)?$f:$e);$K=array();$J=$eb->query($I);if(is_object($J)){while($L=$J->fetch_assoc())$K[]=$L;}elseif(!$J&&!is_object($f)&&$k&&defined("PAGE_HEADER"))echo$k.error()."\n";return$K;}function
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 151.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
as$z=>$X){if($N&&!in_array(idf_escape($z),$N))continue;$ua=convert_field($m[$z]);if($ua)$K.=", $ua AS ".idf_escape($z);}return$K;}function
cookie($F,$Y,$nd=2592000){global$ba;$pe=array($F,(preg_match("~\n~",$Y)?"":$Y),($nd?time()+$nd:0),preg_replace('~\\?.*~','',$_SERVER["REQUEST_URI"]),"",$ba);if(version_compare(PHP_VERSION,'5.2.0')>=0)$pe[]=true;return
call_user_func_array('setcookie',$pe);}function
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 141.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
search_tables(){global$b,$e;$_GET["where"][0]["op"]="LIKE %%";$_GET["where"][0]["val"]=$_POST["query"];$uc=false;foreach(table_status('',true)as$Q=>$R){$F=$b->tableName($R);if(isset($R["Engine"])&&$F!=""&&(!$_POST["tables"]||in_array($Q,$_POST["tables"]))){$J=$e->query("SELECT".limit("1 FROM ".table($Q)," WHERE ".implode(" AND ",$b->selectSearchProcess(fields($Q),array())),1));if(!$J||$J->fetch_row()){if(!$uc){echo"<ul>\n";$uc=true;}echo"<li>".($J?"<a href='".h(ME."select=".urlencode($Q)."&where[0][op]=".urlencode($_GET["where"][0]["op"])."&where[0][val]=".urlencode($_GET["where"][0]["val"]))."'>$F</a>\n":"$F: <span class='error'>".error()."</span>\n");}}}echo($uc?"</ul>":"<p class='message'>".'No tables.')."\n";}function
dump_headers($Ic,$Ed=false){global$b;$K=$b->dumpHeaders($Ic,$Ed);$me=$_POST["output"];if($me!="text")header("Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=".$b->dumpFilename($Ic).".$K".($me!="file"&&!preg_match('~[^0-9a-z]~',$me)?".$me":""));session_write_close();ob_flush();flush();return$K;}function
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 140.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
addcslashes($Gf,"\r\n'\\/");}function
json_row($z,$X=null){static$pc=true;if($pc)echo"{";if($z!=""){echo($pc?"":",")."\n\t\"".addcslashes($z,"\r\n\"\\/").'": '.($X!==null?'"'.addcslashes($X,"\r\n\"\\/").'"':'undefined');$pc=false;}else{echo"\n}\n";$pc=true;}}function
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 136.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
preg_match('~char|text|lob|geometry|point|linestring|polygon|string~',$l["type"]);}function
count_rows($Q,$Z,$Vc,$s){global$y;$I=" FROM ".table($Q).($Z?" WHERE ".implode(" AND ",$Z):"");return($Vc&&($y=="sql"||count($s)==1)?"SELECT COUNT(DISTINCT ".implode(", ",$s).")$I":"SELECT COUNT(*)".($Vc?" FROM (SELECT 1$I$zc) x":$I));}function
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 133.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
get_vals($I,$c=0){global$e;$K=array();$J=$e->query($I);if(is_object($J)){while($L=$J->fetch_row())$K[]=$L[$c];}return$K;}function
get_key_vals($I,$f=null,$cg=0){global$e;if(!is_object($f))$f=$e;$K=array();$f->timeout=$cg;$J=$f->query($I);$f->timeout=0;if(is_object($J)){while($L=$J->fetch_row())$K[$L[0]]=$L[1];}return$K;}function
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 131.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
as$z=>$X){list(,$Qa)=explode(":",$X);list($Jg,$O,$V,$i)=array_map('base64_decode',explode("-",$z));set_password($Jg,$O,$V,decrypt_string(base64_decode($Qa),$Je));$_SESSION["db"][$Jg][$O][$V][$i]=true;}}function
unset_permanent(){global$ze;foreach($ze
as$z=>$X){list($Jg,$O,$V,$i)=array_map('base64_decode',explode("-",$z));if($Jg==DRIVER&&$O==SERVER&&$V==$_GET["username"]&&$i==DB)unset($ze[$z]);}cookie("adminer_permanent",implode(" ",$ze));}function
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 131.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
preg_replace('~[^a-z0-9_]~i','-',$X);}function
hidden_fields($Me,$Kc=array()){while(list($z,$X)=each($Me)){if(!in_array($z,$Kc)){if(is_array($X)){foreach($X
as$Zc=>$W)$Me[$z."[$Zc]"]=$W;}else
echo'<input type="hidden" name="'.h($z).'" value="'.h($X).'">';}}}function
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 129.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
true;}function
queries($I){global$e;static$Pe=array();static$Cf;if(!$Cf)$Cf=microtime(true);if($I===null)return
array(implode("\n",$Pe),format_time($Cf));$Pe[]=(preg_match('~;$~',$I)?"DELIMITER ;;\n$I;\nDELIMITER ":$I).";";return$e->query($I);}function
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 129.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
false;$K=dirname($nc);unlink($nc);}}return$K;}function
password_file($g){$nc=get_temp_dir()."/adminer.key";$K=@file_get_contents($nc);if($K||!$g)return$K;$p=@fopen($nc,"w");if($p){chmod($nc,0660);$K=rand_string();fwrite($p,$K);fclose($p);}return$K;}function
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 127.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
is_ajax(){return($_SERVER["HTTP_X_REQUESTED_WITH"]=="XMLHttpRequest");}function
redirect($B,$D=null){if($D!==null){restart_session();$_SESSION["messages"][preg_replace('~^[^?]*~','',($B!==null?$B:$_SERVER["REQUEST_URI"]))][]=$D;}if($B!==null){if($B=="")$B=".";header("Location: $B");exit;}}function
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 127.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
is_utf8($X){return(preg_match('~~u',$X)&&!preg_match('~[\\0-\\x8\\xB\\xC\\xE-\\x1F]~',$X));}function
shorten_utf8($Gf,$ld=80,$Kf=""){if(!preg_match("(^(".repeat_pattern("[\t\r\n -\x{FFFF}]",$ld).")($)?)u",$Gf,$C))preg_match("(^(".repeat_pattern("[\t\r\n -~]",$ld).")($)?)",$Gf,$C);return
h($C[1]).$Kf.(isset($C[2])?"":"<i>...</i>");}function
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 126.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
dump_headers($Ic,$Ed=false){global$b;$K=$b->dumpHeaders($Ic,$Ed);$me=$_POST["output"];if($me!="text")header("Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=".$b->dumpFilename($Ic).".$K".($me!="file"&&!preg_match('~[^0-9a-z]~',$me)?".$me":""));session_write_close();ob_flush();flush();return$K;}function
dump_csv($L){foreach($L
as$z=>$X){if(preg_match("~[\"\n,;\t]~",$X)||$X==="")$L[$z]='"'.str_replace('"','""',$X).'"';}echo
implode(($_POST["format"]=="csv"?",":($_POST["format"]=="tsv"?"\t":";")),$L)."\r\n";}function
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 116.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
';}global$b,$e,$Eb,$Lb,$Vb,$k,$xc,$_c,$ba,$Oc,$y,$ca,$ed,$Vd,$ze,$Hf,$Dc,$T,$og,$tg,$_g,$ga;if(!$_SERVER["REQUEST_URI"])$_SERVER["REQUEST_URI"]=$_SERVER["ORIG_PATH_INFO"];if(!strpos($_SERVER["REQUEST_URI"],'?')&&$_SERVER["QUERY_STRING"]!="")$_SERVER["REQUEST_URI"].="?$_SERVER[QUERY_STRING]";$ba=$_SERVER["HTTPS"]&&strcasecmp($_SERVER["HTTPS"],"off");@ini_set("session.use_trans_sid",false);session_cache_limiter("");if(!defined("SID")){session_name("adminer_sid");$pe=array(0,preg_replace('~\\?.*~','',$_SERVER["REQUEST_URI"]),"",$ba);if(version_compare(PHP_VERSION,'5.2.0')>=0)$pe[]=true;call_user_func_array('session_set_cookie_params',$pe);session_start();}remove_slashes(array(&$_GET,&$_POST,&$_COOKIE),$oc);if(get_magic_quotes_runtime())set_magic_quotes_runtime(false);@set_time_limit(0);@ini_set("zend.ze1_compatibility_mode",false);@ini_set("precision",20);function
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 115.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
echo'<input type="hidden" name="'.h($z).'" value="'.h($X).'">';}}}function
hidden_fields_get(){echo(sid()?'<input type="hidden" name="'.session_name().'" value="'.h(session_id()).'">':''),(SERVER!==null?'<input type="hidden" name="'.DRIVER.'" value="'.h(SERVER).'">':""),'<input type="hidden" name="username" value="'.h($_GET["username"]).'">';}function
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 114.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
where_link($t,$c,$Y,$Yd="="){return"&where%5B$t%5D%5Bcol%5D=".urlencode($c)."&where%5B$t%5D%5Bop%5D=".urlencode(($Y!==null?$Yd:"IS NULL"))."&where%5B$t%5D%5Bval%5D=".urlencode($Y);}function
convert_fields($d,$m,$N=array()){$K="";foreach($d
as$z=>$X){if($N&&!in_array(idf_escape($z),$N))continue;$ua=convert_field($m[$z]);if($ua)$K.=", $ua AS ".idf_escape($z);}return$K;}function
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 111.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
apply_sql_function($q,$c){return($q?($q=="unixepoch"?"DATETIME($c, '$q')":($q=="count distinct"?"COUNT(DISTINCT ":strtoupper("$q("))."$c)"):$c);}function
get_temp_dir(){$K=ini_get("upload_tmp_dir");if(!$K){if(function_exists('sys_get_temp_dir'))$K=sys_get_temp_dir();else{$nc=@tempnam("","");if(!$nc)return
false;$K=dirname($nc);unlink($nc);}}return$K;}function
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 110.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
auth_error($k){global$b,$Dc;$k=h($k);$wf=session_name();if(isset($_GET["username"])){header("HTTP/1.1 403 Forbidden");if(($_COOKIE[$wf]||$_GET[$wf])&&!$Dc)$k='Session expired, please login again.';else{add_invalid_login();$we=get_password();if($we!==null){if($we===false)$k.='<br>'.sprintf('Master password expired. <a href="https://www.adminer.org/en/extension/" target="_blank">Implement</a> %s method to make it permanent.','<code>permanentLogin()</code>');set_password(DRIVER,SERVER,$_GET["username"],null);}unset_permanent();}}if(!$_COOKIE[$wf]&&$_GET[$wf]&&ini_bool("session.use_only_cookies"))$k='Session support must be enabled.';$pe=session_get_cookie_params();cookie("adminer_key",($_COOKIE["adminer_key"]?$_COOKIE["adminer_key"]:rand_string()),$pe["lifetime"]);page_header('Login',$k,null);echo"<form action='' method='post'>\n";$b->loginForm();echo"<div>";hidden_fields($_POST,array("auth"));echo"</div>\n","</form>\n";page_footer("auth");exit;}if(isset($_GET["username"])){if(!class_exists("Min_DB")){unset($_SESSION["pwds"][DRIVER]);unset_permanent();page_header('No extension',sprintf('None of the supported PHP extensions (%s) are available.',implode(", ",$Ee)),false);page_footer("auth");exit;}$e=connect();}$j=new
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 109.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
substr(preg_replace("~(?<=[?&])($oe".(SID?"":"|".session_name()).")=[^&]*&~",'',"$_SERVER[REQUEST_URI]&"),0,-1);}function
pagination($G,$nb){return" ".($G==$nb?$G+1:'<a href="'.h(remove_from_uri("page").($G?"&page=$G".($_GET["next"]?"&next=".urlencode($_GET["next"]):""):"")).'">'.($G+1)."</a>");}function
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 109.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
2;$K[$z]=$L[$z];}return$K;}}}function
escape_key($z){if(preg_match('(^([\w(]+)('.str_replace("_",".*",preg_quote(idf_escape("_"))).')([ \w)]+)$)',$z,$C))return$C[1].idf_escape(idf_unescape($C[2])).$C[3];return
idf_escape($z);}function
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 108.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
get_lang(){return'en';}function
lang($ng,$Md=null){if(is_array($ng)){$Be=($Md==1?0:1);$ng=$ng[$Be];}$ng=str_replace("%d","%s",$ng);$Md=format_number($Md);return
sprintf($ng,$Md);}if(extension_loaded('pdo')){class
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 104.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
page_headers(){global$b;header("Content-Type: text/html; charset=utf-8");header("Cache-Control: no-cache");if($b->headers()){header("X-Frame-Options: deny");header("X-XSS-Protection: 0");}}function
page_messages($k){$Bg=preg_replace('~^[^?]*~','',$_SERVER["REQUEST_URI"]);$Bd=$_SESSION["messages"][$Bg];if($Bd){echo"<div class='message'>".implode("</div>\n<div class='message'>",$Bd)."</div>\n";unset($_SESSION["messages"][$Bg]);}if($k)echo"<div class='error'>$k</div>\n";}function
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 96.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
substr($lf,0,end($W));return$lf;}function
str2long($lf,$Ng){$W=array_values(unpack('V*',str_pad($lf,4*ceil(strlen($lf)/4),"\0")));if($Ng)$W[]=strlen($lf);return$W;}function
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 95.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
where($Ma,$m);}function
where_link($t,$c,$Y,$Yd="="){return"&where%5B$t%5D%5Bcol%5D=".urlencode($c)."&where%5B$t%5D%5Bop%5D=".urlencode(($Y!==null?$Yd:"IS NULL"))."&where%5B$t%5D%5Bval%5D=".urlencode($Y);}function
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 91.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76