Sign upLogin

aburrell/apexpy

View on GitHub
Star

Showing 90 of 90 total issues

Function __eq__ has a Cognitive Complexity of 24 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

    def __eq__(self, comp_obj):
        """Performs equivalency evaluation.

        Parameters
        ----------
Severity: Minor
Found in apexpy/apex.py - About 3 hrs to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Apex has 28 functions (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

class Apex(object):
    """Calculates coordinate conversions, field-line mapping, and base vectors.

    Parameters
    ----------
Severity: Minor
Found in apexpy/apex.py - About 3 hrs to fix

    Cyclomatic complexity is too high in method _map_EV_to_height. (11)
    Open

        def _map_EV_to_height(self, alat, alon, height, newheight, data, ev_flag):
        """Maps electric field related values to a desired height

        Parameters
        ----------
    Severity: Minor
    Found in apexpy/apex.py by radon

    Cyclomatic Complexity

    Cyclomatic Complexity corresponds to the number of decisions a block of code contains plus 1. This number (also called McCabe number) is equal to the number of linearly independent paths through the code. This number can be used as a guide when testing conditional logic in blocks.

    Radon analyzes the AST tree of a Python program to compute Cyclomatic Complexity. Statements have the following effects on Cyclomatic Complexity:

    Construct Effect on CC Reasoning
    if +1 An if statement is a single decision.
    elif +1 The elif statement adds another decision.
    else +0 The else statement does not cause a new decision. The decision is at the if.
    for +1 There is a decision at the start of the loop.
    while +1 There is a decision at the while statement.
    except +1 Each except branch adds a new conditional path of execution.
    finally +0 The finally block is unconditionally executed.
    with +1 The with statement roughly corresponds to a try/except block (see PEP 343 for details).
    assert +1 The assert statement internally roughly equals a conditional statement.
    Comprehension +1 A list/set/dict comprehension of generator expression is equivalent to a for loop.
    Boolean Operator +1 Every boolean operator (and, or) adds a decision point.

    Source: http://radon.readthedocs.org/en/latest/intro.html

    File test_helpers.py has 271 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring.
    Open

    # -*- coding: utf-8 -*-
"""Test the apexpy.helper submodule

Notes
-----
    Severity: Minor
    Found in apexpy/tests/test_helpers.py - About 2 hrs to fix

      TestApexMethod has 22 functions (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring.
      Open

      class TestApexMethod(object):
    """Test the Apex methods."""
    def setup_method(self):
        """Initialize all tests."""
        self.apex_out = apexpy.Apex(date=2000, refh=300)
      Severity: Minor
      Found in apexpy/tests/test_Apex.py - About 2 hrs to fix

        Identical blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring.
        Open

            @pytest.mark.parametrize("apex_method,fortran_method,fslice",
                             [("_geo2qd", "apxg2q", slice(0, 2, 1)),
                              ("_geo2apex", "apxg2all", slice(2, 4, 1)),
                              ("_qd2geo", "apxq2g", slice(None)),
                              ("_basevec", "apxg2q", slice(2, 4, 1))])
        Severity: Major
        Found in apexpy/tests/test_Apex.py and 2 other locations - About 2 hrs to fix
        apexpy/tests/test_Apex.py on lines 330..334
        apexpy/tests/test_Apex.py on lines 372..376

        Duplicated Code

        Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

        Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

        When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

        Tuning

        This issue has a mass of 53.

        We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

        The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

        If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

        See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

        Refactorings

        Further Reading

        Identical blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring.
        Open

            @pytest.mark.parametrize("apex_method,fortran_method,fslice",
                             [("_geo2qd", "apxg2q", slice(0, 2, 1)),
                              ("_geo2apex", "apxg2all", slice(2, 4, 1)),
                              ("_qd2geo", "apxq2g", slice(None)),
                              ("_basevec", "apxg2q", slice(2, 4, 1))])
        Severity: Major
        Found in apexpy/tests/test_Apex.py and 2 other locations - About 2 hrs to fix
        apexpy/tests/test_Apex.py on lines 330..334
        apexpy/tests/test_Apex.py on lines 421..425

        Duplicated Code

        Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

        Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

        When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

        Tuning

        This issue has a mass of 53.

        We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

        The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

        If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

        See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

        Refactorings

        Further Reading

        Identical blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring.
        Open

            @pytest.mark.parametrize("apex_method,fortran_method,fslice",
                             [("_geo2qd", "apxg2q", slice(0, 2, 1)),
                              ("_geo2apex", "apxg2all", slice(2, 4, 1)),
                              ("_qd2geo", "apxq2g", slice(None)),
                              ("_basevec", "apxg2q", slice(2, 4, 1))])
        Severity: Major
        Found in apexpy/tests/test_Apex.py and 2 other locations - About 2 hrs to fix
        apexpy/tests/test_Apex.py on lines 372..376
        apexpy/tests/test_Apex.py on lines 421..425

        Duplicated Code

        Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

        Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

        When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

        Tuning

        This issue has a mass of 53.

        We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

        The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

        If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

        See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

        Refactorings

        Further Reading

        Cyclomatic complexity is too high in method __eq__. (8)
        Open

            def __eq__(self, comp_obj):
        """Performs equivalency evaluation.

        Parameters
        ----------
        Severity: Minor
        Found in apexpy/apex.py by radon

        Cyclomatic Complexity

        Cyclomatic Complexity corresponds to the number of decisions a block of code contains plus 1. This number (also called McCabe number) is equal to the number of linearly independent paths through the code. This number can be used as a guide when testing conditional logic in blocks.

        Radon analyzes the AST tree of a Python program to compute Cyclomatic Complexity. Statements have the following effects on Cyclomatic Complexity:

        Construct Effect on CC Reasoning
        if +1 An if statement is a single decision.
        elif +1 The elif statement adds another decision.
        else +0 The else statement does not cause a new decision. The decision is at the if.
        for +1 There is a decision at the start of the loop.
        while +1 There is a decision at the while statement.
        except +1 Each except branch adds a new conditional path of execution.
        finally +0 The finally block is unconditionally executed.
        with +1 The with statement roughly corresponds to a try/except block (see PEP 343 for details).
        assert +1 The assert statement internally roughly equals a conditional statement.
        Comprehension +1 A list/set/dict comprehension of generator expression is equivalent to a for loop.
        Boolean Operator +1 Every boolean operator (and, or) adds a decision point.

        Source: http://radon.readthedocs.org/en/latest/intro.html

        Cyclomatic complexity is too high in method __init__. (8)
        Open

            def __init__(self, date=None, refh=0, datafile=None, fortranlib=None):

        if datafile is None:
            datafile = os.path.join(os.path.dirname(__file__), 'apexsh.dat')
        Severity: Minor
        Found in apexpy/apex.py by radon

        Cyclomatic Complexity

        Cyclomatic Complexity corresponds to the number of decisions a block of code contains plus 1. This number (also called McCabe number) is equal to the number of linearly independent paths through the code. This number can be used as a guide when testing conditional logic in blocks.

        Radon analyzes the AST tree of a Python program to compute Cyclomatic Complexity. Statements have the following effects on Cyclomatic Complexity:

        Construct Effect on CC Reasoning
        if +1 An if statement is a single decision.
        elif +1 The elif statement adds another decision.
        else +0 The else statement does not cause a new decision. The decision is at the if.
        for +1 There is a decision at the start of the loop.
        while +1 There is a decision at the while statement.
        except +1 Each except branch adds a new conditional path of execution.
        finally +0 The finally block is unconditionally executed.
        with +1 The with statement roughly corresponds to a try/except block (see PEP 343 for details).
        assert +1 The assert statement internally roughly equals a conditional statement.
        Comprehension +1 A list/set/dict comprehension of generator expression is equivalent to a for loop.
        Boolean Operator +1 Every boolean operator (and, or) adds a decision point.

        Source: http://radon.readthedocs.org/en/latest/intro.html

        Cyclomatic complexity is too high in method basevectors_apex. (8)
        Open

            def basevectors_apex(self, lat, lon, height, coords='geo', precision=1e-10):
        """Returns base vectors in quasi-dipole and apex coordinates.

        Parameters
        ----------
        Severity: Minor
        Found in apexpy/apex.py by radon

        Cyclomatic Complexity

        Cyclomatic Complexity corresponds to the number of decisions a block of code contains plus 1. This number (also called McCabe number) is equal to the number of linearly independent paths through the code. This number can be used as a guide when testing conditional logic in blocks.

        Radon analyzes the AST tree of a Python program to compute Cyclomatic Complexity. Statements have the following effects on Cyclomatic Complexity:

        Construct Effect on CC Reasoning
        if +1 An if statement is a single decision.
        elif +1 The elif statement adds another decision.
        else +0 The else statement does not cause a new decision. The decision is at the if.
        for +1 There is a decision at the start of the loop.
        while +1 There is a decision at the while statement.
        except +1 Each except branch adds a new conditional path of execution.
        finally +0 The finally block is unconditionally executed.
        with +1 The with statement roughly corresponds to a try/except block (see PEP 343 for details).
        assert +1 The assert statement internally roughly equals a conditional statement.
        Comprehension +1 A list/set/dict comprehension of generator expression is equivalent to a for loop.
        Boolean Operator +1 Every boolean operator (and, or) adds a decision point.

        Source: http://radon.readthedocs.org/en/latest/intro.html

        Cyclomatic complexity is too high in method test_basevectors_array. (8)
        Open

            @pytest.mark.parametrize('arr_shape', [(2,), (5,)])
    @pytest.mark.parametrize("bv_coord", ["qd", "apex"])
    @pytest.mark.parametrize("ivec", range(3))
    def test_basevectors_array(self, arr_shape, bv_coord, ivec):
        """Test the output shape for array inputs.
        Severity: Minor
        Found in apexpy/tests/test_Apex.py by radon

        Cyclomatic Complexity

        Cyclomatic Complexity corresponds to the number of decisions a block of code contains plus 1. This number (also called McCabe number) is equal to the number of linearly independent paths through the code. This number can be used as a guide when testing conditional logic in blocks.

        Radon analyzes the AST tree of a Python program to compute Cyclomatic Complexity. Statements have the following effects on Cyclomatic Complexity:

        Construct Effect on CC Reasoning
        if +1 An if statement is a single decision.
        elif +1 The elif statement adds another decision.
        else +0 The else statement does not cause a new decision. The decision is at the if.
        for +1 There is a decision at the start of the loop.
        while +1 There is a decision at the while statement.
        except +1 Each except branch adds a new conditional path of execution.
        finally +0 The finally block is unconditionally executed.
        with +1 The with statement roughly corresponds to a try/except block (see PEP 343 for details).
        assert +1 The assert statement internally roughly equals a conditional statement.
        Comprehension +1 A list/set/dict comprehension of generator expression is equivalent to a for loop.
        Boolean Operator +1 Every boolean operator (and, or) adds a decision point.

        Source: http://radon.readthedocs.org/en/latest/intro.html

        Cyclomatic complexity is too high in method test_geo2apex_undefined_warning. (7)
        Open

            def test_geo2apex_undefined_warning(self):
        """Test geo2apex warning and fill values for an undefined location."""

        # Update the apex object
        self.apex_out = apexpy.Apex(date=2000, refh=10000)
        Severity: Minor
        Found in apexpy/tests/test_Apex.py by radon

        Cyclomatic Complexity

        Cyclomatic Complexity corresponds to the number of decisions a block of code contains plus 1. This number (also called McCabe number) is equal to the number of linearly independent paths through the code. This number can be used as a guide when testing conditional logic in blocks.

        Radon analyzes the AST tree of a Python program to compute Cyclomatic Complexity. Statements have the following effects on Cyclomatic Complexity:

        Construct Effect on CC Reasoning
        if +1 An if statement is a single decision.
        elif +1 The elif statement adds another decision.
        else +0 The else statement does not cause a new decision. The decision is at the if.
        for +1 There is a decision at the start of the loop.
        while +1 There is a decision at the while statement.
        except +1 Each except branch adds a new conditional path of execution.
        finally +0 The finally block is unconditionally executed.
        with +1 The with statement roughly corresponds to a try/except block (see PEP 343 for details).
        assert +1 The assert statement internally roughly equals a conditional statement.
        Comprehension +1 A list/set/dict comprehension of generator expression is equivalent to a for loop.
        Boolean Operator +1 Every boolean operator (and, or) adds a decision point.

        Source: http://radon.readthedocs.org/en/latest/intro.html

        Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
        Open

            def test_init_with_bad_fortranlib(self):
        """Test raises IOError with non-existent datafile input."""
        with pytest.raises(IOError) as oerr:
            apexpy.Apex(fortranlib=self.bad_file)
        assert str(oerr.value).startswith('Fortran library does not exist')
        Severity: Major
        Found in apexpy/tests/test_Apex.py and 1 other location - About 2 hrs to fix
        apexpy/tests/test_Apex.py on lines 202..207

        Duplicated Code

        Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

        Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

        When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

        Tuning

        This issue has a mass of 50.

        We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

        The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

        If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

        See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

        Refactorings

        Further Reading

        Cyclomatic complexity is too high in function subsol. (7)
        Open

        def subsol(datetime):
    """Finds subsolar geocentric latitude and longitude.

    Parameters
    ----------
        Severity: Minor
        Found in apexpy/helpers.py by radon

        Cyclomatic Complexity

        Cyclomatic Complexity corresponds to the number of decisions a block of code contains plus 1. This number (also called McCabe number) is equal to the number of linearly independent paths through the code. This number can be used as a guide when testing conditional logic in blocks.

        Radon analyzes the AST tree of a Python program to compute Cyclomatic Complexity. Statements have the following effects on Cyclomatic Complexity:

        Construct Effect on CC Reasoning
        if +1 An if statement is a single decision.
        elif +1 The elif statement adds another decision.
        else +0 The else statement does not cause a new decision. The decision is at the if.
        for +1 There is a decision at the start of the loop.
        while +1 There is a decision at the while statement.
        except +1 Each except branch adds a new conditional path of execution.
        finally +0 The finally block is unconditionally executed.
        with +1 The with statement roughly corresponds to a try/except block (see PEP 343 for details).
        assert +1 The assert statement internally roughly equals a conditional statement.
        Comprehension +1 A list/set/dict comprehension of generator expression is equivalent to a for loop.
        Boolean Operator +1 Every boolean operator (and, or) adds a decision point.

        Source: http://radon.readthedocs.org/en/latest/intro.html

        Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
        Open

            def test_init_with_bad_datafile(self):
        """Test raises IOError with non-existent datafile input."""
        with pytest.raises(IOError) as oerr:
            apexpy.Apex(datafile=self.bad_file)
        assert str(oerr.value).startswith('Data file does not exist')
        Severity: Major
        Found in apexpy/tests/test_Apex.py and 1 other location - About 2 hrs to fix
        apexpy/tests/test_Apex.py on lines 209..214

        Duplicated Code

        Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

        Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

        When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

        Tuning

        This issue has a mass of 50.

        We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

        The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

        If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

        See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

        Refactorings

        Further Reading

        Cyclomatic complexity is too high in method test_basevectors_apex_invalid_scalar. (7)
        Open

            def test_basevectors_apex_invalid_scalar(self):
        """Test warning and fill values for base vectors with bad inputs."""
        self.apex_out = apexpy.Apex(date=2000, refh=10000)
        invalid = np.full(shape=(3,), fill_value=np.nan)
        Severity: Minor
        Found in apexpy/tests/test_Apex.py by radon

        Cyclomatic Complexity

        Cyclomatic Complexity corresponds to the number of decisions a block of code contains plus 1. This number (also called McCabe number) is equal to the number of linearly independent paths through the code. This number can be used as a guide when testing conditional logic in blocks.

        Radon analyzes the AST tree of a Python program to compute Cyclomatic Complexity. Statements have the following effects on Cyclomatic Complexity:

        Construct Effect on CC Reasoning
        if +1 An if statement is a single decision.
        elif +1 The elif statement adds another decision.
        else +0 The else statement does not cause a new decision. The decision is at the if.
        for +1 There is a decision at the start of the loop.
        while +1 There is a decision at the while statement.
        except +1 Each except branch adds a new conditional path of execution.
        finally +0 The finally block is unconditionally executed.
        with +1 The with statement roughly corresponds to a try/except block (see PEP 343 for details).
        assert +1 The assert statement internally roughly equals a conditional statement.
        Comprehension +1 A list/set/dict comprehension of generator expression is equivalent to a for loop.
        Boolean Operator +1 Every boolean operator (and, or) adds a decision point.

        Source: http://radon.readthedocs.org/en/latest/intro.html

        Cyclomatic complexity is too high in method get_comparison_results. (6)
        Open

            def get_comparison_results(self, bv_coord, coords, precision):
        """Get the base vector results using the hidden function for comparison.

        Parameters
        ----------
        Severity: Minor
        Found in apexpy/tests/test_Apex.py by radon

        Cyclomatic Complexity

        Cyclomatic Complexity corresponds to the number of decisions a block of code contains plus 1. This number (also called McCabe number) is equal to the number of linearly independent paths through the code. This number can be used as a guide when testing conditional logic in blocks.

        Radon analyzes the AST tree of a Python program to compute Cyclomatic Complexity. Statements have the following effects on Cyclomatic Complexity:

        Construct Effect on CC Reasoning
        if +1 An if statement is a single decision.
        elif +1 The elif statement adds another decision.
        else +0 The else statement does not cause a new decision. The decision is at the if.
        for +1 There is a decision at the start of the loop.
        while +1 There is a decision at the while statement.
        except +1 Each except branch adds a new conditional path of execution.
        finally +0 The finally block is unconditionally executed.
        with +1 The with statement roughly corresponds to a try/except block (see PEP 343 for details).
        assert +1 The assert statement internally roughly equals a conditional statement.
        Comprehension +1 A list/set/dict comprehension of generator expression is equivalent to a for loop.
        Boolean Operator +1 Every boolean operator (and, or) adds a decision point.

        Source: http://radon.readthedocs.org/en/latest/intro.html

        Cyclomatic complexity is too high in function igrf_file. (6)
        Open

        @pytest.fixture()
def igrf_file(max_attempts=100):
    """A fixture for handling the coefficient file.

    Parameters
        Severity: Minor
        Found in apexpy/tests/test_Apex.py by radon

        Cyclomatic Complexity

        Cyclomatic Complexity corresponds to the number of decisions a block of code contains plus 1. This number (also called McCabe number) is equal to the number of linearly independent paths through the code. This number can be used as a guide when testing conditional logic in blocks.

        Radon analyzes the AST tree of a Python program to compute Cyclomatic Complexity. Statements have the following effects on Cyclomatic Complexity:

        Construct Effect on CC Reasoning
        if +1 An if statement is a single decision.
        elif +1 The elif statement adds another decision.
        else +0 The else statement does not cause a new decision. The decision is at the if.
        for +1 There is a decision at the start of the loop.
        while +1 There is a decision at the while statement.
        except +1 Each except branch adds a new conditional path of execution.
        finally +0 The finally block is unconditionally executed.
        with +1 The with statement roughly corresponds to a try/except block (see PEP 343 for details).
        assert +1 The assert statement internally roughly equals a conditional statement.
        Comprehension +1 A list/set/dict comprehension of generator expression is equivalent to a for loop.
        Boolean Operator +1 Every boolean operator (and, or) adds a decision point.

        Source: http://radon.readthedocs.org/en/latest/intro.html

        Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
        Open

            def qd2apex(self, qlat, qlon, height):
        """Converts quasi-dipole to modified apex coordinates.

        Parameters
        ----------
        Severity: Major
        Found in apexpy/apex.py and 1 other location - About 1 hr to fix
        apexpy/apex.py on lines 674..704

        Duplicated Code

        Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

        Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

        When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

        Tuning

        This issue has a mass of 46.

        We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

        The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

        If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

        See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

        Refactorings

        Further Reading

        Severity
        Category
        Status
        Source
        Language