Showing 586 of 586 total issues
File main.php
has 598 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
<?php
// ------------------------------------------------------------------------ //
// -- XoopsHP Module -- Xoops e-Learning System //
// Copyright (c) 2005 SUDOW-SOKEN //
// <http://www.mailpark.co.jp/> //
File index.php
has 526 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
<?php
// ------------------------------------------------------------------------ //
// -- XoopsHP Module -- Xoops e-Learning System //
// Copyright (c) 2005 SUDOW-SOKEN //
// <http://www.mailpark.co.jp/> //
Function listarticles
has a Cognitive Complexity of 48 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function listarticles($secid)
{
global $xoopsConfig, $xoopsModuleConfig, $xoopsUser, $xoopsDB, $xoopsTheme, $xoopsLogger, $xoopsModule, $xoopsTpl, $isModAdmin, $xoopsUserIsAdmin;
include dirname(dirname(__DIR__)) . '/header.php';
$myts = MyTextSanitizer::getInstance();
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method sections
has 180 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function sections($secid2show = 0)
{
global $xoopsConfig, $xoopsDB, $xoopsModule, $xoopsModuleConfig;
xoops_cp_header();
// JS for checkbox manipulation
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
function b_XHP_ranking_show($options)
{
global $xoopsDB, $xoopsUser, $xoopsConfig;
$myts = MyTextSanitizer::getInstance();
$block = array();
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 227.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
function b_XHP_completed_show($options)
{
global $xoopsDB, $xoopsUser, $xoopsConfig;
$myts = MyTextSanitizer::getInstance();
$block = array();
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 227.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
if ($expire !== '0000-00-00 00:00:00') {
if ($expire > $currenttime) {
echo '<b>' . _MD_LT_SET_EXPIRE . '</b>: ';
echo "<input class='textbox' type='checkbox' name='setexpire' value='1' checked>";
echo "<input class='textbox' type='text' name='expire' size=19 value='" . $expire . "'> <br>";
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 206.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
if ($expire !== '0000-00-00 00:00:00') {
if ($expire > $currenttime) {
echo '<b>' . _MD_LT_SET_EXPIRE . '</b>: ';
echo "<input class='textbox' type='checkbox' name='setexpire' value='1' checked>";
echo "<input class='textbox' type='text' name='expire' size=19 value='" . $expire . "'> <br>";
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 206.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Function sections
has a Cognitive Complexity of 40 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function sections($secid2show = 0)
{
global $xoopsConfig, $xoopsDB, $xoopsModule, $xoopsModuleConfig;
xoops_cp_header();
// JS for checkbox manipulation
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method listarticles
has 121 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function listarticles($secid)
{
global $xoopsConfig, $xoopsModuleConfig, $xoopsUser, $xoopsDB, $xoopsTheme, $xoopsLogger, $xoopsModule, $xoopsTpl, $isModAdmin, $xoopsUserIsAdmin;
include dirname(dirname(__DIR__)) . '/header.php';
$myts = MyTextSanitizer::getInstance();
Function listsections
has a Cognitive Complexity of 27 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function listsections()
{
global $xoopsConfig, $xoopsModuleConfig, $xoopsDB, $xoopsUser, $xoopsTheme, $xoopsLogger, $xoopsModule, $xoopsTpl, $isModAdmin, $xoopsUserIsAdmin, $xoopsModuleConfig;
include XOOPS_ROOT_PATH . '/header.php';
$myts = MyTextSanitizer::getInstance();
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method portfolio
has 91 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function portfolio($sort_key, $secid)
{
global $xoopsConfig, $xoopsModuleConfig, $xoopsUser, $xoopsDB, $xoopsTheme, $xoopsLogger, $xoopsModule, $xoopsTpl, $isModAdmin, $xoopsUserIsAdmin;
include dirname(dirname(__DIR__)) . '/header.php';
$myts = MyTextSanitizer::getInstance();
Method listsections
has 82 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function listsections()
{
global $xoopsConfig, $xoopsModuleConfig, $xoopsDB, $xoopsUser, $xoopsTheme, $xoopsLogger, $xoopsModule, $xoopsTpl, $isModAdmin, $xoopsUserIsAdmin, $xoopsModuleConfig;
include XOOPS_ROOT_PATH . '/header.php';
$myts = MyTextSanitizer::getInstance();
Method secartedit
has 80 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function secartedit($artid)
{
global $xoopsDB, $xoopsConfig, $xoopsModule, $xoopsModuleConfig;
$myts = MyTextSanitizer::getInstance();
xoops_cp_header();
Method viewdetails
has 74 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function viewdetails($artid, $sort_key)
{
global $xoopsConfig, $xoopsModuleConfig, $xoopsUser, $xoopsDB, $xoopsTheme, $xoopsLogger, $xoopsModule, $xoopsTpl, $isModAdmin, $xoopsUserIsAdmin;
include dirname(dirname(__DIR__)) . '/header.php';
$myts = MyTextSanitizer::getInstance();
Function portfolio
has a Cognitive Complexity of 21 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function portfolio($sort_key, $secid)
{
global $xoopsConfig, $xoopsModuleConfig, $xoopsUser, $xoopsDB, $xoopsTheme, $xoopsLogger, $xoopsModule, $xoopsTpl, $isModAdmin, $xoopsUserIsAdmin;
include dirname(dirname(__DIR__)) . '/header.php';
$myts = MyTextSanitizer::getInstance();
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method viewresults
has 64 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function viewresults($artid, $sort_key)
{
global $xoopsConfig, $xoopsModuleConfig, $xoopsUser, $xoopsDB, $xoopsTheme, $xoopsLogger, $xoopsModule, $xoopsTpl, $isModAdmin, $xoopsUserIsAdmin;
include dirname(dirname(__DIR__)) . '/header.php';
$myts = MyTextSanitizer::getInstance();
Method sectionedit
has 63 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function sectionedit($secid)
{
global $xoopsDB, $xoopsConfig, $xoopsModule, $xoopsModuleConfig;
xoops_cp_header();
echo '<h4>' . _AM_SECCONF . '</h4><br>';
Function viewarticle
has a Cognitive Complexity of 15 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function viewarticle($artid)
{
global $xoopsConfig, $xoopsModuleConfig, $xoopsUser, $xoopsDB, $xoopsTpl, $isModAdmin, $xoopsUserIsAdmin;
$myts = MyTextSanitizer::getInstance();
$artid = (int)$artid;
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
case 'sectiondispchange':
foreach ($_POST['id'] as $secid) {
$secid = (int)$secid;
$display = (int)(empty($_POST['display'][$secid]) ? 0 : 1);
include dirname(__DIR__) . '/module_prefix.php';
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 116.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76