Showing 1,478 of 1,478 total issues
Method add_credit_card_verification_strings
has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def add_credit_card_verification_strings(xml, credit_card, options)
address = options[:billing_address] || options[:address]
if address
address_values = []
%i[address1 zip city state country].each { |part| address_values << address[part].to_s.tr("\r\n", ' ').strip }
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method parse
has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def parse(xml)
response = {}
doc = Nokogiri::XML(xml)
doc.remove_namespaces!
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method add_payer
has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def add_payer(post, payment_method, options)
address = options[:billing_address]
payer = {}
payer[:fullName] = payment_method.name.strip
payer[:contactPhone] = address[:phone] if address && address[:phone]
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method add_threeds_fields
has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def add_threeds_fields(post, options)
return unless three_d_secure = options[:three_d_secure]
add_pair(post, :threeDSEnrolled, formatted_enrollment(three_d_secure[:enrolled]))
if three_d_secure[:enrolled] == 'true'
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method refund
has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def refund(money, identification, options = {})
if identification && !identification.kind_of?(String)
ActiveMerchant.deprecated 'refund should only be used to refund a referenced transaction'
return credit(money, identification, options)
end
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method add_three_ds
has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def add_three_ds(post, options)
return unless three_d_secure = options[:three_d_secure]
post[:SecureXID] = (three_d_secure[:ds_transaction_id] || three_d_secure[:xid]) if three_d_secure.slice(:ds_transaction_id, :xid).values.any?
post[:SecureECI] = formatted_three_ds_eci(three_d_secure[:eci]) if three_d_secure[:eci].present?
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method add_creditcard
has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def add_creditcard(post, creditcard)
if creditcard.respond_to?(:number)
post[:card] ||= {}
post[:card].merge!(
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method parse
has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def parse(body)
return {} if body.blank?
parsed_response = JSON.parse(body)
parsed_response.is_a?(String) ? { 'message' => parsed_response } : parsed_response
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method add_invoice
has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def add_invoice(post, credit_card_or_reference, money, options)
add_pair(post, :transactionUnique, options[:order_id], required: true)
add_pair(post, :orderRef, options[:description] || options[:order_id], required: true)
add_pair(post, :statementNarrative1, options[:merchant_name]) if options[:merchant_name]
add_pair(post, :statementNarrative2, options[:dynamic_descriptor]) if options[:dynamic_descriptor]
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method add_address
has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def add_address(post, creditcard, options)
if address = options[:billing_address] || options[:address]
post[:owner_name] = address[:name]
post[:owner_street] = address[:address1]
post[:owner_street2] = address[:address2] if address[:address2]
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method post_data
has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def post_data(params)
return nil unless params
params.map do |key, value|
next if value != false && value.blank?
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method parse
has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def parse(body)
if /^ID:/.match?(body)
body.split('~').reduce(Hash.new) { |h, v|
m = v.match('(.*?):(.*)')
h.merge!(m[1].underscore.to_sym => m[2])
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method validate_verification_value
has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def validate_verification_value #:nodoc:
errors = []
if verification_value?
errors << [:verification_value, "should be #{card_verification_value_length(brand)} digits"] unless valid_card_verification_value?(verification_value, brand)
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method address_names
has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def address_names(address_name, payment_method)
split_names(address_name).tap do |names|
names[0] = payment_method&.first_name unless names[0].present?
names[1] = payment_method&.last_name unless names[1].present?
end
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method build_update_subscription_request
has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def build_update_subscription_request(reference, creditcard, options)
xml = Builder::XmlMarkup.new indent: 2
add_address(xml, creditcard, options[:billing_address], options) unless options[:billing_address].blank?
add_purchase_data(xml, options[:setup_fee], true, options) unless options[:setup_fee].blank?
add_creditcard(xml, creditcard) if creditcard
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method add_soft_descriptors_from_specialized_class
has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def add_soft_descriptors_from_specialized_class(xml, soft_desc)
xml.tag! :SDMerchantName, soft_desc.merchant_name if soft_desc.merchant_name
xml.tag! :SDProductDescription, soft_desc.product_description if soft_desc.product_description
xml.tag! :SDMerchantCity, soft_desc.merchant_city if soft_desc.merchant_city
xml.tag! :SDMerchantPhone, soft_desc.merchant_phone if soft_desc.merchant_phone
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Similar blocks of code found in 5 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
Response.new(
success_from(response),
message_from(response),
response,
authorization: authorization_from(response),
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 30.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Method add_digital_token_cryptogram
has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def add_digital_token_cryptogram(xml, credit_card, three_d_secure)
return unless credit_card.is_a?(NetworkTokenizationCreditCard) || three_d_secure && credit_card.brand == 'discover'
cryptogram =
if three_d_secure && credit_card.brand == 'discover'
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Similar blocks of code found in 5 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
Response.new(
success_from(response),
message_from(response),
response,
authorization: authorization_from(response),
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 30.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 5 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
Response.new(
success_from(response),
message_from(response),
response,
authorization: authorization_from(response),
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 30.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76