File utils.py
has 392 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring. Wontfix
from __future__ import absolute_import, division, print_function
import os
import numpy as np
import warnings
Cyclomatic complexity is too high in function meta_to_header. (7) Open
def meta_to_header(meta):
"""Transform a meta object into a fits Header
Parameters
----------
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Cyclomatic Complexity
Cyclomatic Complexity corresponds to the number of decisions a block of code contains plus 1. This number (also called McCabe number) is equal to the number of linearly independent paths through the code. This number can be used as a guide when testing conditional logic in blocks.
Radon analyzes the AST tree of a Python program to compute Cyclomatic Complexity. Statements have the following effects on Cyclomatic Complexity:
Construct | Effect on CC | Reasoning |
---|---|---|
if | +1 | An if statement is a single decision. |
elif | +1 | The elif statement adds another decision. |
else | +0 | The else statement does not cause a new decision. The decision is at the if. |
for | +1 | There is a decision at the start of the loop. |
while | +1 | There is a decision at the while statement. |
except | +1 | Each except branch adds a new conditional path of execution. |
finally | +0 | The finally block is unconditionally executed. |
with | +1 | The with statement roughly corresponds to a try/except block (see PEP 343 for details). |
assert | +1 | The assert statement internally roughly equals a conditional statement. |
Comprehension | +1 | A list/set/dict comprehension of generator expression is equivalent to a for loop. |
Boolean Operator | +1 | Every boolean operator (and, or) adds a decision point. |
Cyclomatic complexity is too high in function fake_data. (6) Open
def fake_data(
shape=(512, 512),
beam_fwhm=12.5 * u.arcsec,
pixsize=2 * u.arcsec,
nefd=50e-3 * Jy_beam * u.s**0.5,
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Cyclomatic Complexity
Cyclomatic Complexity corresponds to the number of decisions a block of code contains plus 1. This number (also called McCabe number) is equal to the number of linearly independent paths through the code. This number can be used as a guide when testing conditional logic in blocks.
Radon analyzes the AST tree of a Python program to compute Cyclomatic Complexity. Statements have the following effects on Cyclomatic Complexity:
Construct | Effect on CC | Reasoning |
---|---|---|
if | +1 | An if statement is a single decision. |
elif | +1 | The elif statement adds another decision. |
else | +0 | The else statement does not cause a new decision. The decision is at the if. |
for | +1 | There is a decision at the start of the loop. |
while | +1 | There is a decision at the while statement. |
except | +1 | Each except branch adds a new conditional path of execution. |
finally | +0 | The finally block is unconditionally executed. |
with | +1 | The with statement roughly corresponds to a try/except block (see PEP 343 for details). |
assert | +1 | The assert statement internally roughly equals a conditional statement. |
Comprehension | +1 | A list/set/dict comprehension of generator expression is equivalent to a for loop. |
Boolean Operator | +1 | Every boolean operator (and, or) adds a decision point. |
Cyclomatic complexity is too high in function xy_to_world. (6) Open
def xy_to_world(sources, wcs, x_key, y_key):
# Transform pixel coordinates column to world coordinates
lonlat = wcs.pixel_to_world_values(sources[x_key], sources[y_key])
for key, item, unit in zip(wcs.world_axis_physical_types, lonlat, wcs.world_axis_units):
sources[key] = item * u.Unit(unit)
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Cyclomatic Complexity
Cyclomatic Complexity corresponds to the number of decisions a block of code contains plus 1. This number (also called McCabe number) is equal to the number of linearly independent paths through the code. This number can be used as a guide when testing conditional logic in blocks.
Radon analyzes the AST tree of a Python program to compute Cyclomatic Complexity. Statements have the following effects on Cyclomatic Complexity:
Construct | Effect on CC | Reasoning |
---|---|---|
if | +1 | An if statement is a single decision. |
elif | +1 | The elif statement adds another decision. |
else | +0 | The else statement does not cause a new decision. The decision is at the if. |
for | +1 | There is a decision at the start of the loop. |
while | +1 | There is a decision at the while statement. |
except | +1 | Each except branch adds a new conditional path of execution. |
finally | +0 | The finally block is unconditionally executed. |
with | +1 | The with statement roughly corresponds to a try/except block (see PEP 343 for details). |
assert | +1 | The assert statement internally roughly equals a conditional statement. |
Comprehension | +1 | A list/set/dict comprehension of generator expression is equivalent to a for loop. |
Boolean Operator | +1 | Every boolean operator (and, or) adds a decision point. |
Function fake_data
has 12 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def fake_data(
Function pos_gridded
has 7 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def pos_gridded(
Function pos_list
has 7 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def pos_list(shape=None, within=(0, 1), mask=None, nsources=1, peak_flux=1 * u.mJy, x_mean=None, y_mean=None):
Function pos_uniform
has 7 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def pos_uniform(shape=None, within=(0, 1), mask=None, nsources=1, peak_flux=1 * u.mJy, dist_threshold=0, max_loop=10):
Function evaluate
has 6 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def evaluate(self, x, y, flux, x_0, y_0, sigma):
Function fake_data
has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def fake_data(
shape=(512, 512),
beam_fwhm=12.5 * u.arcsec,
pixsize=2 * u.arcsec,
nefd=50e-3 * Jy_beam * u.s**0.5,
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function xy_to_world
has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def xy_to_world(sources, wcs, x_key, y_key):
# Transform pixel coordinates column to world coordinates
lonlat = wcs.pixel_to_world_values(sources[x_key], sources[y_key])
for key, item, unit in zip(wcs.world_axis_physical_types, lonlat, wcs.world_axis_units):
sources[key] = item * u.Unit(unit)
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function __init__
has 5 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def __init__(self, sigma=sigma.default, x_0=x_0.default, y_0=y_0.default, flux=flux.default, **kwargs):
Function meta_to_header
has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def meta_to_header(meta):
"""Transform a meta object into a fits Header
Parameters
----------
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function pos_too_close
has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def pos_too_close(pos, dist_threshold=0):
"""Remove sources which are too close
Parameters
----------
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"